Ethics and the law: In-house counsel's dilemma
-
Upload
gowling-wlg -
Category
Law
-
view
291 -
download
0
Transcript of Ethics and the law: In-house counsel's dilemma
![Page 1: Ethics and the law: In-house counsel's dilemma](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070516/587354f11a28ab56378b71bb/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
CPD Professionalism Program for General CounselNovember 9, 2015
![Page 2: Ethics and the law: In-house counsel's dilemma](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070516/587354f11a28ab56378b71bb/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Legal Project Management: The roles and responsibilities of law firms and in-house counsel
![Page 3: Ethics and the law: In-house counsel's dilemma](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070516/587354f11a28ab56378b71bb/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
agenda
• Introductions and Objectives• Project Management Fundamentals• Framework for Legal Project Management
– Define– Plan– Monitor and Manage– Review and Improve
![Page 4: Ethics and the law: In-house counsel's dilemma](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070516/587354f11a28ab56378b71bb/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
introductions
• Rick Kathuria, National Director PMO and Legal Logistics
• Bryce Kraeker, Partner
![Page 5: Ethics and the law: In-house counsel's dilemma](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070516/587354f11a28ab56378b71bb/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Slide 5
benefits of legal project management
value knowledge
appropriate workefficiency
get paid for the work completedpredictable cost
clarity on each matter
enhance trust/relationships/teamwork
client satisfaction
clients participants law firm/dept
![Page 6: Ethics and the law: In-house counsel's dilemma](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070516/587354f11a28ab56378b71bb/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Every project has three key constraints that must be considered together.
The consequences of scope changes should be explained to clients proactively
iron triangle – triple constraints
![Page 7: Ethics and the law: In-house counsel's dilemma](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070516/587354f11a28ab56378b71bb/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
A four step-framework making LPM easy for us and our clients
gowlings practical™ framework
![Page 8: Ethics and the law: In-house counsel's dilemma](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070516/587354f11a28ab56378b71bb/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
case study #1 – Project Rio
• North American engineering and environmental consulting firm
• Privately held and owned by over 100 shareholders• Approximately $300 million merger with a global
engineering firm• Partial cash and exchangeable shares
consideration with Canadian shareholders acquiring approximately one-third of the global firm
![Page 9: Ethics and the law: In-house counsel's dilemma](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070516/587354f11a28ab56378b71bb/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
roles on a legal matter (overall)
Client Sponsor Client Team
client team Lead Lawyer Matter Team Legal Project Manager
legal team
third partyNote: A person can play multiple roles a matter.
![Page 10: Ethics and the law: In-house counsel's dilemma](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070516/587354f11a28ab56378b71bb/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Slide 10
RACI matrix
People responsible to complete the tasks
The one (and only one) person accountable for the outcome
People who add knowledge and expertise
People affected by the outcome – Stakeholders
R
A
C
I
Responsible
Informed
Accountable
Consulted
![Page 11: Ethics and the law: In-house counsel's dilemma](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070516/587354f11a28ab56378b71bb/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
1 Define Matter goals Client objectives Scope of work Timing Staffing Value
Understand client expectations
Key Legal Team Responsibilities Clearly articulate expectations and a
definition of success
Key Client Responsibilities
R
A
C
I
Lead Lawyer
Lead Lawyer
Client Sponsor
Matter/Client Team, LPM
gowlings practical™ framework - define
![Page 12: Ethics and the law: In-house counsel's dilemma](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070516/587354f11a28ab56378b71bb/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Slide 12
types of pricing arrangements
![Page 13: Ethics and the law: In-house counsel's dilemma](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070516/587354f11a28ab56378b71bb/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
2014 Corporate Counsel Survey• In-house counsel are
changing the conversation regarding billing options with their law firms.
• When in-house counsel identified their “primary” arrangement, the billable hour is still the most predominant billing method, but there was a considerable drop from 55% to 47%
Source: http://www.canadianlawyermag.com/5353/Seeking-alternative-arrangements.html
![Page 14: Ethics and the law: In-house counsel's dilemma](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070516/587354f11a28ab56378b71bb/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
2 Plan Agree scope; assumptions Establish plan; key milestones Allocate resources Identify baseline fee estimate
R
A
C
I
LPM
Lead Lawyer
Client Sponsor
Matter/Client Team
Engagement Letter outlining plan with scope, fees and assumptions
Key Legal Team Responsibilities Review, validation and feedback on
scope, fees and assumptions
Key Client Responsibilities
gowlings practical™ framework - plan
![Page 15: Ethics and the law: In-house counsel's dilemma](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070516/587354f11a28ab56378b71bb/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Slide 15
sample plan template – transaction
![Page 16: Ethics and the law: In-house counsel's dilemma](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070516/587354f11a28ab56378b71bb/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Slide 16
sample plan template – litigation
![Page 17: Ethics and the law: In-house counsel's dilemma](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070516/587354f11a28ab56378b71bb/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Slide 17
sample project plan template – task view
Assumptions
Links to precedents
![Page 18: Ethics and the law: In-house counsel's dilemma](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070516/587354f11a28ab56378b71bb/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
efficiency / value
• Does it need to be done?• What’s the “best” resource to do it
– Internal– Level of external resource
• Reasonable cost / What is it worth?
![Page 19: Ethics and the law: In-house counsel's dilemma](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070516/587354f11a28ab56378b71bb/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Slide 19
sample staffing profileLawyer - 15+
Lawyer - 9-14
Lawyer - 5-8
Lawyer - 1-2
Clerk/Paralegal
Internal Counsel
![Page 20: Ethics and the law: In-house counsel's dilemma](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070516/587354f11a28ab56378b71bb/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
3 Monitor & Manage Track progress (dockets) Identify variations
(scope, schedule, estimates) Take corrective actions Identify and track risks Communicate status
R
A
C
I
LPM
Lead Lawyer
Client Sponsor, Matter/Client Team
Client Sponsor, Matter/Client Team
Status reports Addendums to engagement letter
Key Legal Team Responsibilities Provide direction on new circumstances Provide feedback
Key Client Responsibilities
gowlings practical™ framework – monitor & manage
![Page 21: Ethics and the law: In-house counsel's dilemma](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070516/587354f11a28ab56378b71bb/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Slide 21
overall progress and task view
Progress
Status
![Page 22: Ethics and the law: In-house counsel's dilemma](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070516/587354f11a28ab56378b71bb/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
4 Review & Improve Lessons learned Client satisfaction
R
A
C
I
LPM
Lead Lawyer
Client Sponsor, Matter/Client Team
Lead Lawyer, Client Sponsor
New and updated precedents Historic matter data for comparison
Key Legal Team Responsibilities Provide feedback
Key Client Responsibilities
gowlings practical™ framework – review & improve
![Page 23: Ethics and the law: In-house counsel's dilemma](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070516/587354f11a28ab56378b71bb/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
questions?• Bryce Kraeker, Partner
– [email protected]– 519-575-7545
• Rick Kathuria, National Director PMO and Legal Logistics– [email protected]– 416-814-5613
![Page 24: Ethics and the law: In-house counsel's dilemma](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070516/587354f11a28ab56378b71bb/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Ethics and the Law: In-House Counsel’s DilemmaNovember 9, 2015
![Page 25: Ethics and the law: In-house counsel's dilemma](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070516/587354f11a28ab56378b71bb/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
•Ethics:
• Well-based standards of right and wrong that prescribe what humans ought to do, usually in terms of rights, obligations, benefits to society, fairness or specific virtues
![Page 26: Ethics and the law: In-house counsel's dilemma](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070516/587354f11a28ab56378b71bb/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
26
•Ethics and Lawyers
Can a good lawyer be a good person?
- Charles Fried
![Page 27: Ethics and the law: In-house counsel's dilemma](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070516/587354f11a28ab56378b71bb/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
27
•Importance of Role:
• Legal ethics as a system of norms, values and standards of behaviour intrinsic to one’s role as a lawyer
![Page 28: Ethics and the law: In-house counsel's dilemma](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070516/587354f11a28ab56378b71bb/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
28
• Testimony of Enron’s lawyers before Congressional Committee:
“We did everything in an ethical manner.”
![Page 29: Ethics and the law: In-house counsel's dilemma](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070516/587354f11a28ab56378b71bb/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
29
• Testimony of Enron’s lawyers before Congressional Committee:
“In our role as lawyers acting for our client, we did everything in an ethical manner.”
![Page 30: Ethics and the law: In-house counsel's dilemma](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070516/587354f11a28ab56378b71bb/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
30
•Perspectives on Role:
“Hired Gun” “Counsellor”
![Page 31: Ethics and the law: In-house counsel's dilemma](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070516/587354f11a28ab56378b71bb/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
31
•Perspectives on Role:
• Lawyer +• Employee
![Page 32: Ethics and the law: In-house counsel's dilemma](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070516/587354f11a28ab56378b71bb/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
32
•Perspectives on Role:
• “Cop”• “Counsellor”• “Entrepreneur”
![Page 33: Ethics and the law: In-house counsel's dilemma](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070516/587354f11a28ab56378b71bb/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
33
•Integrity:
• Reflection• Acceptance of Role’s Implications
![Page 34: Ethics and the law: In-house counsel's dilemma](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070516/587354f11a28ab56378b71bb/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
34
•Small Farmers Act: How Big is Small?The Small Farmers Act (Canada):
32. Control means with respect to any Person at any time (i) holding, whether directly or indirectly, as owner or other beneficiary (other than solely as the beneficiary of an unrealized interest) securities or ownership interests of that Person carrying votes or ownership interests sufficient to elect or appoint 50% or more of the individuals who are responsible for the supervision or management of that Person.
156. Person means a natural person, partnership, limited partnership, company or corporation, joint venture, sole proprietorship.
![Page 35: Ethics and the law: In-house counsel's dilemma](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070516/587354f11a28ab56378b71bb/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
35
•Ethical Issues: Hard to Indentify
“Most of us think the important ethical decisions in our lives will be delivered with a blinking red neon sign: CAUTION: IMPORTANT DECISION AHEAD… The problem is life….comes with no warning signs.”
- Clayton Christenson
![Page 36: Ethics and the law: In-house counsel's dilemma](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070516/587354f11a28ab56378b71bb/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
36
•Ethical Issues: Hard to Resolve
“Being an ethical lawyer is challenging….a lawyer is required to strike the difficult balance between competing ethical obligations so as to make the best ethical decision she can.”
- Alice Wooley
![Page 37: Ethics and the law: In-house counsel's dilemma](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070516/587354f11a28ab56378b71bb/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
37
•Casey at the Tee
![Page 38: Ethics and the law: In-house counsel's dilemma](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070516/587354f11a28ab56378b71bb/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
The Rider and the Elephant
![Page 39: Ethics and the law: In-house counsel's dilemma](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070516/587354f11a28ab56378b71bb/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
39
•Moral Intuition• Sudden appearance in consciousness of evaluative
feelings
• Absence of conscious awareness of investigation, analysis, evidence weighing, reaching conclusion
•Subsequent search for reasons to justify the judgment to self or others
![Page 40: Ethics and the law: In-house counsel's dilemma](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070516/587354f11a28ab56378b71bb/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
40
•Cognitive Biases• Obedience to Authority
• Conformity
•Over-confidence
•Egocentrism
•Confirmation
![Page 41: Ethics and the law: In-house counsel's dilemma](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070516/587354f11a28ab56378b71bb/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
41
•Authority Effect •the CEO or CFO as business person knows best
•the senior lawyer on the file knows best
•the corporation knows best
OBEDIENCE TO AUTHORITY
![Page 42: Ethics and the law: In-house counsel's dilemma](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070516/587354f11a28ab56378b71bb/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
CONFORMITY
42
![Page 43: Ethics and the law: In-house counsel's dilemma](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070516/587354f11a28ab56378b71bb/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
OVER-CONFIDENCE
43
![Page 44: Ethics and the law: In-house counsel's dilemma](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070516/587354f11a28ab56378b71bb/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
SELF-SERVING BIAS
•Emotion Based Judgments
•Automatic Decisions
•“The (Honest) Truth about Dishonesty”
44
![Page 45: Ethics and the law: In-house counsel's dilemma](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070516/587354f11a28ab56378b71bb/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
BOUNDED ETHICALITY
•Intended Behaviour
vs.
Actual Behaviour
45
![Page 46: Ethics and the law: In-house counsel's dilemma](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070516/587354f11a28ab56378b71bb/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
BOUNDED ETHICALITY (cont’d)
•Intended Behaviourvs.
Actual Behaviour
Unintentional Unethical Behaviour
46
![Page 47: Ethics and the law: In-house counsel's dilemma](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070516/587354f11a28ab56378b71bb/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
BOUNDED ETHICALITY
47
PredictionForecasting Errors
RecollectionMemory revisionism Shifting Standards
Decision TimeEthical Fading
Visceral responses
“I should behave ethically…therefore I will”
“I should have behaved ethically…therefore I did”
“I don’t see the ethical implications of this decision…so I do what I want to do”
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Want
Should
From “Blindspot” by Max Baxerman and Ann TenbrunselCopyright 2011 Princeton University Press
![Page 48: Ethics and the law: In-house counsel's dilemma](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070516/587354f11a28ab56378b71bb/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
WE’RE ONLY HUMAN
•Fatigue
•Hunger
•Time Pressure
•Ambiguity and Complexity
48
![Page 49: Ethics and the law: In-house counsel's dilemma](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070516/587354f11a28ab56378b71bb/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
49
•Potential Effect on Legal Ethics•Morals of the marketplace
•Client seen as decision maker
•Commercialisation of law
•Privatizing of lawyers’ professional conduct
•Organizational culture
![Page 50: Ethics and the law: In-house counsel's dilemma](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070516/587354f11a28ab56378b71bb/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
50
•Objectives:• Awareness and recognition• Enhance capacity to exercise judgment
![Page 51: Ethics and the law: In-house counsel's dilemma](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070516/587354f11a28ab56378b71bb/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
51
•Focus on the Elephant• Importance of narrative
• Compliance programs:
• rules-based
• values-based
• Procedural fairness
![Page 52: Ethics and the law: In-house counsel's dilemma](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070516/587354f11a28ab56378b71bb/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
52
•Focus on the Elephant• Identity Model:
• Who am I?
• What kind of situation is this?
• What would someone like me do in this situation?
![Page 53: Ethics and the law: In-house counsel's dilemma](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070516/587354f11a28ab56378b71bb/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
CASE STUDY
•Things that Go Boom in the Night (and Ruin Your Day)
53
![Page 54: Ethics and the law: In-house counsel's dilemma](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070516/587354f11a28ab56378b71bb/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
Thank You
montréal · ottawa · toronto · hamilton · waterloo region · calgary · vancouver · beijing · moscow · london
Michael HermanPartnerGowlings Toronto
![Page 55: Ethics and the law: In-house counsel's dilemma](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070516/587354f11a28ab56378b71bb/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
Conflicts From Both Sides of the Fence - Outside Counsel and the GC
November 9, 2015
![Page 56: Ethics and the law: In-house counsel's dilemma](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070516/587354f11a28ab56378b71bb/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
56
Agenda
1. Who is the Client?
2. McKercher decision: a new test for conflicts?
![Page 57: Ethics and the law: In-house counsel's dilemma](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070516/587354f11a28ab56378b71bb/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
57
Who’s the client?
• Conflicting instructions CEO & Board• Inside counsel response• External counsel response
![Page 58: Ethics and the law: In-house counsel's dilemma](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070516/587354f11a28ab56378b71bb/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
58
Who’s the client?
Getting off the Record
• External counsel• Inside counsel dilemma
![Page 59: Ethics and the law: In-house counsel's dilemma](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070516/587354f11a28ab56378b71bb/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
59
Who’s the client?
• Giving advice beyond your employer• LawPro issues
![Page 60: Ethics and the law: In-house counsel's dilemma](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070516/587354f11a28ab56378b71bb/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
60
McKercher decision
CNR v. McKercher
![Page 61: Ethics and the law: In-house counsel's dilemma](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070516/587354f11a28ab56378b71bb/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
61
Conflict Screen
At Gowlings: a “Matter” (single file) Screen:• Two teams established – professionals and staff
(“Trustees”)• Firm wide announcement of screen• Trustees and those self-identifying give undertaking• Only Trustees on one side can access file,
documents, dockets etc.
![Page 62: Ethics and the law: In-house counsel's dilemma](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070516/587354f11a28ab56378b71bb/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
62
Conflict Screen
A screen doesn’t cure a conflict. • Putting up a screen may be a condition of getting
client consent• A screen can be appropriate in a matter which is not
a “dispute”• Putting up a screen may be something done after a
conflict is addressed
![Page 63: Ethics and the law: In-house counsel's dilemma](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070516/587354f11a28ab56378b71bb/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
63
Preliminary concepts
• The “unrelated matter”• The law firm wants to act for client A on a lawsuit
against B• Search B’s name • The law firm does not act for B on the new lawsuit, but
does act for B on other matters• This is the potential “unrelated matter” conflict
• McKercher is all about “unrelated matters”
![Page 64: Ethics and the law: In-house counsel's dilemma](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070516/587354f11a28ab56378b71bb/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
64
McKercher decision
• Essential facts:• McKercher firm was CN’s “go to” firm in Saskatchewan• McKercher had three matters on for CN at the time
• (i) a real estate acquisition, • (ii) a receivership and • (iii) a personal injury defence
• McKercher launched a $1.75 billion class action against CN
• CN applied to have McKercher disqualified as counsel on the class action
“Bad facts make bad law”
![Page 65: Ethics and the law: In-house counsel's dilemma](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070516/587354f11a28ab56378b71bb/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
65
McKercher decision
• At SCC, held:
• McKercher breached its duty of loyalty to CN• SCC of necessity must have found CN not a
“professional litigant” (though no express statement)
• Should McKercher be disqualified? SCC sent the case back to the lower court to decide remedy, i.e., to disqualify or not
• McKercher had no confidential information about CN
![Page 66: Ethics and the law: In-house counsel's dilemma](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070516/587354f11a28ab56378b71bb/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
66
McKercher decision
• McKercher’s main issue was an “unrelated” matter situation
• McKercher firm was acting for the class action plaintiffs but did not act for CN on the lawsuit
• McKercher firm acted for CN only on other matters “unrelated” to the class action
![Page 67: Ethics and the law: In-house counsel's dilemma](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070516/587354f11a28ab56378b71bb/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
67
McKercher decision
• SCC endorsed its own “bright line” test from R. v. Neil (2002):
“A law firm “may not represent one client whose interests are directly adverse to the immediate interests of another current client – even if the two matters are unrelated – unless both clients consent….”
![Page 68: Ethics and the law: In-house counsel's dilemma](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070516/587354f11a28ab56378b71bb/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
68
McKercher decision
• SCC then tried to set out a practical test as well:
“When a law firm is asked to act against an existing client on an unrelated matter, it must determine whether accepting the retainer will breach the bright line rule. It must ask itself whether (i) the immediate legal interests of the new client are directly adverse to those of an existing client, (ii) the existing client has sought to exploit the bright line rule in a tactical manner; and (iii) the existing client can reasonably expect that the law firm will not act against it in unrelated matters.”
![Page 69: Ethics and the law: In-house counsel's dilemma](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070516/587354f11a28ab56378b71bb/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
69
McKercher decision
• In a Post-McKercher World:
• Law firm’s key issue: To determine when an existing client can be presumed to reasonably expect that the law firm would act against it in this unrelated matter
![Page 70: Ethics and the law: In-house counsel's dilemma](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070516/587354f11a28ab56378b71bb/html5/thumbnails/70.jpg)
70
McKercher decision
• When is it reasonable for a client to expect the firm not to act against it?• Relevant factors:
• Can consent be inferred? Is an existing client a “professional litigant”?
• What is the nature of the relationship of the firm with the existing client?
• What are the terms of the retainer with that client?• What are the types of matters on which the firm acts for
that client?
![Page 71: Ethics and the law: In-house counsel's dilemma](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070516/587354f11a28ab56378b71bb/html5/thumbnails/71.jpg)
71
• Acting against a client in an unrelated matter with screens in place• GCs....what’s the problem?
![Page 72: Ethics and the law: In-house counsel's dilemma](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070516/587354f11a28ab56378b71bb/html5/thumbnails/72.jpg)
Thank You
montréal · ottawa · toronto · hamilton · waterloo region · calgary · vancouver · beijing · moscow · london
R. Ross WellsWaterloo Region Managing [email protected]
Rosa [email protected]
![Page 73: Ethics and the law: In-house counsel's dilemma](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070516/587354f11a28ab56378b71bb/html5/thumbnails/73.jpg)
CPD Credits
This program will count for up to three hours of Professionalism credit toward the mandatory requirements of the Law Society of Upper Canada. It will also count for up to three hours of Professional Responsibility and Ethics and Practice Management credit under the requirements of the Law Society of British Columbia, and for up to three hours of CLE credits under the requirements of the Barreau du Québec.
![Page 74: Ethics and the law: In-house counsel's dilemma](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070516/587354f11a28ab56378b71bb/html5/thumbnails/74.jpg)
Thank You
montréal · ottawa · toronto · hamilton · waterloo region · calgary · vancouver · beijing · moscow · london