EURO4M 4th GA, Norrköping, 17-19 April 2013 Overview of the new MESCAN precipitation analysis...
-
Upload
julia-douglas -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of EURO4M 4th GA, Norrköping, 17-19 April 2013 Overview of the new MESCAN precipitation analysis...
EURO4M 4th GA, Norrköping, 17-19 April 2013
Overview of the new MESCAN precipitation analysis system
C. Soci, E. Bazile, J-F. Mahfouf
with contributions from
F. Besson and M. Lafaysse
EURO4M 4th GA, Norrköping, 17-19 April 2013
Analysis of precipitation
Validation
Issues
Further plans
Outline
EURO4M 4th GA, Norrköping, 17-19 April 2013
Principle:- Based on the OI code used also for the analysis of T2m and RH2m
- Background field: accumulated precipitation forecasted by a numerical model (ARPEGE, AROME, ALADIN, HIRLAM).
- Observations: cumulated precipitation from raingauge measurements (at this stage)
- Possibility of producing 24-h, 12-h, 6-h, 3-h or 1-h accumulated precipitation analysis, the only limiting factor is that the background and the observations must span the same period.
- The analysis is performed at the background horizontal resolution
Analysis of accumulated precipitation in MESCAN
EURO4M 4th GA, Norrköping, 17-19 April 2013
Correlation function:
Analysis of accumulated precipitation in MESCAN (2)
L
r
)L
r1()(
erCor
Two options are available:
1. MESCAN-Log: analysis in log-space on a transformed variable ln(RR+1) RR ~ LN (0, 1
2) ln(RR) ~ N (0, 22)
Preliminary error statistics: o=0.6 et b =0.71, L=43km [after Mahfouf et al., 2007 for CAnadian Precipitation Analysis Project (CAPA)]
2. MESCAN-RR: analysis in physical space on RR ~ N (0, 2)
Preliminary error statistics: o =5 et b =13, L=35km (as in SAFRAN)
EURO4M 4th GA, Norrköping, 17-19 April 2013
Test period : October 2009 – June 2010
First guess: ALADIN operational downscaled with fullpos
Indirect validation of the MESCAN analysis system by forcing with its output (analyses of T2m, RH2m, RR24) the surface scheme ISBA and the hydrological module MODCOU.
Evaluation of the impact of changing the surface forcing variables (T2m, RH2m, RR24, 10-m wind speed, downward SW and LW radiation) on:
• River flow, and
• Snow Depth
The reference system used for validation is the operational system called SIM (SAFRAN-ISBA-MODCOU)
Preliminary validation over France at 5.5 km grid
EURO4M 4th GA, Norrköping, 17-19 April 2013
Validation of MESCAN precipitation analysis vs SAFRAN over France
~ 4200 obs for computing scores~ 1700 obs for analyses
Heidke Skill ScoreMar 2010Jun 2010
Heidke Skill ScoreNov 2009Jun 2010
• MESCAN-RR compared to SAFRAN and MESCAN-Log for spring (Mar-Jun):
- improves the HSS for RR > 5mm/day, but- deteriorates HSS for RR < 2mm/day
Heidke Skill ScoreNov 2009Feb 2010
Bias Absolute error
FG 0.40 1.87
MESCAN-RR -0.08 0.87
MESCAN-Log -0.27 0.96
SAFRAN -0.06 0.93
EURO4M 4th GA, Norrköping, 17-19 April 2013
OBS MAX=397mm
ALADIN RR24 MAX=77mm
SAFRAN MAX=309mm
MESCAN-Log MAX=277mm
Validation on extreme event: Var, 2010 (Grid 0.1°, RR24h)
EURO4M 4th GA, Norrköping, 17-19 April 2013
OBS MAX=397mm
MESCAN-RR MAX=265mm
SAFRAN MAX=309mm
MESCAN-Log
MAX=277mm
Validation on extreme event: Var, 2010 (Grid 0.1°, RR24h)
EURO4M 4th GA, Norrköping, 17-19 April 2013
Validation of MESCAN precipitation analysis vs SAFRAN over France
Accumulated daily RR for 1/10/2009 to 31/07/2010
over France [mm]
~50mm
• Bias correction needed for MESCAN-log
Obs (~4200)MESCAN-RRMESCAN-LogSAFRAN
EURO4M 4th GA, Norrköping, 17-19 April 2013
2D Analysis at ~5 km:T2m, Rh2m, RR
SURFEX (V7): Surface Externalized(www.cnrm.meteo.fr/surfex) with a sophisticated snow scheme (Vionet et al. submitted) and the lake model: Flake (Mironov, 2008)
SH, LH, snow depth, snow cover, soil moisture, Ts_lake
Forecast model:SW, LW, Wind, Ps
Hydrological Model
Coupling the 2D surface analysis and a Surface Scheme for Indirect Validation and Hydrological purposes
EURO4M 4th GA, Norrköping, 17-19 April 2013
• MESCAN-RR (physical space) and SAFRAN are of equal quality with regard to Nash criterion.
• SAFRAN is better over the western part of France, i.e. flat terrain!
Map based on Nash scores
Indirect validation of MESCAN precipitation analysis using the MODCOU hydrological model (F. Besson)
EURO4M 4th GA, Norrköping, 17-19 April 2013
Forcing by ALADIN precipitation
• The forcing provided by the MESCAN-RR precipitation analysis is significantly improved in comparison to the one generated by the ALADIN precipitation.
Impact of different types of forcing on the river flow (Oct09-Jun10)
Forcing by MESCAN-RR
Daily river discharge for the Seine river at Paris
Plots provided by F. Besson
EURO4M 4th GA, Norrköping, 17-19 April 2013
Impact of precipitation on the river flow (Oct09-Jun10)
- in June, the different behaviour of the river flow forced by MESCAN-RR is probably due to a lower accumulation of snowfall during the winter throughout the Rhone watershed.
- Compared with SAFRAN, this underestimation is very likely due to the misleading information provided by the non-heated rain gauges in the mountains during the winter season.
Daily river discharge for the Rhone river at Beaucaire
Provided by F. Besson
EURO4M 4th GA, Norrköping, 17-19 April 2013
– Observations
– SAFRAN
– ALADIN-forecast
– MESCAN v0
– MESCAN v1
– MESCAN v2
Validation of snow depth at observation location (M. Lafaysse)
Bellecote Nivose (3000 m)FLAINE (1640m)
• Generally, the underestimation of the snow depth forcing by MESCAN RR is probably due to the misleading information provided by the non-heated rain gauges or to the under catch due to wind.
EURO4M 4th GA, Norrköping, 17-19 April 2013
Issues
Observations:– high level of uncertainty in using precipitation data particularly in winter
(heated/ non-heated rain gauges, ‘Zero’ precip reports when it snows etc)
– rain gauge measurements not corrected for the wind
Background (downscaled HIRLAM fields from 22km to 5.5km):– What guess to use: fc00+30-fc00+06, fc06+24, fc00+18-fc00+06 + fc12+18 - fc12+06?The quality of the background fields is still under investigation.
revised statistics for background and observation errors
EURO4M 4th GA, Norrköping, 17-19 April 2013
Further plans
At ECMWF for the 2007-2010 (2011 ??) period:
– running and monitoring the production of the background files for both the precipitation and screen-level (T2m/RH2m) analyses;
– running and monitoring the production of the reanalysis:• T2m/RH2m every 6 hours (4 analysis per day)• RR24 (one analysis per day)
Validation of re-analyses– monthly mean, RMSE of 6-hourly T2m– computation of some categorical scores for RR24
EURO4M 4th GA, Norrköping, 17-19 April 2013
Thank you for your attention!
AcknowledgementsThe research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union,
Seventh Framework Programme (FP/2007-2013) under grant agreement no 242093.
EURO4M - reanalysis domain