Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory curs 2 (Argumentation and Discussion)
Evolution of teacher`s argumentation
-
Upload
hector-garcia -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of Evolution of teacher`s argumentation
-
8/16/2019 Evolution of teacher`s argumentation
1/36
Evolution of
Teachers’Argumentation inMarine Fish
Resource IssueCHIU !u"#en !U $hu"meyH$IA% Ming"chun HUA&' Hsin"
chiao
'raduate Institute of$cience A((lication and
)issemination
&ational Taichung University
-
8/16/2019 Evolution of teacher`s argumentation
2/36
%+,ectives ofthe study● the differences of argumentation quality
-from different epistemological views
-in three rounds
-Biology major & Science teaching
● evolution of teachers’ argumentation
-
8/16/2019 Evolution of teacher`s argumentation
3/36
Theoretical
frame#or- . Toulmin Argumentation Pattern TAP!( Toulmin" #$%)
'ata
(ualifier
)laim
*e+uttal,arrant
Bacing
-
8/16/2019 Evolution of teacher`s argumentation
4/36
. Sadler and .owler’s /001!
argumentation quality ru+ric
2evel description
0 3o justification
#4ustification with no
grounds
/ 4ustification with
simple grounds
5 4ustification withela+orated grounds
6 4ustification withela+orated grounds
and a counter position
-
8/16/2019 Evolution of teacher`s argumentation
5/36
● 7volution of argument
- )hange - 7volution
- 3o change
4im’ene8-Alei9andre and Pereiro-:uno8
" /00%!
● 7pistemological views
- 7mpiricist-aligned 7! - :i9ed :!
- )onstructivist-oriented )!
Tsai & 2iu" /00%!
-
8/16/2019 Evolution of teacher`s argumentation
6/36
)esign and/rocedure
-
8/16/2019 Evolution of teacher`s argumentation
7/36
$u+,ect
s.Twenty in-service primary and highschool teachers who are studying for
a science education master degree in
central Taiwan
Central
Taiwan
-
8/16/2019 Evolution of teacher`s argumentation
8/36
Instrument.Socio-scientific issue
;,hat marine fish resource policy
should policy maers made in
order to deal with the crises of
marine fish resource
-
8/16/2019 Evolution of teacher`s argumentation
9/36
)esign
?The tas is set in e-learning system
?Teachers are ased to engage in three-roundargumentation
@ :aing arguments
@ *esponding others’ arguments and
refining arguments
@ roup discussion in the classroom
-
8/16/2019 Evolution of teacher`s argumentation
10/36
)ata Collection and
Analysis?)omponents & (uality ofargumentation
- 7pistemological views
- Three *ounds analysis - Biology major & Science teaching
? 7volution of argumentation
? nter-rater consistency of >$0 is
achieved
-
8/16/2019 Evolution of teacher`s argumentation
11/36
7pistemologicalviews
Su+total3!
7 %
:
#0
) %
E(istemological vie#s0Tsai 1 2iu 34456
-
8/16/2019 Evolution of teacher`s argumentation
12/36
Biologymajor
3on-+iologymajor
Su+total3!
Science
teaching 5 6 C
3on-science
teaching
$ 6 #5
Su+total3! #/ /0
7iology ma,or 1 $cience te
-
8/16/2019 Evolution of teacher`s argumentation
13/36
Results and)iscussion
-
8/16/2019 Evolution of teacher`s argumentation
14/36
Arguments of
di8erente(istemologicalvie#s
C: claim; D: data; W: warrant; R: rebuttal; Q: qualifier; B: backing
E: empiricist-aligned; : mi!ed; C: c"nstructi#ist-"riented
-
8/16/2019 Evolution of teacher`s argumentation
15/36
Quality of
di8erente(istemologicalvie#s
$: %e#el $; &: %e#el &; ': %e#el '; (: %e#el (; ): %e#el )
-
8/16/2019 Evolution of teacher`s argumentation
16/36
Com(arison of arguments
in three rounds
*#D the first round argumentation" */D the second round argumentation"
*5D the third round argumentation
-
8/16/2019 Evolution of teacher`s argumentation
17/36
Quality of
argumentationin three rounds
$: %e#el $; &: %e#el &; ': %e#el '; (: %e#el (; ): %e#el )
-
8/16/2019 Evolution of teacher`s argumentation
18/36
Biology Major, Science
Teaching
B*: Bi"l"g+ ma,"r .cience teac/ing; B*: Bi"l"g+ ma,"r *"n-science teac/ing
*.: *"n-bi"l"g+ ma,"r .cience teac/ing; **: *"n-bi"l"g+ ma,"r *"n-science teac/ing
-
8/16/2019 Evolution of teacher`s argumentation
19/36
2evel of change 7pistemological view Su+total
)hange 7 0
3E6F! : #
) 5F
7volution 7 #
3E%F! : 5
) #F
3o change 7 63E#/! : 1
) /
Fone have +oth change and evolution
Change in teachers’(ositions
-
8/16/2019 Evolution of teacher`s argumentation
20/36
7pistemological view 2evel of change Su+total
7 )hange 0
3E%! 7volution #
3o change 6
: )hange #3E#0! 7volution 5
3o change 1
) )hange 5F
3E%! 7volution #F
3o change /
F one has +oth change and evolution
-
8/16/2019 Evolution of teacher`s argumentation
21/36
Conclusion 1 $uggestion
? 7mpiricist-aligned teachers have
+etter quality>? Teachers have +etter quality in */>
? BS have +etter scores on level 5>
? )onstructivist-oriented teachers getmore changes>
-
8/16/2019 Evolution of teacher`s argumentation
22/36
Than- you for yourattention9
Questions orcomments:
-
8/16/2019 Evolution of teacher`s argumentation
23/36
username
passw"rd
enter
-
8/16/2019 Evolution of teacher`s argumentation
24/36
%ife science argumentati"n
-
8/16/2019 Evolution of teacher`s argumentation
25/36
c"urse
interacti"n
-
8/16/2019 Evolution of teacher`s argumentation
26/36
7cologists
policy maers
fishermen
general persons
roup #
roup /
roup 5
roup 6
ssue discussion
-
8/16/2019 Evolution of teacher`s argumentation
27/36
number
title date aut/"r
Deli#er a new article
-
8/16/2019 Evolution of teacher`s argumentation
28/36
title
c"ntents
0dditi"nal files
c"nfirm cancel
-
8/16/2019 Evolution of teacher`s argumentation
29/36
-
8/16/2019 Evolution of teacher`s argumentation
30/36
-
8/16/2019 Evolution of teacher`s argumentation
31/36
Arguments 'escription 79ample
)laim
)onclusion of that people try toconvince or to +uild itGs ownvalue" often showed in the way of; thinH= or ; agreeH=
thin no matter how" fishery policies inTaiwan can’t stand alone from internationalorgani8ations and agreements>
57$%#//C!
'ata
rounds to support the claim>t’s +ased on the non-am+iguityof data format" which candescri+e the term of the claimaccuracy>
The main cause of the shortage of the currentfishery resources can +e" rather than the in-shore sightseeing fishery" inappropriate fishingtechniques with application of modern
technology>
5B$%#/#$!
Bacing
To e9plain the data’s theorem>t’s a common theory foundationand can +e understood +y thepeople>
.ood and Agriculture Irgani8ation .AI! haveaddress a warning to fishing countriesD n orderto restore the resources" it’s necessary to restrictfishing capacity in the short-term>
6B$%#/#1!
,arrant
To infer 'ata to claims and
e9plain the relationship of thedata to the claim> t could +e arule" a principles" or the +ase ofinference>
Because it’s ;high= price" in other words" it’s
high income for fishermen and food suppliers>They will strive to catch marine lives for profit>And then mae marine fish and lives to death>
#'$%#//0!
(ualifiers
t’s used to restrict the claim"illustrate the intensity of claim
and in which area the claim issuita+le<
Scholars will agree if it’s without pollution andhas a complete set>
#A$10#0/!
-
8/16/2019 Evolution of teacher`s argumentation
32/36
*e+uttal
To illustrate in what situationthe claim can’t +e esta+lished>Ir having dou+ts a+out eitherthe claim" data" warrant"
+acing or qualifier of anargument>
*aising prices seems to let fishermen evenmore want to catch these fish which havehigh economical values> Thus they canincrease their income> *aising prices will
decrease some ind of fish rapidly and can’tensure to let everyone have fish to eat> /A$%#//$!
(uery
To address questions to theclaim or arguments> t meansunclear message or
furthermore question>
But what ind of marine lives are rare andviewa+le< s there any clear definition to tellthe people or film and pu+lic welfare
advertisement to let people watch< 6B#/#0!
Ifftas
arguments or data which has
no direct connection withissue
,e indeed have responsi+ility to care howwe consume glo+al marine resources andhow this influence the environment> 7ven ifwhat most people see is a dish of sashimi or a
+owl of shar’s fin on the ta+le> But weshould now that if we don’t control the useof environmental resources" we or our laterperiod will get feed+ac> ,e have only oneearth and one ocean>
57$%#/#!
-
8/16/2019 Evolution of teacher`s argumentation
33/36
Argumentation Quality
Rubric Score 'escription 79ample
0 3o justification
Any country in the world include Taiwan is a+solutelyhard to get away from a vicious circle which destroys theenvironment> lo+ali8ation have already e9isted> ,hatrole should Taiwan play among the closely lined+iosphere" atmosphere" and glo+al ocean current" and alsoin the powerful connection with contemporary technologyand economical system<57$%#/#!
#4ustification with no
grounds
JTo conserve marine resources is the government and entirepeople’s duty> t’s also the inshore fishing’s prerequisiteconditions to eep sustaina+le use> J)5B$%#/#$!
/4ustification with
simple grounds
JTo esta+lish a special agency to integrate the oceanmanagement> J)
─
There’re a+out C to ocean-related
departments in Taiwan> Some rights and duties areoverlapping" opposite" or insufficient> To deal with oceanaffairs often lac of communication and coordination>
Besides" it’s time-consuming and achieve little> J, , So
t’s necessary to esta+lish a special agency>
/A$%#///!
The sea shore 8one is an ecological sensitive area
-
8/16/2019 Evolution of teacher`s argumentation
34/36
5
4ustification with
ela+oratedgrounds
JThe sea shore 8one is an ecological-sensitive area>nappropriate developments usually cause serious
environment damages> J,,─ So the environmental
impact statement of coast developments is very
important> J)。─” 7nvironmental impact statement=
lay emphasis on the ;prevention= of environment
protection> So any coast development programs should+e enforced in the term of planning" and on the premisethat protecting inshore fishing to eep sustaina+le use"and +e considered if it’s practica+le> After lifting thecurfew" Taiwan develop rapidly> The sea shore 8one"especially in the west" is developed highly concentrated>So the policies in the future should not only enforce the
environmental impact statement and also consider theaccumulative impact" that is the accumulation of alldevelopments or the entire attacs to the environmentafter the reciprocal effect> Thus can carry out the true
value of environmental impact statement> J'。
/A$%#///!
64ustification with a
counter position
J,e should protect marine fish resources to eepsustaina+le use and esta+lish correct fisheries control soas to let the people eat delicious seafood> J)> Jf we raisethe price of the seafood on the contrary" it’s not onlyuseless for the present situation" +ut also a e9ploitation to
consuming rights and interests> J* 。
#B$%#/#$!
-
8/16/2019 Evolution of teacher`s argumentation
35/36
Change in teachers’
(ositions2evel ofchange role 7pistemolo-gical view source dimension
change
3KP!
fisherman ) roup
discussion
:arine resources
protecting area
change
PK3!
generalperson
: Paper report Legetarianism
change
3KP!
ecologist ) roupdiscussion
*estrict to catch someind of fish
change
3KP!
fisherman ) Paper report *estrict to catch some
ind of fish
2evel ofl
7pistemolodi i
-
8/16/2019 Evolution of teacher`s argumentation
36/36
changerole
p-gical view
source dimension
7volution
PKP! ecologist : 7-learning :arine resources protectingarea K until the environment-
clean technique is mature
PKP! fisherman ) roup discussion sightseeing fishery Kmainly onseafood
PKP! fisherman 7 roup discussion& paper reports
nshore cultivate fishing &sightseeing fishery K planned
+y the government
PKP! ecologist : roup discussion sightseeing fishery K)onsulting other successfulcountries" planned and guided
+y the government>
PKP! policymaer
: 7-learning 'ig out smuggling K through afair and just procedure