Evaluating the efficacy of an online class.ppt

17
Evaluating The Efficacy of an Online Class By Debra Molinare, Donna Wasson and Evanielis Grissom March 2, 2011 Sample footer 1

Transcript of Evaluating the efficacy of an online class.ppt

Page 1: Evaluating the efficacy of an online class.ppt

Evaluating The Efficacy of an Online Class

By Debra Molinare, Donna Wasson and

Evanielis Grissom

March 2, 2011 Sample footer 1

Page 2: Evaluating the efficacy of an online class.ppt

The ScenarioOur group was presented with the problem of a hypothetical campus that is experiencing a lack of quality and/or consistency in their online courses.

Here is a synopsis of some the complaints had by students

Disorganization in course design and development

Inconsistency in instructor presence and immediacy

Lack of academic rigor

Assignments lack clarification

March 2, 2011 Sample footer 2

Page 3: Evaluating the efficacy of an online class.ppt

March 2, 2011 Sample footer 3

Page 4: Evaluating the efficacy of an online class.ppt

Developing a plan of action

What we were charged to do was determined what are the elements of a quality online course consists of. Or rather, what makes an online class “good”

In our attempt to find solutions for the problems that students had been reporting, we came up with the following questions to explore:

March 2, 2011 Sample footer 4

Page 5: Evaluating the efficacy of an online class.ppt

Questions to Consider

Is the criteria for a good face to face course the same for an online course?

How does one evaluate online education?

Is quality online education discipline dependent?

March 2, 2011 Sample footer 5

Page 6: Evaluating the efficacy of an online class.ppt

Methodology

March 2, 2011 Sample footer 6

It came to us that our basic need is to examine how the structure and design of the course relates to the students having meaningful learning experiences within a specific course of study.

Page 7: Evaluating the efficacy of an online class.ppt

MethodologyWe used the Quality Online Control Initiative by the Illinois Online Network as a reference point in determining what elements should exist in an online course.

Here is what we discovered.

March 2, 2011 Sample footer 7

Page 8: Evaluating the efficacy of an online class.ppt

Discovering Quality

In designing and

implementation of curriculum

March 2, 2011 Sample footer 8

Page 9: Evaluating the efficacy of an online class.ppt

Quality of Instructional Design

We found that the following questions should be addressed during the design of the course

1. How is your course structured? - The course goals/objectives are precisely stated to the students. - Information should be grouped in content ‘chunks’ or modules - The module’s objectives are clearly stated to the learner - The content is sequential, builds upon itself

2. What information does your course syllabus include? - Course description including credit hours and necessary supplies - Instructor information; bio, availability, picture and contact preference - Calendar of explicit due dates - Grading policy with grading scale and weights - Technical requirements: hardware, software, connection speed - Technical competencies necessary to be successful in the course

March 2, 2011 Sample footer 9

Page 10: Evaluating the efficacy of an online class.ppt

Quality of Instructional Design

March 2, 2011 Sample footer 10

3. What information does your course include? - Course description including credit hours and necessary supplies - Instructor information; bio, availability, picture and contact preference - Calendar of explicit due dates - Grading policy with grading scale and weights - Technical requirements: hardware, software, connection speed - Technical competencies necessary to be successful in the course

Page 11: Evaluating the efficacy of an online class.ppt

Discovering Quality

In Communication and Learning

Experiences

March 2, 2011 Sample footer 11

Page 12: Evaluating the efficacy of an online class.ppt

Quality of Communication and Learning Experiences

1. Do you provide variety in the course? - Use a variety of delivery methods of instruction - Ensure your modes of delivery are purposeful and follow course goals - Allow students to demonstrate knowledge through various assessment modes

2. What learning opportunities are available for students? - Plan activities that are permit student-to-student learning; student-to-instructor learning and student-to-content learning - Forums should be separate in the course site such as community, content, and questions - Discussion forums are clearly defined and articulate the instructor’s role - Discussion areas are accessible based upon purpose

3. Is group work a part of your course? - Group expectations should have clear and concise outcomes - Overall group task should be appropriate - Group formation should have rules and group members have clearly stated roles - The delivery of the group product should be articulated clearly as to how, when and where

12

Page 13: Evaluating the efficacy of an online class.ppt

Discovering QualityIn assessment of student achievement of

course goals and competencies

March 2, 2011 Sample footer 13

Page 14: Evaluating the efficacy of an online class.ppt

Quality of Assessment

1. Does your course ensure academic integrity? - You and your students should abide by copyright and fair use law - Provide your students with the school’s Code of Conduct

March 2, 2011 Sample footer 14

Page 15: Evaluating the efficacy of an online class.ppt

Quality of Assessment2. What are your strategies to for student

evaluation and assessment? · They should reflect and measure your course’s stated goals and objectives. · Use multiple methods, such as quizzes, tests, discussions, essays, projects and surveys. · Conduct them on an ongoing basis throughout the course. · Design and administer your assessments and evaluations in ways to uphold academic integrity.

3. How are you assigning grades? · Assignments need give explicit rubrics, rationale and standards. · Course procedures for reporting grade information to students should comply with FERPA and institutional regulations. · The course’s overall grading scale should be communicated clearly. · Students should be aware of any penalties that might be assessed to their grades. · Expectations for student participation need to be clear and measurable. · Extra credit (if available) should be described, including where, when, and how.

March 2, 2011 Sample footer 15

Page 16: Evaluating the efficacy of an online class.ppt

Quality of Assessment

March 2, 2011 Sample footer 16

4. What can students expect in terms of instructor feedback? - State when students will receive feedback. - Clarify what type of feedback will be received. - Indicate how feedback will be given.

5. How will you manage your student assessments and evaluations? - State clearly the time allocated for each assessment. - Indicate when assessments will be available, as well as the deadlines. - State your policy on retaking assessments. - Provide clear instructions on how assessments will be delivered or submitted.

Page 17: Evaluating the efficacy of an online class.ppt

ConclusionFrom our findings we have found that instructional design is paramount in online teaching success. Furthermore, ID should also play a role in the methods and frequency of student/instructor communication as instructor presence should be built in to the course.

Also ID should have a focused plan of action built around feedback that has some degree of immediacy. This should be written clearly in the syllabus.

Finally, the design of the course should focus on tools that would enable learning objectives to be met.

March 2, 2011 Sample footer 17