Evaluation of Envisat data using a NWP Assimilation System: A vortex-centred view

23
Page 1 Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002 Evaluation of Envisat data using a NWP Assimilation System: A vortex-centred view Authors: W.A. Lahoz, S. Migliorini, R. Bannister, R. Brugge, A. O’Neill Data Assimilation Research Centre, Reading, UK Thanks: ESA, Envisat cal-val teams, Met Office (UK), CNR.IFAC, BADC

description

Evaluation of Envisat data using a NWP Assimilation System: A vortex-centred view. Authors: W.A. Lahoz, S. Migliorini, R. Bannister, R. Brugge, A. O’Neill Data Assimilation Research Centre, Reading, UK Thanks: ESA, Envisat cal-val teams, Met Office (UK), CNR.IFAC, BADC. Talk overview. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Evaluation of Envisat data using a NWP Assimilation System: A vortex-centred view

Page 1: Evaluation of Envisat data using a NWP Assimilation System: A vortex-centred view

Page 1Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002

Evaluation of Envisat data using a NWP Assimilation System: A vortex-centred

view

Authors: W.A. Lahoz, S. Migliorini,

R. Bannister, R. Brugge, A. O’Neill

Data Assimilation Research Centre,

Reading, UK

Thanks: ESA, Envisat cal-val teams,

Met Office (UK), CNR.IFAC, BADC

Page 2: Evaluation of Envisat data using a NWP Assimilation System: A vortex-centred view

Page 2Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002

Talk overview

Aims

Methodology

Results

- Qualitative

- Quantitative

Conclusions

Further Work

Page 3: Evaluation of Envisat data using a NWP Assimilation System: A vortex-centred view

Page 3Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002

Aims

Evaluate L2 GOMOS, MIPAS & SCIAMACHY data (AOID 1039)

Height-resolved and total column data

- Temperature

- Ozone

- Water vapour

Page 4: Evaluation of Envisat data using a NWP Assimilation System: A vortex-centred view

Page 4Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002

Methodology

Apply to L2 data (unassimilated): vortex-centred view

Vortex-centred view used to look at UARS MLS water vapour

data (Lahoz et al, JAS 1994; QJRMS 1996)

Self-consistency

Comparison against independent datasets

Qualitative/quantitative comparisons

Later: apply to L2+ data (assimilated into a NWP system)

Page 5: Evaluation of Envisat data using a NWP Assimilation System: A vortex-centred view

Page 5Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002

Results: qualitative

24/Oct/2002

Geopotential

Height: Met Office

12 GMT

1, 10, 100hPa

MIPAS orbit track

18.42 – 19.30 GMT

1hPa 10hPa

100hPa Orbit track

S

E

GMID

Page 6: Evaluation of Envisat data using a NWP Assimilation System: A vortex-centred view

Page 6Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002

Results: qualitative

24/Oct/2002

Temperature MIPAS (top)

Temperature Met Off (bottom)

Along orbit track

S E

S E

1hPa

10hPa

100hPa

1hPa

10hPa

100hPa

Page 7: Evaluation of Envisat data using a NWP Assimilation System: A vortex-centred view

Page 7Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002

Results: qualitative

24/Oct/2002

Ozone MIPAS (top)

Water vapour MIPAS (bottom)

Along orbit track

S E

S E

1hPa

10hPa

100hPa

1hPa

10hPa

100hPa

Page 8: Evaluation of Envisat data using a NWP Assimilation System: A vortex-centred view

Page 8Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002

Results: qualitative

24/Oct/2002

CH4 MIPAS (top)

N2O MIPAS (bottom)

Along orbit track

S E

S E

1hPa

10hPa

100hPa

1hPa

10hPa

100hPa

Page 9: Evaluation of Envisat data using a NWP Assimilation System: A vortex-centred view

Page 9Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002

Results: qualitative

24/Oct/2002

HNO3 MIPAS (top)

NO2 MIPAS (bottom)

Along orbit track

S E

S E

1hPa

10hPa

100hPa

1hPa

10hPa

100hPa

Day Night

Page 10: Evaluation of Envisat data using a NWP Assimilation System: A vortex-centred view

Page 10Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002

Results: qualitative

27/Sep/2002

MIPAS v sondes

(Ny Alesund: 78.9N, 11.9E)

Temperature (top; K)

Ozone (bottom; ppmv)

1hPa

1000hPa180 300

1hPa

1000hPa0 15

Page 11: Evaluation of Envisat data using a NWP Assimilation System: A vortex-centred view

Page 11Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002

Results: qualitative

27/Sep/2002

MIPAS v sondes

(Payerne: 46.8N, 7.0E)

Temperature (top; K)

Ozone (bottom; ppmv)

1hPa

1000hPa180 300

0

1hPa

1000hPa15

Page 12: Evaluation of Envisat data using a NWP Assimilation System: A vortex-centred view

Page 12Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002

Results: qualitative

27/Sep/2002

MIPAS v sondes

(Marambio: 64.3S, 56.7W)

Temperature (top; K)

Ozone (bottom; ppmv)

1hPa

1000hPa180 300

1hPa

1000hPa0 15

Page 13: Evaluation of Envisat data using a NWP Assimilation System: A vortex-centred view

Page 13Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002

Results: qualitative

25/Sep/2002

Total ozone column

SCIAMACHY

& footprint

Total ozone column

analyses (KNMI/

ESA)

Page 14: Evaluation of Envisat data using a NWP Assimilation System: A vortex-centred view

Page 14Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002

Results:quantitative

MIPAS v

Sonde ( x AK)

Jokioinen (60.8N,

23.5E)

18 Sep 2002

Chi-squared test

Temperature (K)

MIPAS Averaging Kernels

Red star: MIPAS

Green diamond: Sonde x AK

Page 15: Evaluation of Envisat data using a NWP Assimilation System: A vortex-centred view

Page 15Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002

Results:quantitative

MIPAS v

Sonde ( x AK)

Ny Alesund

200hPa->10hPa

September 2002

Ozone (LH)

Temperature (RH)

+1-1 +1-1

Page 16: Evaluation of Envisat data using a NWP Assimilation System: A vortex-centred view

Page 16Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002

Results:quantitative

MIPAS v

Sonde( x AK)

Several stations

200hPa->10hPa

September 2002

Ozone (LH)

Temperature (RH)

Page 17: Evaluation of Envisat data using a NWP Assimilation System: A vortex-centred view

Page 17Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002

Results: quantitative

23/Sep/2002

Histogram

SCIAMACHY –

KNMI/ESA (Total

ozone / DU)

GOME bias not

removed

Page 18: Evaluation of Envisat data using a NWP Assimilation System: A vortex-centred view

Page 18Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002

Results: quantitative

24/Sep/2002

Histogram

SCIAMACHY –

KNMI/ESA (Total

ozone / DU)

GOME bias not

removed

Page 19: Evaluation of Envisat data using a NWP Assimilation System: A vortex-centred view

Page 19Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002

Results: quantitative

25/Sep/2002

Histogram

SCIAMACHY –

KNMI/ESA (Total

ozone / DU)

GOME bias not

removed

Page 20: Evaluation of Envisat data using a NWP Assimilation System: A vortex-centred view

Page 20Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002

Data Assimilation

Struthers, Brugge, Lahoz, O’Neill & Swinbank, JGR 2002

Cal-val:O: Observations, A: Analyses, B: Background/Forecast

- Impact of observations: OSEs

- Stability & Bias: O-A differences

- Normality of Errors: O-B histograms

- Best Linear Unbiased Estimate (BLUE): rms(O-A)

- Comparison against independent data

Page 21: Evaluation of Envisat data using a NWP Assimilation System: A vortex-centred view

Page 21Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002

Conclusions

MIPAS: results suggest:

Consistency between MIPAS data & meteorology

Temperature, ozone vs independent data (sondes x AK):

- temperature better characterised than ozone; unrealistic vertical oscillations in temperature retrieval

- ozone errors too small (systematic error needed); ozone has a positive bias

- MIPAS temperature and ozone errors are close to Gaussian

Page 22: Evaluation of Envisat data using a NWP Assimilation System: A vortex-centred view

Page 22Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002

Conclusions

SCIAMACHY: results suggest:

SCIAMACHY total column ozone data agrees well with GOME analyses (N.B. GOME biases not removed):

- bias magnitude ~6DU (bias can be positive/negative)

- std of differences ~20 DU (Errors are close to Gaussian)

- consistent with GOME analyses bias (see BIRA/IASB web-site)

GOMOS

Air density in GOMOS needed work (Sep); may be OK now

Page 23: Evaluation of Envisat data using a NWP Assimilation System: A vortex-centred view

Page 23Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002

Further Work

MIPAS water vapour data (compare vs balloons)

SCIAMACHY total ozone column biases

GOMOS data (ozone, water vapour)

Assimilation into Met Office system (MIPAS ozone data assimilated for 6 hours & evaluating experiment)

- Cal-val

- Combine limb and nadir geometries: ASSET project

- Averaging kernels/theory