Slide 1

Ethics and the Standards Uprising Moderator: Ken Gold, RPLS 1

Slide 2

Abstract: In the late 1940s through the 1970s, Texas, generally, and the nation as a whole, saw a professional conscience stirring among surveying practitioners. That stirring focused on unethical to sometimes criminal conduct by persons holding themselves out to be land surveyors. Registration had not been enough. Everything from simply incompetent to grossly fraudulent, so called practice endangered the publics valued holdings. There were no uniform standards. Little to no investigative force. Little to nothing by which competence could be measured. Often closure alone was the criteria. The Texas profession, at first hesitant to act, decided to identify proper surveying procedures and create plateaus of practice from which its land surveyors shall not deviate. This presentation is a summary of how we got here. And why Ethics played a big role! 2

Slide 3

3 Except for LSLSs and PEs, before, during and just after WWII, virtually anyone with a transit (or compass) and tape could be a surveyor. To differentiate the competent from the incompetent was difficult. And often too late.

Slide 4

4 This is the story of how the Texas Surveyors Association, urged by conscientious members, came to forge ahead and develop a series of voluntary professional standards, training aides and the basis for TBPLS mandatory minimum standards... It is the story of our Manual of Practice.

Slide 5

Dedicated practitioners debated on how to correct unprofessional situations. Business challenges such as; Unfair competition, Incompetent practitioners, Incomplete to Illegal surveys, Part-timers with borrowed equipment, Honest, but unskilled practitioners and... Those that didnt know... they didnt know. Not just a Texas Problem! 5

Slide 6

Surveyor Registration Long process... hard work Problems lingered Many Registrants contributed Grandfathering: Honest recommendations Few regulations... One part in.... Practices varied across state Surveyors complained Public complained! Similar National concerns! HISTORIC UPDATE 6

Slide 7

7 All across the USA, Survey Quality Complaints: Closures unattained Butcher-paper plats Unadjusted instruments Mended and kinked chains Untrained employees New equipment miss-used Registration qualifications varied

Slide 8

8 Storms on the Horizon! Voices of displeasure!

Slide 9

At the National level it was nearing the roar of a student uprising! SO! Time to address the issues! 9

Slide 10

The National Scene: American Congress on Surveying and Mapping Conscience of Nations surveyors ACSM founded 1941 Adopted Technical Standards for Property Surveys, 1946. Texas Section ACSM, early 1950s Quality concerns permeated Title Insurance Cos. Ethical challenges demanded solutions. 10

Slide 11

First ALTA Standards, 1962 Title Company enthusiasm onboard. A major factor in surveyors future! ACSM and American Title Assoc. formed joint committee to create... 11

Slide 12

Then in mid 1970s, ACSM created (NSPS) the National Society of Professional Surveyors. Every state in the Country invited to send a representative... a Governor. They came and returned enthusiastically! ALTA standards slow to spread Nationally. Professional-quality surveys still rarity. Major effort still required. Time and dedication. 12

Slide 13

Some surveyors were true professionals, well educated, understood duties. Some trained apprentices. Some apprentices learned. Some learned more. Some learned less... and... taught others. And some of the learned... taught others. 13

Slide 14

B egan path of diminishing returns. And subject to the Professions... FEAST AND FAMINE CYCLES! But Governors kept in touch! IT WAS A PROFESSIONAL, ETHICAL CONNECTION! 14

Slide 15

Local TSA Chapters formed, +/- 1960s Several Chapters developed standards Good intention but little coordination. Standards issue spread among many states. Studies led to varied Standards development. Some States reluctant to share. Some shared willingly; even offering to help. 15

Slide 16

16 Then came the big Questions... Do Texas surveyors really need Standards??? Would they support surveying standards? If so, could: surveyor to client relations improve? public relations get better? inter-professional communications advance? quality of survey-products increase? the entire profession be better managed? the lesser competent get improved guidance? It will be a long, winding path, but worth it!

Slide 17

17 A. Protection of the public, B. Professional harmony, C. Quality expectation, D. Communication, E. Problem Solving, F. Protection of the Professional? G. But can surveyors afford them? Could Standards actually offer better...

Slide 18

Many TSA Member Attitudes Mixed bag ! Real Professionals dont need Standards! Paper Standards not enforceable. Too many differences in Texas... Who is to say what is good practice? Public wont pay for text-book surveys! Aint never gonna work! Will be tough assignment!! 18

Slide 19

19 Developing Standards in Texas??? Got about as much chance as a cow riding a surfboard! So TSA took a chance... and sent out a Questionnaire... Members replied, Create some Standards.

Slide 20

20 State of Texas Surveying Affairs: Quality surveying practices, too diverse! Standards were non existent or unenforced. What constitutes good surveying practice? Opinions varied as much as the surveys... ALTA specifications seldom used... And mostly abused!

Slide 21

21 Reports on Surveying in areas across the state: Some grandfathered-in were just measurers; Many practitioners knew no boundary law; Many had not even heard of Stafford v. King; Some only surveyed as, We always done it this way! Pretty easy; just measure line and put in a stob! Dont get excited, round here, we all do it like that. Not sure what is meant by that dignity of calls. Whut it says on his deed is whut he gets! Yet surviving among them were many solid practitioners!

Slide 22

SURVEY STANDARDS FOR TEXAS 1975, TSA President Skeet Mitchell convinced of need, APPOINTED COMMITTEE! Committee of seven members from geographically diverse areas of state. Chair given broad powers to get it done. Where best to start? Research, just as for a land survey. What exists? What fits... or can be fit? 22 Or retro-fit!

Slide 23

23 And the seven members came... from the forests, brambles and swamps in East Texas; from big and bigger oil patches in Texas and pipe liners across the state; from big city hustle and bustle and the Capitol City. They gathered, began their chore. AND Each knew best how to make a survey!

Slide 24

1st committee meeting... Exercise in chaos! Lasted two 12+ hour-weekend days! Committee: Big communication problems. Entering the unknown areas. Language barrier: Speaking Texas- survey-eze difficult for committee. Really needed to tighten the string! 24

Slide 25

Tex-as co-or-din-ate-Sys-tem Many interruptions to define terms Interruptions and explanations took up valuable time. A signer or an interpreter was needed! Ya got some other name for that? 25

Slide 26

Developing Surveying Standards started a long, hard trip!... With many discussions... Debates... Mild to volatile... Arguments... and even Threats of violence! A major ethical challenge to continue! 26

Slide 27

27 Ethical Tongue Tying A learning experience... Persuasions over explosions; Expressives without Expletives; Suggest: propose, think, reason and consider; Avoid the derogatory: stupid, dumb, ignorant; Never insult, degrade, slur, impugn a relative. Smile a lot! Or grin and bear it!

Slide 28

28 The ethics we know And the ethics we practice, Are sometimes at an opposite end; For as hard as we try, tis hard not to lie, Some rules are... Too easy to bend

Slide 29

Many surveying terms common; many not! Major turning point arrived! In hind-sight, so simple! After much debate, agreed to rely on ACSM Dictionary 29

Slide 30

Agreed to accept statutory laws. (Some practices were not only unprofessional, unethical, but unlawful!) Trespassing Safety Property damage Unregistered County Surveyors Proclaiming land ownership Quota surveying Deed layouts Other Issues 30

Slide 31

Defining the Profession What do professional land surveyors do? Can projects be accurately identified? Do most chores have identifiable steps? HMMM? Such a novel idea! 31

Slide 32

Other States with Standards only delineated land surveys. Standards Committee asked all states and received Standards from nine: Arkansas, California, Florida, North Carolina, Georgia, Maine, Missouri, New York, and Wisconsin. North Carolina and Wisconsin were excellent patterns; Almost adopted. 32 Lotsa reading and studying!

Slide 33

Some Texas surveyors did 100% boundary work. Many others only 30% boundary and 70% other: route surveys, mixed construction, topographic, control... all associated with boundary work. What Texas Land Surveyors Do (From original questionnaire) 33

Slide 34

After countless combative discussions Standards Committee Finds a Motto: Identify what needs to be done; Not how to do it! Thereby the Surveyor applies Professional Methodology to satisfy the Specifications. 34

Slide 35

35 Qualities needed for Standards Execution And an ethical, professional conscience. Satisfying Standards will require... Professional know-how! Professional understanding! Professional ability!

Slide 36

But there was more... Committee found: most surveying assignments, jobs, etc. have numerous common applications. Such applications grouped in Specifications. Those Specs identified, defined common applications elements such as Bearings, Monuments, Closure, Records Search, Maps and Measurements. 36

Slide 37

Procedure had required EXTREME ethical conduct, debate and compromise. Again and again. Committee learned lessons of tact and diplomacy never before encountered. Chair challenged as referee and judge. An explosion of issues and values. 37

Slide 38

38 Disputes were common. Voices were raised... Some spoke over others. Tempers flared. Even a walk-out was threatened! Nerve ends were bared!

Slide 39

39 Members were challenged with homework. Written papers to clarify, support opinions. Mid-1970s No email or instant messaging, few FAX options. Snail mail or telephone All took time to create and get response. And at personal expense.

Slide 40

40 No matter how Committee looked at their chore... each member saw it differently! And each knew his viewpoint was best !

Slide 41

Things surveyors do... Often called: An assignment, or Some work, or A contract, or A project, or A job. 41

Slide 42

42 Common things in profession often named or called by different terms. Committee finally chose to develop Manual of Practice in two main parts: STANDARDS and SPECIFICATIONS Standards define terms and conditions; Specifications define certain assignments.

Slide 43

Standards Committee Takes a Stand And well call Assignments... Categories ! Is Professional Surveying sum of many parts? Should Standards cover total practice? Are many parts used in different jobs? Can parts be identified? Can parts be grouped into different jobs? YES! 43

Slide 44

A unit dividing major professional services of a Registered Professional Land Surveyor into defined segments of similar nature, procedure and practice. A Category is comprised of one or several services or products that are closely allied. A Route Survey is a Category. A Land Title Survey is a different Category. Each Category has specific requirements.* * Manual of Practice, 1 st edition,1976 to 12 th 2013 And a Category is: 44

Slide 45

45 Perseverance Prevailed The blueprint was made... Now the mold had to be cast. Again each had a different idea!

Slide 46

Many Committee meetings; Many more debates; Each definition, term, argued! More writing, opinions offered; Weeks passed, then months. 46

Slide 47

47 After an exhausting meeting. Category 1A finally completed, Sent to membership for vote. More debate at Annual meeting; Approved for one year, 10/9/1976, and voluntary use. Happy Birthday! Category 1A

Slide 48

48 Wheels of progress turn slowly Vote by attending membership and mail ballot; small success for Committee... Large move for Texas surveying profession. Precursor in decades to come, for legal, mandatory professional standards.

Slide 49

Category 1A 1st Issue of the Manual of Practice 1976 Folded Legal size paper (18 pages) 49

Slide 50

50 From 1976 through the years following, Manual was updated; Categories added; all Membership approved. New Categories for boundary related tasks. Route surveys, topos, Construction, vertical- horizontal control, etc.

Slide 51

51 Registration Practices Act changed over years. Allowed Registration Board to develop minimum standards for Texas Land Surveying. TSA Category 1A was a primary resource. It took nearly 17 years.

Slide 52

52 TBPLS Minimum Standards Long debated; Chosen wisely; As MINIMUM Standards. The Board establishes these minimum standards of practice to better serve the general public in regulating the practice of professional land surveying in Texas. TBPLS Rule 663.13

Slide 53

53 Surveyor must do no less than the minimum. Because... Registration is a legal qualification... To make a survey of minimum quality! Registration gives surveyor benefit of the doubt... BUT, are all SURVEYORS truly professional, Or just minimally qualified?

Slide 54

54 Todays Manual of Practice On line, 12 th Edition Evolution: Standards, now in 3 parts: I.Introduction, II.General Statement & III.Definitions & Applications Virtually same language as 1 st Ed. TBPLS rules referenced often.

Slide 55

55 Specifications for Categories: Ten Categories now listed. Still in original format... Still listing what needs to be done... And not how to do it! And still needs to be kept up to date!

Slide 56

56 TBPLS Minimum Standards offer few training aides past mandatory requirements for boundary surveys. TSPS Standards and Categories offer check- lists and training aides for what needs to be done in ten areas of professional surveying. These are not in competition. They help mold the real professional! And the employees!!! Trivial Comparison

Slide 57

57 Category 1A Still the Gold Standard. Tolerance Chart needs updating. Specifications remain appropriate... If followed! But nothing remains static... Maintenance, updates and review required! New Administration, please take note! And Understood!

Slide 58

58 Category 1A The Texas answer to an ALTA survey. Includes many Title Industry concerns. Flexible to additional needs. Should be major part of your contract. MINIMUM STANDARD DETAIL REQUIREMENTS for ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEYS as adopted by American Land Title Association American Congress on Surveying and Mapping and National Society of Professional Surveyors

Slide 59

59 Again Emphasizing Differences Highlights for understanding: TBPLS minimum standards are law. Mandatory and Minimum. TSPS Standards Voluntary, often More detailed, comprehensive. Designed with Title Co. Interests. And a check list for employees/trainees!

Slide 60

60 TSPS Manual of Practice Table of Contents offers a one sentence preview of each of the 10 Categories. Good for checking work and training employees.

Slide 61

61 Surveyors are an historic breed! We have survived the ages...but not alone. It is mostly because we knew who was holding the end of our chain... Those who support our mission: Programmers, Technicians, Researchers, and rodmen! No surveyor stands alone! Every Surveyor needs a reliable Bubba! I got your back, boss!

Slide 62

62 There was a surveyor named Brudaben. Whose surveys werent all they coulda been. Though his chain was pulled tight To set his marks right; The tail-end wasnt held... where it shoulda been. And some final, Important Points!

Slide 63

63 And a second set-up is much better!

Slide 64

64 Remember, redundant measurement is only assurance surveyor has to support an opinion on distance and/or direction. Whether on plat... Or in court! This fact applies to every surveying tool from chain... to G.P.S. And then there is research! Now, are you ready to present your case?

Slide 65

65 Research, Records Search: Surveyors Magic Wand! Requirements in Manuals1st edition still viable! TBPLS rule 663.16(B) Boundary Construction: A land surveyor assuming the responsibility of performing a land survey also assumes the responsibility for such research of adequate thoroughness to support the determination of the location of the boundaries of the land being surveyed. Verbatim from 1st Ed, Manual of Practice.

Slide 66

66 How deep do we dig? How far do we go, To be adequate and sufficient? Cause we never can tell, When the survey we sell, Will be held by the court... As deficient!

Slide 67

67 Communication, the heart and root of success! The channels must be open... to, for, between, and with... employees, clients, employers, contractors/pro- viders, business associates, etc.

Slide 68

68 Standards require good communication. Also... offer good communication Identify necessary tasks, check lists and employee training aides.

Slide 69

69 Important Ethics of Communication As appropriate: Letter Message received: Letter answer or acknowledgment. Email message received: Email answer or acknowledgment. Telephone message received: Telephone a response. Memo received Memo answered or acknowledgment.

Slide 70

70 Business Acumen No communication should go unacknowledged! Better-half Acumen No communication should go unacknowledged!

Slide 71

71 TSPS has the Manual of Practice. Must be under constant review. Members need assurance it is good info; Up to date on processes that identify good surveying procedures... Always on What needs to be done... And never on how to do it!

Slide 72

72 Surveyors must follow minimums. Do what is minimally required. Is Maintaining a Minimum a professional trait? Are steps being taken beyond entry level? Opportunity is in the Manual of Practice To step to the forefront. An Ethical Truth Best way to outcompete ones competitor is to outperform ones competitor.

Slide 73

73 Your TAIL... And your bosss!

Slide 74

74 Post Scrips Originally Standards Committee: Wanted to distinguish TSA members Hoped TSA would require members use; Felt TSA members should pledge use: Wanted compulsory use if TSA member; Hoped TBPLS would incorporate as rules; Hoped to use for a Standards Legislation.

Slide 75

75 Original Committee; In fond memory Al Armstrong Harold Fisher Ken Gold Abbott Hargraves Harold Robertson Clint Sumrall W. C. Wilson

Slide 76

76 Thanks for being here!

Slide 77

77 Questions, Comments, Complaints? Yall enjoy lunch, now!

Slide 78

78