Evaluation of TXDOT’s Digital Base Map

27
Evaluation of TXDOT’s Digital Base Map By Michael Flaming

description

Evaluation of TXDOT’s Digital Base Map. By Michael Flaming. Digital Map Standards. National Map Accuracy Standard 90% of tested points smaller that threshold 1:24,000 threshold for printed maps is 1/30 th of an inch = 66.66 feet No national standard for digital maps - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Evaluation of TXDOT’s Digital Base Map

Page 1: Evaluation of TXDOT’s  Digital Base Map

Evaluation of TXDOT’s Digital Base Map

ByMichael Flaming

Page 2: Evaluation of TXDOT’s  Digital Base Map

Digital Map Standards

National Map Accuracy Standard 90% of tested points smaller that

threshold 1:24,000 threshold for printed maps is

1/30th of an inch = 66.66 feet No national standard for digital maps

some claim to conform to NMAS

Page 3: Evaluation of TXDOT’s  Digital Base Map

Aerial Photo Metadata Map Name:  CAPCO 2002 Orthophotography Project Imagery Photo Scale:           1=3000' Horizontal Datum:      NAD83 Coordinate system:     US State Plane State Plane Zone:      Texas Central State Plane FIPSZone:  4203 Projection:            Lambert Conformal Conic Photo Flight Date:     February 2002 Camera Name:           RC30 5236 Film Type:             Kodak Aerocolor III 2444 Focal Length:          153.026mm Aircraft Height (AMT): 18000' Horiz. Accuracy Std.   +/- 4' Bounding Box in US State Plane Zone 4203    Upper Left:   3231310, 10022634    Upper Right:  3241957, 10022634    Lower Left:   3231310, 10010542    Lower Right:  3241957, 10010542 Description:  Color Aerial Photography captured for the    10,496 square mile region database as developed and    maintained by the Capital Area Planning Council (CAPCO). Distributed by CAPCO 2512 IH 35 South, Suite 220 Austin, TX  78704

Page 4: Evaluation of TXDOT’s  Digital Base Map

Evaluate Horizontal Accuracy

Compare Digital maps against more accurate standard

Accuracy of digital maps on the order of 5-10m

Accuracy of differentially corrected GPS on the order of < 0.5m

Page 5: Evaluation of TXDOT’s  Digital Base Map

Analysis of Accuracy Test routes selected

Urban Interstate Highway (I-35) Urban State Highway (US 183, Mopac) Rural State Highway (US 183 Lockhart) Loop 360, 2222, FM163

High accuracy GPS data collected Actual road data compared to same road segments of

digital maps Various buffers used to compute map coverage ratio

Buffer represents range in which results are accurate For a given coverage ratio, the larger the buffer the

lower the accuracy For a given buffer, the greater the coverage ratio, the

higher the accuracy

Page 6: Evaluation of TXDOT’s  Digital Base Map

Trimble Pro XRS Receiver

Trimble Recon Data Collector

GPS Data Collection

1989 Nissan Maxima w/sunroof

Page 7: Evaluation of TXDOT’s  Digital Base Map

GPS Data

US183

I 35

LP 360

Page 8: Evaluation of TXDOT’s  Digital Base Map

TXDOT Base Map

Page 9: Evaluation of TXDOT’s  Digital Base Map

GPS Data

Focus area LP360

Page 10: Evaluation of TXDOT’s  Digital Base Map

GPS (Maxima) Line

Page 11: Evaluation of TXDOT’s  Digital Base Map

TXDOT Base map Line

Page 12: Evaluation of TXDOT’s  Digital Base Map

Calculate buffer

Page 13: Evaluation of TXDOT’s  Digital Base Map

10m buffer of GPS line

Page 14: Evaluation of TXDOT’s  Digital Base Map

Calculate Intersect

Page 15: Evaluation of TXDOT’s  Digital Base Map

Intersect of 10m buffer of GPS line and

TXDOT Basemap

Page 16: Evaluation of TXDOT’s  Digital Base Map

3m buffer of GPS line

Page 17: Evaluation of TXDOT’s  Digital Base Map

Intersect of 3m buffer

Page 18: Evaluation of TXDOT’s  Digital Base Map

Attributes of Intersect Same as attributes

of base map Shape length in

decimal degrees Original Projected

line length in meters

Must calculate new shape lengths

Page 19: Evaluation of TXDOT’s  Digital Base Map

VBA Script to Calculate Length “Gathers” up all

the bits of lines and adds up the sum

Separated by object ID

Page 20: Evaluation of TXDOT’s  Digital Base Map

New Line length Field calculation to get new line length

Page 21: Evaluation of TXDOT’s  Digital Base Map

Resulting data for LP 360 Nine attribute

tables for each buffer intersect “dumped” to Excel for analysis

Page 22: Evaluation of TXDOT’s  Digital Base Map

Attribute table

Page 23: Evaluation of TXDOT’s  Digital Base Map

Omitted data Portions that were obviously outdated due

to recent construction were omitted.

Page 24: Evaluation of TXDOT’s  Digital Base Map

LP 360 GraphBasemap Accuracy

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1.00

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Buffer (m)

Co

vera

ge

Rat

io

LP360

Page 25: Evaluation of TXDOT’s  Digital Base Map

Basemap Accuracy

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1.00

m 1 m 2 m 3 m 4 m 5 m 6 m 7 m 8 m 9 m 10 m

Buffer (m)

Cov

erag

e R

atio

LP1

LP360

I-35

US183 Urban

2222

FM672

US183 Rural

Mean

Upper Bound

Lower Bound

Coverage Ratio

Page 26: Evaluation of TXDOT’s  Digital Base Map

Conclusions

Linear features of TXDOT roadbed basemap have an accuracy of +/- 7m with a confidence of 90%.

Page 27: Evaluation of TXDOT’s  Digital Base Map

Questions?