Exams Policy - Bishop Auckland Food Festival€¦ · Exams Policy 2019-20 (Oct-Sept19) ... SEAHAM...
Transcript of Exams Policy - Bishop Auckland Food Festival€¦ · Exams Policy 2019-20 (Oct-Sept19) ... SEAHAM...
Exams Policy 2019-20 (Oct-Sept19) Page: 1 of 24
SEAHAM HIGH SCHOOL
Exams Policy
The Purpose of the Exams Policy is:
To ensure the planning and management of exams is conducted efficiently and in the best interest of candidates.
To ensure the operation of an efficient exam system, giving
clear guidelines for all relevant staff.
It is the responsibility of everyone involved in the centre’s exam processes to read, understand and implement this policy.
Centre Manager Responsible: Geoff Lumsdon (Head of Centre / Head Teacher)
Reviewed by:
Head of Centre Senior Leader for Exams Exams Manager; Exams Officer Governors
Review Cycle: Annually
Last Review Date: January 2019
Review Date: D/Line 27-Sept-19 (Review Oct19)
Next Review Date: September / October 2020
Early Review Date for Appendages: Dates TBC as required (Policy Committee Meeting)
Appendages/Updates: (Since Last Review Date)
*General update of some wording/grammar * EAR changed to ROR *Exams Officer changed to Exams Officer/Manager * Sec1. SLT & Head of Centre & SLT must be familiar with JCQ Booklets * Sec1. Check exam deliveries same day, latest one-day * Sec1. Exam papers open within 90mins (previously 60mins) *Sect6.1 DDA/Freedom of Information Act * Sec6.3 Covering exams may include support of Cover Manager *Sec6.4 GDPR info added * Sec7 Equality Act – update on where to find information * Sec9.2 External & Mock Exams MUST NOT be sat in same room at same time; Reception 8.30am to 3.30pm Mon-Fri Term Time *Sec10.2 Exams Staff to liaise with Head of Centre before sending any Candidate Late Attendance Forms to awarding bodies. *Sec10.3 Between Clash Exams, candidates can revise using own resources but must not be coached by other persons. *Sec10.4 Contagious illness information
Displayed/Circulated to: All Staff; VLE: Website
Approved by: Chair of Governors
Signed:
Dated:
Exams Policy 2019-20 (Oct-Sept19) Page: 2 of 24
Contents
1. Exam Responsibilities
2. The Statutory Tests & Qualifications Offered
3. Exam Seasons & Timetables
4. Entries, Entry Details & Late Entries
5. Exam Fees
6. The Disability Discrimination ACT & Freedom of Information Act,
Special Needs (SEND), Access Arrangements & GDPR
7. Equality Act 2010 (Equality & Human Rights)
8. Estimated Grades
9. Managing Invigilators & Exam Days
10. Candidates: General, Late, Clash Exams & Special
Consideration
11. Controlled Assessments & Appeals Against Internal
Assessment (Non-Exam Assessments – NEAs)
12. Results & Post Results:
Clerical Checks; Reviews of Marking/Results (ROR);
Moderation Review & Access to Scripts (ATS)
13. Certificates
14. Exams Risk Assessment (Controlled & Other Assessments)
15. Policy: a) Appeals against Internally Assessed Marks
b) Appeals against External Marks
16. Examinations Contingency Plan
17. Fire & Emergency Exam Policy & Procedures
Exams Policy 2019-20 (Oct-Sept19) Page: 3 of 24
1. Exam Responsibilities
Head of Centre (Senior Leaders)
Overall responsibility for the school as an exam centre:
All senior leaders must be familiar with latest JCQ Instructions for Conducting Exams (I.C.E. Booklet) & the JCQ General Regulations for Approved Centres.
Advises on appeals and re-marks. The head of centre is responsible for reporting all suspicions or actual incidents of
malpractice. Refer to the JCQ document Suspected Malpractice in Examinations and Assessments.
Exams Officer / Exams Manager
Manages administration of external (public) and internal (domestic/mock) exams and
distribution of exam results:
Advises senior leadership team, subject/class tutors and relevant support staff
of annual exam timetables and application procedures as set by exam boards.
Oversees the production and distribution to staff, governors and candidates of an annual calendar for all exams in which candidates will be involved and
communicates regularly with staff concerning imminent deadlines and events.
Ensures candidates and their parents are informed of and understand those
aspects of the exam timetable that will affect them (display on student portal).
Consults with teaching staff to ensure that deadlines are communicated to heads of faculty so that all controlled assessments/NEAs can be completed on
time and in accordance with JCQ guidelines (email & display on VLE exams corner).
Provides/confirms estimated entries (awarding bodies use estimates for preliminary exam materials & school uses data to set-up final entry mark-
sheets and prepare school exam calendars/timetables).
Receives, removes from parcel packing, checks, logs and stores securely all exam
papers in secure storage and all exam stationery in secure cupboard (External & mock
exam papers must be kept separate & easily identified)
o If unable to check same day, must still be stored securely & checked following day.
Any anomalies contact awarding body immediately.
o Ideally exam papers should NOT be opened until prior to exam in exam room but
when several exam rooms are used it is permitted to open papers within 90-mins
of awarding body’s exam published starting time; an invigilator must be present &
papers transferred to exam room in securely sealed packet.
Administers access arrangements and makes applications for special consideration using the JCQ Access Arrangements and Special Considerations
Regulations and Guidance relating to candidates who are eligible for
adjustments in examinations.
Identifies and manages exam timetable clashes within JCQ guidelines.
Accounts for income and expenditures relating to all exam costs/charges;
prepares and forwards exam stationery orders to finance department.
Line manages the senior exam invigilator and invigilators and provides support
and training to ensure the smooth running & responsible conduct of exams.
Exams Policy 2019-20 (Oct-Sept19) Page: 4 of 24
Oversees teachers’ direct online or SIMS mark-sheet submissions of candidates’ controlled assessment marks/NEA; tracks despatches and stores returned
controlled assessments and other relating material from awarding bodies.
Arranges for dissemination of exam results and certificates to candidates and in
consultation with the SLT, forwards any appeals/re-mark requests.
Maintains systems and processes to support the timely entry of candidates for
their exams (ensuring teaching staff meet school and exam board deadlines).
Data Manager /Assistant
Data analysis of exam results is the responsibility of data manager.
Senior Leader / Deputy Head in Charge of Curriculum
Organisation of teaching and learning.
External validation of courses followed at key stage 4 / post-16.
Heads of Faculty/Department/School/Curriculum
Guidance and pastoral oversight of candidates who are unsure of exam entries or amendments to entries.
Responsible for forwarding candidates’ names to SLT for post-results procedures.
Meet deadlines set by exams officer/manager to send accurate controlled assessment/NEA marks via SIMS or directly online (with any declaration forms).
Accurate completion of exam entries and all other mark sheets on SIMS and adherence to deadlines as set by the exams officer/manager.
Head of Careers
Guidance and careers information IAG (Information & Guidance).
Teachers
Notification of access arrangements (as soon as made aware after the start of
the course). Submission of candidates’ names to heads of department /school /curriculum
and to include exams officer/manager in communications. Inform candidates of their internal assessment centre marks before marks are
sent to awarding bodies and within a minimum 5 working days before marks
are sent, to allow time for appeal procedures to take place – see 15b).
SENCO & designated Senior Leader (for Access Arrangements/Special Considerations)
Identification and testing of candidates’ requirements for access arrangements. Provision of additional support for spelling, reading, mathematics, dyslexia or
essential skills, hearing impairment, English for speakers of other languages, IT equipment and to help candidates achieve their course aims.
Makes access arrangement applications after specialised teacher assessments.
Lead Invigilator/Invigilators
Safeguards secure collection & return of exam papers and other materials to and from the exams office at start & end of each exam.
Exams Policy 2019-20 (Oct-Sept19) Page: 5 of 24
Ensure examinations are run in accordance with JCQ guidance. Adhere to seat plans and ensure candidates receive correct exam papers. Ensure access arrangements noted on seat plans are allocated to candidates.
Complete and check exam registers before candidates leave exam room. Checks all exam papers and associated paperwork has been fully completed
before candidates and staff leave exam room, including incident forms. After each exam return equipment and paperwork in an organised manner. Under guidance of exams officer/manager, check/pack exam papers are ready
for despatch.
Candidates
Confirmation and signing of controlled assessments/coursework. With teachers’ support, should understand controlled assessment (NEA)
regulations and sign a declaration that authenticates work as their own. Read JCQ (and other) exam related information for candidates as directed by
exams officer/manager and teachers (displayed on student portal & exam noticeboard).
Sign to confirm authorisation of Review of Marking/Results (ROR) and Access to Scrips (ATS).
Sign Data Protection Form so Access Arrangement Application can be processed electronically to consent sharing of some personal data between organisations:
JCQ, AQA, CCEA, OCR, Pearson (Edexcel) and WJEC.
2. The Statutory Tests & Qualifications Offered
The statutory tests and qualifications offered at this centre are decided by the heads of subject together with the heads of faculties and departments.
The statutory tests and qualifications offered are:
The subjects offered for these qualifications in any academic year may be found in the centre’s published prospectus for that year. If there is a change of syllabus from the
previous year, exams officer/manager must be informed as soon as a decision is made.
At Key Stage 3 (Years 7, 8 & 9)
There are no statutory exams for KS3 at the moment.
At Key Stage 4 (Years 10 & 11)
All candidates will be entitled, and encouraged, to achieve an entry for qualifications with an external awarding body.
3. Exam Seasons & Timetables
3.1 Exam Seasons
BTEC on-screen/on-demand exams and Internal exams are scheduled as required.
External exams/assessments may be scheduled November; January; March; May; June.
Exams Policy 2019-20 (Oct-Sept19) Page: 6 of 24
All internal (mock/domestic) exams are held under external exam conditions. The exam series used in the centre is decided by the heads of subject and the heads
of department/faculty.
Heads of year will support collecting information and suggested exam dates for internal exams; this should be completed by September/October latest if possible.
3.2 Timetables
Once confirmed, exams officer/manager will pass individual exam timetables for all
exams to key stage4 co-ordinators to issue to candidates via tutors, ensuring fair notice is allowed.
Exams officer/manager will display exam timetables on school noticeboards and on student portal on school website.
Subject teachers are also responsible for informing candidates of the dates and times of their examinations as directed by exams officer/manager.
4. Entries, Entry Details & Late Entries
4.1 Entries
Candidates are selected for their exam entries by the heads of subject, heads of department/faculty and the subject teachers.
Candidates, or parents/carers, can request a subject entry, change of level or withdrawal.
The centre in general is not an open centre for external (private) candidates.
4.2 Late Entries
Entry deadlines are circulated to heads of department via memos and emails and the centre VLE (see VLE > Staff Portal > Documents > Exams Corner).
Late entries are authorised by heads of subject, heads of department/faculty and
subject teachers and should be approved by exams manager with a member of SLT.
5. Exam Fees
The centre will pay all normal exam fees on behalf of candidates.
If a candidate requests a Post Results Service against the advice of subject staff, they will be charged. (see Section 12 of this policy).
Late entry or amendment fees are paid by centre.
Candidates or departments will not be charged for changes of tier, withdrawals made by the
proper procedures or alterations arising from administrative processes provided these are
made within the time allowed by the awarding bodies and as agreed by senior leaders.
Exams Policy 2019-20 (Oct-Sept19) Page: 7 of 24
6. The Disability Discrimination Act (DDA 2005/2018)
Freedom of Information Act 2000,
Special Needs (SEND), Access Arrangements & GDPR
6.1 DDA /Freedom of Information Act
The Disability Discrimination Act 2005/2018 extends the application of the DDA to
general qualifications. All exam centre staff must ensure that the access arrangements and special consideration regulations and guidance are consistent with
the law (please refer to JCQ General Regulations booklet for DDA & Freedom of Information Act 2000 information).
6.2 Special Needs
A candidate’s special needs requirements are determined by the SENCO, doctor and educational psychologist / specialist teacher.
The SENCO will inform subject teachers, exams officer/manager of candidates with
special educational needs who are embarking on a course leading to an exam, and date of exam. The SENCO to then inform individual staff of special arrangements that
any candidates may be granted during the course and for exam.
Exams officer/manager to provide and keep updated a list of access arrangement and special and other exam requirements for staff (displayed on VLE, exams corner).
6.3 Access Arrangements
Making exam arrangements for candidates with access arrangements and special
needs is the responsibility of exams officer/manager. Submitting completed access arrangement applications to the awarding bodies is the
responsibility of the SENCO.
Rooming for access arrangement candidates will be arranged by the exams officer/manager.
Invigilation and support cover for access arrangement candidates will be organised by exams officer/manager and may include support of cover manager as directed.
Access arrangement support for internal exams will include invigilators but LSAs will be used when extra resources are required; external exams will include LSAs and invigilators and only supply staff if resources are short (ideally only supply staff who are familiar to both the school and candidates should be used).
During exams, daily access arrangement and update exam training for supply staff will be provided by exams officer/manager, unless delegated to an invigilator.
6.4 GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation)
Personal Data Consent, Privacy Notice & Data Protection Confirmation Forms to be signed by all candidates with agreed Access Arrangements; this supersedes the
previous Data Protection Notice. Data Protection Notices signed by candidates prior to 29-Jan-19 & available for
inspection purposes do not need to be updated. Anyone wanting to see full details of information held by JCQ can email
[email protected] to initiate a subject access request (see www.jcq.org.uk for full details).
Exams Policy 2019-20 (Oct-Sept19) Page: 8 of 24
7. Equality Act 2010 (Equality & Human Rights)
All exams staff to receive training for the Equality Act 2010 definition of disability.
Advice: Refer to JCQ General Regulations for Approved Centres, sections: 5.4/5.5 & JCQ
Access Arrangements & Reasonable Adjustments Booklet Pg.4.
Staff should familiarise themselves with the document published by the Equalities and Human
Rights Commission (EHRC) Reasonable adjustments for disabled pupils – Guidance:
https://www.equalityhumanrights.com/en/advice-and-guidance/equality-act-guidance
8. Estimated Grades
Estimated Grades
The heads of department will submit estimated grades to the exams officer/manager
as per requested deadlines. (JCQ has withdrawn request except for those courses requiring Preliminary Material, however the exams office continues to require this information to
determine external exam dates and to support arranging internal exam dates and timetables, also to set-up mark-sheets for entries and set deadlines).
9. Managing Invigilators & Exam Days
9.1 Managing Invigilators
External invigilators will be used for internal exams and external exams.
The recruitment of invigilators is the responsibility of the Head Teacher.
Securing the necessary Disclosure & Barring Service (DBS) checks for clearance of new invigilators is the responsibility of the centre administration.
DBS fees for securing such clearance are paid by the centre (however if a future
employee is offered a position after DBS and before start date and withdraw application they will be liable to refund/costs).
Invigilators are trained, timetabled and briefed by the exams officer/manager; the
lead invigilator or other experienced invigilators may assist in this process.
Invigilators’ rates of pay are set by the centre administration.
9.2 Exam Days
The exams officer/manager will arrange to book all exam rooms after liaison with other users and make the question papers, other exam stationery and materials
available for the invigilators. At the request of the exams officer/manager, site management is responsible for
setting up the allocated exam rooms.
The lead invigilator, exams officer/manager or designated staff agreed by the head of centre will start all exams in accordance with JCQ guidelines.
Exams Policy 2019-20 (Oct-Sept19) Page: 9 of 24
Senior leaders or subject staff may be present at the start of the exam to assist with identification of candidates (these should be authorised by head of centre and agreed by exams officer/manager); advice given must be in line with awarding bodies rules.
In practical exams subject teachers may be on hand in case of technical difficulties.
Timed Art & Design exams are normally invigilated by subject teachers; however because the subject teacher may need to give technical assistance to an individual
candidate, additional invigilators should be deployed at the head of centre’s discretion. Exam papers must not be read by subject teachers or removed from exam room
before end of an exam session even if the same exam is running late in centre. Papers can be distributed to heads of department at the end of the awarding bodies
finishing time/exam session and after exam papers have been checked and packaged for postage. This includes not distributing exam papers until after late exams have
been sat/packaged (i.e. due to clashes or other reasons).
A relevant subject teacher may be available to read out any subject-specific instructions and start the exam if required (as per awarding bodies guidance).
If a subject teacher reads questions in the paper they must remain in exam room until
the end of the exam. Subject teachers are under strict instructions not to enter an exam room without permission or a malpractice could be referred to head of centre.
External exams & mock exams must NOT be sat in the same room at the same time.
Reception should be permanently staffed between 8.30am & 3.30pm term time for receipt
of secure exam materials & to accompany JCQ Inspector or awarding body representative.
10. Candidates: General; Late & Clash Exams & Special Consideration
10.1 Candidates
The centre’s published rules on acceptable dress, behaviour and candidates’ use of
mobile phones and all electronic devices (including watches with data storage) apply at all times.
Candidates’ personal belongings remain their own responsibility and the centre accepts no liability for their loss or damage.
Candidates showing inappropriate behaviour are dealt with in accordance with the awarding bodies’ guidelines.
10.2 Late (Very) Candidates
To maintain security of exams, all candidates sitting general qualification exams must:
Start 9am exams: no earlier than 8.30am and no later than 9.30am
Start 1.30pm exams: no earlier than 1pm and no later than 2pm (Exceptions: timetabled clashes or large cohorts split to allow sittings)
Candidates arriving late should be allowed to sit exam (this is at the discretion of the centre).
Exams longer than 1-hour: candidates will not be allowed to leave the exam room
unsupervised until at least 1-hour after the awarding body’s published starting time, after which they will not be allowed to return:
Exams Policy 2019-20 (Oct-Sept19) Page: 10 of 24
Candidates will be considered very late if they arrive 1-hour after awarding body’s published start time. (General published start times are: 9am and 1.30pm).
Exams less than one hour: candidates must remain supervised until published finishing time of exams:
Candidates will be considered very late if they arrive after awarding body’s published finishing time).
Candidates arriving very late should have evidence of supervision. Exams staff to liaise
with head of centre and send separately within 7-days form ‘JCQ/VLA-report a candidate admitted very late to examination room’ (refer to JCQ I.C.E instructions: candidates who arrive late).
Evidence of supervision should ideally cover from beginning of published start time of exam but must always cover candidate:
From 1-hour after published start time to arrival/starting exam (for exams 1-hour or more) (example: from 10.30am AM session and 2.30pm PM session) From end of published finishing time to arrival/starting exam (for exams less than 1-hour).
Both late and very late candidates must be recorded on incident forms.
Very late candidates must be warned the awarding body may not accept their work.
For any late issues that fall into above categories, exams officer/manager will report to head of centre. The head of centre is responsible for candidates who are late for
their exams, or do not turn up at all.
10.3 Clash Candidates
The exams officer/manager will be responsible as necessary for supervising escorts, identifying a secure venue and arranging overnight stays.
Candidates will be formally supervised at all times between clash exams and may
revise using their own resources but must NOT be coached by a member of staff.
(See below Special Considerations 10.4 for information on clash exams).
10.4 Special Consideration
Should a candidate be ill before an exam, suffer bereavement or other trauma, be taken ill during the exam itself or otherwise disadvantaged or disturbed during an
exam, then it is the candidate’s responsibility to alert the centre, the exams officer/manager, or the exam invigilator, to that effect.
Candidates suffering an contagious or infectious illness should sit exam separately and exam papers kept separate (i.e. in a paper pocket with a note of explanation to exam board).
The candidate must support any special consideration claim with appropriate evidence
within three days of the exam, for example a letter from the candidate’s doctor. The exams officer/manager will deal with issues up to and after the three days’ deadline by liaising with exam boards if needed. Evidence of illness observed by invigilators
during exams may be used.
The centre may apply for special considerations on the last paper when a candidate has been entered for 3 or more exams timetabled for the same day and the total
duration of those exam papers is more than 5-hours 30-minutes including extra time (rest breaks & supervised breaks will not be included in total time) (GCSE Exams).
Exams Policy 2019-20 (Oct-Sept19) Page: 11 of 24
11. Controlled Assessment & Appeals Against Internal Assessments
11.1 Controlled Assessment / Non Exam Assessment (NEA)
Candidates with controlled assessments/NEAs to prepare, must do by end off course.
Heads of faculty are responsible under the direction of the head of centre to carry out controlled assessments/NEAs exactly as per exam board regulations.
Internal deadline dates for controlled assessment/NEA are decided by heads of faculties and published internally so that quality assurance checks can be carried out by senior leaders and/or exam board staff.
Exams officer/manager will remind teachers of exam board deadlines via memos/emails.
Heads of department will ensure all controlled assessment/NEA work is ready for despatch
at the correct time and in accordance with centre and final exam board deadlines. The exams officer/manager will keep a record of what has been sent when and to whom.
Marks for internally assessed work (NEAs) can be input on SIMS via mark-sheets set
up by exams officer/manager or directly onto awarding body online secure sites by the heads of department/faculty; the exams officer/manager must be informed of the chosen option.
11.2 Appeals Against Internal Assessments (Non-Exam Assessments – NEA)
The centre is obliged to publish a separate procedure on this subject, which is available from the exams office (see section 15).
Heads of department should advise candidates of their marks within a sufficient window in order to allow time for any internal appeal to be concluded prior to the
submission of centre marks to the awarding body. (Candidates should also be informed
that marks submitted still may be subject to change through the moderation process).
The main points are:
Appeals will only be entertained if they apply to the process leading to an assessment. There is no appeal against the mark or grade awarded.
Candidates may appeal to the head of centre if they feel their controlled assessment has been assessed unfairly, inconsistently or not in accordance with
the specification for the qualification. (Private candidates may appeal directly to awarding body).
Appeals must be made in writing to the head of centre (or other nominee) and as soon as possible to ensure the internal process is completed prior to
submission of centre marks to the awarding body. The head of centre (or nominee) will decide whether the process used conformed to the requirements.
The head of centre’s findings will be notified in writing, copied to the exams
officer/manager and recorded for the awarding body’s inspection. Deadlines apply.
Exams Policy 2019-20 (Oct-Sept19) Page: 12 of 24
12. Results & Post Results: Clerical Checks; Reviews of Marking/Results (ROR); Moderation Review & Access to Scripts (ATS)
12.1 Results
Candidates will receive individual results slips on results days in person at the centre or by post to their home address (an s.a.e. should be provided for postal option).
Arrangements for the school to be open on results days are made by the head of
centre. The provision of senior members staff and their availability immediately after
publication of results will be the responsibility of the head of centre.
The provision of staff to distribute exams results will be the responsibility of the exams officer/manager.
12.2 Post Results (Deadlines Apply – See JCQ Post Results Booklet)
Candidates will be made aware of ‘access to scripts’ and ‘post results enquiries and
appeals services’ BEFORE requests for these are submitted to awarding bodies.
Centre must obtain written candidate consent for clerical checks and reviews of marking before an application is made, as with these services candidates’ marks and subject grades may be lowered. Failure to do so will be considered centre malpractice.
Centre must meet awarding bodies deadlines for post results services. Candidates’ consent must also be agreed for Access to Scripts (ATS) and will have option to choose if their exam scripts remains anonymous for classroom teaching and learning.
12.3 Clerical Re-Check (Service 1)
A Clerical Re-Check is a re-check of all clerical procedures leading to the issue of a
result; it is only available for objective tests (multiple choice tests) (see JCQ Post Results
Booklet)
Checks include:
that all parts of scripts were marked; the totalling of marks and recording of marks.
written consent of candidates must be obtained (consent via email is acceptable).
(Deadline for completion is 10 days after awarding bodies receive request).
12.4 Review of Marking/Results (ROR) (Service 2)
Review of Marking (ROR) requests may be put forward by centre staff or candidates to head of centre if they have reasonable grounds for believing there is a marking error. If a result is queried, teaching staff and head of centre will investigate the feasibility
of asking for a review of marking/results at the centre’s expense and the candidate will be asked to sign a form to agree understanding that marks may be lowered,
remain the same as well as being raised (as JCQs rulings).
This is NOT a re-marking of the candidate’s original script:
this is a Post Review of original marking to ensure correct mark schemes were applied
correctly and also includes checks that all parts of scripts were marked and that the
totalling of marks and recording of marks are also correct.
written consent of candidates must be obtained (consent via email is acceptable).
(Deadline for completion is 15 days after awarding bodies receive request).
Exams Policy 2019-20 (Oct-Sept19) Page: 13 of 24
When the centre does not uphold a Review of Marking/Results (Service 2) request, a candidate may apply via head of centre to have an enquiry carried out. If candidate requires this against advice of subject staff, they will be charged. (see Exam Fees: Section 5)
Changes to candidate’s’ results arising from a Review of Marking (Service 2) cannot lead to a subsequent late request for Review of Moderation (Service 3).
12.5 Review of Moderation Review (Service 3)
A Moderation Review is the review of the original moderation to ensure the assessment criteria has been fairly, reliably and consistently applied; it is NOT a re-moderation of candidates’ work (please refer to current JCQ Post Results Booklet or
relevant awarding bodies instructions).
A Moderation Review will be undertaken on original sample of candidates’ work only and cannot be for the work of individual candidates or for the work of candidates not in original sample (including work carried forward to a subsequent exam series).
All work submitted for a Moderation of Review must be sent within 3 working days and must have been kept under secure conditions and not have been returned to candidates.
Candidate consent is not required for a moderation review as candidates’ marks may be lowered but their published subject grades will not be lowered in the series concerned, however a lowered mark can be carried forward to future certification.
(Deadline for completion is up to 35 days after moderator receives original sample of work from centre).
12.6 Access to Scripts (ATS) (refer to JCQ Post Results Booklet for specific dates)
After the release of results, candidates may ask subject staff to request the return of papers
within one day for priority original copies (GCE only).
Copies of scripts to support Reviews of Marking (Service 2) can be requested (the deadline for
requests will be 7 days after candidates’ publication of results and copies will be provided
to centres by beginning September for summer results (see JCQ Post Results Booklet).
Copies of scripts can be requested for teaching and learning purpose (the deadline for these
requests will be end of September (see JCQ Post Results Booklet for date).
Applications for ATS must be made online via the awarding bodies extranet sites by the exams
officer/manager and will be provided for GCSE (GCE AS and A Level) papers:
If a copy of the marked script (ATS) has been requested; the examiner marks & annotations
will be shown, therefore then a Service 2 request must be put forward at same time as ATS;
a later request after a Service 2 request would not be allowed.
Deadline to request ATS will be one week after deadline for Review of Results (Service 2)
Edexcel / Pearson Script Viewer: Access to Script (ATS) service allows exams office (or
allocated teachers) to request copies of candidates' marked exam papers. The self-service
online portal allows viewing of electronically marked scripts as part of the Enquiries about
Results service. The system is web based and facilitates:
viewing of electronically marked scripts online
printing of scripts in pdf format to be printed or saved and distributed electronically
The written consent of candidates must be obtained (consent via email is acceptable).
Candidates have the right to decline a centre from requesting ATS but if they do agree
to ATS they have the right to request anonymity. Access deadline for online ATS for Edexcel Pearson is approx. mid-December for summer results.
Exams Policy 2019-20 (Oct-Sept19) Page: 14 of 24
13. Certificates
On receipt of certificates and before being issued to candidates, the school will check a sample batch to
ensure exam grades are correct; all certificates previously subjected to a Review of Marking/Results (Service 2) will be checked.
Certificates are collected and signed for: Certificates may be collected on behalf of a candidate by a third party, provided they have been authorised to do so and provide proof of identity and sign and date to confirm receipt. Replacement certificates will only be requested by centre if the centre is responsible for an error on the
certificate (i.e. spelling of names) or the centre is responsible for loss.
If a candidate has lost or misplaced a certificate they must incur the costs. The exams office/manager will direct candidate to exam board websites to request replacement. The centre is obliged to keep certificates for one year after receipt but will retain them for a minimum of three years; after this time they can be securely destroyed or returned to exam board (either option is acceptable).
Exams officer/manager to arrange date and venue for final certificate day/evening.
Exams Policy 2019-20 (Oct-Sept19) Page: 14 of 24
14. Exams Risk Assessment
Risks and Issues
(Covers ALL non-exam assessments (NEAs) or
controlled assessments for candidates/students)
Possible Remedial Action Staff
Forward planning Action
Timetabling
Assessment schedule clashes with other
activities
Plan/establish priorities well ahead for all
subjects and lines of learning (e.g. at the start
of the academic year or as soon as aware)
Plan dates in consultation with school
calendar – negotiate with other parties
SLT
Too many controlled assessments/NEAs,
too close together across all GCSE
subjects and other lines of learning.
Plan controlled assessments so they are
spaced over the duration of the course
Space all assessments to allow candidates a
realistic time between each (taking into
account any windows or deadlines)
SLT / HOFs
Accommodation
Insufficient space in classrooms for
candidates
Once the group size of the cohort is known,
at the start of academic year, flag instances
where regular classroom space may not be
suitable to conduct controlled assessments
Use more than one classroom or multiple
sittings where necessary
HOFs / HODs
Insufficient facilities for all candidates Careful planning ahead and booking of rooms
and centre facilities
Any late issues liaise with cover manager to
flag free rooms or rearrange temporary
classrooms
HOFs
Exams Policy 2019-20 (Oct-Sept19) Page: 15 of 24
Risks and Issues
(Covers ALL non-exam assessments (NEAs) or
controlled assessments for candidates/students)
Possible Remedial Action Staff
Forward planning Action
Downloading Awarding Body set tasks
IT system unavailable on day of assessment Download tasks well ahead of scheduled
assessment date in all cases
Book IT equipment well ahead and download
tasks before scheduled date of assessment
Liaise with IT manager
HOFs
Teaching staff / assessors unable to access
task details
Test secure access rights ahead of controlled
assessment/NEA schedule every year and
every session
Ensure teaching staff have access rights for
the correct area of awarding body secure
extranet sites at the start of the academic
year and well ahead of the controlled
assessment/NEA schedule
HOFs
Loss of task details in transmission Download tasks well ahead of scheduled
assessment dates
Liaise with IT manager
Contact awarding body and ask for
replacement task; download again (may have
option to change to paper version if available)
HOFs
Absent Students / Candidates
Candidates absent for all or part of
assessment (various reasons)
Plan alternative session(s) for candidates Ensure dates are within parameters
(windows) for assessments.
HOFs / HODs
Clash of Exams
Candidates have a clash because of exams
or other assessments
Always consider candidate timetables well
ahead and decide on priorities (set exam
dates/times) to take into account clashes
NB: Re-takes of controlled assessments /
NEAs are limited; check rules as some may
be carried forward for re-sits
Check with exams calendars and liaise with
exams officer/manager and cover manager
before providing an alternative date
If needed consult with awarding bodies
HOFs
Exams Policy 2019-20 (Oct-Sept19) Page: 16 of 24
Risks and Issues
(Covers ALL non-exam assessments (NEAs) or
controlled assessments for candidates/students)
Possible Remedial Action Staff
Forward planning Action
Control levels for task taking
Assessment is undertaken under incorrect
level of control (time, resources,
supervision and collaboration)
Ensure teaching staff / assessors know what
level is applicable and understand what is
involved. Provide training if required
Head of faculty (HOF) to immediately liaise
with SLT link and head of centre
Seek guidance from the awarding body
SLT / HOFs
Supervision
Candidate study diary/plan not provided
or completed*
Ensure teaching staff / assessors are aware of
the need for study diary / plans to be
completed at start of, or early in course
Ensure candidates start, continue and
complete study diary/plans and that they are
signed after every session
HOFs /HODs /
Teachers / Assessors
* Not all GCSE controlled assessments will require the completion of a study diary or study plans
Teaching staff do not understand that the
supervision of NEAs controlled
assessments is their responsibility
Ensure teaching staff fully understand the
nature of NEA controlled or other
assessments and their role in supervising
assessments
Exams officer/manager to issue awarding
bodies NEAs controlled assessment guidelines
at start of academic year (i.e. JCQ regulations)
Copy of available awarding body guidelines
saved: VLE > Staff Portal> Documents>
Exams Corner
SLT to provide training (Extended SLT) to be
disseminated by HOFs during CPD
SLT / EO
A suitable supervisor has not been
arranged for an assessment where teaching
staff / assessors are not supervising
A suitable supervisor must be arranged for
any NEA / controlled assessment session
where a teacher is not supervising, in line
with the awarding body’s specification
Ensure that new or covering assessors are
made aware of awarding body assessment
rules and guidelines
Alternatively postpone assessment or re-
arrange within parameter dates; liaise with
SLT, cover manager and exams
officer/manager
HOFs / HODs
Exams Policy 2019-20 (Oct-Sept19) Page: 17 of 24
Risks and Issues
(Covers ALL non-exam assessments (NEAs) or
controlled assessments for candidates/students)
Possible Remedial Action Staff
Forward planning Action
Task setting
Teaching staff / assessors fail to correctly
set tasks
Ensure teaching staff fully understand the
task setting arrangements as defined in the
awarding body’s specification**
Arrange CPD Training
Seek guidance from the awarding body
SLT / HOFs
** All tasks whether set by the awarding body or the centre must be developed in line with the requirements of the specification.
Assessments have not been moderated in
line with the awarding body’s specification
Check specification and plan required
moderation appropriately
Liaise with SLT
Seek guidance from the awarding body
HOFs
Security of materials
Assessment tasks not kept secure before
assessment
Ensure teaching staff fully understand the
importance of task security; work must be
locked securely away and the whereabouts
known to at least one other member of staff
with a set of keys (to cover a staff absence)
Contact the awarding body to request/obtain
different assessment tasks
*If there has been a breach of security or if
malpractice is suspected, liaise with head of
centre and inform exams officer/manager and
follow malpractice policy
HOFs
Candidates’ work not kept secure during
or after assessment
Define the appropriate level of security, in
line with the awarding body’s requirements,
for each department as necessary
Ensure assessment materials are immediately
locked away
Read awarding body guidelines; seek guidance
from them if needed
*If there has been a breach of security or if
malpractice is suspected, liaise with head of
centre and follow malpractice policy
HOFs
Insufficient or insecure storage space Look at provision for suitable secure storage
at the start of the course (check updates for
JCQ guidelines)
Find alternative storage and space within the
centre
Liaise with SLT if needed
HOFs
Exams Policy 2019-20 (Oct-Sept19) Page: 18 of 24
Risks and Issues
(Covers ALL non-exam assessments (NEAs) or
controlled assessments for candidates/students)
Possible Remedial Action Staff
Forward planning Action
Deadlines
Awarding body deadlines not met by
candidates
Ensure all candidates are briefed on deadlines
and the penalties for not meeting them
Mark what work candidates have produced by
the deadline
Seek guidance from awarding body on further
action
Liaise with exams officer/manager
HOFs / HODs /
Teachers
Deadlines for marking and/or paperwork
not met by teaching staff / assessors
Ensure teaching staff / assessors are given
clear deadlines (prior to awarding body
deadline) to complete marking/paperwork so
exams officer/manager can process and
submit marks ahead of awarding body
deadlines
Liaise with head of centre
Seek guidance from awarding body
HODs / HOFs
Authentication
Student fails to sign authentication form Ensure all candidates have authentication
forms to sign and that the authentication
form is securely attached to their work when
it is completed and handed in for marking
Find candidate and ensure authentication form
is signed
Be aware of internal / external deadlines
Seek advice from exams officer/manager if
unsure
HODs / HOFs
Teaching staff / assessors fail to complete
authentication forms or leave before
completing the authentication process
Ensure teaching staff fully understand the
importance of authentication forms and the
requirement of a signature and date.
Urgently return the authentication form to
the teacher for signature
Ensure authentication forms are signed as
candidates’ work is marked; not at the end of
season
HOFs
Exams Policy 2019-20 (Oct-Sept19) Page: 19 of 24
Risks and Issues
(Covers ALL non-exam assessments (NEAs) or
controlled assessments for candidates/students)
Possible Remedial Action Staff
Forward planning Action
Marking
Teaching staff / assessors interpret
marking descriptions incorrectly
Ensure appropriate CPD training and
practicing of marking
Plan for sampling of marking during the
practice phase
Arrange for review of marking
Liaise with SLT
Consult the awarding body’s specification for
appropriate procedures
HOFs / SLT
Centre does not run the standardisation
activity as required by the awarding body
Plan against the awarding body’s
requirements for standardisation, i.e. when
and how this activity must be conducted
Check with the awarding body whether a
later standardisation event can be arranged
Liaise with head of centre
Head of Centre
Exams Policy 2019-20 (Oct-Sept19) Page: 20 of 24
15a. Appeals against Internally Assessed Marks (GCSE Controlled & Non-Exam Assessments - NEAs)
Policy: Appeals against Internally Assessed Marks (Non-Exam Assessments NEAs);
Informing Candidates of their Centre Assessed Marks
Seaham High School is committed to ensuring that whenever staff mark candidates’ work, this is done fairly, consistently and in accordance with the awarding body’s specification and subject-specific associated documents. Candidates’ work will be marked by staff who have appropriate knowledge, understanding and skills, and who have been trained in this activity. Seaham High School is committed to ensuring the work produced by candidates is authenticated according to the requirements of the awarding body. Where a number of teachers are involved in marking candidates’ work, internal moderation and standardisation will ensure consistency of marking. Candidates must be told the results mark given by Seaham High School for a centre assessed component/unit for GCSE (GCE) and Project Qualifications. This will enable the candidate to request a review of the centre’s marking prior to the marks being submitted to the awarding body (see Qualification Level Conditions and Requirements).
Sufficient time must be allowed; it is suggested a minimum 5 working days prior to centre marks being sent to exam boards to allow for a candidate to appeal. An appeal can NOT be made once exam boards have received centre marks.
A candidate may make use of the appeals procedure if h/she feels they were not informed of their marks in relation to above. Note that appeals may only be made against the process that led to the assessment and not against the mark or grade submitted by the school to the awarding body. This procedure is available from the Exams Manager, Mr O’Malley. 1 Appeals should be made as early as possible in order to ensure that the internal appeals
process is completed prior to the submission of centre marks to the awarding body and candidates will be informed that they may request copies of materials to assist them in considering whether to request a review of the centre’s marking of the assessment.
2 Candidates should be provided with a clear deadline which must be met in order to make requests for a review of the centre’s marking. Appeals should be made in writing to Exams Manager, Mr O’Malley, who will investigate the appeal with at least two other members of staff who have not been involved in the internal assessment decision. If Exams Manager was directly involved in the assessment in question, the Head of Centre will appoint another member of staff of similar or greater seniority to conduct the investigation. Likewise, if the Exams Manager is not able to conduct the investigation for any other reason.
3 The purpose of the appeal will be to decide whether the process used for the internal assessment (non-exam assessment NEA) conformed to the published requirements of the awarding body’s specification and subject specific associated documents.
4 The appellant will be informed in writing of the outcome of the appeal, including any relevant correspondence with the awarding body and any changes made to the procedure relating to internal assessment.
5 The outcome of the appeal will be made known to the Head of Centre; this will not be logged as a complaint. A written record will be kept and made available to the awarding body upon request. Should the appeal bring any irregularity in procedures to light, the awarding body will be informed. Candidates will be informed in writing of the outcome.
After work has been assessed internally, it is moderated by the awarding body to ensure consistency in marking between centres. The moderation process may lead to mark changes; this process is outside the control of Seaham High School and is not covered by this procedure. If you have concerns, please ask Exams Manager, Mr O’Malley for a copy of the appeals procedure of the relevant awarding body.
Exams Policy 2019-20 (Oct-Sept19) Page: 21 of 24
15b. Appeals Against External Assessed Marks (NEAs) Where a candidate is unhappy with the mark awarded for an applicable external exam unit (written exam, controlled or practical assessment), a clerical check or review of marking may be requested via the exams office, under the direction of the head of centre. The candidate will be required to acknowledge that his/her grade may be confirmed, raised or lowered and will be responsible for paying the relevant fee at the time of the request. The decision as to whether to support such an enquiry will be made by Seaham High School on the basis of several factors, including knowledge of the exam system and professional judgement (Refer to Section 12 of Exams Policy).
16. Examination Contingency Plan
1. Disruption of teaching time – centre closed for an extended Period Criteria for implementation of the plan Centre closed or candidates are unable to attend for an extended period during normal
teaching or study supported time, interrupting the provision of normal teaching and
learning.
Where there is disruption to teaching time and students miss teaching and learning, it
remains the responsibility of the centre to prepare students, as usual, for examinations:
Recommended actions:
If the disruption is for a limited period of time the school timetable will be adapted to provide opportunity for catch up lessons when the building is reopened.
During extended closure of buildings, alternative centres will be found and utilised to provide lessons for accredited subjects where possible.
During partial closure of buildings, a structured timetable will be created to ensure that every student will attend school during specifically identified periods.
Teachers will prepare work for students which will be distributed to students either via email or posted out to students’ place of residence.
The school will follow Department of Education Guidance on emergency planning and their advice on severe weather. The head of centre will liaise with centre staff.
2. Disruption of the distribution of examination papers Criteria for implementation of the plan Issues surrounding the distribution of examination papers to centres in advance of
examinations:
Recommended actions:
Awarding organisations to source alternative couriers for delivery of hardcopies.
Awarding organisations to provide centres with electronic access to examination papers via a secure external network.
Seaham High School does not have a fax machine, therefore if electronic transfer is not possible a nearby centre with this facility will be asked to receive information under supervision of a designated member of exams staff or from SLT.
The examinations officer/manager is responsible for ensuring that copies are received, made and stored under secure conditions.
Exams Policy 2019-20 (Oct-Sept19) Page: 22 of 24
3. Candidates unable to take examinations because of a crisis - centres remain open
Criteria for implementation of the plan Candidates are unable to attend examination centres to sit examinations as normal:
Recommended actions:
Head of centre, with agreement of relevant awarding bodies (via JCQ instructions where appropriate) to contact local school(s) (and/or possibly nearby Church Hall or Town Hall) to request permission to sit exam(s) at alternative site.
Centre to liaise with candidates to identify whether examinations are to be sat at an alternative venue in agreement with awarding organisations. JCQ guidance on alternative site arrangements can be accessed through the JCQ website - http://www.jcq.org.uk
If alternative site used, exams officer/manager to complete correct associated paperwork.
Centre to offer candidates an opportunity to sit any examinations missed at the next available series.
Centre to apply to awarding organisations for special consideration for candidates who have met the minimum requirements.
Candidates are only eligible for special consideration if they have been fully prepared and have covered the whole course but are affected by adverse circumstances beyond their control. If a candidate chooses not to sit an examination for other reasons they should be aware that special consideration rules will not apply.
JCQ guidance on special consideration can be accessed through the JCQ website: http://www.jcq.org.uk
4. Centres are unable to open as normal during the examination period Criteria for implementation of the plan Centre unable to open as normal for scheduled examinations:
If the centre is unable to open for examinations as normal, the exams officer/manager must inform
each awarding body which exams are due to be taken; this should be done as soon as possible.
The responsibility for deciding whether it is safe for a centre to open lies with the head of centre:
o The Head is responsible for taking advice, or following instructions from relevant local or national agencies in deciding whether they are able to open.
Recommended actions:
Centre to open for examinations and examination candidates only, if possible.
Centre to use alternative venues in agreement with relevant awarding organisations if possible.
Centre may offer candidates an opportunity to sit any examinations missed at the next available series.
Centre to apply to awarding organisations for special consideration for candidates who have met the minimum requirements.
5. Disruption to the transportation of completed examination scripts Criteria for implementation of the plan Delay in normal collection arrangements for completed examination scripts:
Recommended actions:
Exams Policy 2019-20 (Oct-Sept19) Page: 23 of 24
In the first instance centre to seek advice from awarding organisations and normal collection agency regarding collection.
Centre is not to make their own arrangements for transportation without approval from awarding organisations.
Exams officer/manager to ensure secure storage of completed examination scripts until collection.
6. Assessment evidence is not available to be marked Criteria for implementation of the plan Large scale damage to / or destruction of completed examination scripts / assessment
evidence before it can be marked:
Recommended actions:
Awarding organisations to generate candidate marks for affected assessments based on other appropriate evidence of candidate achievement as defined by the awarding organisations in consultation with the regulators.
Candidates to retake affected assessment at subsequent assessment window.
7. Teacher unable to mark internally assessed course work according to marking schedules. Criteria for implementation of plan Teacher is unable to mark coursework resulting in a risk to the delivery of results by
scheduled dates:
Recommended actions:
Prioritisation of marking to be based on results dates.
Centre to negotiate with centre teaching staff who are delivering in same subject to mark coursework
In the event of a subject specialist not being available in school, the centre will seek advice/guidance/recommendations for an alternative marker through the LA adviser for the specialist subject.
8. Centres are unable to distribute results as normal Criteria for implementation of plan Centre is unable to access or manage the distribution of results to candidates, or to
facilitate post results services:
Recommended actions:
In first instance, parents to be notified of delay of results by phone/text (or email) and provided with expected date for receipt of results (a letter may be sent depending on advance notice).
In the event of a system failure on the main site, the school business manager or exams manager or senior leader and data manager to go to local authority office to download and collate results.
In the event of the absence of the school business manager during the period of receipt of results the exams officer/manager, senior leader and data officer/manager would take over the responsibility of downloading the results and ensuring that students are notified of outcomes of examinations.
In the event of absence of all examination administrative staff the head of centre will contact the relevant examination boards to seek alternative means of receiving results.
Exams Policy 2019-20 (Oct-Sept19) Page: 24 of 24
17. Fire & Emergency Exam Policy & Procedures
Staff & Pupils should follow the evacuation procedures shown:
Candidates to remain in seats and follow Invigilator instructions carefully.
Candidates to leave all question papers and scripts on desks.
Appointed Invigilator should take with them the Exam Attendance Register.
Candidates should be escorted, supervised from exam room in silence.
Evacuate rooms using nearby safest exit and escort candidates to MUGA Area
o (Outside Multi-Use Gym Area – outside of East Wing of school building).
o Next to doors, all rooms include directions/map to nearest fire exit.
At all times avoid close proximity to non-exam students.
Candidates should be closely supervised to ensure there is no discussion about
the examination.
Exams Officer/Manager and School Administrator should each be in possession
of a full list of exam candidates (to be provided by Exams Officer/Manager prior
to exams).
Exams Officer/Manager to liaise with Invigilators and inform School
Administrator of any absences.
Invigilators should make a note of the interruption and how long it lasted
(please use Incident Forms).
Once the building is deemed safe to enter, candidates should be allowed the full
working time set for the examination (i.e. awarded back any missing time).
Exams Officer/Manager to make a full report of the incident and the action
taken and send it to the relevant awarding body.
(Depending on severity of disruption and/or the possibility of not being able to
resume Exam, Awarding Bodies may allow Special Considerations).