Evolution, Compassion and The New Spiritualities Paul Gilbert PhD FBPsS Mental Health Research Unit...
-
Upload
jacob-foxall -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of Evolution, Compassion and The New Spiritualities Paul Gilbert PhD FBPsS Mental Health Research Unit...
Evolution, Compassion and The New Spiritualities
Paul Gilbert PhD FBPsSMental Health Research Unit
Derby Universityand Mental Health Trust
Kingsway HospitalDerby
compassionatemind.co.uk
New Spiritual Focus Alistair Hardy explored lived experiences
“Have you ever been aware of, or influenced by a power, whether you call it God or not, which is different from your
everyday self”
Expansiveness - beyond the self or current reality
Connectedness - peacefulness
Environment and sensory cues
Reorganises self-values
Religion and Spiritualities
The word religion comes from the Latin religiere meaning to reconnect
Religious schools and beliefs focus on forms of connectedness and meaning
Forms of connectedness are shaped via innate mechanisms for understanding social roles
God images shaped by socio-economic processes –e.g., help in warfare or nurture harvests.
What Shapes the forms for Religion and Spiritualities?
Heath, Bell and Sternberg (2001) point out that to adopt a belief system, like a belief in witchcraft, God, or the power of compassion, the focus must be on something that is relevant to a person and have certain qualities and functions
Public engagement
Personal endorsement
Nature of threat (physical, isolation, meaning, control)
Religion and spiritualities
* Usually contains messages about types of threat and how to deal with them (e.g., have to develop a relationship with them to win them over)
* Is transpersonal (affects others)
* Must fit with the ecological needs of the group (e.g., developing beliefs in Gods of the sea are relevant to sea farers but not land locked peoples)
* Guides social behaviours and informs rituals; it is emotionally textured, and it provides a sense of group coherence and belonging (believing in the same things)
Place in Historical and Cultural Contexts Soul Concepts –Relational (Single or Multiple Gods)
Vadic tradition – Life as a journey - soul progresses/evolves via learning via trails -- re-incarnationArabic tradition - World is where one is tested: Good go to heaven and bad are punishedGreek/Roman - We are play things of the Gods: can aspire to join the elite – nice and unpleasant places after deathChristianity - Introduces family and attachment psychology
Pantheism God Consciousness pervades all - Material world (including humans) are patterns of its form
God AS…..
God as beyond human reason and human understanding - the unknown (as in Aristotle) versus God as human-like with feelings, passions and desires - issue of projection vs empathy
God as awakening via the consciousness of humans (as in Jung) versus God as already fully formed and conscious and in the process of revealing himself to us
God as accessible only via deep mediation, intuition and mystical knowledge versus God who relies on science, reason and philosophy to reveal himself
God as a personal and available deity with whom we can personally relate versus God as an impersonal, pantheistic force (as in Star Wars movies; or Buddha consciousness)
God as a Performer of Functions
Social Regulator (social function)
Law giver/judge
Leader/protector
Ultimate authority/power to reward/punish
The more threatened groups feel the more submissive behaviour and obedience dominates the forms
Personal Self/Object (personal function)
Father
Soother
SaviourBlade Runner – kill the creator
Jung “save us from what”
Forms of Spirituality
Relational Spiritualities
Solutions to external threat – meaning and safeness
Social mentalities/relational mind, dialogical
Held in mind of a ‘powerful’ other - protection
Attachment, gratitude, submissive, appeasement devotion, group loyalty
Forgiveness (de-shame), atonement, acceptance, love meaning, re-union, coming home
Internal Spiritualities
Solution to internal threats (unruly mind, attachment to desires)
Mind training (mediation) meta-cognitive mind, non-dialogical
Compassion - common humanity
Enlightenment into the true nature of consciousness and free from the wheel of reincarnation
Evolution, Religion
and Spiritualities
DarwinDarwin’s theories emerge in industrial age – influenced by both Malthus and economic thought -Species are transformed via the struggle for survival – not economic - but natural selection
“Whatever the cause may be of each slight difference in the offspring from their parents - and a cause for each must exist – it is the steady accumulation, through natural selection, of such differences, when beneficial to the individual, that gives rise to all the more important modifications of structure, by which the innumerable beings on the face of the earth are enabled to struggle with each other, and the best adapted to survive” (1859/1979, p. 203-4)
Innate and Acquired(v) Genotype (v) Environment = (v) Phenotype Genotypes are potential competencies for - Examples: Language, attachment, defensive behaviours
Phenotypes are the expressed or manifest traits/outputs that are observable or measurable
Examples: Styles of language, attachment.
Evolution, religion and spiritualities
Evolution theory cannot be used to prove the existence or non-existence of Gods or supernatural realms e.g., God as designer can set whole system up (e.g. the material universe) with laws that facilitates the emergence of forms
We can use evolution theory and ‘knowledge of our minds’ to study the emergence of forms and minds that try to understand the emergence of forms
Our minds have evolved to cope with threats, acquire resources and reproduce – We have become ‘meaning-making’ ‘curious and seeking’ -- and we alone know that we will die and maybe cease to exist -
Self-Protection
In species without attachment only 1-2% make it to adulthood to reproduce. Threats come from ecologies, food shortage, predation, injury, disease. At birth individuals must be able to “go it alone” be mobile and disperse
Mind evolved with a range of special systems for self-defense that fuel raid onset emotions (fear, anger disgust) and behaviour [fight flight, submit expel].
Self-vs-others protectionIn species without attachment only 1-2% make it to adulthood to reproduce. Threats come from ecologies, food shortage, predation, injury, disease. At birth individuals must be able to “go it alone” be mobile and disperse
Attachment as “looking after.” Individuals obtain protection, food and care when ill. Seeking closeness rather than dispersion. Few offspring but high survival rate.
Co-operative and mutual support when ‘your’ prosperity impacts on mine
Overview of an EvolutionaryJourney
Attachment
Threat Safeness Compassion
Mutual support
Self -Regulation
Types of Affect Regulator Systems
Incentive/resource focused
Seeking and behaviour activating
Dopamine (?)
Affiliative focused
Soothing/safeness
Opiates (?)
Threat-focused safety seeking
Activating/inhibitingSerotonin (?)
Anger, anxiety disgust
Drive, excite, vitality Content, safe, connect
Evolution, Brain and Social Roles
Evolution and Social Roles
Human Symbolic thought and self-identity, theory of mind, metacognition
Mammalian Caring, group, alliance-
building, play, status
Reptilian Territory, aggression, sex, hunting
Four Evolved Processing DomainsThreat vs safe: All animals must decide this in their domain of existence. Links to evolved, basic emotions of threat (anger, anxiety, disgust) and basic emotions of safeness and reward
Role forming: mammals have specialised motivational and processing systems that are role-focused (e.g. for attachment, friendship, and sex, similarity)
Human cognitive systems: language, use symbols, use meta-cognition, imagine/fantasise and inwardly model –access to…
Self-regulating systems: Self-evaluation, self-identities and self-to-self relating
Biosocial Goal and Social Mentality Theory
Animals must engage in various ‘social tasks’ to secure their genes being represented in subsequent generations
Evolution enables animals to communicate with each other and co-construct social roles for these tasks
Evolution provides mechanisms (motives, emotions cognitive and behavior systems) for role creation and it is the organization of these elements that are key for competent social enactments
The (human) organisation of social mentalities is choreographed via self-identity forming systems
Social Mentalities
Goals require attention directing and processing systems that provide feedback for goal corrections
Social mentalities are thus the psychological steering mechanisms for BioSocial Goals
Social Mentalities choreograph and pattern emotions behaviours and cognitions according to how goal seeking has been successful, failed or punished
In constant process of blending and internal co-regulating and give rise to ‘States of Mind’
Biosocial Goals and Social Mentalities
Biosocial goals motivate movement towards co-creations
Care seeking Goal to obtain inputs from others that enhance prosperity
Care giving Goal is to engage with others that foster prosperity in ‘the other ‘
Cooperation Goal is to share, building reciprocal alliances, make a contribution and have a sense of belonging and connectedness with others
Competing Obtain and defend resources and control conducive to prosperity
Sexual Attract and be attracted to others for sexual engagement
Social mentalitiesAre role focused and thus always include self-to-other and other-to-self -- we use each other for goal securing
Seek to co-construct roles via interactional ‘dances’
Pattern and choreograph social motives, emotions and fantasies
Mature with the unfolding of developmental abilities
Pattern and choreograph physiological activity
Blend together or conflict as self-identities emerge
Self-Other Role Co-Creations
Care-seeking
Care-giving
Co-operating
Competing
Sexual
Self As
Needing seeking
Providing alleviating
Sharing belonging
Power comparing
Attracting attracted
Other ASProviding alleviating
Needing seeking
Sharing belonging
Power comparing
Attracting attracted
Innate motivational (seeking) systems with range of emotional and cognitive processing systems that link to a ‘sense of self’’ A Self As……
Monitoring Threat/safenessAvailability access
Distress in other empathy
Similarity cheating
Relative power talents abilities
Attractiveness
Self-vs-others protectionIn species without attachment only 1-2% make it to adulthood to reproduce. Threats come from ecologies, food shortage, predation, injury, disease. At birth individuals must be able to “go it alone” be mobile and disperse
Caring and Attachment as “looking after.” Individuals obtain protection, food and care when ill. Seeking closeness rather than dispersion. Few offspring but high survival rate.
Co-operative and mutual support when ‘your’ prosperity impacts on mine
Care eliciting
This aspect of our nature is activated when we see ourselves in a state of need; a need that cannot (in the first instance) be satisfied by recourse to our own selves or human social relationships. When care eliciting motivates the religious relationship to God, God is constructed as a superior other, sometimes in the form of a parent (Father or Mother figure) to whom we turn for love, help and understanding. Our ideal is for unconditional love. There is a yearning for closeness, union, protection and rescue, and a fear of abandonment. We are rescued from the oblivion of death by the fact of God. The upside is that we may indeed find a way to create these feelings and satisfy our need for care and love; we open ourselves up to ‘receive’. In prayer we ask for things (love, knowledge, wisdom, strength etc.) The down side is that we can remain dependent on the external deity.
Care-giving
One cannot elicit love and investment from another unless the other is prepared to give it. So God is created as a limitless source of love, care and wisdom. The caring mentality also invites us to be caring to others; to develop our basic compassion for others and to utilise our altruistic strategies in relationships.
We believe that God has our best interests at heart (is not indifferent) and wants to see us mature, grow and prosper, to come into a closer relationship with him/her.
Co-operationHere the relationship is seen more as a transaction; God gives us something in exchange for something, and we are aware of this trade. It is not unconditional love but love that is conditional - if you behave ‘this way’ you are accepted, if you don't, you are not.
Cooperation also tends towards the desire for conformity; that is religion is used to subdue intra-group conflicts and to harmonies values and beliefs. We are invited to think we are all the same, of one tribe and group, with one leader
Jung, in his book Answer to Job, came up with the idea that God needs us as much as we need God
Competitive and rank-focusedBeliefs and experiences of the spiritual are textured by complex hierarchical, leader-follower relationships. Then arises all the questions of the powers of the leader to ordain and order, to punish disobedience, to make special and offer prestige. The themes of inferior-superior, dominate-subordinate, shame and pride, weave their plots. Today the strife that arises as religions `compete' for the minds of people is enormous and some fear that religion will be used as a focus for yet more major wars. Sometimes people within such social structures are into crusades, to win converts to the armies of God. Often certain individuals will give themselves status and prestige, and there is a ladder or highly ranked structure to God, with the priests and popes etc. at the top.
God as experienced vai our social mentalities or archetypes
We cannot experience the mind of the other directly but only through their emitted behaviours and our interpretation of those behaviours
We will use archetypal forms to impose meaning and co-create roles
Role enactments create powerful emotional experiences that can be interpreted in spiritual ways
Dark SideOften linked to feelings of threat and injustice – easily manipulated by leaders
Revert to basic threat system solutions
Strong in-group ties
Needs for specialness (not common humanity) submission obedience – rigidity creates safeness (Cults)
Spiritualities must therefore consider issues of social justice and the creation of safeness
Therapy We are all seekers, confronting fears and challenges of ‘finding ourselves here’
So spirituality is often fundamental to mental health and not a decontextualised process
We have yearnings for social connectedness, to be valued by others and for life to be meaningful
These yearnings can lead us into practice and insights, compassion and healing – but also into dangers and destructiveness
Spirituality can be explored in regard to basic human psychology and the nature of our short, and for many, harsh existence
To feel safe and valued and loved changes our journey into the spiritual
Compassion
Long history to the idea that compassion relates to the integration of various of our qualities of mind
It is a way of seeing an experience the world
It requires training
It organise the brain into new patterns that give rise to certain types of experience
Definitions of CompassionBuddhist As loving kindness; open heartedness‘deep feeling and understanding of the suffering of others associated with a deep commitment and responsibility to try to alleviate it’
Develop the Perfections (Paramitas - to carry across –oceans of suffering to enlightenment)
Generosity
Ethical Behaviour Patience
Concentration
EffortWisdom
Compassion
Other Views of Compassion
Definitions stretch back to Buddhism and Aristotle: suffering as non- trivial; non-deserved. and one can have empathy
McKay & Fanning (1992) understanding, acceptance and forgiveness
Neff (2003)Kindness-warmthCommon humanityMindfulness-Non-judgemental
Gilbert (1989, 2000, 2005)A mental orientation that combines various, care focused qualities of mind and is dependent on those qualities
Components of compassionfrom the care giving mentality
Compassion
Sympathy
EmpathyNon-judgement
Care for well being
Distress sensitive
Distress tolerant
Create opportunities for growth and change With Warmth
Compassion Practice
Mindful compassion involves learning to direct one’s attention in a nonjudgmental fashion in order train one’s mind to organize itself via compassion and activate soothing system as a key affect regulator.
It involves mindful practice of compassion focusing via attention, thinking, behaviour and feeling that involves:
Process
Imagery
Goals
Compassion Practice
Insight, Practice and DevelopmentProcess
Therapeutic relationship, formulation, basic view of evolution and personhood
Imagery
From memory and fantasy
Tasks/exercises
Motivation, attention, thinking, behaviour and feelings
Compassionate dialogues
Compassionate letters/paintings/pictures/poetry
Compassion FocusEmpathy and sympathy for one’s own distress
Awareness with out-judgement or blame
De-shame and focus on common humanity
Key focus is “finding what is experienced as
helpful, kind and supportive in this moment”
“Having compassion for myself means I feel so much more at peace with myself. Knowing that it is a normal way of life to have compassion for myself and it’s not an abnormal way of thinking, but a very healthy way of thinking. It felt like I was training my mind to switch to this mode when I start to feel bad about myself or life situations were starting to get on top of me”
ConclusionCompassion is a potential mind/brain organising system
We can train our minds to develop it’s qualities
It has healing properties – via soothing system
It is a focus for a link between old-new spiritualities, psychotherapy and a way for organising social values
Biosocial Goals Social Mentalities and Interpersonal Schema
Motivated role enactments (BSGs) Social Mentalities Emitted behaviours
Responses of others Threatening or safe Role matching
Interpersonal schemas Self As Other as
e.,g. Attachment IWMs; Trust, Power, Agency, Identity
Self-to-other-to-selfEvolution of cognitive systems for
interpersonal behaviour
Inter-subjectivityTheory of mind
Self as object/subjectPretend, imagine fantasise
RuminationMeta-cognition
Type of role
Co-constructedRole (mis)match
Self
Signal sensitive
Other
Multiple processing systems