Assimilation of Pacific Lightning Data into a Mesoscale NWP Model
Evaluation of Envisat data using a NWP Assimilation System: A vortex-centred view
description
Transcript of Evaluation of Envisat data using a NWP Assimilation System: A vortex-centred view
Page 1Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002
Evaluation of Envisat data using a NWP Assimilation System: A vortex-centred
view
Authors: W.A. Lahoz, S. Migliorini,
R. Bannister, R. Brugge, A. O’Neill
Data Assimilation Research Centre,
Reading, UK
Thanks: ESA, Envisat cal-val teams,
Met Office (UK), CNR.IFAC, BADC
Page 2Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002
Talk overview
Aims
Methodology
Results
- Qualitative
- Quantitative
Conclusions
Further Work
Page 3Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002
Aims
Evaluate L2 GOMOS, MIPAS & SCIAMACHY data (AOID 1039)
Height-resolved and total column data
- Temperature
- Ozone
- Water vapour
Page 4Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002
Methodology
Apply to L2 data (unassimilated): vortex-centred view
Vortex-centred view used to look at UARS MLS water vapour
data (Lahoz et al, JAS 1994; QJRMS 1996)
Self-consistency
Comparison against independent datasets
Qualitative/quantitative comparisons
Later: apply to L2+ data (assimilated into a NWP system)
Page 5Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002
Results: qualitative
24/Oct/2002
Geopotential
Height: Met Office
12 GMT
1, 10, 100hPa
MIPAS orbit track
18.42 – 19.30 GMT
1hPa 10hPa
100hPa Orbit track
S
E
GMID
Page 6Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002
Results: qualitative
24/Oct/2002
Temperature MIPAS (top)
Temperature Met Off (bottom)
Along orbit track
S E
S E
1hPa
10hPa
100hPa
1hPa
10hPa
100hPa
Page 7Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002
Results: qualitative
24/Oct/2002
Ozone MIPAS (top)
Water vapour MIPAS (bottom)
Along orbit track
S E
S E
1hPa
10hPa
100hPa
1hPa
10hPa
100hPa
Page 8Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002
Results: qualitative
24/Oct/2002
CH4 MIPAS (top)
N2O MIPAS (bottom)
Along orbit track
S E
S E
1hPa
10hPa
100hPa
1hPa
10hPa
100hPa
Page 9Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002
Results: qualitative
24/Oct/2002
HNO3 MIPAS (top)
NO2 MIPAS (bottom)
Along orbit track
S E
S E
1hPa
10hPa
100hPa
1hPa
10hPa
100hPa
Day Night
Page 10Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002
Results: qualitative
27/Sep/2002
MIPAS v sondes
(Ny Alesund: 78.9N, 11.9E)
Temperature (top; K)
Ozone (bottom; ppmv)
1hPa
1000hPa180 300
1hPa
1000hPa0 15
Page 11Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002
Results: qualitative
27/Sep/2002
MIPAS v sondes
(Payerne: 46.8N, 7.0E)
Temperature (top; K)
Ozone (bottom; ppmv)
1hPa
1000hPa180 300
0
1hPa
1000hPa15
Page 12Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002
Results: qualitative
27/Sep/2002
MIPAS v sondes
(Marambio: 64.3S, 56.7W)
Temperature (top; K)
Ozone (bottom; ppmv)
1hPa
1000hPa180 300
1hPa
1000hPa0 15
Page 13Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002
Results: qualitative
25/Sep/2002
Total ozone column
SCIAMACHY
& footprint
Total ozone column
analyses (KNMI/
ESA)
Page 14Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002
Results:quantitative
MIPAS v
Sonde ( x AK)
Jokioinen (60.8N,
23.5E)
18 Sep 2002
Chi-squared test
Temperature (K)
MIPAS Averaging Kernels
Red star: MIPAS
Green diamond: Sonde x AK
Page 15Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002
Results:quantitative
MIPAS v
Sonde ( x AK)
Ny Alesund
200hPa->10hPa
September 2002
Ozone (LH)
Temperature (RH)
+1-1 +1-1
Page 16Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002
Results:quantitative
MIPAS v
Sonde( x AK)
Several stations
200hPa->10hPa
September 2002
Ozone (LH)
Temperature (RH)
Page 17Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002
Results: quantitative
23/Sep/2002
Histogram
SCIAMACHY –
KNMI/ESA (Total
ozone / DU)
GOME bias not
removed
Page 18Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002
Results: quantitative
24/Sep/2002
Histogram
SCIAMACHY –
KNMI/ESA (Total
ozone / DU)
GOME bias not
removed
Page 19Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002
Results: quantitative
25/Sep/2002
Histogram
SCIAMACHY –
KNMI/ESA (Total
ozone / DU)
GOME bias not
removed
Page 20Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002
Data Assimilation
Struthers, Brugge, Lahoz, O’Neill & Swinbank, JGR 2002
Cal-val:O: Observations, A: Analyses, B: Background/Forecast
- Impact of observations: OSEs
- Stability & Bias: O-A differences
- Normality of Errors: O-B histograms
- Best Linear Unbiased Estimate (BLUE): rms(O-A)
- Comparison against independent data
Page 21Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002
Conclusions
MIPAS: results suggest:
Consistency between MIPAS data & meteorology
Temperature, ozone vs independent data (sondes x AK):
- temperature better characterised than ozone; unrealistic vertical oscillations in temperature retrieval
- ozone errors too small (systematic error needed); ozone has a positive bias
- MIPAS temperature and ozone errors are close to Gaussian
Page 22Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002
Conclusions
SCIAMACHY: results suggest:
SCIAMACHY total column ozone data agrees well with GOME analyses (N.B. GOME biases not removed):
- bias magnitude ~6DU (bias can be positive/negative)
- std of differences ~20 DU (Errors are close to Gaussian)
- consistent with GOME analyses bias (see BIRA/IASB web-site)
GOMOS
Air density in GOMOS needed work (Sep); may be OK now
Page 23Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002
Further Work
MIPAS water vapour data (compare vs balloons)
SCIAMACHY total ozone column biases
GOMOS data (ozone, water vapour)
Assimilation into Met Office system (MIPAS ozone data assimilated for 6 hours & evaluating experiment)
- Cal-val
- Combine limb and nadir geometries: ASSET project
- Averaging kernels/theory