EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHM USED IN EFFICIENT CONGESTION MANAGEMENT ANALYSIS
description
Transcript of EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHM USED IN EFFICIENT CONGESTION MANAGEMENT ANALYSIS
International Journal of Research in Advanced Technology - IJORAT Vol. 2, Issue 3, MARCH 2016
All Rights Reserved © 2016 IJORAT 1
EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHM USED
IN EFFICIENT CONGESTION
MANAGEMENT ANALYSISA.Anish Joy
1, Dr. .P.Annapandi,M.E.,PhD
2,S.Jeya Pradeepa
3
1PG student, Dept of EEE, FRANCIS XAVIER Engineering College, Tamilnadu, India
2Professor, Dept of EEE,FRANCIS XAVIER Engineering College, Tamilnadu, India
3PG student, Dept of EEE, FRANCIS XAVIER Engineering College, Tamilnadu, India
Abstract: A particle swarm optimization (PSO) technique for a reactive power wind farm (WF) dispatch
function, in order to calculate the reactive power reference for each wind turbine (WT). The dispatch can
be formulated as the problem of minimize the difference in power interchange at interconnection point
(PCC). Incorporation of PSO as a optimization technique for the WF dispatch make possible consider
different parameters to improve it performance and give it more capabilities. a comprehensive analysis of
the dynamic interactions between wind energy curtailment and an energy storage system (ESS) when the
ramping rates of power plants are considered. An analytical framework is developed to study different
mitigation measures in terms of total energy curtailed, total congestion costs, line load factor and
congestion probability
Keywords Particle swarm optimization (PSO), Energy storage system (ESS), Genetic algorithm (GA),
Induction Generator (IG)
I INTRODUCTION
Every day it is more recognized the large potential
of renewable energies to displace greenhouse gases
emissions and to achieve climate change mitigation
targets. Among these technologies, wind power has
been the fastest growing renewable energy
worldwide. However, there are many integration
challenges regarding the impact of wind energy in
both the design and operation of power systems.
Thus, according, a cost effective transition to a
system with high levels of penetration of
renewable, will need not only improvements in the
electricity infrastructure but also fundamental
changes in the philosophy of network operation and
development. Special attention has to be devoted to
the transmission system as new wind capacity
deployment may also introduce bottlenecks in the
grid. In this context, one of the most important
aspects of the future integration of renewable
energies is the reduction of transmission congestion
while maintaining minimum impact on the
reliability of the grid and the capital and
operational costs of the system
In general, congestion management approaches can
be classified into systemic and local solutions.
Systemic solutions involve a system-level
minimization of the total operational costs, while
fulfilling the network security constraints. The
most common strategy for congestion management
is to compensate the fluctuation of the wind energy
through a re-dispatch of other power plants. This
approach has the disadvantage that deviates from
the economic optimality, and the accuracy of the
solution is directly affected by the forecasting
errors in both wind generation and load. In a
comprehensive review of different approaches for
congestion management in competitive markets is
presented. In a real time congestion supervisor is
proposed in order to reduce the re-dispatching. The
deployment of this technique requires the
installation of network controllers located in the
transmission lines and in each generator. Besides
the upgrade of the existing communication
network, this congestion management approach
would need the modification of the current grid
codes as well.
II CONGESTION MANAGEMENT
Congestion management in a multi-buyer/
multi-seller system is one of the most involved
tasks if it has to have a market based solution with
economic efficiency. In a vertically integrated
utility structure, activities such as generation,
transmission and distribution are within direct
control of a central agency or a single utility.
Generation is dispatched in order to achieve the
system least cost operation. Along with this, the
optimal dispatch solution using security
constrained economic dispatch eliminates the
possible occurrence of congestion. This effectively
means that generations are dispatched such that the
power flow limits on the transmission lines are not
exceeded.
International Journal of Research in Advanced Technology - IJORAT Vol. 2, Issue 3, MARCH 2016
All Rights Reserved © 2016 IJORAT 2
According to reference the congestion management
is defined as “the comprehensive set of actions or
procedures to ensure that no violations of the grid
constraints occur”. By following this approach, this
work proposes a comprehensive methodology to
study the dynamic interactions of wind curtailment
and energy storage for transmission congestion
management while considering ramp-up and ramp-
down rates of generating units. The methodology is
applied to a real network system located in the
northern part of Chile.
III ENERGY STORAGE MODEL
There are different ESS technologies that can be
used for congestion mitigation. Due to their current
stage of development at a high rated capacity (100
MW), four technologies are the most suitable for
congestion management: pumped hydro system
(PHS), compressed air energy storage (CAES),
thermal energy storage (TES), and battery energy
storage system (BESS). A generic model of an ESS
that considers operational rules to deal with the
dynamic congestion management is proposed. For
simplicity, we assume that the ESS and the wind
farm are connected to the same busbar. Note
however that, in the general case, not every wind
farm busbar holds a connection to an ESS.The final
application of the proposed framework is
described. The ESS stores energy from the wind
farm when there is overload in transmission
capacity and supplies power back to the grid when
the transmission congestion is relieved. This
behaviour translates into a simple control strategy,
where other factors like changes in the energy
price, operational reserves opportunities, etc., are
not considered. Fig.3.1 shows the diagram of the
ESS model based on reference. Figure shows the
ESS model used for operational analysis.
Fig 3.1-ESS model used for operational analysis.
IV PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION
(PSO)
Particle Swarm Optimization Swarm
Intelligence (SI) is an innovative distributed
intelligent paradigm for solving optimization
problems. PSO incorporates swarming behaviours
observed in flocks of birds, schools of fish, or
swarms of bees, and even human social behaviour,
from which the idea is emerged. PSO is a
population-based optimization tool, which could be
implemented and applied easily to solve various
function optimization problems. As an algorithm,
the main strength of PSO is its fast convergence,
which compares favourably with many global
optimization algorithms like Genetic Algorithms
(GA) Simulated Annealing (SA) and other global
optimization algorithms.
Particle swarm optimisation (PSO) is an
evolutionary computation technique that applies an
analogy of swarm behaviour of natural creatures. It
has been motivated by the behaviour of organisms
acting as a unit, for example he schooling of
shocking of birds. Birds usually seek food (their
objective) in swarms. Each individual bird (agent)
reconfigures its behaviour, based on its own
experience and the experiences of others.
Minimize(x; y)
Where x denotes the dependent variables,
consisting in bus voltages, transmission line
loadings, etc. and where y denotes the independent
variables, in this case WT reactive power
consumption/generation. Basically, the position of
each agent has an associated velocity vki , this is
responsible for the movement and theposition
change of the agents. Each agent knows its best
historical value and the corresponding position. In
addition, each agent is aware of the value and
corresponding position of the best agent of the
swarm.
A ALGORITHM
In a PSO algorithm, the population has n
particles that represent candidate solutions. Each
particle is a k-dimensional real-valued vector,
where k is the number of the optimized parameters.
Therefore, each optimized parameter represents a
dimension of the problem space. The modified PSO
technique for integer problem can be described in
the following steps
Step 1: (Initialization):
Set t=0 and generate random n particles,
{Xi (0), i=1,2,..n}. Each article is considered to be
solution for the problem and it can be described as
Xi (0)=[ xi,1(0); xi ,2(0); ……;xi ,m(0)]
Each control variable will have a range [xmin,
xmax]. Each particle in the initial population is
International Journal of Research in Advanced Technology - IJORAT Vol. 2, Issue 3, MARCH 2016
All Rights Reserved © 2016 IJORAT 3
evaluated using the objective function f. For each
particle, set
Xi*(0) =Xi(0) and
Fi* = fi ; i=1,2,3.....,n.
Search for the best value of the objective function
fbest .Set the particle associated with fbest as the
global best,X**
(0),with an objective function. Set
the initial value of the inertia weight w(0).In this
study the objective function is the optimal power
flow ,which will be calculated after running the
power flow and meeting all our constraints.
Step 2: Counter Updating:
Update the counter t= t +1
Step 3: Velocity updating:
Using the global best and individual best,
the ith
particle velocity in the kth
dimension in this
study (integer problem) is updated according to the
following equation:
Vi,k(t) = w(t).vi,k(t-1) + b1s1(xi*,k(t-1)-xi,k(t-1))
+b2s2(xi**,k(t-1) – xi,k (t-1)
From the previous equation i is the particle number,
b1, b2 are positive constants, s1 s2 are uniformly
distributed Random numbers in [0, 1] and k is the
kth
control variable. Then, check the velocity limits.
If the velocity violated its limit, set it at its proper
limit. The second term of the above equation
represents the cognitive part of the PSO where the
particle changes its velocity based on its own
thinking and memory. The third term represents the
social part of PSO where the particle changes its
velocity based on the social-psychological
adaptation of knowledge.
Step 4: Position updating:
Based on the updated velocity, each
particle changes its position according to the
following equation:
Xi,k(t) = xi,k(t-1) + vi,k(t)
Step 5: Individual best updating:
Each particle is evaluated and updated
according to the update position.
Step 6:
Search for the minimum value in the
individual best and its solution has ever been
reached so far, and considers it to be the minimum.
Step 7:
Stopping criteria: if one of the stopping criteria is
satisfied, then stop otherwise go to step-2.
Fig 4.1 Flowchart for PSO Algorithm
V PROPOSED MODEL
In this proposed system, we present a
comprehensive analysis of the dynamic interactions
between wind energy curtailment and an energy
storage system (ESS) when the ramping rates of
power plants are considered. An analytical
framework is developed to study different
mitigation measures in terms of total energy
curtailed, total congestion costs, line load factor
and congestion probability. This framework is
tested in a real case study and a sensitivity analysis
Initialization
Power
Flow
Constraine
d Satisfied
Update Counter
Update Velocity
Update Position
Update individual Best , If
Needed
Update Global Best , If Needed
Power Flow
Constraint
Stop
NO
YES
YES
NO
International Journal of Research in Advanced Technology - IJORAT Vol. 2, Issue 3, MARCH 2016
All Rights Reserved © 2016 IJORAT 4
is performed to identify the influence of the main ESS design parameters in congestion
Fig-5.1 Simulation Model Of Proposed System
Figure 5.1 shows the simulation model of
the power system. In this system the generation and
distribution side was presented in this model. The
asynchronous generator was used in the wind
turbine. The main component of the generation side
is wind generator. The output of this model is given
below. The output is taken in the wind generator
side and also load side which shows the congestion
occur in the transmission side was mitigate and that
was managed with the PSO algorithm
Figure 5.2 shows the model of the
induction generator. In this project the IG used for
the better performance. It has the small settling
time to reach the constant rotor speed.
The output of the induction generator and
the system model output is given in the figure 5.3
and the figure 5.4
International Journal of Research in Advanced Technology - IJORAT Vol. 2, Issue 3, MARCH 2016
All Rights Reserved © 2016 IJORAT 5
Fig5.2 Model of induction Generator
Fig 5.3 Output of Wind generator
Fig 5.4 Output of Voltage level in the load
International Journal of Research in Advanced Technology - IJORAT Vol. 2, Issue 3, MARCH 2016
All Rights Reserved © 2016 IJORAT 6
VI CONCLUSION
In this work, wind power curtailment and energy storage
as transmission congestions mitigation measures are
analyzed. It is found that there is a dynamic interaction
that introduces an over cost when slow power plants are
re-dispatched. Congestion mitigation measures are
compared in terms of congestion probability, line load
factor and total energy curtailed. The following
behaviour is observed:
When using wind curtailment, there are two
effects. There is an economic impact on the
wind generator, due to the energy curtailed, not
sold to the system. Also, there is an over cost
on the system due to the re-dispatch.
When using ESS in combination with wind curtailment
the over cost effect may be reduced, but it cannot be
eliminated. As in the previous case, there is an economic
impact on the wind generator, and also on the system
REFERENCES
1) Panida Boonyaritdachochai , Chanwit Boonchuay,
Weerakorn Ongsakul “Optimal congestion
management in an electricity market using particle
swarm optimization with time-varying acceleration
coefficients” Computers and Mathematics with
Applications 60 (2010) 10681077
2) S. Thangalakshmi, P. Valsalal “Congestion
management using hybrid fish bee optimization”
Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information
Technology 20th December 2013. Vol. 58 No.2 ©
2005 - 2013 JATIT & LLS. All rights reserved
3) FarzadVazinram, MajidGandomkar, Javad Nikoukar
“ Optimal Active Power Rescheduling of Generators
for Congestion Management Based On Big Bang-
Big Crunch Optimization Using New Definition of
Sensitivity” International Journal of Engineering and
Advanced Technology (IJEAT) ISSN: 2249 – 8958,
Volume-3, Issue-2, December 2013
4) Dr. V.P. Sakthivel , S.V.Vijayasundaram “Chaotic
Particle Swarm Optimization for Congestion
Management in an Electricity Market” International
Journal of Scientific and Research Publications,
Volume 4, Issue 6, June 2014 1 ISSN 2250-3153
5) Jonas Eickmann, Tim Drees, Jens D. Sprey, Albert
Moser, “Optimizing Storages for Transmission
System Operation” 8th International Renewable
Energy Storage Conference and Exhibition, IRES
2013
6) P. Balachennaiah , M. Suryakalavathi , Palukuru
Nagendra, “Optimizing real power loss and voltage
stability limit of a large transmission network using
firefly algorithm” Engineering Science and
Technology, an International Journal (2015)
7) R. Saranya, K. Balamurugan, M.
Karuppasamypandiyan, “Artificial Bee Colony
Algorithm Based Congestion Management in
Restructured Power System” Indian Journal of
Science and Technology, Vol 8(S7), 171–178, April
2015
8) FarzadVazinram, MajidGandomkar, Mehdi
BayatMokhtari, “Congestion Management Using
Real and Reactive Power Rescheduling Based on
Big Bang-Big Crunch Optimization Algorithm ”
International Journal of Automation and Power
Engineering (IJAPE) Volume 3 Issue 3 May 2014
www.ijape.org DOI: 10.14355/ijape.2014.0303.02
9) Rajesh Retnamony , Dr. I. Jacob Raglend, “Multi-
Objective Congestion Management in a Deregulated
Power System - A Review ” Australian Journal of
Basic and Applied Sciences, 9(16) Special 2015,
Pages: 373-378
10) E.M. Mosconia, S. Poponia, C. Silvestria “Insights
into congestion costs and financial risk
management:the electricity market” The 5th
International Conference on Sustainable Energy
Information Technology (SEIT 2015)
11) Tobias Hennig, Lothar Löwer, Luis Mariano Faiella,
Sebastian Stock, Malte Jansen, Lutz Hofmann, Kurt
Rohrig “Ancillary Services Analysis of an Offshore
Wind Farm Cluster – Technical Integration Steps of
a Simulation Tool” EERA DeepWind’2014, 11th
Deep Sea Offshore Wind R&D Conference , Energy
Procedia 53 ( 2014 ) 114 – 123
12) CuicuiYanga, JunzhongJia,∗, JimingLiub,1,
JinduoLiua, BaocaiYina “Structural learning of
Bayesian networks by bacterial foraging
optimization” International Journal of Approximate
Reasoning 69 (2016) 147–167
13) Luis S. Vargas, Gonzalo Bustos-Turu, and Felipe
Larraín “Wind Power Curtailment and Energy
Storage in Transmission Congestion Management
Considering Power Plants Ramp Rates” IEEE
TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, VOL.
30, NO. 5, SEPTEMBER 2015