Evaluation and Overall Feedback
2
AS Coursework Overall Marks Name: STANGHELLINI Carlo Planning – Comments and mark out of 15/20 For full comments please see the pre-production marks sheet Construction – Main Task – comments and mark out of 56/60 For full comments please see the production marks sheet Evaluation – Comments and mark out of 16/20 Question 1: PowerPoint/SlideShare – excellent detail on how conventions used in production, with very good understanding shown of how mise-en-scene used to set up narrative, and conform/challenge genre codes. There is good evidence of linking product to real products to highlight argument. Question 2: PowToon – some detail on how representation and mise-en-scene used to represent characters, but needed more analytical comments. ore detail on how Use of theorists would have enhanced answer. Question 3: Prezi – some nice detail on a range of distributors that you could choose but no final decision made???. Question 4 & 5: PowerPoint/SlideShare – good detail on typical audience for genre with use of research, taken from previous research for pre-production. Basic detail on how audience was attracted, no audience feedback included to show if goals had been met. Question 6: Emaze –good detail on technologies used throughout the production. Answer is missing detail on what was actually learnt. Question 7: Video – excellent post with good detail on what was learnt and progress made, with good use of footage from both products. Good (at times excellent) detail on questions showing good understanding of task, audience and genre.
-
Upload
stanghello -
Category
Education
-
view
33 -
download
1
Transcript of Evaluation and Overall Feedback
AS Coursework Overall Marks
Name: STANGHELLINI Carlo
Planning – Comments and mark out of 15/20
For full comments please see the pre-production marks sheet
Construction – Main Task – comments and mark out of 56/60
For full comments please see the production marks sheet
Evaluation – Comments and mark out of 16/20Question 1:PowerPoint/SlideShare – excellent detail on how conventions used in production, with very good understanding shown of how mise-en-scene used to set up narrative, and conform/challenge genre codes. There is good evidence of linking product to real products to highlight argument.Question 2:PowToon – some detail on how representation and mise-en-scene used to represent characters, but needed more analytical comments.ore detail on howUse of theorists would have enhanced answer.Question 3:Prezi – some nice detail on a range of distributors that you could choose but no final decision made???.Question 4 & 5:PowerPoint/SlideShare – good detail on typical audience for genre with use of research, taken from previous research for pre-production. Basic detail on how audience was attracted, no audience feedback included to show if goals had been met.Question 6:Emaze –good detail on technologies used throughout the production. Answer is missing detail on what was actually learnt.Question 7:Video – excellent post with good detail on what was learnt and progress made, with good use of footage from both products.
Good (at times excellent) detail on questions showing good understanding of task, audience and genre.Great use of analytical detail, images and research in answering questions.Read your work, as there are lapses in spelling, punctuation and capital letters!Very good use of technologies.
Total 87/100 Grade: A
