EU Indicator Toolkitcertess.culture-routes.lu/system/files/work/ETIS Toolkit Detailed... · Data...
Transcript of EU Indicator Toolkitcertess.culture-routes.lu/system/files/work/ETIS Toolkit Detailed... · Data...
European Tourism Indicator System
Detailed Indicator Reference Sheets
For Sustainable Destinations
DG Enterprise and Industry
February 2013
EUROPEAN TOURISM INDICATOR SYSTEM DETAILED INDICATOR REFERENCE SHEETS
2 | P a g e
This document has been commissioned by the European Commission as a deliverable of the Study
on the Feasibility of a European Tourism Indicator System for Sustainable Management at
Destination Level. It was developed by:
Main Authors
Professor Graham Miller, The University of Surrey
Dr Louise Twining-Ward, Sustainable Travel International
Dr Murray Simpson, The INTASAVE Partnership
Other Contributors
Heather Clyne, The University of Surrey
Rachel McCaffery, The INTASAVE Partnership
Peter Krahenbuhl, Sustainable Travel International
Marilyn Larden, Sustainable Travel International
Robert Chappell, Sustainable Travel International
Antonio Pezzano, Sustainable Travel International
Brian Mullis, Sustainable Travel International
Ted Manning, Tourisk Inc.
© European Union, 2013
The content of this publication does not reflect the official opinion of the European Union. Responsibility for
the information and views expressed in the publication lies entirely with the author(s).
Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged.
EUROPEAN TOURISM INDICATOR SYSTEM DETAILED INDICATOR REFERENCE SHEETS
3 | P a g e
Table of Contents
Detailed Indicator Reference Sheets ...................................................................................................... 4
Section A: Destination Management ...................................................................................................... 5
A.1 Sustainable Tourism Public Policy ................................................................................................ 5
A.2 Sustainable Tourism Management in Tourism Enterprises .......................................................... 7
A.3 Customer Satisfaction ................................................................................................................... 9
A.4 Information and Communication ............................................................................................... 11
Section B: Economic Value .................................................................................................................... 13
B.1 Tourism Flow (volume & value) at Destination .......................................................................... 13
B.2 Tourism Enterprise(s) Performance ............................................................................................ 18
B.3 Quantity and Quality of Employment ......................................................................................... 23
B.4 Safety and Health ........................................................................................................................ 26
B.5 Tourism Supply Chain ................................................................................................................. 28
Section C: Social and Cultural Impact ................................................................................................... 31
C.1 Community/Social Impact ........................................................................................................... 31
C.2 Gender Equality .......................................................................................................................... 35
C.3 Equality/Accessibility .................................................................................................................. 38
C.4 Protecting and Enhancing Cultural Heritage, Local Identity and Assets ..................................... 42
Section D: Environmental Impact ......................................................................................................... 45
D.1 Reducing Transport Impact ........................................................................................................ 45
D.2 Climate Change ........................................................................................................................... 49
D.3 Solid Waste Management .......................................................................................................... 52
D.4 Sewage Treatment ...................................................................................................................... 55
D.5 Water Management ................................................................................................................... 57
D.6 Energy Usage .............................................................................................................................. 61
D.7 Landscape and Biodiversity Protection ...................................................................................... 64
D.8 Light and Noise Management .................................................................................................... 67
D.9 Bathing Water Quality ................................................................................................................ 69
EUROPEAN TOURISM INDICATOR SYSTEM DETAILED INDICATOR REFERENCE SHEETS
4 | P a g e
Detailed Indicator Reference Sheets
This part of the Toolkit has a reference sheet for each core and optional indicator.
Core indicators are marked in GREEN . Optional indicators are in BLUE . Optional indicators are
those that are not considered essential for destinations just starting their use of indicators. Those
destinations that have advanced their monitoring work would be expected to work with some of the
optional indicators.
For each indicator, a table is provided with methods for monitoring the indicator. The method sheets
include reason the for monitoring, data requirements, unit of measurement, terms that have been
defined in the glossary, data collection instructions, method to calculate the result of the indicator,
frequency of data collection, reporting format, any international benchmarks that may exist,
suggested actions, and any additional references.
These reference sheets should provide a useful starting point for monitoring. The specifics of data collection responsibility will be different from place to place. Destinations are encouraged to make notes on this table regarding who is responsible for collecting the relevant information on each indicator.
Core Indicator: A.1.1 The indicator goes here – when this box is green it's a core indicator. Blue boxes are for optional indicators.
Reason for measuring This part explains why it is important to measure this indicator
Data requirements What information is needed, e.g. crime data, noise policy
Units of measurement What units to use when recording the information, e.g. $. %
Terms in glossary Terms used in the indicator that are explained in the Glossary- See http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/sectors/tourism/index_en.htm
Data collection instructions
Destination Management Survey, Visitor Survey, Resident Survey, Enterprise Survey or other official data such as waste reports, water reports, crime reports, etc.(will depend on indicator)
Method of calculation How to calculate the result based on the data collected
Frequency of data collection
How often a destination is expected to collect new information
Reporting format How to best display/analyse the information
International benchmarks Any international points of reference are here
Key Stakeholders/users Who will need to act on the indicator results
Suggested actions What results are they likely to need to take if the information is under the expected target?
References Any points for further reading
EUROPEAN TOURISM INDICATOR SYSTEM DETAILED INDICATOR REFERENCE SHEETS
5 | P a g e
Section A: Destination Management A.1 Sustainable Tourism Public Policy
Core Indicator: A.1.1 Percentage of the destination with a sustainable tourism strategy/ action plan, with agreed monitoring, development control and evaluation arrangement
Reason for measuring Planning is the first step towards long-term sustainability. This indicator seeks to determine if a destination has a sustainable tourism policy and actionable plan, and if so, the completeness of it.
Data requirements The plan and/or policy document
Units of measurement %
Terms in glossary Sustainable tourism plan/ Sustainable tourism action strategy
Data collection instructions
Destination Management Survey
Method of calculation
Total number of destination villages/towns with action plan ÷ total number of destination villages/towns * 100 = % of the destination with sustainable tourism strategy/action plan OR Total population of areas with tourism strategy/action plan ÷ total population * 100= % of population with sustainable tourism strategy/action plan
Frequency of data collection
Every one to two years
Reporting format Pie chart
International benchmarks N/A
Key Stakeholders/users Destination Managers, Policy Makers
Suggested actions Extension of plan to cover entire destination area
References
Check UNWTO Guidelines for Policy-making and Planners http://pub.world-tourism.org:81/epages/Store.sf/?ObjectPath=/Shops/Infoshop/Products/1396/SubProducts/1396-1
EUROPEAN TOURISM INDICATOR SYSTEM DETAILED INDICATOR REFERENCE SHEETS
6 | P a g e
Optional Indicator: A.1.1.1 Percentage of residents satisfied with their involvement and their influence in the planning and development of tourism
Reason for measuring Consultation is vital to sustainable tourism. This indicator seeks to understand if interested residents are engaged with tourism planning, and if so, if they are satisfied with their involvement and influence.
Data requirements Results of resident survey
Units of measurement %
Terms in glossary Resident Resident satisfaction
Data collection instructions
Resident Survey
Method of calculation
Total number of resident respondents satisfied with their involvement and influence in the planning and development of tourism ÷ total number of resident respondents * 100 = % of local residents satisfied with their involvement
Frequency of data collection
Annual
Reporting format Pie chart
International benchmarks N/A
Key stakeholders/users Destination Managers, Policy Makers
Suggested actions Review policies and procedures for involving residents in planning
References http://www.e-unwto.org/content/u01642/?p=4283cf23e9c0437da9fe576ebe925bd8&pi=0
Optional Indicator: A.1.1.2 Percentage of the destination represented by a destination management organisation
Reason for measuring Ensuring communities are represented is crucial to sustainability. This indicator measures the extent to which they are included.
Data requirements Policy documents showing the jurisdiction of the DMO
Units of measurement %
Terms in glossary Destination Management Organisation (DMO)
Data collection instructions
Destination Management Survey
Method of calculation
Total number of communities with a DMO ÷ total number of communities * 100 = % of communities with a DMO OR Total population of areas represented by the DMO ÷ total population * 100= % of population represented by DMO
Frequency of data collection
Every two to three years
Reporting format Pie chart
International benchmarks N/A
Key stakeholders/users Destination Managers, Policy Makers
Suggested actions Consider including residents outside the DMO area to participate
References
EUROPEAN TOURISM INDICATOR SYSTEM DETAILED INDICATOR REFERENCE SHEETS
7 | P a g e
A.2 Sustainable Tourism Management in Tourism Enterprises
Core Indicator: A.2.1 Percentage of tourism enterprises/establishments in the destination using a voluntary verified certification/labelling for environmental/quality/sustainability and/or CSR measures
Reason for measuring
Certification is an indication of industry interest and implementation of sustainable business practices. This indicator looks at the percentage of tourism enterprises that have had an independent verification of their sustainability practices and allows Destination managers and policy makers to create incentives for participation.
Data requirements List of certified businesses, list of all registered tourism businesses
Units of measurement %
Terms in glossary Certification/labelling Environmental/quality/sustainability
Data collection instructions
Enterprise Survey
Method of calculation Total number of tourism enterprises certified ÷ total number of tourism enterprises * 100 = % of tourism enterprises certified
Frequency of data collection
Annual
Reporting format Pie chart
International benchmarks By 2007, total certified tourism products in Europe were estimated to be between 6000 and 10,000; and globally there were just less than 15,000 certified businesses and products.
Key stakeholders/users Destination Managers
Suggested actions Actions to encourage increased certification by tourism enterprises
References http://www.responsibletravel.org/resources/documents/reports/Ecotourism_Handbook_III.pdf
EUROPEAN TOURISM INDICATOR SYSTEM DETAILED INDICATOR REFERENCE SHEETS
8 | P a g e
Optional Indicator: A.2.1.1 Number of tourism enterprises/establishments with sustainability reports in accordance with the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI)
Reason for measuring This indicator seeks to determine the number of enterprises that have submitted a globally accepted sustainability report.
Data requirements List of businesses reporting, list of all tourism businesses
Units of measurement Percentage of businesses
Terms in glossary Global Reporting Initiative
Data collection instructions
Enterprise Survey
Method of calculation Total number of tourism enterprises that have submitted a GRI ÷ total number of tourism enterprises * 100 = % of enterprises that have submitted a GRI
Frequency of data collection
Annual
Reporting format Bar chart to show progress over time
International benchmarks As of July 2012, there were 80 tourism/leisure organisations with GRI sustainability reports in Europe and 118 worldwide.
Key stakeholders/users Destination Managers
Suggested actions Raise awareness and encourage more businesses to submit GRI reports. Highlight those that do.
References http://database.globalreporting.org/
EUROPEAN TOURISM INDICATOR SYSTEM DETAILED INDICATOR REFERENCE SHEETS
9 | P a g e
A.3 Customer Satisfaction
Core Indicator: A.3.1 Percentage of visitors that are satisfied with their overall experience in the destination
Reason for measuring The quality of the visitor experience affects the ability of the destination to generate economic benefits. This indicator investigates visitor satisfaction.
Data requirements Results of visitor survey
Units of measurement %
Terms in glossary Visitor satisfaction
Data collection instructions
Visitor Survey
Method of calculation Total number of visitors responding as satisfied with overall experience ÷ total number of visitor respondents * 100 = % of visitors satisfied with overall experience
Frequency of data collection
Every one or two years as resources allow
Reporting format Bar chart showing change over time
International benchmarks Brussels – 95.68% of visitors satisfied with overall experience (2012) Northern Ireland – 99% of visitors satisfied with overall experience (2003)
Key stakeholders/users All
Suggested actions Low scores require further analysis. Matching the data with visitor profiles and tourism products can help provide a more in-depth picture and identify issues to focus on.
References
http://www.tci-research.com/ http://visitbrussels.be/bitc/static/front/img/db/img_8999.pdf UNWTO practical guide to destination management: section 1.9 Maximising Visitor Satisfaction
EUROPEAN TOURISM INDICATOR SYSTEM DETAILED INDICATOR REFERENCE SHEETS
10 | P a g e
Optional Indicator: A.3.1.1 Percentage of repeat/return visitors (within 5 years)
Reason for measuring Visitors who return and become loyal, repeat visitors are often more economically beneficial to the destination. Monitoring the percentage of repeat visitors is important.
Data requirements Results of visitor survey
Units of measurement %
Terms in glossary Repeat/return visitor
Data collection instructions
Visitor Survey
Method of calculation Total number of repeat/return visitor respondents in last 5 years ÷ total number of visitor respondents in last 5 years * 100 = % of repeat/return visitors in last 5 years
Frequency of data collection
Annual
Reporting format Bar chart showing trend
International benchmarks N/A
Key stakeholders/users Destination Managers
Suggested actions Further analysis into satisfaction levels
References
EUROPEAN TOURISM INDICATOR SYSTEM DETAILED INDICATOR REFERENCE SHEETS
11 | P a g e
A.4 Information and Communication
Core Indicator: A.4.1 The percentage of visitors who note that they are aware of destination sustainability efforts
Reason for measuring
Publicly announcing support for a move towards greater sustainability is important. This indicator focuses on ensuring public awareness of the destination’s sustainability position and alignment with its policies, actions and results.
Data requirements Results of visitor survey
Units of measurement %
Terms in glossary Official tourism information
Data collection instructions
Visitor Survey
Method of calculation Total number of visitors who note that are aware of sustainability efforts ÷ total number of visitors * 100 = % of visitors who note they are aware of destination sustainability efforts
Frequency of data collection
Annual
Reporting format Pie chart
International benchmarks N A
Key stakeholders/users Destination Managers, Tourism Enterprises, Residents, Policy Makers
Suggested actions Increase the sustainability content of marketing materials
References
EUROPEAN TOURISM INDICATOR SYSTEM DETAILED INDICATOR REFERENCE SHEETS
12 | P a g e
Optional Indicator: A.4.1.1 The percentage of businesses that communicate their sustainability efforts to visitors in their products, marketing, or branding
Reason for measuring Educating visitors about the sustainability issues and initiatives in the destination is one of the roles of a sustainable destination. This indicator measures the sustainability content of visitor information.
Data requirements Results of enterprise survey
Units of measurement %
Terms in glossary Destination visitor information
Data collection instructions
Enterprise Survey
Method of calculation Total number of businesses that communicate sustainability to visitors ÷ total number of businesses * 100 = % of business that communicate their sustainability efforts to visitors
Frequency of data collection
Annual
Reporting format Pie chart
International benchmarks N/A
Key stakeholders/users Destination Managers, Tourism Enterprises, Residents, Policy Makers
Suggested actions Increase the sustainability content of marketing materials
References
EUROPEAN TOURISM INDICATOR SYSTEM DETAILED INDICATOR REFERENCE SHEETS
13 | P a g e
Section B: Economic Value B.1 Tourism Flow (volume & value) at Destination
Core Indicator: B.1.1 Number of tourist nights per month
Reason for measuring The number of tourist nights is a primary indicator of tourism volume in the destination. This indicator measures average volume per month throughout the year, revealing seasonal patterns in the destination.
Data requirements Number of visitors, tourists, and tourist nights
Units of measurement Occupancy rate (the closest industry standard measure)
Terms in glossary Tourist nights
Data collection instructions
Destination Management Survey
Visitor Survey
Method of calculation
Tally number of tourist nights every month Tally total number of tourist nights annually ÷ 12 = Average number of tourist nights per month
Frequency of data collection
Monthly Annually
Reporting format Bar chart by month for fiscal/reporting year
International benchmarks N/A
Key stakeholders/users Destination Managers, Tourism Enterprises
Suggested actions Monitor annual trends determine if tourism is increasing or decreasing tourist nights
References
NOTES: Note: destinations such as parks with few overnight visitors should use tourist days per month (B 3.1.1.2) Regional and national tourism statistics usually collect the total number of tourist nights in the region or the country. In most cases they only include commercial accommodation (not residential tourism), but they represent good estimations. Furthermore, most are geographically divided into municipalities or small destinations and temporarily split by months. If these figures are available, it is ideal and there is no need to collect further data on this. If not, it is necessary to collect the data at the destination level. This can be done by the destination representatives who can ask for data directly from the different commercial tourism accommodation enterprises since they have their own occupancy registers.
EUROPEAN TOURISM INDICATOR SYSTEM DETAILED INDICATOR REFERENCE SHEETS
14 | P a g e
Optional Indicator: B.1.1.1 Relative contribution of tourism to the destination's economy (% GDP)
Reason for measuring This measure shows how important tourism is to a destination. A high percentage may suggest economic vulnerability due to over reliance on tourism.
Data requirements
Total value of tourism in the destination made up of revenue generated from all tourism businesses and their subsectors and related activities. Total value of the destination’s economy.
Units of measurement %
Terms in glossary Relative Contribution
Data collection instructions
Total value of tourism can only be accurately calculated using in-depth survey and economic tools such as Satellite Accounting. Destination Management Survey
Method of calculation Total economic value of tourism ÷ total economic value of destination (GDP) * 100 = % of GDP derived from tourism
Frequency of data collection
Annual
Reporting format Pie chart, stacked graph
International benchmarks
In 2011, the direct contribution of tourism to Europe’s GDP was 2.9% and the total contribution (direct + indirect + induced income) was 7.9%. Direct contribution ranged from 1.6% in Lithuania and Germany to 14.5% in Malta, while total contribution ranged from 4.2% in Lithuania to 27.7% in Malta.
Key stakeholders/users Policy Makers, Destination Managers
Suggested actions Monitor annual trends to better forecast economic impacts and develop policy
References http://www.wttc.org/eng/Tourism_Research/Economic_Data_Search_Tool/
EUROPEAN TOURISM INDICATOR SYSTEM DETAILED INDICATOR REFERENCE SHEETS
15 | P a g e
Optional Indicator: B.1.1.2 Number of ‘same day’ visitors in high season and low season
Reason for measuring Comparing day and overnight visitors is important. While overnight visitors have a higher trip spend, day visitors are often important for retailers.
Data requirements Results of visitor survey
Units of measurement Number of people
Terms in glossary Same day visitors
Data collection instructions
Visitor Survey
Method of calculation Total number of same day visitors in the high season Total number of same day visitors in the low season
Frequency of data collection
Annually
Reporting format Bar graph by month for fiscal/reporting period
International benchmarks N/A
Key stakeholders/users Policy Makers, Destination Managers, Tourism Managers
Suggested actions Monitor annual trends
References http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/statistics_explained/index.php/Tourism_trends
NOTES: European tourism statistics are currently limited to at least an overnight stay; as of 2014, outbound same day visits will be covered as well.
EUROPEAN TOURISM INDICATOR SYSTEM DETAILED INDICATOR REFERENCE SHEETS
16 | P a g e
Optional Indicator: B.1.1.3 Daily spending per same day visitor
Reason for measuring To better understand the spending patterns and economic impact of day visitors and compare these patterns over time with overnight visitors
Data requirements Results of visitor survey
Units of measurement Local currency
Terms in glossary Daily spending Same day visitors
Data collection instructions
Visitor Survey
Method of calculation
Tally daily spending per same day visitor respondents ÷ total number of respondents = Average daily spending per same day visitor Total annual spending by same day visitors ÷ total number of annual same day visitors ÷ 365 = Average daily spending per same day visitor
Frequency of data collection
Annual
Reporting format Pie chart of spending pattern, comparative bar chart of overnight and same day spending
International benchmarks In the UK, average daily spending per same day visitor, including those visits where no money was spent, was £34 (€42.84) in 2011.
Key stakeholders/users Policy Makers, Destination Managers, Tourism Managers
Suggested actions Low tourist spending would suggest the need for product development and reinvestment in destination services
References http://www.visitengland.org/Images/GBDVS%20Main%20Annual%20Report%20FV3%20-%2025%20%20May%202012_FINAL_tcm30-32969.pdf
EUROPEAN TOURISM INDICATOR SYSTEM DETAILED INDICATOR REFERENCE SHEETS
17 | P a g e
Core Indicator: B.1.2 Daily spending per tourist (accommodation, food and drinks, other services)
Reason for measuring Monitoring tourist spending is a good way of showing the direct economic impact of tourism to the destination.
Data requirements Results of visitor survey
Units of measurement Local currency
Terms in glossary Daily spending
Data collection instructions
Visitor Survey
Method of calculation
Tally daily spending per tourist respondents (in total and by item)÷ total number of respondents = Average daily spending per tourist/spending by item Total annual spending by tourists ÷ total number of annual tourists ÷ 365 = Average daily spending per tourist
Frequency of data collection
Annual
Reporting format Bar chart compared with day visitors
International benchmarks In Europe, average daily spending per tourist was €64 for all holiday trips in 2011.
Key stakeholders/users Policy Makers, Destination Managers
Suggested actions Research and analysis on ways to enhance visitor spending and value chain connections
References http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-SF-12-028/EN/KS-SF-12-028-EN.PDF
EUROPEAN TOURISM INDICATOR SYSTEM DETAILED INDICATOR REFERENCE SHEETS
18 | P a g e
B.2 Tourism Enterprise(s) Performance
Core Indicator: B.2.1 Average length of stay of tourists (nights)
Reason for measuring The economic value of tourism multiplies as the length of visitor stay increases. Monitoring average length of stay is an important pulse on enterprise and destination performance.
Data requirements Tourism data reports
Units of measurement Number of nights
Terms in glossary Tourist nights
Data collection instructions
Destination Management Survey
Visitor Survey
Method of calculation Tally the total tourist nights per respondent ÷ total number of respondents = Average length of stay per tourist
Frequency of data collection
Annual
Reporting format Bar graph
International benchmarks In Europe, the average length of stay was 5.4 nights for all holiday trips in 2011
Key stakeholders/users Tourism Enterprises, Destination Managers
Suggested actions Should average length of stay begin to trend downward, investigate potential causes (limited attractions or activities, reduced value for price)
References http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-SF-12-028/EN/KS-SF-12-028-EN.PDF
EUROPEAN TOURISM INDICATOR SYSTEM DETAILED INDICATOR REFERENCE SHEETS
19 | P a g e
Optional Indicator: B.2.1.1 Average length of stay of same day visitors (hours)
Reason for measuring The longer visitors stay in a destination, the more they spend. Increasing the average hours spent in a place and monitoring that increase is a useful indicator of performance.
Data requirements Tourism data reports
Units of measurement Number of hours
Terms in glossary Same day visitors
Data collection instructions
Destination Management Survey
Visitor Survey
Method of calculation Tally the total number of hours spent by same day respondents ÷ total number of same day respondents = Average length of stay per same day visitor
Frequency of data collection
Annual
Reporting format Bar graph
International benchmarks N/A
Key stakeholders/users Tourism Enterprises, Destination Managers
Suggested actions Should average length of stay begin to trend downward, investigate potential causes (limited attractions or activities, reduced value for money)
References
EUROPEAN TOURISM INDICATOR SYSTEM DETAILED INDICATOR REFERENCE SHEETS
20 | P a g e
Optional Indicator: B.2.1.2 Percentage of ten largest tourism enterprises involved in destination management/cooperative marketing
Reason for measuring
Working collaboratively is an indication of the level of trust among members of the tourism community and it ensures diverse perspectives are included in sustainable tourism development. The indicator measures to what extent tourism businesses are collaborating.
Data requirements List of ten largest tourism enterprises in destination (by number of employees). Results of Enterprise survey
Units of measurement %
Terms in glossary Cooperative marketing
Data collection instructions
Enterprise Survey
Method of calculation Number of ten largest tourism enterprises participating in cooperative marketing ÷ 10 * 100 = % top ten largest tourism enterprises involved in cooperative marketing
Frequency of data collection
Annual
Reporting format Pie Chart
International benchmarks N/A
Key stakeholders/users Destination Managers
Suggested actions Determine if there are opportunities to extend collective marketing, looking at good practice from other destinations
References
EUROPEAN TOURISM INDICATOR SYSTEM DETAILED INDICATOR REFERENCE SHEETS
21 | P a g e
Core Indicator: B.2.2 Occupancy rate in commercial accommodation per month and average for the year
Reason for measuring Occupancy rates measure the efficiency of accommodation stock utilisation. A sustainable destination fills up its rooms year-round.
Data requirements Accommodation occupancy report
Units of measurement %
Terms in glossary Occupancy rate (by room) Commercial accommodation
Data collection instructions
Destination Management Survey
Method of calculation
Total number of overnight stays in commercial accommodations per month ÷ total number of commercial accommodation rooms available * day in month * 100 = Occupancy rate in commercial accommodations per month Sum of monthly occupancy rates for the year ÷ 12 = Average monthly rate for the year Total number of overnight stays in commercial accommodations annually ÷ 12 ÷ total number of commercial accommodations rooms available * 365 * 100 = Average monthly occupancy rate for the year
Frequency of data collection
Monthly Annual
Reporting format Bar chart for reporting period, pie chart
International benchmarks In 2011, the average occupancy rate was 64% in commercial accommodation in the UK.
Key stakeholders/users Hoteliers, Destination Managers
Suggested actions Monitor trends over time, address seasonality issues, and use to consider applications for further room development
References http://www.visitengland.org/Images/UKOS%20Annual%20summary_FINAL_290512_tcm30-32955.pdf
EUROPEAN TOURISM INDICATOR SYSTEM DETAILED INDICATOR REFERENCE SHEETS
22 | P a g e
Optional Indicator: B.2.2.1 Average price per room in the destination
Reason for measuring Price per room is important because it reflects the revenue the destination gains from accommodation. When combined with occupancy rates it reflects the revenue potential of the destination.
Data requirements Price per room, average occupancy rates
Units of measurement Local currency
Terms in glossary Revenue per available room (REV PAR)
Data collection instructions
Enterprise Survey (accommodations)
Destination Management Survey
Method of calculation Tally average room rate for all available rooms throughout the destination. Result ÷ x Occupancy % = Revenue per available room
Frequency of data collection
Annual
Reporting format Bar chart
International benchmarks In 2011, average REV PAR was €66.17 in Europe, ranging from €54.07 in Spain to €75.68 in Italy. In city destinations, REV PAR ranged from €42.36 in Birmingham to €187.35 in Venice.
Key stakeholders/users Hoteliers, Destination Managers
Suggested actions REV PAR will illustrate the average price for each room and should act as a baseline for monitoring trends in destination value
References http://www.hotelnewsnow.com/articles.aspx/7359/STR-Global-Europe-results-for-2011
EUROPEAN TOURISM INDICATOR SYSTEM DETAILED INDICATOR REFERENCE SHEETS
23 | P a g e
B.3 Quantity and Quality of Employment
Core Indicator: B.3.1 Direct tourism employment as percentage of total employment
Reason for measuring To understand the role of tourism in job creation and the sector’s relative value in terms of employment generation.
Data requirements Results of employment reports and analysis
Units of measurement %
Terms in glossary Direct tourism employment
Data collection instructions
Destination Management Survey
Method of calculation Total number of residents directly employed by tourism ÷ total size of destination labour force * 100 = % of local residents directly employed by tourism
Frequency of data collection
Annual
Reporting format Pie chart
International benchmarks In Europe, direct tourism employment was 3.3% of total employment in 2011, ranging from 1.6% in Lithuania to 15.7% in Malta.
Key stakeholders/users Destination Managers, Policy Makers
Suggested actions Monitor trends to better understand the growth or decline of tourism jobs
References http://www.wttc.org/site_media/uploads/downloads/european_union2012.pdf
EUROPEAN TOURISM INDICATOR SYSTEM DETAILED INDICATOR REFERENCE SHEETS
24 | P a g e
Optional Indicator: B.3.1.1 Percentage of jobs in tourism that are seasonal
Reason for measuring A true measure of tourism’s employment generation and value needs to consider the seasonal variation in employment.
Data requirements Results of employment report
Units of measurement %
Terms in glossary Seasonal
Data collection instructions
Enterprise Survey
Method of calculation Total number of seasonal tourism jobs ÷ total number of tourism jobs * 100 = % of tourism jobs that are seasonal
Frequency of data collection
Annual
Reporting format Pie chart
International benchmarks In 2007, 24% of hotel and restaurant employees and 30% employed in tourist accommodation had a seasonal job in Europe
Key stakeholders/users Destination Managers, Policy Makers
Suggested actions Try to find opportunities for tourism jobs that are year-round and not subjected to seasonal variations
References http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/statistics_explained/index.php/Tourism_employment
NOTES: The percentage of jobs that were seasonal ranged from 6% in Estonia and Romania to 55% in Poland for the hotel and restaurant sector and from 7% in Romania to 41% in Greece for tourist accommodation in 2007.
EUROPEAN TOURISM INDICATOR SYSTEM DETAILED INDICATOR REFERENCE SHEETS
25 | P a g e
Optional Indicator: B.3.1.2 Percentage of tourism enterprises providing student internships
Reason for measuring
The skill level of tourism employees is indicative of the quality of the employment. This indicator helps assess the how many local tourism enterprises are helping to train the next generation of travel and tourism professionals.
Data requirements Results of Enterprise survey
Units of measurement %
Terms in glossary Student internships
Data collection instructions
Enterprise Survey
Method of calculation Total number of tourism enterprises providing student internships ÷ total number of tourism enterprises * 100 = % of tourism enterprises providing student internships
Frequency of data collection
Annual
Reporting format Pie chart
International benchmarks
Key stakeholders/users Tourism Enterprises, Destination Managers, Policy Makers
Suggested actions If this is low, more opportunities for student internship should be considered.
References
EUROPEAN TOURISM INDICATOR SYSTEM DETAILED INDICATOR REFERENCE SHEETS
26 | P a g e
B.4 Safety and Health
Core Indicator: B.4.1 Percentage of tourism enterprises inspected for fire safety in the last year
Reason for measuring
Public safety is a critical component of destination management and business operations. Keeping track of which properties and have been inspected improves inter-departmental co-ordination and helps ensure an enterprise does not consistently avoid inspection, and, therefore, present a risk to visitor safety.
Data requirements Health and Safety Records, Results of Enterprise Survey
Units of measurement %
Terms in glossary Fire safety
Data collection instructions
Enterprise Survey
Method of calculation Total number of tourism enterprises that have been inspected for fire safety ÷ total of tourism enterprises * 100 = % of tourism enterprises inspected for fire safety
Frequency of data collection
Annual
Reporting format Pie chart
International benchmarks N/A
Key stakeholders/users Destination Managers
Suggested actions Hotels that are not inspected should be contacted and the situation resolved in accordance to internationally accepted standards
References
EUROPEAN TOURISM INDICATOR SYSTEM DETAILED INDICATOR REFERENCE SHEETS
27 | P a g e
Optional Indicator: B.4.1.1 Percentage of tourists who register a complaint with the police
Reason for measuring Increasing crime rates against tourists and by tourists can be a warning sign for other types of social impacts in the destination
Data requirements Crime reports, statistics
Units of measurement %
Terms in glossary
Data collection instructions
Crime Reports
Method of calculation Total number of tourists who registered a complaint with the police ÷ total number of tourists * 100 = % of tourists who registered a complaint with the police
Frequency of data collection
Annual
Reporting format Bar graph
International benchmarks N/A
Key stakeholders/users Tourism Enterprises, Destination Managers, Government Officials
Suggested actions Should rates reports exceed target or rise unexpectedly, action to reduce these crimes should be taken
References
EUROPEAN TOURISM INDICATOR SYSTEM DETAILED INDICATOR REFERENCE SHEETS
28 | P a g e
B.5 Tourism Supply Chain
Core Indicator: B.5.1 Percentage of tourism enterprises actively taking steps to source local, sustainable, and fair trade goods and services
Reason for measuring
Responsible purchasing helps to strengthen local economies and reduce environmental impacts. If a destination is aware of the local purchasing decisions the destination can leverage that purchasing power to provide a greater amount of local, sustainable, and fair trade products and services.
Data requirements Results of Enterprise survey
Units of measurement %
Terms in glossary Local goods and services Sustainable goods and services Fair trade goods and services
Data collection instructions
Enterprise Survey
Method of calculation Total number of tourism enterprises actively sourcing ÷ total number of tourism enterprises * 100 = % of tourism enterprises actively taking steps to source local, sustainable, and fair trade goods and services
Frequency of data collection
Annual
Reporting format Pie chart
International benchmarks N/A
Key stakeholders/users Tourism Enterprises, Destination Managers
Suggested actions Establish a program to encourage responsible purchasing practices
References http://destinet.eu/topics/sustainable-supply-chain-management/
EUROPEAN TOURISM INDICATOR SYSTEM DETAILED INDICATOR REFERENCE SHEETS
29 | P a g e
Optional Indicator: B.5.1.1 Percentage of the destination covered by a policy promoting local, sustainable and/or fair trade products and services
Reason for measuring Implementing a policy to promote responsible purchasing helps to leverage the purchasing power of the destination to provide a greater amount of local, sustainable, and fair trade products and services.
Data requirements Results of Destination Management Survey
Units of measurement %
Terms in glossary Sustainable goods and services Fair trade goods and services
Data collection instructions
Destination Management Survey
Method of calculation
Total amount of destination covered by a policy of promoting local sustainable and/or fair trade products and services ÷ total size of the destination * 100 = % of destination covered by a policy promoting local, sustainable and/or fair trade products and services
Frequency of data collection
Annual
Reporting format Pie chart
International benchmarks N/A
Key stakeholders/users Destination Managers, Tourism Enterprises
Suggested actions If the result is rather low, encourage more enterprises to consider responsible purchasing practices
References
EUROPEAN TOURISM INDICATOR SYSTEM DETAILED INDICATOR REFERENCE SHEETS
30 | P a g e
Optional Indicator: B.5.1.2 Percentage of tourism enterprises sourcing a minimum of 25% of food and drink from local/regional producers
Reason for measuring Sourcing local products increases the economic value of tourism. Tracking this figure will help DMOs explore ways to increase the connection between tourism and local agriculture.
Data requirements Results of Enterprise survey
Units of measurement %
Terms in glossary Local/Regional
Data collection instructions
Enterprise survey
Method of calculation
Total number of tourism enterprises that source a minimum of 25% of food and drink from local/regional producers ÷ total number of tourism enterprises * 100 = % of tourism enterprises sourcing a minimum of 25% of food and drink from local/regional producers
Frequency of data collection
Annual
Reporting format Stacked bar graph
International benchmarks N/A
Key stakeholders/users Tourism Enterprises, Destination Managers
Suggested actions If the result is rather low (>20%), encourage more enterprises to consider responsible purchasing practices
References
EUROPEAN TOURISM INDICATOR SYSTEM DETAILED INDICATOR REFERENCE SHEETS
31 | P a g e
Section C: Social and Cultural Impact C.1 Community/Social Impact
Core Indicator: C.1.1 Number of tourists/visitors per 100 residents
Reason for measuring The density of tourists/visitors in comparison to residents offers a suitable indicator for understanding the social impact of tourism on residents. This is referred to as the ‘penetration ratio’.
Data requirements Number of tourists
Units of measurement Number of tourists/visitors
Terms in glossary
Data collection instructions
Destination Management Survey
Method of calculation Total number of tourists* average length of stay/total residents*365/100
Frequency of data collection
Annually
Reporting format Bar graph
International benchmarks In Europe, the average tourism intensity was 446.3 tourists per 100 residents in 2009.
Key stakeholders/users Destination Managers, Policy Makers
Suggested actions When visitor density is high, it is important to identify any bottlenecks (e.g. parking, pedestrian areas) that could alleviate resident stress and improve the visitor experience.
References http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/statistics_explained/index.php/Tourism_statistics_at_regional_level
EUROPEAN TOURISM INDICATOR SYSTEM DETAILED INDICATOR REFERENCE SHEETS
32 | P a g e
Optional Indicator: C.1.1.1 Percentage of residents who are satisfied with tourism in the destination (per month/season)
Reason for measuring
Checking on resident satisfaction on a regular basis is an important gauge for visitor experience. Being alert to changes in levels of resident satisfaction and taking action where necessary is fundamental to sustainable tourism.
Data requirements Resident surveys, tourism studies during peak season
Units of measurement %
Terms in glossary Resident satisfaction
Data collection instructions
Resident Survey
Method of calculation
Number of residents who responded “satisfied” or better ÷ total number of residents who responded * 100 = % of residents satisfied with tourism Repeat for each month/season/year
Frequency of data collection
Monthly Seasonally Annually
Reporting format Bar graph
International benchmarks N/A
Key stakeholders/users Destination Managers
Suggested actions Should the results be less than an agreed percentage, destination managers and tourism enterprises need to engage with residents to determine how to better plan tourism development and activities
References
EUROPEAN TOURISM INDICATOR SYSTEM DETAILED INDICATOR REFERENCE SHEETS
33 | P a g e
Optional Indicator: C.1.1.2 Number of beds available in commercial visitor accommodation per 100 residents
Reason for measuring This is a way of measuring the relative impact of tourism on residents’ way of life.
Data requirements Tourism census for accommodations and beds
Units of measurement Number of beds
Terms in glossary Available beds Commercial accommodation
Data collection instructions
Destination Management Survey
Method of calculation Total number of visitor beds in commercial accommodation ÷ total number of residents * 100 = Number of available beds per 100 residents
Frequency of data collection
Annually
Reporting format Bar chart
International benchmarks
5.7 bed places available per 100 residents in Europe (2009) Average bed places available in the 14 European regions with the highest number of tourist bed places per 100 residents = 51.1 beds places (2005)
Key stakeholders/users Destination Managers, Policy Makers
Suggested actions
When the number of beds per 100 residents rises sharply it might be time to have a public meeting about the impacts of accommodation development. This is a particular concern if occupancy rates average under 60%.
References
http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=tour_cap_bed&lang=en http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-SF-08-001/EN/KS-SF-08-001-EN.PDF
Notes: 28,388,523 / 498,000,000 * 100 residents = 5.7 bed places per 100 residents (EU-27 bed places available in 2009/population of EU-27 in 2009)
EUROPEAN TOURISM INDICATOR SYSTEM DETAILED INDICATOR REFERENCE SHEETS
34 | P a g e
Optional Indicator: C.1.1.3 Number of second/rental homes per 100 homes
Reason for measuring
Having large numbers of rental properties can change the nature of a destination, particularly when rental properties outnumber resident homes. Keeping a check on the balance of rentals and residencies can help address this issue before it becomes a problem.
Data requirements Number of second homes Number of resident homes
Units of measurement Number of second/rental homes
Terms in glossary Second/rental homes
Data collection instructions
Destination Management Survey
Method of calculation
Total number of homes ÷ 100 = N factor Total number of second/rental homes ÷ N factor = Number of second/rental homes per 100 homes Total number of second/rental homes ÷ total number of homes * 100 = Number of second/rental homes per 100 homes
Frequency of data collection
Every three years
Reporting format Pie chart
International benchmarks
EU Regions - Nord-Pas-de Calais, Zeeland and West Flanders second/rental homes: 20% (2004), Catalonia: 23% (2005), Southern North Sea coast: 2% (2001). In some seaside resorts, second and holiday homes can reach 75% of all residencies.
Key stakeholders/users Destination Managers, Policy Makers
Suggested actions
When the ratio of second home / rental properties becomes close to 40% of resident homes (or another agreed to percentage), it is time to gauge public concerns and address the impacts of second home development.
References http://www.deduce.eu/IFS/IFS22.pdf
EUROPEAN TOURISM INDICATOR SYSTEM DETAILED INDICATOR REFERENCE SHEETS
35 | P a g e
C.2 Gender Equality
Core Indicator: C.2.1 Percentage of men and women employed in the tourism sector
Reason for measuring This standard measurement will show the impact of tourism on women’s employment. It can be particularly powerful when compared with percentages in other sectors.
Data requirements Number of employees in the tourism sector Number of male employees Number of female employees
Units of measurement %
Terms in glossary -
Data collection instructions
Enterprise Survey
Method of calculation
Total number of men employed in tourism ÷ total number of tourism employees * 100 = % of men employed by tourism Total number of women employed in tourism ÷ total number of tourism employees * 100 = % of women employed by tourism
Frequency of data collection
Annual
Reporting format Stacked bar graph, pie chart
International benchmarks
Among European countries for which data are available, two out of every three people employed in the tourist accommodation sector were female. Romania has 72% employment of women in tourism. Malta (38 %) and Italy (49 %) are the only countries where women did not hold the majority of the jobs in the tourist accommodation sector (2007).
Key stakeholders/users All
Suggested actions An unbalanced situation could mean that career and education programs need reviewing to ensure they are open and appealing to all.
References http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/statistics_explained/index.php/Tourism_employment
EUROPEAN TOURISM INDICATOR SYSTEM DETAILED INDICATOR REFERENCE SHEETS
36 | P a g e
Optional Indicator: C.2.1.1 Percentage of tourism enterprises where the general manager position is held by a woman
Reason for measuring To ensure both men and women are equitably represented at varying levels tourism employment, including management positions.
Data requirements Employment and economic impact reports
Units of measurement %
Terms in glossary Management positions
Data collection instructions
Enterprise Survey
Method of calculation Total number of tourism enterprises with a woman general manager ÷ total number of tourism enterprises * 100 = % of tourism enterprises where the general manager is a woman
Frequency of data collection
Annual
Reporting format Stacked bar graph, pie chart
International benchmarks 22% of key positions in tourism are held by women (2010)
Key stakeholders/users All
Suggested actions
Where the percentage of women in managerial positions is dramatically less that the percentage of women in the sector, particularly when compared with other sectors, programmes should be developed to help recruit and support women moving up the career ladder.
References UNWTO Global Report on Women in Tourism 2010
EUROPEAN TOURISM INDICATOR SYSTEM DETAILED INDICATOR REFERENCE SHEETS
37 | P a g e
Optional Indicator: C.2.1.2 Average wage in tourism for women compared to average wage for men (sorted by tourism job type)
Reason for measuring This indicator establishes whether women and men in similar positions/levels in the tourism industry are getting similar pay rates.
Data requirements Employment and economic impact reports
Units of measurement Percentage parity
Terms in glossary -
Data collection instructions
Enterprise Survey
Method of calculation
Tally all salaries of women (per each job type) ÷ total number of women employed in that job type = Average wage of women by job type Tally all salaries of men (per each job type) ÷ total number of men employed in that job type = Average wage of men Compare the two averages by type
Frequency of data collection
Annual
Reporting format Bar chart
International benchmarks Globally, women in tourism are typically earning 10% to 15% less than their male counterparts (2010).
Key stakeholders/users DMO, women in business
Suggested actions If pay is found to be quite different (<10%) for men and women, investigation may be needed. Policy / programmes resulting in an equitable ratio would need to be developed.
References UNWTO Global Report on Women in Tourism 2010
EUROPEAN TOURISM INDICATOR SYSTEM DETAILED INDICATOR REFERENCE SHEETS
38 | P a g e
C.3 Equality/Accessibility
Core Indicator: C.3.1 Percentage of commercial accommodation with rooms accessible to people with disabilities and/or participating in recognised accessibility schemes
Reason for measuring
It is important for a destination to be able to accommodate people with disabilities. This measurement will help raise awareness of the accessibility of the destination. Where the percentage is very low, it may also draw the attention of hoteliers who identify a market opportunity.
Data requirements Reports on accessibility at commercial accommodations
Units of measurement %
Terms in glossary Commercial accommodation Accessibility Accessibility schemes
Data collection instructions
Enterprise Survey
Method of calculation
Total number of commercial accommodation with rooms accessible to people with disabilities and/or participating in recognised schemes ÷ total number of commercial accommodations * 100 = % of commercial accommodations with rooms accessible to people with disabilities
Frequency of data collection
Annual
Reporting format Clustered bar graph (accommodations, attractions, public transport)
International benchmarks N/A
Key stakeholders/users Destination Managers, Tourism Enterprises
Suggested actions DMOs can encourage accessible accommodation by listing accessible businesses in their brochures and online marketing
References http://www.accessibletourism.org, http://www.tourismforall.org.uk/
EUROPEAN TOURISM INDICATOR SYSTEM DETAILED INDICATOR REFERENCE SHEETS
39 | P a g e
Optional Indicator: C.3.1.1 Percentage of destination served by public transport that is accessible to people with disabilities and people with specific access requirements
Reason for measuring Destinations need to be accessible to all visitors
Data requirements Results on accessibility coverage of local public transport systems
Units of measurement % of land area
Terms in glossary Local transport Accessibility
Data collection instructions
Destination Management Survey
Method of calculation Total area (in km2) of coverage by accessible public transport ÷ total area (in km2) * 100 = % of destination (in km2) covered by accessible public transport
Frequency of data collection
Annual
Reporting format Spatial representation
International benchmarks N/A
Key stakeholders/users Transportation Services, Destination Managers
Suggested actions Low levels of coverage may be indicative of the need invest in accessible transport
References http://www.sagetraveling.com/Public-Transportation/
EUROPEAN TOURISM INDICATOR SYSTEM DETAILED INDICATOR REFERENCE SHEETS
40 | P a g e
Core Indicator: C.3.2 Percentage of visitor attractions that are accessible to people with disabilities and/or participating in recognised accessibility schemes
Reason for measuring DMOs need to ensure visitors with limited mobility can access public attractions. This indicator can be used to highlight good practice.
Data requirements Enterprise Survey results on accessibility at attractions
Units of measurement %
Terms in glossary Accessibility Accessibility schemes
Data collection instructions
Enterprise Survey
Method of calculation
Total number of visitor attractions accessible to people with disabilities and/or participating in recognised schemes ÷ total number of visitor attractions * 100 = % of visitor attractions accessible to people with disabilities
Frequency of data collection
Annual
Reporting format Clustered bar graph (accommodations, attractions, public transport)
International benchmarks N/A
Key stakeholders/users Tourism Enterprises, Destination Managers
Suggested actions Where a low number of attractions are accessible, investment may need to be made in consultation with groups promoting accessible tourism.
References ENAT (European Network for Accessible Tourism)
NOTES: Some natural/cultural attractions are not suitable to be converted for accessibility such as
those under protection, or those in inaccessible locations e.g. caves.
EUROPEAN TOURISM INDICATOR SYSTEM DETAILED INDICATOR REFERENCE SHEETS
41 | P a g e
Optional Indicator: C.3.2.1 Percentage of visitors satisfied with the accessibility of the destination for those with disabilities or specific access requirements
Reason for measuring Monitoring visitor satisfaction with accessibility helps planners know whether they are meeting visitor needs.
Data requirements Results of accessibility reports for the destination
Units of measurement %
Terms in glossary Accessibility
Data collection instructions
Visitor Survey
Method of calculation Tally satisfaction level with accessibility from customer respondents ÷ total number of customer respondents * 100 = % satisfaction level of customers with accessibility
Frequency of data collection
Annual
Reporting format Pie chart
International benchmarks N/A
Key stakeholders/users All
Suggested actions Visitor feedback should be collected, and, where consistent complaints or suggestions about accessibility are received, action needs to be identified.
References
EUROPEAN TOURISM INDICATOR SYSTEM DETAILED INDICATOR REFERENCE SHEETS
42 | P a g e
C.4 Protecting and Enhancing Cultural Heritage, Local Identity and Assets
Core Indicator: C.4.1 Percentage of the destination covered by a policy or plan that protects cultural heritage
Reason for measuring
Ensuring the entire destination is included in cultural heritage policies is important. Having a policy to identify, protect and enhance the built (tangible) and other expressions cultural heritage e.g. music, (intangible) is vital to the sense of place and resident pride. Measuring this clearly identifies any shortfall.
Data requirements Cultural heritage protection and enhancement policies
Units of measurement %
Terms in glossary Cultural heritage
Data collection instructions
Destination Management Survey
Method of calculation Total number of destination villages/towns with policy or plan ÷ total number of destination village/towns * 100 = % of the destination with cultural heritage policy or plan
Frequency of data collection
Annual
Reporting format Pie chart
International benchmarks N/A
Key stakeholders/users DMOs
Suggested actions Where policies only cover part of the destination, they may need to be extended.
References http://ethics.unwto.org/en/content/tourism-and-intangible-cultural-heritage
EUROPEAN TOURISM INDICATOR SYSTEM DETAILED INDICATOR REFERENCE SHEETS
43 | P a g e
Optional Indicator: C.4.1.1 Percentage of residents who have positive or negative views on the impact of tourism on destination identity
Reason for measuring This indicator is a barometer of tourism’s cultural impact.
Data requirements Community meeting minutes, resident surveys
Units of measurement %
Terms in glossary Destination identity
Data collection instructions
Resident Survey
Method of calculation
Total number of residents with positive view of tourism impact ÷ total number of resident respondents * 100 = % of residents who have a positive view on the impact of tourism on destination identity Total number of resident respondents with negative view of tourism impact ÷ total number of resident respondents * 100 = % of residents who have a negative view on the impact of tourism on destination identity
Frequency of data collection
Annual
Reporting format Pie chart
International benchmarks N/A
Key stakeholders/users
Suggested actions Where negative views are high, concerns should be addressed through an inclusive participatory process.
References http://socib.academia.edu/AmyDiedrich/Papers/799615/Local_perceptions_of_tourism_as_indicators_of_destination_decline
EUROPEAN TOURISM INDICATOR SYSTEM DETAILED INDICATOR REFERENCE SHEETS
44 | P a g e
Optional Indicator: C.4.1.2 Percentage of the destination’s biggest events that are focused on traditional/local culture and assets
Reason for measuring Holding events focused on local culture can be an effective means of increasing pride.
Data requirements Calendar of events
Units of measurement %
Terms in glossary Traditional / local culture (may include sports) Local assets
Data collection instructions
Destination Management Survey
Method of calculation Total number of biggest tourism events (in revenue or visitor number) based on traditional/local culture/assets ÷ 10 * 100 = % of biggest ten events focused on traditional culture
Frequency of data collection
Annual
Reporting format Bar graph
International benchmarks N/A
Key stakeholders/users DMO, Department of Culture
Suggested actions Where there are low numbers of events and high tourist interest in culture, developing this aspect of the tourism events calendar is recommended
References
EUROPEAN TOURISM INDICATOR SYSTEM DETAILED INDICATOR REFERENCE SHEETS
45 | P a g e
Section D: Environmental Impact D.1 Reducing Transport Impact
Core Indicator: D.1.1 Percentage of tourists and same day visitors using different modes of transport to arrive at the destination (public/private and type)
Reason for measuring Tracking the mode of transport used by visitors helps flag the need to increase the availability of sustainable transport options.
Data requirements Transportation reports
Units of measurement %
Terms in glossary Modes of transport
Data collection instructions
Visitor Survey
Method of calculation
Total number of tourist and visitor respondents using public transportation to arrive at the destination ÷ total number of tourist and visitor respondents * 100 = % of tourists and visitors using public transportation to arrive at the destination Total number of tourist and visitor respondents using private transportation to arrive at the destination ÷ total number of tourist and visitor respondents * 100 = % of tourists and visitors using private transportation to arrive at the destination Repeat private transportation for: car, motorcycle, RV, boat, other
Frequency of data collection
Annual
Reporting format Pie chart
International benchmarks In 2005, the distribution of different transport modes for overnight trips of 4 nights or more in Europe was Air = 25.1%, Private and hired vehicle = 57.2%, Bus, coach = 7.2%, Rail = 7.9%, Other = 2.7%
Key stakeholders/users DMOs, transportation authorities/companies
Suggested actions Strategy to increase availability of sustainable transport options
References http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/statistics_explained/index.php/Tourism_and_sustainable_development
EUROPEAN TOURISM INDICATOR SYSTEM DETAILED INDICATOR REFERENCE SHEETS
46 | P a g e
Optional Indicator: D.1.1.1 Percentage of visitors using local/soft mobility/public transport services to get around the destination
Reason for measuring Tracking the use of traffic reducing, environmentally-friendly (soft mobility) transport options can help to inform local transportation policies.
Data requirements Transportation reports
Units of measurement Percentage
Terms in glossary Soft mobility Local transport
Data collection instructions
Visitor Survey
Method of calculation
Total number of visitor respondents using local/soft mobility/public transport services to get around the destination ÷ total number of visitor respondents * 100 = % of visitors using local/soft mobility/public transport services to get around the destination
Frequency of data collection
Annual
Reporting format Pie chart
International benchmarks In Europe, bus/coach/rail was the primary mode of transport for 15.1% of overnight trips of 4 nights or more in 2005.
Key stakeholders/users DMO, transportation authorities
Suggested actions Strategy to promote the use of sustainable transport options
References http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/statistics_explained/index.php/Tourism_and_sustainable_development
EUROPEAN TOURISM INDICATOR SYSTEM DETAILED INDICATOR REFERENCE SHEETS
47 | P a g e
Core Indicator: D.1.2 Average travel (km) by tourists to and from home or average travel (km) from the previous destination to the current destination
Reason for measuring This information helps identify the cost of distance and the environmental impact of attracting short-haul visitors. It also adds to visitor profile information for marketing purposes.
Data requirements Transportation reports
Units of measurement Km
Terms in glossary -
Data collection instructions
Visitor Survey
Method of calculation
Tally total km travel by tourist respondent travelling from home ÷ total number of tourist respondents = Average travel (km) by tourist Tally total km travel by tourist respondent travelling from another destination ÷ total number of tourist respondents = Average travel (km) by tourist from another destination
Frequency of data collection
Annual
Reporting format Table
International benchmarks N/A
Key stakeholders/users DMOs
Suggested actions Promotional activities emphasising short-haul travel and alternative modes of travel to the destination, such as rail.
References
EUROPEAN TOURISM INDICATOR SYSTEM DETAILED INDICATOR REFERENCE SHEETS
48 | P a g e
Optional Indicator: D.1.2.1 Average travel (km) by same day visitors from and to destination
Reason for measuring This information helps to identify the cost of distance and the environmental impact of attracting day visitors from nearby areas.
Data requirements Transportation reports
Units of measurement Km
Terms in glossary -
Data collection instructions
Visitor Survey
Method of calculation Tally total travel (km) by same day visitor respondents ÷ total number of same day visitor respondents = Average travel (km) by same day visitors
Frequency of data collection
Annual
Reporting format Table
International benchmarks N/A
Key stakeholders/users DMOs
Suggested actions Promotional activities emphasising travel from nearby areas and alternative modes of travel (coach, rail, etc.)
References
NOTES: European tourism statistics are currently limited to at least an overnight stay; as of 2014, outbound same day visits will be covered as well.
EUROPEAN TOURISM INDICATOR SYSTEM DETAILED INDICATOR REFERENCE SHEETS
49 | P a g e
D.2 Climate Change
Core Indicator: D.2.1 Percentage of tourism enterprises involved in climate change mitigation schemes—such as: CO2 offset, low energy systems, etc.—and “adaptation” responses and actions
Reason for measuring Business engagement in mitigation activities is a sign or increased awareness and success of DMO incentives.
Data requirements Climate change reports, programs, events, news
Units of measurement %
Terms in glossary Climate change mitigation
Climate change adaptation response
Data collection instructions
Enterprise survey
Method of calculation
Total number of tourism enterprises involved in mitigation and adaptation ÷ total number of tourism enterprises * 100 = % of tourism enterprises involved in climate change mitigation schemes and adaptation actions
Frequency of data collection
Annual
Reporting format Clustered bar graph (tourism enterprises, destination)
International benchmarks N/A
Key stakeholders/users DMO, environmental agencies, hotel/tourism associations
Suggested actions Where this is low (>30%), programs may need to be developed to increase awareness of the issues related to climate change
References http://www.unep.fr/shared/publications/pdf/DTIx1047xPA-ClimateChange.pdf
EUROPEAN TOURISM INDICATOR SYSTEM DETAILED INDICATOR REFERENCE SHEETS
50 | P a g e
Optional Indicator: D.2.1.1 Percentage of the destination included in climate change adaptation strategy or planning
Reason for measuring Including the whole destination in climate change initiatives is important. This indicator monitors how much is missed in order to encourage inclusion.
Data requirements Climate change reports, programs, events, news
Units of measurement %
Terms in glossary Climate change adaptation strategy
Data collection instructions
Destination Management Survey
Method of calculation Total amount of destination included in climate change adaptation plan ÷ total size of the destination * 100 = % of destination included in climate change adaptation strategy or plan
Frequency of data collection
Annual
Reporting format Clustered bar graph (tourism enterprises, destination)
International benchmarks N/A
Key stakeholders/users DMO, environmental agencies
Suggested actions Where this is low, DMO may need to work with environmental agencies to plan for uncovered areas
References
http://www.eea.europa.eu/themes/climate/national-adaptation-strategies http://www.unep.fr/shared/publications/pdf/DTIx1047xPA-ClimateChange.pdf
EUROPEAN TOURISM INDICATOR SYSTEM DETAILED INDICATOR REFERENCE SHEETS
51 | P a g e
Optional Indicator: D.2.1.2 Percentage of tourism accommodation and attraction infrastructure located in “vulnerable zones.”
Reason for measuring This indicator is designed to raise awareness of climate-related vulnerability.
Data requirements Land use and zoning reports
Units of measurement %
Terms in glossary Vulnerable zones
Data collection instructions
Enterprise Survey
Method of calculation
Total number of tourism accommodations and attractions located in “vulnerable zones” ÷ total number of accommodations and attractions * 100 = % of tourism accommodations and attractions located in “vulnerable zones”
Frequency of data collection
Annual
Reporting format Pie chart
International benchmarks N/A
Key stakeholders/users DMO, environmental agencies, hotel/tourism associations
Suggested actions Where this is high, efforts to engage the tourism industry in mitigation and adaptation will also need to be high
References http://cca.eionet.europa.eu/docs/TP_1-2011
EUROPEAN TOURISM INDICATOR SYSTEM DETAILED INDICATOR REFERENCE SHEETS
52 | P a g e
D.3 Solid Waste Management
Core Indicator: D.3.1 Waste volume produced by destination (tonnes per resident per year or per month)
Reason for measuring This indicator measures the size of the solid waste footprint of the destination. Keeping track of absolute volume is a means to assess the effectiveness of waste reduction initiatives.
Data requirements Waste and recycling reports, landfill statistics
Units of measurement Kg per month
Terms in glossary -
Data collection instructions
Waste report
Method of calculation
Tally total volume of waste produced per month ÷ total number of residents = Waste per resident per month Tally total volume of waste produce per annum ÷ total number of residents = Waste per resident per year
Frequency of data collection
Monthly Annually
Reporting format Bar chart
International benchmarks
In Europe, 524 kg of municipal waste was generated per resident/year in 2008, which varied from 306 kg in the Czech Republic to 802 kg in Denmark. Every international tourist in Europe generates at least 1 kg of solid waste per day, and up to 2 kg/resident/day for the USA (UNEP 2003).
Key stakeholders/users DMO, waste management agency, hotel/tourism association
Suggested actions Where trends are initially high or are not improving over time, policy or multi-stakeholder meetings may be necessary to assess and mitigate the problem.
References
http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_PUBLIC/8-19032010-AP/EN/8-19032010-AP-EN.PDF http://www.unep.org/greeneconomy/Portals/88/documents/ger/GER_11_Tourism.pdf
EUROPEAN TOURISM INDICATOR SYSTEM DETAILED INDICATOR REFERENCE SHEETS
53 | P a g e
Optional Indicator: D.3.1.1 Percentage of tourism enterprises separating different types of waste
Reason for measuring Keeping track of private sector engagement shows the effectiveness of awareness initiatives and the need for incentives in this area.
Data requirements Waste stream audits, policies, management plans
Units of measurement %
Terms in glossary Waste separation
Data collection instructions
Enterprise Survey
Method of calculation Total number of tourism enterprises involved in waste separation activities ÷ total number of tourism enterprises * 100 = % of tourism enterprises involved in waste separation
Frequency of data collection
Annual
Reporting format Clustered bar chart (waste, water, energy)
International benchmarks N/A
Key stakeholders/users DMO, waste management agency, hotel/tourism association
Suggested actions When this percentage is low, the DMO should work with above stakeholders or policy makers to promote and encourage waste separation.
References
http://sutour.ier.uni-stuttgart.de/englisch/downloads/sutour_lores_en.pdf http://www.unep.fr/shared/publications/pdf/WEBx0015xPA-WaterWaste.pdf
EUROPEAN TOURISM INDICATOR SYSTEM DETAILED INDICATOR REFERENCE SHEETS
54 | P a g e
Core Indicator: D.3.2 Volume of waste recycled (percent or per resident per year)
Reason for measuring Recycling is one way to reduce landfill waste. This indicator tracks the success of recycling initiatives.
Data requirements Waste and recycling reports, landfill statistics
Units of measurement %, tonnes
Terms in glossary Recycled
Data collection instructions
Waste report
Method of calculation
Tally total volume of recycled materials ÷ total volume of waste * 100 = % of waste recycled Tally total volume of recycled materials per year ÷ total number of residents = Total volume recycled per resident per year
Frequency of data collection
Annual
Reporting format Pie chart
International benchmarks
In Europe, 40% of waste was land filled, 20% incinerated, 23% recycled and 17% composted (2008). The Member States with the highest recycling rates for municipal waste were Germany (48% of waste treated), Belgium and Sweden (both 35%), Ireland and the Netherlands (both 32%) and Slovenia (31%). Composting of municipal waste was most common in Austria (40%), Italy (34%), the Netherlands (27%), Belgium (25%), Spain and Luxembourg (both 20%).
Key stakeholders/users DMO, waste management agency, hotel/tourism association
Suggested actions Collaborative efforts and/or policy will be needed to increase recycling efforts and incentives can be provided for enterprises using recycled goods
References http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_PUBLIC/8-19032010-AP/EN/8-19032010-AP-EN.PDF
Notes: In destinations where there are more visitors than residents volume of waste per visitor may be more appropriate.
EUROPEAN TOURISM INDICATOR SYSTEM DETAILED INDICATOR REFERENCE SHEETS
55 | P a g e
D.4 Sewage Treatment
Core Indicator: D.4.1 Percentage of sewage from the destination treated to at least secondary level prior to discharge
Reason for measuring Sewage discharge treatment is fundamental to sustainability. Tracking this information helps to identify and treat problem areas where they exist.
Data requirements Sewage treatment and discharge maps
Units of measurement %
Terms in glossary Secondary sewage treatment
Data collection instructions
Sewage reports
Method of calculation Total amount of sewage treated at least at secondary level prior to discharge ÷ total amount of sewage * 100 = % of sewage treated at least at secondary level prior to discharge
Frequency of data collection
Every three years
Reporting format Map
International benchmarks N/A
Key stakeholders/users DMO, waste management/sanitation agency, hotel/tourism association
Suggested actions Where this is low, an action strategy will be needed to drive change
References http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/statistics_explained/index.php/Water_statistics#Wastewater_treatment
NOTES: Tertiary wastewater treatment is most common in the Netherlands, Germany, Austria, Italy, Sweden and Greece, where at least four in every five residents are connected to this type of wastewater treatment. In contrast, no more than 1 % of the population is connected to tertiary wastewater treatment in Romania and Bulgaria (2011).
EUROPEAN TOURISM INDICATOR SYSTEM DETAILED INDICATOR REFERENCE SHEETS
56 | P a g e
Optional Indicator: D.4.1.1 Percentage of commercial accommodation connected to central sewage system and/or employing tertiary sewage treatment
Reason for measuring Central sewage or tertiary systems are the most effective in reducing water-borne pollutants. Raising awareness of the scale of this issue in the destination is the first step towards finding a solution.
Data requirements Sewage treatment and discharge maps
Units of measurement %
Terms in glossary Central sewage system Tertiary sewage treatment
Data collection instructions
Sewage reports
Method of calculation
Total number of commercial accommodations connected to central sewage system/tertiary sewage treatment ÷ total number of commercial accommodations * 100 = % of commercial accommodations connected to central sewage system/tertiary sewage treatment
Frequency of data collection
Every three years
Reporting format Pie chart, map
International benchmarks N/A
Key stakeholders/users DMO, waste management/sanitation agency, hotel/tourism association
Suggested actions Where this is low, actions for increasing the coverage of central sewage treatment should be explored to protect the long-term health of the destination, its residents and visitors
References http://www.unep.fr/shared/publications/pdf/WEBx0015xPA-WaterWaste.pdf
NOTES: The United Nations Environment Programme Mediterranean Action Plan Priority Actions Programme (UNEP/MAP/PAP) (2001) estimated that 48 per cent of the largest coastal cities (over 100,000 inhabitants) have no sewage treatment systems, 10 per cent possess a primary treatment system, 38 per cent a secondary system and only four per cent a tertiary treatment system (Hall, 2006).
EUROPEAN TOURISM INDICATOR SYSTEM DETAILED INDICATOR REFERENCE SHEETS
57 | P a g e
D.5 Water Management
Core Indicator: D.5.1 Fresh water consumption per tourist night compared to general population water consumption per person night
Reason for measuring
Tracking fresh water consumption in tourism enterprises and comparing this with resident usage highlights the water footprint of the tourism sector and the need for conservation measures where needed.
Data requirements Water usage reports, monthly utilities, annual tourist nights, population
Units of measurement Litres
Terms in glossary -
Data collection instructions
Enterprise Survey Destination water usage report
Method of calculation
Total fresh water consumption related to general population (per year or per month) ÷ total number of residents = fresh water consumption per resident (per year or per month) Total fresh water consumption related to tourism (per year or per month) ÷ total number of tourists nights (per year or per month) = fresh water consumption per tourist night Compare
Frequency of data collection
Annual
Reporting format Bar graph
International benchmarks
Each tourist consumes 300 litres of freshwater per day on average, whereas “luxury” tourists can consume up to 880 litres. By comparison, average per capita residential consumption in Europe is estimated at 241 litres per day (2011).
Key stakeholders/users DMO, water authorities, hotel/tourism associations
Suggested actions Increased awareness of importance of and investment in water-saving programmes for the tourism sector
References http://www.unep.org/greeneconomy/Portals/88/documents/ger/GER_11_Tourism.pdf
EUROPEAN TOURISM INDICATOR SYSTEM DETAILED INDICATOR REFERENCE SHEETS
58 | P a g e
Optional Indicator: D.5.1.1 Percentage of tourism enterprises with low-flow shower heads and taps and/or dual flush toilets/waterless urinals
Reason for measuring Tracking tourism enterprise engagement in water conservation activities helps gauge the success of water conservation initiatives that will result in saving money for enterprises.
Data requirements Water usage report, policies, management plans
Units of measurement %
Terms in glossary Low-flow shower heads Dual flush toilets Waterless urinals
Data collection instructions
Enterprise Survey
Method of calculation
Total number of tourism enterprises with low-flow shower heads and taps and/or dual flush toilets/waterless urinals ÷ total number of tourism enterprises * 100 = % of tourism enterprises with low-flow shower heads and taps and/or dual flush toilets/waterless urinals
Frequency of data collection
Annual
Reporting format Clustered bar chart (waste, water, energy)
International benchmarks Flow rates should be a minimum of: 2.2 gallon per minute, low flow faucets and aerators; 2.5 gallon per minute, low flow showerheads; 1.6 gallons per flush toilets or composting toilets; or No-flush urinals.
Key stakeholders/users DMO, water authorities, hotel/tourism associations
Suggested actions Increased awareness of the importance of and investment in water-saving programmes for the tourism sector
References http://www.unep.fr/shared/publications/pdf/WEBx0015xPA-WaterWaste.pdf
EUROPEAN TOURISM INDICATOR SYSTEM DETAILED INDICATOR REFERENCE SHEETS
59 | P a g e
Optional Indicator: D.5.1.2 Percentage of tourism enterprises using recycled water
Reason for measuring Using recycled grey water can be an effective reduction strategy for garden irrigation. This indicator tracks how widely implemented these initiatives are at the tourism enterprise level.
Data requirements Water usage report, policies, management plans
Units of measurement %
Terms in glossary Recycled water
Data collection instructions
Enterprise survey
Method of calculation Total number of tourism enterprises using recycled water ÷ total number of tourism enterprises * 100 = % of tourism enterprises using recycled water
Frequency of data collection
Annual
Reporting format Clustered bar chart (waste, water, energy)
International benchmarks N/A
Key stakeholders/users DMO, water authority, hotel/tourism associations
Suggested actions Where uptake is low and water scarcity is high, greater emphasis will need to be placed in recycling technologies, particularly for high water users such as golf courses
References http://www.unep.fr/shared/publications/pdf/WEBx0015xPA-WaterWaste.pdf
EUROPEAN TOURISM INDICATOR SYSTEM DETAILED INDICATOR REFERENCE SHEETS
60 | P a g e
Optional Indicator: D.5.1.3 Percentage of water use derived from recycled water in the destination
Reason for measuring Using recycled grey water can be an effective reduction strategy for garden irrigation. This indicator tracks how widely these initiatives are implemented at the destination level.
Data requirements Water usage report, policies, management plans
Units of measurement %
Terms in glossary Recycled water
Data collection instructions
Destination Water Report
Method of calculation Total volume (or similar measure) of recycled water used in the destination ÷ total volume (or similar measure) of water used * 100 = % of water use derived from recycled water in the destination
Frequency of data collection
Every three years
Reporting format Pie chart
International benchmarks In 2005, 3.7% of water use was derived from recycled water in European Mediterranean countries
Key stakeholders/users DMO, water authority, hotel/tourism associations
Suggested actions Where recycling rates are low and water scarcity is high, greater emphasis will need to be placed on recycling technologies in discussion with destination authorities
References
http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/statistics_explained/index.php/Water_supply_and_recycling_statistics http://www.sbla.com.cy/site/sala_website/PRESENTATIONS/DR%20ANGELAKIS%20CYPRUS%20WORKSHOP.pdf
EUROPEAN TOURISM INDICATOR SYSTEM DETAILED INDICATOR REFERENCE SHEETS
61 | P a g e
D.6 Energy Usage
Core Indicator: D.6.1 Energy consumption per tourist night compared to general population energy consumption per person night
Reason for measuring The energy consumption of the tourism sector is a crucial piece of information for tourism development and planning. Reducing the tourism energy footprint will also save enterprises money.
Data requirements Energy usage reports, monthly utilities, annual tourist nights, population
Units of measurement Percentage resident/tourist consumption
Terms in glossary Energy consumption
Data collection instructions
Enterprise survey
Destination energy usage report
Method of calculation
Total energy consumption related to general population (per year or per month) ÷ total number of residents = fresh energy consumption per resident (per year or per month) Total energy consumption related to tourism (per year or per month) ÷ total number of tourist nights (per year of per month) = energy consumption per tourist night Compare
Frequency of data collection
Annual
Reporting format Bar chart
International benchmarks World daily energy consumption per capita is estimated at 135MJ (a value that includes energy generation and industry).
Key stakeholders/users DMO, energy authorities, hotel/tourism associations
Suggested actions Increased investment in energy-saving programs for the tourism sector
References http://www.unep.org/greeneconomy/Portals/88/documents/ger/GER_11_Tourism.pdf
Notes: There is no systematic international country dataset on energy consumption from tourism activities.
EUROPEAN TOURISM INDICATOR SYSTEM DETAILED INDICATOR REFERENCE SHEETS
62 | P a g e
Optional Indicator: D.6.1.1 Percentage of tourism enterprises that have switched to low-energy lighting
Reason for measuring Tracking tourism enterprise engagement in saving energy like using low energy lighting helps gauge the success of energy-saving programs and initiatives.
Data requirements Energy usage report, policies, management plans
Units of measurement %
Terms in glossary Low-energy lighting (e.g., LEDs)
Data collection instructions
Enterprise Survey
Method of calculation Total number of tourism enterprises that have switched to low-energy lighting ÷ total number of tourism enterprises * 100 = % of tourism enterprises that have switched to low-energy lighting
Frequency of data collection
Annual
Reporting format Clustered bar chart (waste, water, energy)
International benchmarks N/A
Key stakeholders/users DMO, energy authorities, hotel/tourism associations
Suggested actions Increased investment in energy-saving programs for the tourism sector
References http://www.setcom-project.eu/uploads/media/SETCOM_Broschuere_final_02.pdf
EUROPEAN TOURISM INDICATOR SYSTEM DETAILED INDICATOR REFERENCE SHEETS
63 | P a g e
Optional Indicator: D.6.1.2 Annual amount of energy consumed from renewable sources (Mwh) as a percentage of overall energy consumption
Reason for measuring This indicator tracks the destination’s progress in converting to renewable sources of energy.
Data requirements Energy usage reports, monthly utilities, annual tourist nights, population
Units of measurement Mwh
Terms in glossary Renewable energy
Data collection instructions
Enterprise Survey
Destination energy usage report
Method of calculation
Tally total amount of renewable energy consumed per annum Total amount of renewable energy consumed per annum ÷ total amount of energy consumed per annum * 100 = % of total energy consumed that came from renewable sources
Frequency of data collection
Annual
Reporting format Bar chart
International benchmarks
Renewable energy sources accounted for 9.0 % of the Europe’s gross inland energy consumption in 2009. In Latvia and Sweden, over one third of the energy consumed was derived from renewable and more than a quarter in Austria. The renewable energy target for Germany is 45% by 2030.
Key stakeholders/users DMO, energy authorities, hotel/tourism associations
Suggested actions Destination-wide discussion of goals for renewable energy
References http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/statistics_explained/index.php/Renewable_energy_statistics http://www.unep.fr/shared/publications/pdf/3258-SwitchedOn.pdf
EUROPEAN TOURISM INDICATOR SYSTEM DETAILED INDICATOR REFERENCE SHEETS
64 | P a g e
D.7 Landscape and Biodiversity Protection
Core Indicator: D.7.1 Percentage of destination (area in km2) that is designated for protection
Reason for measuring
Protected areas are crucial for development control and wildlife conservation. The measurement indicates the level to which a destination demonstrates commitment to protection and recognises the significance of biodiversity.
Data requirements Land use maps
Units of measurement Percentage
Terms in glossary
Data collection instructions
Destination Management Survey
Method of calculation Total geographic area (km2) designated as protected within the destination ÷ total geographic area (km2) of the destination * 100 = % of destination designated as protected
Frequency of data collection
Every three years
Reporting format Table, Map
International benchmarks In Europe, protected areas range from 3% of Turkey to 36% of Slovenia (2010)
Key stakeholders/users DMO, Environmental agencies, Tour Operators Association
Suggested actions Where land/marine areas are not well protected, community consultation may be needed to set aside land for this purpose.
References http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/figures/percentage-of-terrestrial-protected-areas
EUROPEAN TOURISM INDICATOR SYSTEM DETAILED INDICATOR REFERENCE SHEETS
65 | P a g e
Optional Indicator: D.7.1.1 Percentage of local enterprises in the tourism sector actively supporting protection, conservation, and management of local biodiversity and landscapes.
Reason for measuring Tourism enterprises are significant beneficiaries of investment in protected areas, so it is important to track the sector’s contribution to conservation.
Data requirements Biodiversity and conservation programs, policies, management plans
Units of measurement %
Terms in glossary Biodiversity and landscape protection
Data collection instructions
Enterprise survey
Method of calculation
Total number of tourism enterprises actively supporting local protection, conservation and management ÷ total number of tourism enterprises * 100 = % of tourism enterprises actively supporting local protection, conservation, and management
Frequency of data collection
Annual
Reporting format Clustered bar graph (pollution)
International benchmarks N/A
Key stakeholders/users DMO, Environmental agencies, Hotel/Tourism Associations
Suggested actions Development of programmes for philanthropy and discussion of opportunities for charitable contributions of time and/or money
References http://www.cbd.int/doc/programmes/tourism/tourism-manual-en.pdf
EUROPEAN TOURISM INDICATOR SYSTEM DETAILED INDICATOR REFERENCE SHEETS
66 | P a g e
Optional Indicator: D.7.1.2 Percentage of destination covered by a biodiversity management and monitoring plan
Reason for measuring This is an indicator of the activities of conservation agencies and the degree of management of biodiversity in the destination.
Data requirements Environmental impact assessments, monitoring reports
Units of measurement % of land area
Terms in glossary Biodiversity monitoring
Data collection instructions
Destination Management Survey
Method of calculation
Total area (in km2) within the destination covered by a biodiversity management and monitoring plan ÷ Total area (in km2) of the destination * 100 = % of destination (in km2) covered by a biodiversity management and monitoring plan
Frequency of data collection
Every three years
Reporting format Table of species
International benchmarks N/A
Key stakeholders/users DMO, Environmental agencies, Hotel/Tourism Associations
Suggested actions Increase awareness of the need to manage and monitor biodiversity
References http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data#c5=all&c11=biodiversity&c17=&c0=20&b_start=0
EUROPEAN TOURISM INDICATOR SYSTEM DETAILED INDICATOR REFERENCE SHEETS
67 | P a g e
D.8 Light and Noise Management
Core Indicator: D.8.1 The destination has policies in place that require tourism enterprises to minimise light and noise pollution
Reason for measuring Light and noise pollution can cause significant disturbance to residents and local wildlife. This indicator monitors efforts by the tourism industry to minimise this impact.
Data requirements Destination policies
Units of measurement Existence of policies
Terms in glossary Light pollution Noise pollution
Data collection instructions
Destination Management Survey
Method of calculation Yes or No
Frequency of data collection
Every three years
Reporting format Traffic light
International benchmarks N/A
Key stakeholders/users DMO, environmental agencies, hotel/tourism associations
Suggested actions Where these policies are not in place and noise and light pollution is identified as a problem area for residents, tourism enterprises will need to be engaged in collaborative problem solving.
References http://assembly.coe.int/Main.asp?link=/Documents/WorkingDocs/Doc10/EDOC12179.htm
Notes: The acoustic nuisance scale begins at 65 dB. In European countries where reliable statistics are available it is considered that around 40% of the population is exposed to noise levels exceeding 55 decibels (dB) during the day and 22% of the population to levels of more than 65 dB. Over 30% of the population is believed to be exposed to noise levels exceeding 55 dB during the night (2010). 99% of the population In Europe and the United States (excluding Alaska and Hawaii) live under a polluted night-time sky.
EUROPEAN TOURISM INDICATOR SYSTEM DETAILED INDICATOR REFERENCE SHEETS
68 | P a g e
Optional Indicator: D.8.1.1 Percentage of the destination and percentage of population covered by local strategy and/or plans to reduce noise and light pollution
Reason for measuring Light and noise pollution can cause significant disturbance to residents and local wildlife. This indicator highlights destination policies in this area.
Data requirements Destination policies
Units of measurement %
Terms in glossary Light pollution Noise pollution
Data collection instructions
Destination Management Survey
Method of calculation
Total amount of destination covered by local strategy/plans to reduce noise and light pollution ÷ total size of the destination * 100 = % of destination covered by local strategy and existence of plans to reduce noise and light pollution Total population covered by local strategy/plans to reduce noise and light pollution ÷ total population of the destination * 100 = % of population covered by local strategy and existence of plans to reduce noise and light pollution
Frequency of data collection
Annual
Reporting format Pie chart
International benchmarks N/A
Key stakeholders/users DMO, environmental agencies, hotel/tourism associations
Suggested actions Where this is not in place and identified as an issue on resident surveys, community meeting could be held to discuss/identify key sources of pollution and suggest mitigation strategies
References http://ec.europa.eu/environment/noise/greenpap.htm
EUROPEAN TOURISM INDICATOR SYSTEM DETAILED INDICATOR REFERENCE SHEETS
69 | P a g e
D.9 Bathing Water Quality
Core Indicator: D.9.1 Level of contamination per 100 ml (faecal coliforms, campylobacter)
Reason for measuring
Tourist health and safety is a core element of sustainability. These bacteria can cause illness and are indicative of poor waste water treatment. Publicising this information raises awareness of the need to improve management systems.
Data requirements Water quality reports
Units of measurement ml
Terms in glossary Contamination Colony forming unit (CFU)
Data collection instructions
Water quality reports
Method of calculation Data collection via water sampling
Frequency of data collection
Monthly On-going
Reporting format Data
International benchmarks MCL (Maximum Contaminant Level) – Coliform Bacteria CFU/100ml of water =<1
Key stakeholders/users DMOs, environmental agencies, Hotel/tourism associations
Suggested actions Where closures are high the hotel/tourism association will need to lobby for research into causes and regulatory change to penalise polluters.
References http://www.extension.purdue.edu/extmedia/WQ/WQ-15.html http://www.tvdsb.ca/uploads/ScienceProbeware/fecal_coliform.pdf
EUROPEAN TOURISM INDICATOR SYSTEM DETAILED INDICATOR REFERENCE SHEETS
70 | P a g e
Optional Indicator: D.9.1.1 Number of days beach/shore closed due to contamination
Reason for measuring Beach closures have a significant impact on the economic viability of a beach resort. Making this information public increases awareness of the need to resolve water quality issues.
Data requirements Beach closures, contamination reports
Units of measurement # of days
Terms in glossary Contamination
Data collection instructions
Contamination Reports
Method of calculation Tally of beach/shore closure days due to contamination
Frequency of data collection
On-going Annual
Reporting format Table
International benchmarks N/A
Key stakeholders/users DMOs, environmental agencies, Hotel/tourism associations
Suggested actions Where closures are high, improved research into causes and regulatory change to penalise polluters is needed.
References http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/european-bathing-water-quality-in-2011
Notes: In 2011, 207 bathing waters were banned or closed in Europe (1 %), 57 more than in 2010. Some closures may be related to marine life rather than pollution.