Evaluating an oral presentation with slides

33
what makes a good presentation? English for science teachers Tuesday 2 November 2010

description

English with ICT for science teachers; presentation guidelines

Transcript of Evaluating an oral presentation with slides

Page 1: Evaluating an oral presentation with slides

what makes a good presentation?

English for science teachers

Tuesday 2 November 2010

Page 2: Evaluating an oral presentation with slides

Elements to consider

Tuesday 2 November 2010

Page 3: Evaluating an oral presentation with slides

Elements to consider

Delivery

Tuesday 2 November 2010

Page 4: Evaluating an oral presentation with slides

Elements to consider

Delivery

Content

Tuesday 2 November 2010

Page 5: Evaluating an oral presentation with slides

Elements to consider

Delivery

Content

Slides

Tuesday 2 November 2010

Page 6: Evaluating an oral presentation with slides

Elements to consider

Delivery

Content

Slides

Overall Effect

Tuesday 2 November 2010

Page 7: Evaluating an oral presentation with slides

Delivery (débit)

1.VOLUME

2.PACE

3.ATTITUDE

Tuesday 2 November 2010

Page 8: Evaluating an oral presentation with slides

DELIVERY

VOLUME: TOO quiet .......... TOO LouD

Tuesday 2 November 2010

Page 9: Evaluating an oral presentation with slides

DELIVERY

VOLUME: TOO quiet .......... TOO Loud

PACE: TOO S L O W .......... TOO Fast

Tuesday 2 November 2010

Page 10: Evaluating an oral presentation with slides

DELIVERY

VOLUME: TOO quiet .......... TOO Loud

PACE: TOO S L O W .......... TOO Fast

ATTITUDE: TOO TIMID ...... TOO overbearing

Tuesday 2 November 2010

Page 11: Evaluating an oral presentation with slides

CONTENT

1.INFORMATION LOAD

2.COGNITIVE LOAD

3.ORGANISATION

Tuesday 2 November 2010

Page 12: Evaluating an oral presentation with slides

CONTENT

Tuesday 2 November 2010

Page 13: Evaluating an oral presentation with slides

CONTENT

TOO MUCH INFORMATION ... NOT ENOUGH INFORMATION

Tuesday 2 November 2010

Page 14: Evaluating an oral presentation with slides

CONTENT

TOO MUCH INFORMATION ... NOT ENOUGH INFORMATION

TOO SIMPLE ........... TOO COMPLEX

Tuesday 2 November 2010

Page 15: Evaluating an oral presentation with slides

CONTENT

TOO MUCH INFORMATION ... NOT ENOUGH INFORMATION

TOO SIMPLE ........... TOO COMPLEX

POORLY ORGANISED ....... TOO RIGIDLY ORGANISED

Tuesday 2 November 2010

Page 16: Evaluating an oral presentation with slides

SLIDES (diapos)

1.READABILITY

2.ESTHETICS

3.BALANCE

Tuesday 2 November 2010

Page 17: Evaluating an oral presentation with slides

SLIDES

Tuesday 2 November 2010

Page 18: Evaluating an oral presentation with slides

SLIDES

TOO MUCH TEXT ... NOT ENOUGH TEXT

Tuesday 2 November 2010

Page 19: Evaluating an oral presentation with slides

SLIDES

TOO MUCH TEXT ... NOT ENOUGH TEXT

NOT ENOUGH COLOUR, TOO FEW ILLUSTRATIONS ........... TOO MUCH COLOUR, TOO MANY ILLUSTRATIONS

Tuesday 2 November 2010

Page 20: Evaluating an oral presentation with slides

SLIDES

TOO MUCH TEXT ... NOT ENOUGH TEXT

NOT ENOUGH COLOUR, TOO FEW ILLUSTRATIONS ........... TOO MUCH COLOUR, TOO MANY ILLUSTRATIONS

WRITTEN AND SPOKEN TEXT TOO SIMILAR ..... WRITTEN AND SPOKEN TEXT TOO DIFFERENT

Tuesday 2 November 2010

Page 21: Evaluating an oral presentation with slides

BAD SLIDE

• This slide is boring.

• There are no illustrations.

• I read exactly what you see.

Tuesday 2 November 2010

Page 22: Evaluating an oral presentation with slides

BAD SLIDE

This slide is bad too because there is a great deal of text to read and it’s not easy to see how it is organised. If the audience reads the whole text, they will not be able to pay attention to the speaker. If the speaker reads the text aloud, they add nothing to what the audience can read by themselves. The font is too small and there is nothing to motivate the audience to make the effort to read the text and follow the speaker’s argument. As a rule of thumb, you should use a font size above 20. You should also keep text to a minimum and divide it into points to help the audience see where you are. You can add additional information orally while we look at your slide. Illustrations, when well chosen, make your slides more attractive and help the audience to focus on your main points. Your slides complement your presentation because listeners generally do not listen intently throughout your presentation. They may “tune out” from time to time, losing concentration and thinking about something else. If your slides are well designed, your audience can find the thread of your presentation again by looking at the main ideas on your slide and the illustrations. The colour scheme is fairly nasty too.

Tuesday 2 November 2010

Page 23: Evaluating an oral presentation with slides

BAD SLIDE

Tuesday 2 November 2010

Page 24: Evaluating an oral presentation with slides

BAD SLIDE

this slide is poor

Tuesday 2 November 2010

Page 25: Evaluating an oral presentation with slides

BAD SLIDE

this slide is poor

because it is too different from the others

Tuesday 2 November 2010

Page 26: Evaluating an oral presentation with slides

BAD SLIDE

this slide is poor

because it is too different from the others

and the effects are distracting

Tuesday 2 November 2010

Page 27: Evaluating an oral presentation with slides

BAD SLIDE

this slide is poor

because it is too different from the others

and the effects are distracting

Tuesday 2 November 2010

Page 28: Evaluating an oral presentation with slides

OVERALL EFFECT

1.EASY TO FOLLOW ...... DIFFICULT TO FOLLOW

2.INTERESTING TO LISTEN TO .... DULL TO

LISTEN TO

3.STRONG POINTS (don’t change) .... WEAK POINTS (TRY TO CHANGE)

Tuesday 2 November 2010

Page 29: Evaluating an oral presentation with slides

Evaluation of presentations

Tuesday 2 November 2010

Page 30: Evaluating an oral presentation with slides

Evaluation of presentations

Delivery

Tuesday 2 November 2010

Page 31: Evaluating an oral presentation with slides

Evaluation of presentations

Delivery

Content

Tuesday 2 November 2010

Page 32: Evaluating an oral presentation with slides

Evaluation of presentations

Delivery

Content

Slides

Tuesday 2 November 2010

Page 33: Evaluating an oral presentation with slides

Evaluation of presentations

Delivery

Content

Slides

Overall Effect

Tuesday 2 November 2010