Name of Evalutor : Eng. Samson Mukiti MusyokaTECHNICAL EVALUATION

DETAILED ANALYSIS

Evaluation Criteria Max 1 2 3 4 5Water Supply

1.1 1 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 1

1.2 2 1 1.5 1.3 1 2

1.3 1 0.5 0.47 0.50 0.63 0.83

1.4 1 0.4 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.85

1.5 1 0.45 0.4 0.6 0.5 0.81.6 Experience in Operation and Maintenance 1 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.81.7 Experience in Monitoring and Evaluation 1 0.55 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.71.8 Experience in Contract Management 2 2 2 2 2 2

10 5.9 6.17 6.6 6.23 8.982.1 Comments/Suggestion to TOR 2 0 0.2 2 0.5 2

2.2 1 0 0.2 1 0.3 12.3 Understanding the Objective of the TOR 3 1 0.5 2.5 2 3

2.4 2 1 0 1.5 1 2

2.5 1 0.7 0.3 1 0.4 1

2.6 5 3 3 3.5 2 5

2.7 10 6 6 7 5 92.8 Quality of Resource Utilization -Staffing Schedule 1 0.5 0.4 1 0.5 12.9 -No. of staff Permanent 2 1.5 1.4 2 1 2

2.10 3 3 2 3 2 32.11 Logistics -No. of Vehicles 1 1 1 1 1 1

2.11.1 -No. of Computers 1 1 1 1 1 12.11.2 -Available Relevant Programs 1 1 1 1 1 1

2.12 Quality Management 2 1 1 1.5 1 2

REVIEW OF DESIGNS AND SUPERVISION OF WORKS FOR THWAKE MULTIPURPOSE WATER DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM

Sub criteria No

Experience in Detailed Design and Review of Piped Water Supply of capacity 120,000m3/day

Experience in Detailed Design and Review of Dam of height 77m and capacity 681mcm

Experience in Detailed Design and Review of Generation of Power

Experience in Detailed Design and Review of Power Generation Network of at least 132KV T line of length 30km

Experience in Synergies ( Standards) Development in Water Infrastructure and Power Generation

1.0 Specific experience of the Consultant (as a firm) relevant to the Assignment

Comments/suggestion on the Data to be provided by client

Completeness and Responsiveness (Responding Exhaustive manner all the requirement of the TOR)

Clarity (Are various elements coherent and the decision points well defined?)

Creativity and Innovation (Does the proposal suggest any new approaches to the assignment or new methodologies that help achieve better outcomes?)

Timelines of Output (Is the proposed activity schedule realistic? Are the requested outputs provided on time?)

Flaxibility and Adaptability (Are the methodology and work plan flexible and easy to adapt to changes that might occur during implementation of the assignment?)

35 20.7 18 29 18.7 34

10 Project Director (Team Leader)

2 2 2 2 2 2Adequancy for the Project 60%(20yrs experience) 6 4 3.5 4.5 4 5Experience in developing Countries 10% 1 1 1 1 1 1Experience in East Africa 5% 0.5 0.5 0 0 0 0.5Proficiency in English 5% 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5

3.1 Project Director (Team Leader) 10 8 7 8 7.5 99 Senior Resident Engineer

1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8Adequancy for the Project 60%(15yrs experience) 5.4 5 5.4 5.4 5 5.4Experience in developing Countries 10% 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9Experience in East Africa 5% 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.40 0.45

Proficiency in English 5% 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.4 0.453.2 Senior Resident Engineer 9 8.6 9 9 8.5 9

7 Geotechnical/Materials Engineer

1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4

4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2Experience in developing Countries 10% 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.5 0.7Experience in East Africa 5% 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.3 0.35

Proficiency in English 5% 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.3 0.353.3 Geotechnical/Materials Engineer 7 7 7 7 6.7 7

7 Senior Hydrologist

1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4Adequancy for the Project 60%(20yrs Experience) 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2Experience in developing Countries 10% 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7Experience in East Africa 5% 0.35 0 0.35 0 0.35 0.35Proficiency in English 5% 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.3 0.35

3.4 Senior Hydrologist 7 6.65 7 6.65 6.95 78 Senior Dam Engineer

1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6

4.8 0 0 0 0Experience in developing Countries 10% 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.8Experience in East Africa 5% 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.40 0.20 0.00Proficiency in English 5% 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.4

3.5 Senior Dam Engineer 8 3.2 3.2 3.2 2.6 2.8

2.0 Adequacy of the proposed work plan and methodology in responding to the TOR

General Qualifications 20%(Registered with ERB &IEK or similar bodies)

General Qualifications 20%(Registered with ERB &IEK)

General Qualifications 20%(Registered with ERB &IEK)

Adequancy for the Project(Experience minimum 5yrs) 60%

General Qualifications 20%(At least 20ys relevant Experience )

General Qualifications 20%(reg. with Hydrological Society of Kenya)

Adequancy for the Project 60%(Conversant with Water Act, 2002)

7

1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4

4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2Experience in developing Countries 10% 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.4 0.7Experience in East Africa 5% 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.2 0Proficiency in English 5% 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.2 0.35

3.6 Water Supply and Sewerage Design Engineer 7 7 7 7 6.4 6.657 Senior Electrical Engineer

1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4Adequancy for the Project 60%(15yrs Experience) 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2Experience in developing Countries 10% 0.7 0.7 0.70 0.70 0.50 0.70Experience in East Africa 5% 0.35 0.35 0 0.35 0.2 0.35Proficiency in English 5% 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35

3.7 Senior Electrical Engineer 7 7 6.65 7 6.65 7

55 47.45 46.85 47.85 45.3 48

TOTAL SCORE ACHIEVED 100 74.1 71 83 70 91

Water Supply and Sewerage Design Engineer

General Qualifications 20%((Registered with ERB &IEK)

Adequancy for the Project 60%(At least 20yrs Experience)

General Qualifications 20%(reg. with Engineers Board of Kenya)

3..0 Qualifications and competence of the key staff for the assignment