Evolution of teacher`s argumentation

download Evolution of teacher`s argumentation

of 36

Transcript of Evolution of teacher`s argumentation

  • 8/16/2019 Evolution of teacher`s argumentation

    1/36

     

    Evolution of

    Teachers’Argumentation inMarine Fish

    Resource IssueCHIU !u"#en !U $hu"meyH$IA% Ming"chun HUA&' Hsin"

    chiao

    'raduate Institute of$cience A((lication and

    )issemination

    &ational Taichung University

  • 8/16/2019 Evolution of teacher`s argumentation

    2/36

     

    %+,ectives ofthe study● the differences of argumentation quality

      -from different epistemological views

      -in three rounds

      -Biology major & Science teaching

    ● evolution of teachers’ argumentation

  • 8/16/2019 Evolution of teacher`s argumentation

    3/36

     

    Theoretical

    frame#or- . Toulmin Argumentation Pattern TAP!( Toulmin" #$%) 

    'ata

    (ualifier

    )laim

    *e+uttal,arrant

    Bacing

  • 8/16/2019 Evolution of teacher`s argumentation

    4/36

     

    . Sadler and .owler’s /001!

    argumentation quality ru+ric

    2evel description

    0 3o justification

    #4ustification with no

    grounds

    / 4ustification with

    simple grounds

    5 4ustification withela+orated grounds

    6 4ustification withela+orated grounds

    and a counter position

  • 8/16/2019 Evolution of teacher`s argumentation

    5/36

     

    ● 7volution of argument 

    - )hange  - 7volution

      - 3o change

      4im’ene8-Alei9andre and Pereiro-:uno8

      " /00%!

    ● 7pistemological views

      - 7mpiricist-aligned 7!  - :i9ed :!

      - )onstructivist-oriented )!

    Tsai & 2iu" /00%!

  • 8/16/2019 Evolution of teacher`s argumentation

    6/36

     

    )esign and/rocedure

  • 8/16/2019 Evolution of teacher`s argumentation

    7/36 

    $u+,ect

    s.Twenty in-service primary and highschool teachers who are studying for

    a science education master degree in

    central Taiwan

    Central

    Taiwan

  • 8/16/2019 Evolution of teacher`s argumentation

    8/36 

    Instrument.Socio-scientific issue

    ;,hat marine fish resource policy

    should policy maers made in

    order to deal with the crises of

    marine fish resource

  • 8/16/2019 Evolution of teacher`s argumentation

    9/36 

    )esign

      ?The tas is set in e-learning system

      ?Teachers are ased to engage in three-roundargumentation

      @ :aing arguments

      @ *esponding others’ arguments and

    refining arguments

      @ roup discussion in the classroom

  • 8/16/2019 Evolution of teacher`s argumentation

    10/36

     

    )ata Collection and

    Analysis?)omponents & (uality ofargumentation

      - 7pistemological views

      - Three *ounds analysis  - Biology major & Science teaching

    ? 7volution of argumentation 

    ? nter-rater consistency of >$0 is

    achieved

  • 8/16/2019 Evolution of teacher`s argumentation

    11/36

     

    7pistemologicalviews

    Su+total3!

    7 %

    #0

    ) %

    E(istemological vie#s0Tsai 1 2iu 34456

  • 8/16/2019 Evolution of teacher`s argumentation

    12/36

     

    Biologymajor

    3on-+iologymajor

    Su+total3!

    Science

    teaching 5 6 C

    3on-science

    teaching

    $ 6 #5

    Su+total3! #/ /0

    7iology ma,or 1 $cience te

  • 8/16/2019 Evolution of teacher`s argumentation

    13/36

     

    Results and)iscussion

  • 8/16/2019 Evolution of teacher`s argumentation

    14/36

     

    Arguments of

    di8erente(istemologicalvie#s

    C: claim; D: data; W: warrant; R: rebuttal; Q: qualifier; B: backing

    E: empiricist-aligned; : mi!ed; C: c"nstructi#ist-"riented

  • 8/16/2019 Evolution of teacher`s argumentation

    15/36

     

    Quality of

    di8erente(istemologicalvie#s

    $: %e#el $; &: %e#el &; ': %e#el '; (: %e#el (; ): %e#el )

  • 8/16/2019 Evolution of teacher`s argumentation

    16/36

     

    Com(arison of arguments

    in three rounds

    *#D the first round argumentation" */D the second round argumentation"

    *5D the third round argumentation

  • 8/16/2019 Evolution of teacher`s argumentation

    17/36

     

    Quality of

    argumentationin three rounds

    $: %e#el $; &: %e#el &; ': %e#el '; (: %e#el (; ): %e#el )

  • 8/16/2019 Evolution of teacher`s argumentation

    18/36

     

    Biology Major, Science

     Teaching

    B*: Bi"l"g+ ma,"r .cience teac/ing; B*: Bi"l"g+ ma,"r *"n-science teac/ing

     *.: *"n-bi"l"g+ ma,"r .cience teac/ing; **: *"n-bi"l"g+ ma,"r *"n-science teac/ing

  • 8/16/2019 Evolution of teacher`s argumentation

    19/36

    2evel of change 7pistemological view Su+total

    )hange 7 0

    3E6F! : #

    ) 5F

    7volution 7 #

    3E%F! : 5

    ) #F

    3o change 7 63E#/! : 1

    ) /

    Fone have +oth change and evolution

    Change in teachers’(ositions

  • 8/16/2019 Evolution of teacher`s argumentation

    20/36

    7pistemological view 2evel of change Su+total

    7 )hange 0

    3E%! 7volution #

    3o change 6

    : )hange #3E#0! 7volution 5

    3o change 1

    ) )hange 5F

    3E%! 7volution #F

    3o change /

    F one has +oth change and evolution

  • 8/16/2019 Evolution of teacher`s argumentation

    21/36

     

    Conclusion 1 $uggestion

    ? 7mpiricist-aligned teachers have

      +etter quality>? Teachers have +etter quality in */>

    ? BS have +etter scores on level 5>

    ? )onstructivist-oriented teachers getmore changes>

  • 8/16/2019 Evolution of teacher`s argumentation

    22/36

     

    Than- you for yourattention9

    Questions orcomments:

  • 8/16/2019 Evolution of teacher`s argumentation

    23/36

    username

     passw"rd

    enter 

  • 8/16/2019 Evolution of teacher`s argumentation

    24/36

    %ife science argumentati"n

  • 8/16/2019 Evolution of teacher`s argumentation

    25/36

    c"urse

    interacti"n

  • 8/16/2019 Evolution of teacher`s argumentation

    26/36

    7cologists

    policy maers

     fishermen

    general persons

    roup #

    roup /

    roup 5

    roup 6

    ssue discussion

  • 8/16/2019 Evolution of teacher`s argumentation

    27/36

    number 

    title date aut/"r  

    Deli#er a new article

  • 8/16/2019 Evolution of teacher`s argumentation

    28/36

    title

    c"ntents

    0dditi"nal files

    c"nfirm cancel

  • 8/16/2019 Evolution of teacher`s argumentation

    29/36

  • 8/16/2019 Evolution of teacher`s argumentation

    30/36

  • 8/16/2019 Evolution of teacher`s argumentation

    31/36

    Arguments 'escription 79ample

    )laim

    )onclusion of that people try toconvince or to +uild itGs ownvalue" often showed in the way of; thinH= or ; agreeH=

    thin no matter how" fishery policies inTaiwan can’t stand alone from internationalorgani8ations and agreements>

    57$%#//C!

    'ata

    rounds to support the claim>t’s +ased on the non-am+iguityof data format" which candescri+e the term of the claimaccuracy>

    The main cause of the shortage of the currentfishery resources can +e" rather than the in-shore sightseeing fishery" inappropriate fishingtechniques with application of modern

    technology> 

    5B$%#/#$!

    Bacing

    To e9plain the data’s theorem>t’s a common theory foundationand can +e understood +y thepeople>

    .ood and Agriculture Irgani8ation .AI! haveaddress a warning to fishing countriesD n orderto restore the resources" it’s necessary to restrictfishing capacity in the short-term>

    6B$%#/#1!

    ,arrant

    To infer 'ata to claims and

    e9plain the relationship of thedata to the claim> t could +e arule" a principles" or the +ase ofinference>

    Because it’s ;high= price" in other words" it’s

    high income for fishermen and food suppliers>They will strive to catch marine lives for profit>And then mae marine fish and lives to death>

     #'$%#//0!

    (ualifiers

    t’s used to restrict the claim"illustrate the intensity of claim

    and in which area the claim issuita+le<

    Scholars will agree if it’s without pollution andhas a complete set>

    #A$10#0/!

  • 8/16/2019 Evolution of teacher`s argumentation

    32/36

    *e+uttal

    To illustrate in what situationthe claim can’t +e esta+lished>Ir having dou+ts a+out eitherthe claim" data" warrant"

    +acing or qualifier of anargument>

    *aising prices seems to let fishermen evenmore want to catch these fish which havehigh economical values> Thus they canincrease their income> *aising prices will

    decrease some ind of fish rapidly and can’tensure to let everyone have fish to eat> /A$%#//$!

    (uery

    To address questions to theclaim or arguments> t meansunclear message or

    furthermore question>

    But what ind of marine lives are rare andviewa+le< s there any clear definition to tellthe people or film and pu+lic welfare

    advertisement to let people watch< 6B#/#0!

    Ifftas 

    arguments or data which has

    no direct connection withissue

    ,e indeed have responsi+ility to care howwe consume glo+al marine resources andhow this influence the environment> 7ven ifwhat most people see is a dish of sashimi or a

    +owl of shar’s fin on the ta+le> But weshould now that if we don’t control the useof environmental resources" we or our laterperiod will get feed+ac> ,e have only oneearth and one ocean>

    57$%#/#!

  • 8/16/2019 Evolution of teacher`s argumentation

    33/36

    Argumentation Quality

    Rubric Score 'escription 79ample

    0 3o justification

    Any country in the world include Taiwan is a+solutelyhard to get away from a vicious circle which destroys theenvironment> lo+ali8ation have already e9isted> ,hatrole should Taiwan play among the closely lined+iosphere" atmosphere" and glo+al ocean current" and alsoin the powerful connection with contemporary technologyand economical system<57$%#/#!

    #4ustification with no

    grounds

     JTo conserve marine resources is the government and entirepeople’s duty> t’s also the inshore fishing’s prerequisiteconditions to eep sustaina+le use> J)5B$%#/#$!

    /4ustification with

    simple grounds

     JTo esta+lish a special agency to integrate the oceanmanagement> J)

      ─

    There’re a+out C to ocean-related

    departments in Taiwan> Some rights and duties areoverlapping" opposite" or insufficient> To deal with oceanaffairs often lac of communication and coordination>

    Besides" it’s time-consuming and achieve little> J, , So

    t’s necessary to esta+lish a special agency>

    /A$%#///!

    The sea shore 8one is an ecological sensitive area

  • 8/16/2019 Evolution of teacher`s argumentation

    34/36

    5

    4ustification with

    ela+oratedgrounds

     JThe sea shore 8one is an ecological-sensitive area>nappropriate developments usually cause serious

    environment damages> J,,─ So the environmental

    impact statement of coast developments is very

    important> J)。─” 7nvironmental impact statement=

    lay emphasis on the ;prevention= of environment

    protection> So any coast development programs should+e enforced in the term of planning" and on the premisethat protecting inshore fishing to eep sustaina+le use"and +e considered if it’s practica+le> After lifting thecurfew" Taiwan develop rapidly> The sea shore 8one"especially in the west" is developed highly concentrated>So the policies in the future should not only enforce the

    environmental impact statement and also consider theaccumulative impact" that is the accumulation of alldevelopments or the entire attacs to the environmentafter the reciprocal effect> Thus can carry out the true

    value of environmental impact statement> J'。

    /A$%#///!

    64ustification with a

    counter position

     J,e should protect marine fish resources to eepsustaina+le use and esta+lish correct fisheries control soas to let the people eat delicious seafood> J)> Jf we raisethe price of the seafood on the contrary" it’s not onlyuseless for the present situation" +ut also a e9ploitation to

    consuming rights and interests> J* 。

    #B$%#/#$!

  • 8/16/2019 Evolution of teacher`s argumentation

    35/36

    Change in teachers’

    (ositions2evel ofchange role 7pistemolo-gical view source dimension

    change

    3KP!

    fisherman ) roup

    discussion

    :arine resources

    protecting area

    change

    PK3!

    generalperson

    : Paper report Legetarianism

    change

    3KP!

    ecologist ) roupdiscussion

    *estrict to catch someind of fish

    change

    3KP!

    fisherman ) Paper report *estrict to catch some

    ind of fish

    2evel ofl

    7pistemolodi i

  • 8/16/2019 Evolution of teacher`s argumentation

    36/36

    changerole

    p-gical view

    source dimension

    7volution

    PKP! ecologist : 7-learning :arine resources protectingarea K until the environment-

    clean technique is mature

    PKP! fisherman ) roup discussion sightseeing fishery Kmainly onseafood

    PKP! fisherman 7 roup discussion& paper reports

    nshore cultivate fishing &sightseeing fishery K planned

    +y the government

    PKP! ecologist : roup discussion sightseeing fishery K)onsulting other successfulcountries" planned and guided

    +y the government>

    PKP! policymaer

    : 7-learning 'ig out smuggling K through afair and just procedure