EURISOL Design Study NUPECC MEETING LNF - DECEMBER 5th, 2003.

EURISOL EURISOL Design StudyDesign Study

NUPECC MEETINGNUPECC MEETING

LNF - DECEMBER 5th, LNF - DECEMBER 5th, 20032003

The EURISOL status reportThe EURISOL status report The The Task Group reportsTask Group reports are to be supplied as are to be supplied as

Appendices to the EURISOL Report, and are now Appendices to the EURISOL Report, and are now at at the Printerthe Printer. Proofs will be received shortly, and . Proofs will be received shortly, and printing should take place during printing should take place during December 03December 03..

The main document, The main document, "The EURISOL Report""The EURISOL Report" itself is itself is almost complete, and will be almost complete, and will be circulatedcirculated to the to the EURISOL Steering Committee members for final EURISOL Steering Committee members for final comment and correctionscomment and corrections, and will then be , and will then be printed printed in early January 2004.in early January 2004.

600 copies600 copies of the Report plus the 5 separate of the Report plus the 5 separate companion volumes of the Appendices will be companion volumes of the Appendices will be mailed out thereafter. mailed out thereafter. A CD versionA CD version will also be will also be available, together with the report, and also available, together with the report, and also separately. separately.

EURISOL DESIGN STUDY ACTION EURISOL DESIGN STUDY ACTION GENERAL INFORMATION GENERAL INFORMATION

Aim of this specific programme is to Aim of this specific programme is to remove the remove the Structural weaknessesStructural weaknesses of of European ResearchEuropean Research

This activity promotes the development This activity promotes the development of a fabric of of a fabric of research infrastructures of research infrastructures of highest quality and performancehighest quality and performance in in Europe and their Europe and their optimum useoptimum use on a on a European scale.European scale.

Aim of this scheme is to contribute, to Aim of this scheme is to contribute, to feasibility studies and technical feasibility studies and technical preparatory workpreparatory work for a for a potentialpotential new new infrastructure which have a clear infrastructure which have a clear European dimension and interest.European dimension and interest.

SPECIFIC PROGRAMMESPECIFIC PROGRAMME

STRUCTURING THE ERASTRUCTURING THE ERA

RESEARCH RESEARCH INFRASTRUCTURESINFRASTRUCTURES

DESIGN STUDYDESIGN STUDY

AREA OF INTERVENTION

SUPPORT SCHEME

INSTRUMENT

SSA SSA (SPECIFIC SUPPORT ACTION)(SPECIFIC SUPPORT ACTION)

This instrument aim to contribute actively This instrument aim to contribute actively among other objectives the among other objectives the preparation of preparation of future activities future activities

FP6-2003-INFRASTRUCTURES-4 CALLFP6-2003-INFRASTRUCTURES-4 CALL SPECIFIC INFORMATION SPECIFIC INFORMATION

Total budget for the Total budget for the call:call:

70 M€ 70 M€

Requested budget:Requested budget: About 9 M€About 9 M€Deadline:Deadline: 4 March 20044 March 2004

Pre-notification Pre-notification proposal:proposal:

before the end of 2003before the end of 2003

Acronym:Acronym: EURISOL DSEURISOL DS

Consortium agreement:Consortium agreement: not requirednot required

Duration of the project:Duration of the project: 48 months48 months

The Community support will take the form of grant up to a The Community support will take the form of grant up to a maximum of 50% of the total cost of the Design Study maximum of 50% of the total cost of the Design Study

WRITING GROUP:WRITING GROUP: G.Fortuna, P. Butler, Y. BlumenfeldG.Fortuna, P. Butler, Y. Blumenfeld

Consultant for Beta-beams: M. LindroosConsultant for Beta-beams: M. Lindroos

COORDINATINGCOORDINATING INSTITUTION:INSTITUTION: GANILGANILTechnical Coordinator:Technical Coordinator: John CornellJohn Cornell

EURISOL DESIGN STUDY: EURISOL DESIGN STUDY: THE SCIENTIFIC GOALSTHE SCIENTIFIC GOALS

Production of a Detailed Engineering Design (DED), of the facility, in particular in relation to its most technologically advanced aspect” (i.e. excluding the detailed design of standard elements of the infrastructure)

Carrying out the Technical Preparatory Work (TPW) related to components, subsystems, material or techniques (dedicated software is included) that are critical for the future development of the new facility

EVALUATION CRITERIA FOREVALUATION CRITERIA FOR SPECIFIC SUPPORT ACTIONS SPECIFIC SUPPORT ACTIONS

The evaluation criteria are organized in four different The evaluation criteria are organized in four different areas, areas,

to each area specific weight and threshold are given . to each area specific weight and threshold are given . The final threshold of the proposal is : 3.5/5The final threshold of the proposal is : 3.5/5

EUROPEAN ADDED VALUE (weight: 1; threshold: 3/5)

the extent of the European significance and interest of the proposed infrastructure, in particular in terms of the needs of the potential users and of the opportunities for multidisciplinary research S&T EXCELLENCE (weight: 1; threshold: 3/5)

The extent to which: - the proposed new infrastructure is scientifically and

technologically original and innovative;

- the proposed study and work is scientifically and technologically

well structured, also in relation to the overall development plans of the new infrastructure.

EVALUATION CRITERIA FOREVALUATION CRITERIA FOR SPECIFIC SUPPORT ACTIONS SPECIFIC SUPPORT ACTIONS

RELEVANCE TO THE OBJECTIVES OF THE SCHEME

(weight: 1; threshold: 3/5)

The extent to which:- there is a clear scientific or technological need for the proposed detailed engineering design and technical preparatory work;- the proposed study and work is capable of exploring the funding and, where appropriate, the regional and transregional dimensions of the proposed infrastructure. QUALITY OF THE MANAGEMENT (weight: 1; threshold: 3/5)

The extent to which:- the project management and the competence of each partner are appropriate for the intended study and work;- there is a clear description and justification of the corresponding budget, divided by tasks and by participants

PROPOSAL STRUCTUREPROPOSAL STRUCTUREA COMPLETE PROPOSAL HAS TWO PARTS: PART A AND PART BA COMPLETE PROPOSAL HAS TWO PARTS: PART A AND PART B

It is a set of forms collecting necessary administrative information (activity code, abstract, organisation legal name, address, legal status, cost model, total funding requested, etc)

The co-ordinator fills in forms A1 and A3The co-ordinator fills in forms A1 and A3

Participants fill in the A2 formParticipants fill in the A2 form

The scientific and technical content of the proposal will be given in detail.It describes, among other things, the nature of the proposed work, the participants and their roles in the proposed project.

It will be prepared by the Writing GroupIt will be prepared by the Writing Group

PART PART AA

PART PART BB

PREPARATION O F THE EURISOL.DS PREPARATION O F THE EURISOL.DS PROPOSAL:PROPOSAL:

IMPORTANT MILESTONES IMPORTANT MILESTONES YEAR 2003YEAR 2003 MAY 12thMAY 12th THE WRITING GROUP (G. FORTUNA, P. BUTLER, Y. BLUMENFELD) IS THE WRITING GROUP (G. FORTUNA, P. BUTLER, Y. BLUMENFELD) IS

APPOINTED BY THE EURISOL STEERING COMMITEE AT THE ORSAY APPOINTED BY THE EURISOL STEERING COMMITEE AT THE ORSAY MEETING)MEETING)

END OF JULYEND OF JULYTHE CALL FOR COLLECTING LETTERS OF INTEREST TO PARTICIPATE IN THE CALL FOR COLLECTING LETTERS OF INTEREST TO PARTICIPATE IN THE EURISOL. DS IS LAUNCHED.THE EURISOL. DS IS LAUNCHED.

SEPTEMBER 20thSEPTEMBER 20thFOURTY LETTERS OF INTERERST FROM ABOUT 20 DIFFERENT FOURTY LETTERS OF INTERERST FROM ABOUT 20 DIFFERENT INSTITUTIONS ARE COLLECTED BY THE WRITING GROUP.INSTITUTIONS ARE COLLECTED BY THE WRITING GROUP.

OCTOBER 2nd,3rdOCTOBER 2nd,3rdAT THE EURISOL STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING HELD AT LNL 11 AT THE EURISOL STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING HELD AT LNL 11 DIFFERENT TASKS ARE IDENTIFIED AND THE TASKS LEADERS DIFFERENT TASKS ARE IDENTIFIED AND THE TASKS LEADERS APPOINTED.APPOINTED.

NOVEMBER 14thNOVEMBER 14thAT ORSAY FIRST OPEN MEETING OF THE TASK LEADERS WITH THE AT ORSAY FIRST OPEN MEETING OF THE TASK LEADERS WITH THE WRITING GROUP. A PROVISIONAL WORK PLANNING OF THE VARIOUS WRITING GROUP. A PROVISIONAL WORK PLANNING OF THE VARIOUS TASKS IS PRESENTED AND DISCUSSED.TASKS IS PRESENTED AND DISCUSSED.

6

8

10

89

65

12

21

6

30

0

5

10

15

20

25

Letters of interest per Tasks Liquid metaltarget&1+ ion-source

Dir. target/ion-source1+

Solid conv. target&1+ion-source

Safety&radio-protection

Heavy-ionaccel.design

Proton accel. Design

SC CavityDevelopment

Beam preparation

Physics & instrument.

Beam intensity calcs

Beta-beam aspects

Globalcoherence&facilitylayout

3 3

5

2

3

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0

1

2

3

4

5

6 Participants from country of origin

TASKSTASKS LEADERLEADER E-MAILE-MAIL INSTITUTEINSTITUTE ** NATURE NATURE OF WORKOF WORK

Liquid Metal Target/Ion Source Liquid Metal Target/Ion Source 11++

F. GroeschelF. Groeschel [email protected]@psi.ch PSIPSI PW - PRO - EPW - PRO - E

Direct Target/Ion-Source 1Direct Target/Ion-Source 1++ J. LettryJ. Lettry [email protected]@cern.ch CERNCERN PW - PRO - EPW - PRO - E

Solid Converter Target/Ion–Solid Converter Target/Ion–Source 1Source 1++

L. TecchioL. Tecchio [email protected]@lnl.infn.it INFNINFN PW - PRO – EPW - PRO – E

Safety & RadioprotectionSafety & Radioprotection D. RidikasD. Ridikas [email protected]@cea.fr CEA SACLAYCEA SACLAY PW PW

Heavy-Ion Accelerator DesignHeavy-Ion Accelerator Design M-H. M-H. MoscatelloMoscatello

[email protected]@ganil.fr GANILGANIL PW -PW -PROPRO

Proton Accelerator DesignProton Accelerator Design A. FaccoA. Facco [email protected]@lnl.infn.it INFNINFN PW - PW - PROPRO

SC Cavity DevelopmentSC Cavity Development S. BoussonS. Bousson [email protected]@ipno.in2p3.fr IPNOIPNO

PW –PROPW –PRO

Beam PreparationBeam Preparation A. JokinenA. Jokinen [email protected]@phys.jyu.fi JYFLJYFL PW PW - PRO- PRO - E - E

Physics and InstrumentationPhysics and Instrumentation R. PageR. Page [email protected]@ns.ph.liv.ac.uk U LIVERPOOLU LIVERPOOL PW - PW - PROPRO

Beam Intensity CalculationsBeam Intensity Calculations

(Also Protons v Heavy Ions)(Also Protons v Heavy Ions)K.H. SchmidtK.H. Schmidt [email protected]@gsi.de GSIGSI PW – E PW – E

Beta Beams AspectsBeta Beams Aspects M. BenediktM. Benedikt [email protected]@cern.ch CERNCERN PWPW

Global Coherence and LayoutGlobal Coherence and Layout TO BE TO BE DEFINEDDEFINED

**PW=PaperwoPW=Paperworkrk

PRO=PrototypPRO=Prototypee

E =ExperimentE =Experiment

N.N.

11

22

33

44

55

66

77

88

99

1010

1111

1212

TASK LEADERS PER COUNTRY

3

2

11

1

2

1

France

I taly

Switzerland

Finland

United Kingdom

CERN

Germany

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE TASKSBRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE TASKS

Direct target & 1Direct target & 1++ ion ion source: source: the objective of this task is the the objective of this task is the development of a development of a target and ion source for radionuclide productiontarget and ion source for radionuclide production that can accommodate up to that can accommodate up to 100 kW100 kW power from a beam of protons or power from a beam of protons or heavier ions. The work package should also investigate how to heavier ions. The work package should also investigate how to significantly improve the efficiency for the release and ionisation significantly improve the efficiency for the release and ionisation process over that of present target and ion source systems. process over that of present target and ion source systems. (J. Lettry) (J. Lettry)

Liquid metal target & 1Liquid metal target & 1++ ion source: ion source: the objective of this task is the the objective of this task is the development of a development of a LIQUID METAL CONVERTERLIQUID METAL CONVERTER target that can target that can accommodate up to accommodate up to 5 MW proton power5 MW proton power. The work package should also . The work package should also investigate the efficient production of singly charged ions of neutron investigate the efficient production of singly charged ions of neutron rich radionuclides in the secondary fissile target and ion source system. rich radionuclides in the secondary fissile target and ion source system. (F. Groeschel)(F. Groeschel)

Solid Converter Target and 1Solid Converter Target and 1++ ion-source” ion-source” this task should this task should continue the work already conducted, within the task Target and Ion continue the work already conducted, within the task Target and Ion Sources of EURISOL-RTD -, studying in depth the feasibility and the Sources of EURISOL-RTD -, studying in depth the feasibility and the reliability of reliability of neutron converters based on solid materialsneutron converters based on solid materials in the beam in the beam power domain of some power domain of some hundred KW.hundred KW. In other words, it should move In other words, it should move from a conceptual design to a much more engineering oriented from a conceptual design to a much more engineering oriented study, which should better outline and start to freeze technical study, which should better outline and start to freeze technical choices for such crucial facility component, especially in relation with choices for such crucial facility component, especially in relation with the RIB production target coupling.the RIB production target coupling. (L. Tecchio)(L. Tecchio)

2

1

3


Heavy IonHeavy Ion Accelerator Design:Accelerator Design: this task should continue the work this task should continue the work already of the task already of the task Post Accelerator and Mass SeparatorPost Accelerator and Mass Separator of EURISOL- of EURISOL-RTD -, studying in depth dynamics, beam transport and matching of RTD -, studying in depth dynamics, beam transport and matching of the beam characteristics with the the beam characteristics with the needs of the future experimental needs of the future experimental campaignscampaigns. This task will move from a conceptual design to a much . This task will move from a conceptual design to a much more engineering oriented study, which should better outline and start more engineering oriented study, which should better outline and start to to freeze technical choicesfreeze technical choices for the subsystems and components of the for the subsystems and components of the HI-Accelerator included in the Eurisol machineHI-Accelerator included in the Eurisol machine chain. chain. (M. H. Moscatello)(M. H. Moscatello)

Safety and radioprotectionSafety and radioprotection: : in in the framework of this taskthe framework of this task calculation of calculation of radiation production and activationradiation production and activation should be performed. should be performed. The methods for The methods for shieldingshielding against prompt radiation and for the against prompt radiation and for the containment of activitycontainment of activity should be studied. This task also should should be studied. This task also should investigate the investigate the handling of targetshandling of targets and in particular the and in particular the disposal of disposal of spent targetsspent targets. The conformity of the proposed installation to the . The conformity of the proposed installation to the legislation shall be insured. legislation shall be insured. (D. Ridikas)(D. Ridikas)

Proton AcceleratorProton Accelerator Design:Design: the task the task “Proton Accelerator Design“Proton Accelerator Design”” should continue the work already conducted, within the task should continue the work already conducted, within the task “Proton Driver” of Eurisol RTD, deepening the study of dynamics, “Proton Driver” of Eurisol RTD, deepening the study of dynamics, beam transport and matching of the beam characteristics with the beam transport and matching of the beam characteristics with the feasibility of the neutron converter and production target in terms feasibility of the neutron converter and production target in terms of sustainable powerof sustainable power. In other words, this task will move from a . In other words, this task will move from a conceptual design to a much more oriented engineering study, conceptual design to a much more oriented engineering study, which should better outline and start to which should better outline and start to freeze the technical freeze the technical choiceschoices for subsystems and components of the proton driver for subsystems and components of the proton driver . . (A. Facco)(A. Facco)

4

5

6


Beam preparationBeam preparation:: this task is concerned with several aspects of this task is concerned with several aspects of beam preparation for injection into the post-acceleratorbeam preparation for injection into the post-accelerator: beam bunching : beam bunching and cooling; species purification (e.g. classical magnetic separation or and cooling; species purification (e.g. classical magnetic separation or ion trap); ion trap); charge breedingcharge breeding, , multi-user capability.multi-user capability. (A. Jokinen)(A. Jokinen)

SC Cavity Development:SC Cavity Development: with this task we intended to attack, as with this task we intended to attack, as first priority, the technical open problems related to the first priority, the technical open problems related to the construction construction of complete cryomodules.of complete cryomodules. It is worthwhile mentioning that such It is worthwhile mentioning that such cryomodules should fit the configuration and the design choices of cryomodules should fit the configuration and the design choices of the driver and post accelerator proposed for the EURISOL facility. the driver and post accelerator proposed for the EURISOL facility. (S. (S. Bousson)Bousson)

Physics and instrumentation:Physics and instrumentation: this task should build upon the this task should build upon the conclusions of the report published within the FP-5 Eurisol contract conclusions of the report published within the FP-5 Eurisol contract (see http://www.ganil.fr/eurisol) to select (see http://www.ganil.fr/eurisol) to select few key scientific goals and few key scientific goals and identify the required experimental methods using novel detector identify the required experimental methods using novel detector technologiestechnologies.. (R. Page)(R. Page)

7

8

9


Beta beam aspects:Beta beam aspects: the objective of this task is to liaise with the the objective of this task is to liaise with the target group to optimize target group to optimize 6He and 18Ne production6He and 18Ne production and the beam and the beam preparation group for the development of preparation group for the development of pulsed ECR sourcepulsed ECR source; to liaise ; to liaise with with the post-accelerationthe post-acceleration group; group; to develop the design of the storage to develop the design of the storage ring/ rapid cycling synchrotron, decay ring andring/ rapid cycling synchrotron, decay ring and stacking schemestacking scheme. . (M.Benedikt)(M.Benedikt)

Beam Intensity Calculations: Beam Intensity Calculations: in the framework of this task a in the framework of this task a procedure for calculating procedure for calculating beam intensities for various accelerator and beam intensities for various accelerator and target configurationstarget configurations in a consistent manner should be devised, in in a consistent manner should be devised, in order to compare and choose between different technical solutions. In order to compare and choose between different technical solutions. In particular, particular, production yields using primary proton, deuteron and heavy production yields using primary proton, deuteron and heavy ion beams should be investigated for specific radio-nuclidesion beams should be investigated for specific radio-nuclides.. The The production of nuclei very far from stability by production of nuclei very far from stability by fragmentation of fragmentation of intermediate energy radioactive beamsintermediate energy radioactive beams should be explored. The should be explored. The conducting of a conducting of a limited number of experimentslimited number of experiments to validate the to validate the calculation procedures is encouraged. calculation procedures is encouraged. (K. H. Schmidt)(K. H. Schmidt)

Global Coherence and Layout: Global Coherence and Layout: to be definedto be defined

10

11

12

INPUTS FROM ORSAY MEETINGINPUTS FROM ORSAY MEETING Need of better defining the “border lines” Need of better defining the “border lines”

of the various tasksof the various tasks Need of a strong (sub)coordination of the Need of a strong (sub)coordination of the

3 accelerators (targets) related tasks3 accelerators (targets) related tasks Strong indication of concentrating the Strong indication of concentrating the

resources on accelerators and targets resources on accelerators and targets tasks(6M€ out of 9M€)tasks(6M€ out of 9M€)

Need of involving SMEs and non-Need of involving SMEs and non-european( VI FP) partners( Triunf, european( VI FP) partners( Triunf, Vinca…..)Vinca…..)

Dec.1st,03: final instructions including Dec.1st,03: final instructions including tabular forms to the task leaderstabular forms to the task leaders

MANAGEMENT SUPPORTING GROUP

•SCIENTIFIC SECRETARY

•ADMINISTRATION

TECHNICAL COORDINATOR

PROJECT ADVISORY

COMMITTEE3 Members

STEERING COMMITTEEMANAGEMEMENT GROUP

+ Representatives of theparticipating institution

1 Meeting/Y

•Approval of the planning

•Monitoring of the use of resources

COORDINATION BOARDManagement Group +Task Leaders

2-3 Meetings/Y

•Scientific&Technical Planning

•Task Coordination&Global Coherence

Task 1

Task 2

Task n

MANAGEMENT GROUPCOORDINATOR+2 Members

Responsibility for theExecution of the contract

ANNUAL PARTICIPANTS MEETING1 Meeting/Y

•Information Plan between the Project and the Community

ANNUAL PARTICIPANTS MEETING1 Meeting/Y

•Information Plan between the Project and the Community

Preparation o f the Eurisol.ds Preparation o f the Eurisol.ds Proposal:Proposal:

Important milestones Important milestones YEAR 2004YEAR 2004

JANUARY 8thJANUARY 8th DEADLINE FOR THE PREPARATION OF AN DEADLINE FOR THE PREPARATION OF AN

ADVANCED DESCRIPTION OF THE TASKS ADVANCED DESCRIPTION OF THE TASKS CONTAINING: WORK PLANNING, MILESTONES, CONTAINING: WORK PLANNING, MILESTONES, DELIVERABLES AND REQUESTED RESOURCES.DELIVERABLES AND REQUESTED RESOURCES.

JANUARY 26thJANUARY 26thPARIS: PARIS: JOINT MEETING OF THE WRITNG GROUP JOINT MEETING OF THE WRITNG GROUP AND THE EURISOL STEERING COMMITTE TO AND THE EURISOL STEERING COMMITTE TO EXAMINE THE STATUS OF THE PROPOSAL AND ITS EXAMINE THE STATUS OF THE PROPOSAL AND ITS GLOBAL COHERENCE.GLOBAL COHERENCE.

FEBRUARY 16tHFEBRUARY 16tHCERN: OPEN MEETING OF THE WRTITING GROUP CERN: OPEN MEETING OF THE WRTITING GROUP AND THE TASK LEADERS FOR THE UPDATE OF THE AND THE TASK LEADERS FOR THE UPDATE OF THE PROPOSAL DRAFT PROPOSAL DRAFT

EURISOL Design Study NUPECC MEETING LNF - DECEMBER 5th, 2003.

Documents

Transcript of EURISOL Design Study NUPECC MEETING LNF - DECEMBER 5th, 2003.