Evolution, Education and Evaluation: Tree-thinking in Intro Biology

23
Evolution, Education and Evaluation: Tree-thinking in Intro Biology Phil Gibson OU TSI October 20, 2011

description

Evolution, Education and Evaluation: Tree-thinking in Intro Biology. Phil Gibson OU TSI October 20, 2011. Miller, J.D., E.C. Scott, and S. Okamato. 2006. Public Acceptance of Evolution. Science . 313: 765-766. The Basic Ideas of Tree-thinking. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Evolution, Education and Evaluation: Tree-thinking in Intro Biology

Page 1: Evolution, Education and Evaluation: Tree-thinking in Intro Biology

Evolution, Education and Evaluation: Tree-thinking inIntro Biology

Phil Gibson

OU TSI October 20, 2011

Page 2: Evolution, Education and Evaluation: Tree-thinking in Intro Biology

Miller, J.D., E.C. Scott, and S. Okamato. 2006. Public Acceptance of Evolution. Science. 313: 765-766.

Page 3: Evolution, Education and Evaluation: Tree-thinking in Intro Biology

The Basic Ideas of Tree-thinking

“Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution." Theodosius Dobzhansky (1973)

“Nothing in evolution makes sense except in the light of phylogeny.” (Society of Systematic Biologists 2001).

“Nothing makes sense in phylogeny except in the light of DNA.” (Kalinowski et al. 2010)

Page 4: Evolution, Education and Evaluation: Tree-thinking in Intro Biology

Tree-Thinking

Page 5: Evolution, Education and Evaluation: Tree-thinking in Intro Biology

Tree-Thinking

Page 6: Evolution, Education and Evaluation: Tree-thinking in Intro Biology

• Question #1: What is the relationship between ability to read phylogenetic trees relate and acceptance of evolution?

• Question #2: How does student understanding of natural selection and genetics relate to understanding and acceptance of evolution?

• Question #3: Will a tree-thinking based curriculum using active learning modules improve student understanding and acceptance of evolution and evolutionary theory?

What we want to know

Page 7: Evolution, Education and Evaluation: Tree-thinking in Intro Biology

BIOL 1134 Evolution, Ecology, & Diversity

1. Encourage understanding and appreciation for major, modern biological thought and theories:

– Unity and diversity of life (DNA and genetic variation)– History of life (evolution and phylogeny)– Relationship between structure and function (adaptation)– Focus on life at the individual, population, community,

and ecosystem levels (hierarchical organization, interdependence)

2. Develop student skills, understanding, and appreciation for the nature of science.

– Thinking, reasoning, and problem-solving in biology. – Prediction and hypothesis testing in science. – Data collection, analysis, and interpretation– Group collaboration and interactions.

Page 8: Evolution, Education and Evaluation: Tree-thinking in Intro Biology

DNA & GeneticsDNA & Genetics

Inheritance & Pedigrees

Inheritance & Pedigrees

EvolutionConcepts & Mechanisms

EvolutionConcepts & Mechanisms

PhylogeneticsRead & Construct

Trees

PhylogeneticsRead & Construct

Trees

Application(Biodiversity

surveys, adaptations,

speciation etc.)

Application(Biodiversity

surveys, adaptations,

speciation etc.)

Tree-thinking Curriculum Structure

Page 9: Evolution, Education and Evaluation: Tree-thinking in Intro Biology

Components of the curriculum.

• Genetic basis of phylogeny & tree thinking: genetics, inheritance, and population genetics

• Principles of tree-thinking: how-to of phylogeny construction and interpretation

• Application of tree-thinking: opportunities to collect and analyze data, processes of hypothesis development and testing

• Modules: Case study, group inquiry, active learning

Page 10: Evolution, Education and Evaluation: Tree-thinking in Intro Biology

Pedigree Analysis & Genetics

Page 11: Evolution, Education and Evaluation: Tree-thinking in Intro Biology

Phylogeny of Domestic Dog Breeds – Result of Artificial

Selection

Page 12: Evolution, Education and Evaluation: Tree-thinking in Intro Biology

Platypus Reproduction & Mammalian Evolution

Page 13: Evolution, Education and Evaluation: Tree-thinking in Intro Biology

Pollination and Floral Evolution

Page 14: Evolution, Education and Evaluation: Tree-thinking in Intro Biology

A Deadly Passion: Evolution of Sexual Cannibalism

Australian redback spider

Praying mantis Scorpion

Page 15: Evolution, Education and Evaluation: Tree-thinking in Intro Biology

Assessment & Evaluation

• Measure of the Acceptance of the Theory of Evolution (MATE): 20 question Likert-scale survey (Rutledge & Sadler 2007)

• Tree-thinking Challenge, Understanding Phylogenetic Trees, Tree Thinking Concept Inventory Variety of questions to read and construct phylogenetic trees. (Baum et al. 2005, Meir et al. 2007, Neagle 2009)

• Concept Inventory of Natural Selection, Genetics Concept Assessment (Anderson & Fisher 2002, Smith et al. 2008)

Page 16: Evolution, Education and Evaluation: Tree-thinking in Intro Biology

MATE pre-post Comparison

Page 17: Evolution, Education and Evaluation: Tree-thinking in Intro Biology

Tree Reading Assessments

Page 18: Evolution, Education and Evaluation: Tree-thinking in Intro Biology

MATE & TTCI Spring 2011

Page 19: Evolution, Education and Evaluation: Tree-thinking in Intro Biology

MATE, Natural Selection & Genetics

Page 20: Evolution, Education and Evaluation: Tree-thinking in Intro Biology

Normalized Learning Gain

Page 21: Evolution, Education and Evaluation: Tree-thinking in Intro Biology

Deeper Analysis & the Education Literature

• The education literature is rich with techniques for further analysis

• Item Analysis, Discrimination Index calculations, Cronbach’s α provide further insights that basic statistics don’t reveal.

• Further analysis of specific questions and answers.

Page 22: Evolution, Education and Evaluation: Tree-thinking in Intro Biology

What we’ve learned so far. . .

• Tree-thinking curriculum appears to increase understanding and acceptance of evolutionary theory.

• Acceptance of evolution is related to tree-thinking ability knowledge of natural selection, and knowledge of genetics.

• Better assessments are needed.• There’s more work to do!

Page 23: Evolution, Education and Evaluation: Tree-thinking in Intro Biology

Acknowledgements

• National Science Foundation – DUE #0940835

• The University of Oklahoma – College of Arts and Sciences,

Department of Botany and Microbiology, Department of Zoology

• J. Cooper, M. Jones, S. Rhodes, A. Makowicz, C. Poindexter, M. Gibson, D. Washecheck

All research conducted under OU IRB# 12682