EU Funding 2014-20

Andrew PritchardDirector of Policy & Infrastructure

Introduction

Why are we here? Localisation of EU Funding Emerging UK Priorities & Outcomes The role of LEPs Timescales

Why are we here?

One of 6 events to help local organisations prepare for the next round of EU funding 2014-19

Part of a technical assistance project led by East Midlands Councils to provide an evidence base for future EU funding

To make sure that we maximise the potential of EU investment

Localisation of EU funding

Establishment of a national ‘EU Growth Programme’

LEPs to develop EU investment strategies Each LEP to be given a ‘notional

allocation’ of EU funding to prioritise Payments to be made centrally Notional allocations will be reviewed

against performance from 2017 onwards

GLLEP

EU National Allocation = €133.5 million UK Local Growth Fund Allocation = tbc

Emerging UK Priorities

•Innovation•SME Competitiveness•ICT 45% + of ERDF

•Employment•Skills•Social Inclusion 70% + of ESF

•Climate Change•Environment•Sustainable Transport No Minimum spend

•Low Carbon Economy 15% + of ERDF

Also…

Minimum 20% of combined ESF/ERDF on ‘social inclusion’

Gender equality, equal opportunities & non-discrimination

Sustainable development

Key Outcomes

“It’s the economy, stupid”

More Jobs Less Worklessness

The Role of LEPs

To develop a local EU Investment Strategy To prioritise projects against a notional

allocation of EU funds To maximise the impact of EU investment

in their areas To work with other LEPs to achieve

economies of scale wherever possible

Timescales

September 2013: Draft LEP EU Investment Strategies

January 2014: finalise strategies

March 2014: new EU Programme starts

2017 – first review of notional allocations

Your mission today…

To think about how best EU funding could be used to address market failures.

To highlight areas or issues where wider collaboration might be helpful.

To ask if you do not understand.

East Midlands PA3 ProjectSocio-Economic Evidence – the future of European

Funds in Greater Lincolnshire1st July, 2013

Chris LawtonNottingham Business School

Project Rationale and Objectives• The project aims to provide socio-economic evidence

to help identify synergies, linkages and common challenges across LEPs within or overlapping the East Midlands

• To identify opportunities for collaboration across the themes identified in the ‘Europe 2020’ strategy

• The UK Government would: “like to see Local Enterprise Partnerships working with each other to deliver a bigger impact… and achieve economies of scale wherever possible”

Source: HM Government, April 2013. ‘Technical Annex: Preliminary guidance to Local Enterprise Partnerships on development of Structural & Investment Fund Strategies.’ paragraph 2.8, p. 4.

Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database right, 2013.

Local Enterprise Partnerships within or overlapping the East Midlands Region

Chart 1: Headline GVA per head indices (UK=100) NUTS2, 2011

Economic Context

Source: ONS Crown Copyright, 2012. ‘Regional Gross Value Added, 2011’.

Economic Context

Source: ONS Crown Copyright, 2013. ‘Annual Population Survey’, January-December 2008 and January-December 2012. From NOMIS [accessed 24th June, 2013].

Chart 2:Employment rate (% working age residents), 2012

• The SME environment remains difficult, but some signs of improvement: – Business death rates have fallen since 2009 and business birth

rates have increased– Survival rates for new businesses have significantly decreased

since pre-recession– Small businesses (<50 employees) have been more likely to

retain staff but cut/freeze wages and investment, with resulting lost productivity

– Large businesses (>250) more likely to cut staff whilst maintaining investment and productivity levels

• Lenders report that demand for credit remains low• Despite some structural improvements, firms seeking credit

continue to report difficulties in the supply of finance• Exports have been growing moderately in recent months

EU Thematic Objective: SME Competitiveness

Chart 3: Business Births and Deaths (as a % of end-of-year count of active enterprises), 2011

Source: ONS Crown Copyright, 2012. ‘Business Demography 2011 – Enterprise Births, Deaths and Survivals.’

EU Thematic Objective: SME Competitiveness

SME Competitiveness: Business Birth Rate (as a % of end-of-year count of active enterprises), 2011

Source: ONS Crown Copyright, 2012. ‘Business Demography 2011 – Enterprise Births, Deaths and Survivals.’Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database right, 2013.

Chart 4: Two year business survival rate from year of birth (%)

EU Thematic Objective: SME Competitiveness

Source: ONS Crown Copyright, 2012. ‘Business Demography 2011 – Enterprise Births, Deaths and Survivals.’

Chart 5: Innovation inputs: Business Enterprise Investment in R&D (as a % of total workplace GVA), 1999 and 2009

EU Thematic Objective: Innovation

Source: Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, 2012. ‘Regional Economic Performance Indicators – Live Tables’.

EU Thematic Objective: InnovationChart 6: Employment in High and Medium-High Technology Industries (% work-based employment), 2011

Source: ONS Crown Copyright, 2012. ‘Business Register and Employment Survey, 2011.’ Data accessed from NOMIS [17th June, 2013] and analysed under Chancellor’s Notice Ref NTCBRES11-P0537.

Innovation: Employment in High and Medium-High Technology Industries (%), 2011

Source: ONS Crown Copyright, 2012. ‘Business Register and Employment Survey, 2011.’ Data accessed from NOMIS [17th June, 2013] and analysed under Chancellor’s Notice Ref NTCBRES11-P0537. Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database right, 2013.

EU Thematic Objectives: Employment, Social Inclusion and Skills

Chart 7: Unemployment Rate (% 16+ resident population), 2012

Source: ONS Crown Copyright, 2013. ‘Annual Population Survey’, January-December 2012. From NOMIS [accessed 14 th June, 2013].

Employment, Social Inclusion and Skills: Unemployment – model-based estimates (%), 2012

Source: ONS Crown Copyright, 2012. ‘Model-based estimates of unemployment’, January-December 2012. From NOMIS [accessed 17th June, 2013].Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database right, 2013.

EU Thematic Objectives: Employment, Social Inclusion and Skills

Chart 8: Trends in the Unemployment Rate (% 16+ resident population), 2007-2012

Source: ONS Crown Copyright, 2013. ‘Annual Population Survey’, January-December 2007 to January-December 2012. From NOMIS [accessed 14th June, 2013].

Employment, Social Inclusion and Skills: Resident Adults Qualified to a Level 4 (first degree) and above (%), 2012

Source: ONS Crown Copyright, 2012. ‘Annual Population Survey’, January-December 2012. From NOMIS [accessed 17th June, 2013].Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database right, 2013.

Key Points• Some improvements (e.g. business births and deaths),

but overall economic context remains challenging• North-south or east-west divides (depending on topic)

exacerbated by the recession:– Unemployment/Social Exclusion: north-south divide– Enterprise and Skills: north-south and east-west– Innovation: east-west (M1 corridor)

• Importance of manufacturing and large firms in regional innovation activity

• Enterprise, innovation and low-carbon themes will be explored further in x2 regional round-tables

Common Issues: Greater Lincolnshire Local Enterprise Partnership

SME Competitiveness Innovation Employment, Social Inclusion and Skills

Leicester & Leicestershire, SEM and NEP – pockets of high business birth rates (but note higher death rates in Greater Lincolnshire)

Construction – important employer across the East Midlands

D2N2 – High-tech manufacturing in Lincoln: investigate common strengths and supply chain relationships with D2N2 (including Low Carbon/ links with energy sector)

Leicester & Leicestershire and GCGP – Food & Drink

Sheffield City Region, GCGP and D2N2 – significantly increasing unemployment rates in more isolated rural areas. Persistently higher than average unemployment in urban centres such as Lincoln and Grimsby

GCGP – coastal concentration of very low skill levels, especially Boston and Fenland districts

Greater Lincolnshire LEP

Emerging priorities

Background

• Role: lobby, support, deliver• Support and commissioning role for SIs• Board members want focused approach• Infrastructure and catalyst projects• Activity based on our competitive advantage

Progress

• Invest To Grow business loan fund• Regional Growth Fund• Growth Ambitions 2013 document• Preparation to growth plan• Business/stakeholder engagement

Beware

• Strategy-itis• Mission creep• Lack of detail• Direct economic outputs v catalyst projects• Regulations and the private sector

Vision to 2030

Summary

• Strong opportunities to match fund• Emphasis on sectors and business• Sense of place likely to emerge• Two “asks” of government on SIs: • Infrastructure and catalyst projects• Business-friendly approach to applicants

Experience from current programmes

The NE GroupSpencer PrewettChief Executive

Predominantly ERDF 20,000 SMEs Supported 250 New Business Start Ups 1,000 Jobs Created 2,500+ Individuals Assisted to Employment 400 Grants Issued 800 Business Increasing ICT Usage

Skills development in SMEs missing Established a Training Division Developed training partnerships Established Social Media Network Organisation Needs Analysis Identification of Key Worker Targeted training

Flexible approach Business responsive service Individual responsive service Linking needs of both Enabled growth of both Continuity and sustainability 180 SMEs engaged 170 Individuals trained

Rural Development 1st July 2013

Coastal Action Zone

Local Action Group www.coastal-rdpe.co.uk

CAZ RDPE Programme 2007 -2013

The creation of a quality coastal environment

Aims

Linking community and landscape on the Lincolnshire coast

to realise the natural assets of the area,

without compromising sustainable development principles.

Issues

Seasonality Poor Economic Performance Under Achievement Landscape

Five key objectives with priorities

Productive coastal landscapes - Farm Diversification

Enhancing coastal competitiveness - Microenterprise Development

A quality coastal destination - Tourism

Cherishing coastal capital - Rural heritage (Natural & Cultural)

Building coastal capacity - Training and Information

Cross cutting themes - Innovation and Sustainability

SuccessesIndividual projects delivered more than one objective and sustainability

- Increased quality self catering cottages, improving farm viability and micro-enterprises, creating wildlife habitat

- Enhancing and improving the landscape and rural heritage, career development

- Building local community capacity and contributing to the area and its economy

The projects supported were robust as they could be

Sustainability

Networking and co-operation

- Engagement with main business support prorammes to strengthen projects

- Local involvement with initiatives and organisations

- Developing Partnership working going into the new programme period

Lessons learnt

Use local knowledge and experience

Be realistic with priorities

Consider a ‘tool kit’ of delivery mechanisms

Be proactive with partnership working

Be innovative