Evolution of the Var valley landscape

38
Evolution of the Var valley landscape Philippe AUDRA

description

Evolution of the Var valley landscape. Philippe AUDRA. GLOMAR CHALLENGER 1970 Deep Sea Drilling Project. Evaporites ≈ 5 Ma. N. Spain. Morocco. 3 (5.3 Ma). 2 (T < 0.5 Ma). 1 (5.9 Ma). Deep -basin, shallow -water model [ Hsü , Cita & Ryan, 1973]. 5.3 Ma: The Flood!. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Evolution of the Var valley landscape

Page 1: Evolution of  the Var valley  landscape

Evolution of the Var valley landscape

Philippe AUDRA

Page 2: Evolution of  the Var valley  landscape
Page 3: Evolution of  the Var valley  landscape

GLOMAR CHALLENGER 1970

Deep Sea Drilling Project

=> « Messinian » evaporites (6 Ma)

Page 4: Evolution of  the Var valley  landscape

Spain

Morocco

N

Page 5: Evolution of  the Var valley  landscape

Evaporites ≈ 5 Ma

Page 6: Evolution of  the Var valley  landscape

5.3 Ma: The Flood!

Page 7: Evolution of  the Var valley  landscape

Deep canyons onshore

EbroRhône Danube

Nile?

Page 8: Evolution of  the Var valley  landscape

Nile valley (Egypt) / Aswan dam900 km from shore / 200 m bsl.

Page 9: Evolution of  the Var valley  landscape
Page 10: Evolution of  the Var valley  landscape

A virtual canyon!

Page 11: Evolution of  the Var valley  landscape

A virtual canyon!

Page 12: Evolution of  the Var valley  landscape

Canyon’s geometry

Page 13: Evolution of  the Var valley  landscape

Canyon’s fill

Page 14: Evolution of  the Var valley  landscape

100 km long Canyon

Page 15: Evolution of  the Var valley  landscape

Var PaillonRoyaLoup

-1500 m / 15 km(10 %!)

Var mouth=> Submarine deep canyons

Page 16: Evolution of  the Var valley  landscape
Page 17: Evolution of  the Var valley  landscape

Depth 1000 m

Page 18: Evolution of  the Var valley  landscape

History at La Manda site

Before Messinian (6 Ma)=> Wide and low entrenched valley

Page 19: Evolution of  the Var valley  landscape

History at La Manda site

Messinian Crisis (5,96 – 5,32 Ma)=> Deep Canyon entrenchment

Page 20: Evolution of  the Var valley  landscape

History at La Manda site

Messinian Crisis (5,96 – 5,32 Ma)=> Deep Canyon entrenchment + tectonic uplift

Page 21: Evolution of  the Var valley  landscape

History at La Manda site

Messinian Crisis (5,96 – 5,32 Ma)=> collapse, breccia veneer along canyon slope

Page 22: Evolution of  the Var valley  landscape

History at La Manda site

Pliocene High Sea-level Stand (5,32 – 2 Ma)=> Canyon flooding by seawater

Page 23: Evolution of  the Var valley  landscape

History at La Manda site

Pliocene High Sea-level Stand (5,32 – 2 Ma)=> Raise WT => spongy karst (mixing zone)

Page 24: Evolution of  the Var valley  landscape

History at La Manda site

Pliocene High Sea-level Stand (5,32 – 2 Ma)=> 1/ Filling with marine clays

Page 25: Evolution of  the Var valley  landscape

History at La Manda site

Pliocene High Sea-level Stand (5,32 – 2 Ma)=> 2/ Filling with marine delta conglomerates

Page 26: Evolution of  the Var valley  landscape

History at La Manda site

Pliocene High Sea-level Stand (5,32 – 2 Ma)=> 3/ Filling with fluvial conglomerates

Page 27: Evolution of  the Var valley  landscape

History at La Manda site

Quaternary (2 Ma -> today)=> Entrenchment with levels of fluvial terraces

Page 28: Evolution of  the Var valley  landscape

History at La Manda site

Today…

Pliocene sea level = 350 m alt.

Uplift 300 m

Uplift 700 m

West East

Terraces in alluvium

Page 29: Evolution of  the Var valley  landscape

History at La Manda site

Today…

West East

Lateralrecharge

Vertical transferRiver / alluvium

Pic-Nic Carros Village!

Sea level 0 mBridge +60 m

Canyon bottom -300 / -700 m

Page 30: Evolution of  the Var valley  landscape

Flood plain:« Casier »(compartments)

Active channel:« natural » braided channel

Narrowing of active channel

Page 31: Evolution of  the Var valley  landscape

Sediment transport

Stream power = f(v)

Þ balance between erosion / sediment transport:

Þ if v ↓ => deposition (riverbed ↑ = aggradation)

Þ if v ↑ => erosion (riverbed ↓ = incision)

Þ if v steady => transport (equilibrium)

For a given v:

Þ if sediment load ↑ => deposition => riverbed ↑

Þ if sediment load ↓ => erosion => riverbed ↓

Page 32: Evolution of  the Var valley  landscape

Military map [J. BOURCET DE LA SAIGNE, Ingénieur ordinaire du Roy 1764-1769]

Sediment transport

Page 33: Evolution of  the Var valley  landscape

The sediment transport troubleManda Bridge

Weirs construction

Þ ponding (v ↓)

Þ sediments blocked upstream

Þ riverbed ↑

Þ Braided channel

2 m! Upstream segment

Page 34: Evolution of  the Var valley  landscape

The sediment transport trouble

Manda Bridge

Þ coarse sediments

blocked upstream

Þ fine load crosses

Þ eventually deposits

Þ vegetation dev.

Þ Rectilinear channelMiddle segment

Page 35: Evolution of  the Var valley  landscape

The sediment transport troubleÞ No load anymore!

Þ Erosion restart

Þ Riverbed incision

Þ Meandering channel

Lower segment6-8 m!

Page 36: Evolution of  the Var valley  landscape

Var online…http://www.vigicrues.gouv.fr/niv_spc.php?idspc=22

Page 38: Evolution of  the Var valley  landscape

See you tomorrow on the field!Meeting at 8:00

be on time!!!