Estimation of Fault Resistance from Fault Recording Dataapic/uploads/Forum/P2014_6.pdf · Bulk...
Transcript of Estimation of Fault Resistance from Fault Recording Dataapic/uploads/Forum/P2014_6.pdf · Bulk...
Estimation of Fault Resistance from Fault Recording Data
Daniel Wong & Michael Tong 2014-November-5
Agenda
• Project Background & Introduction
• Fault Resistance & Effect
• Estimation Algorithm
• Estimation Results
• Conclusion
Project Background
• Canada’s only fully independent transmission company
• Own and operate more than half of Alberta’s Transmission Grid
• Serve 85% of Alberta population
• Interconnections to BC, Saskatchewan and Montana (US)
• 12,000 km transmission lines 69kV to 500kV
• 300 substations
• More than 20,000 protection relays
• Own and operate a telecommunication (in-house) system
About AltaLink
Project Background
• Impedance Protection - one of the widely used line protections
• Impedance relay responds to Voltage and Current
• Line impedance contains reactance and resistance
• Ground fault impedance contains line impedance and ground fault resistance
• For correct relay operation, relay setting needs to coverage ground fault resistance
• The question is “how much resistance to cover”
Line Protection Coverage
Project Background
• AltaLink in-house guideline (up to December 2004)
• For transmission lines, impedance protection were applied most of the time
• For zone 1 impedance setting, it needs to cover 5 Ohms
• Based on actual operating experience, line protection performance was good
• No problem was identified with the 5 Ohms coverage
AltaLink relay setting guidelines (Pre December 2004)
Project Background
AESO Protection Standard
Alberta Interconnected Electric System Protection Standards: • Effective: December 1, 2004
• Valid for 5 years
• Expired: December 1, 2009
• Document Size: 65 pages
Project Background
AESO Protection Standard
Section 3.6 on Fault Types
Protection applied to the Alberta Interconnected Electric System must be capable of detecting:
• Single line to ground fault with 20 Ohms (tower footing plus arc) impedance
• Phase to phase to ground fault with 20 Ohms (tower footing plus arc) impedance
Project Background
ISO (AESO) Rules
ISO Rules – Section 502.3 Interconnected Electric System Protection Requirements:
• Draft rules posted on 2012 August 15 for consultation
• Final rules posted on 2012 December 31
• Effective: 2012 December 31
• Expiry: No date declared yet
• Document size: 12 pages
Project Background
ISO (AESO) Rules - Section 502.3 Interconnected Electric System Protection Requirements
Ground Fault Resistance Coverage:
• Single line-to-ground fault with impedance up to 5 Ohms
• Phase-to-phase-to-ground fault with impedance up to 5 Ohms
Project Background
• Based on protection guidelines, standards and rules, requirements on ground fault resistance coverage changes from 5 to 20 and back to 5 Ohms again
• No improvement or deterioration in protection performance was observed with these changes
• No study has been carried out to determine the magnitude of ground fault resistance in the AltaLink system
• In mid 2012, a study project was initiated with University of Alberta
Project Introduction
• Alberta Power Industry Consortium (APIC) Project – (Report No. 2013A-1) Develop an algorithm to estimate the fault resistances from fault
data recorded and verify the algorithm through simulation and experimental studies
Apply the algorithm to a large number of fault cases with COMTRADE fault files in single phase to ground faults on 2-terminal lines
Identify the typical value of the ground fault resistance in AltaLink system in order to assess the Protection Setting Guidelines
• Department of E&C Engineering, University of Alberta
• P&C Engineering and System Operations, AltaLink
Single Phase to Ground Fault:
• Electric arc: Traditionally considered as a resistance Dependent on the arc current/length Value is variable during the fault
• Tower grounding: Mainly resistive Not dependent on the fault current Value is stable during the fault
• Objects in the fault path: Usually considered mainly resistive Might be zero or very high Value is unpredictable
Fault Resistance
ZL1
Rf
X
R
Z (apparent impedance)
Fault Resistance Effect
Homogeneous System
ZL1 ZL1
Overreach Underreach
X X
R R
Z(apparent impedance)
Z(apparent impedance)
Fault Resistance Effect
Non-Homogeneous System
Estimation Algorithm
• Two stages:
Stage 1: Fault location estimation
Stage 2: Fault resistance estimation
Relay Relay
SV
SI
LmZ 1 Lm Z
FR
RI
RV
F
Z1S mZ1L (1-m)Z1L Z1R
Z2S mZ2L (1-m)Z2L Z2R
Z0S mZ0L (1-m)Z0L Z0R
S S S-End R-End
V1S V1R
3RF
I1S
I2S
I0S
I1R
I2R
I0R
-
V2F
+
IF
Estimation Algorithm
Stage 1 – Fault Location Estimation
Two-Ended Negative-Sequence Impedance Method
• Negate the effect of pre-fault load and fault resistance, zero-sequence mutual impedance.
• No source are involved, calculation is based on Magnitude. Data alignment is not required.
Z2S mZ2L (1-m)Z2L Z2R
I2S I2R
-
V2F
+
2 2 2 2F S S LV I Z mZ 2 2 2 21F R R LV I Z m Z
Estimation Algorithm
Stage 2 – Fault Resistance Estimation
Relay Relay
SV
SI
LmZ 1 Lm Z
FR
RI
RV
F
1 0 3AS L AS r F FV Z I k Im RI
Estimation Algorithm
For an A-G fault, Voltage and current at end S:
Estimation Results
• 54 fault cases in AltaLink 240KV and 138KV transmission system. 92% of the faults on the studied lines have a fault resistance of less than 5Ω
• Average/Median value of the fault resistance in 240KV system < Average/Median value of the fault resistance in 138KV system
Estimation Results (All Fault Cases) M
ay-0
7Ju
l-0
9Ju
l-0
9Se
p-0
9M
ar-1
0A
pr-
10
May
-10
Jun
-10
Au
g-1
0A
ug-
10
Jan
-11
Ap
r-1
1M
ay-1
1M
ay-1
1M
ay-1
1Ju
l-1
1Ju
l-1
1Ju
l-1
1A
ug-
11
Au
g-1
1A
ug-
11
Sep
-11
Sep
-11
Ap
r-1
2A
pr-
12
Sep
-12
May
-13
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
240KV Line Fault Resistance Level (All Fault Cases)
Estimated Value (Ω) Median Value ( 0.76)
Average Value (1.31)
Feb
-08
Mar
-08
Jul-
08
Au
g-0
8M
ar-0
9Se
p-0
9Ju
l-1
0Se
p-1
0Fe
b-1
1A
pr-
11
May
-11
May
-11
May
-11
Jul-
11
Jul-
11
Ap
r-1
2M
ay-1
2A
ug-
12
Au
g-1
2A
ug-
12
Au
g-1
2O
ct-1
2N
ov-
12
Feb
-13
Mar
-13
Jun
-13
Au
g-1
3
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
138KV Line Fault Resistance Level (All Fault Cases)
Estimated Value (Ω) Median Value (2.33)
Average Value (2.84)
Estimation Results (Excluding Outlier) M
ay-0
7Ju
l-0
9Se
p-0
9M
ar-1
0A
pr-
10
May
-10
Jun
-10
Au
g-1
0A
ug-
10
Jan
-11
Ap
r-1
1M
ay-1
1M
ay-1
1M
ay-1
1Ju
l-1
1Ju
l-1
1Ju
l-1
1A
ug-
11
Au
g-1
1A
ug-
11
Sep
-11
Sep
-11
Ap
r-1
2A
pr-
12
Sep
-12
May
-13
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
240KV Line Fault Resistance Level (Excluding Outlier)
Estimated Value (Ω) Median Value ( 0.72)
Average Value (0.87)
Feb
-08
Mar
-08
Jul-
08
Au
g-0
8M
ar-0
9Se
p-0
9Ju
l-1
0Se
p-1
0Fe
b-1
1A
pr-
11
May
-11
May
-11
May
-11
Jul-
11
Jul-
11
Ap
r-1
2M
ay-1
2A
ug-
12
Au
g-1
2A
ug-
12
Au
g-1
2O
ct-1
2N
ov-
12
Feb
-13
Jun
-13
Au
g-1
3
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
138KV Line Fault Resistance Level (Excluding Outlier)
Estimated Value (Ω) Median Value (2.17)
Average Value (2.31)
Estimation Results (Pie Chart)
> 5 Ohm 8%
2 ~ 5 Ohm 24%
< 2 Ohm 68%
Fault Resistance Level (All Fault Cases)
> 5 Ohm 4%
2 ~ 5 Ohm 25%
< 2 Ohm 71%
Fault Resistance Level (Excluding Outliers)
Estimation Results (Ω vs. Cause) u
nkn
ow
nTr
acto
rU
nkn
ow
nu
nkn
ow
nlig
htn
ing
Co
nta
min
atio
nB
ird
Nes
tB
ird
Nes
tB
ird
Nes
tU
nkn
ow
nU
nkn
ow
nU
nkn
ow
nu
nkn
ow
nU
nkn
ow
nLi
ghtn
ing
Un
kno
wn
un
kno
wn
Un
kno
wn
Un
kno
wn
Un
kno
wn
Un
kno
wn
Ligh
tnin
gU
nkn
ow
nC
VT
failu
reLi
ghtn
ing
Un
kno
wn
Co
nd
uct
or
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
240KV Line Fault Resistance Level (All Fault Cases)
Estimated Value (Ω) Median Value ( 0.76)
Average Value (1.31)
Cro
ss-a
rmC
ross
-arm
Ligh
tnin
gC
on
tam
inat
ion
Co
nd
uct
or
Ligh
tnin
gC
on
du
cto
rC
on
tam
inat
ion
Gra
vel T
ruck
Ligh
tnin
gU
nkn
ow
nU
nkn
ow
nLi
ghtn
ing
Du
mp
Tru
ckC
ross
-arm
We
ath
er
un
kno
wn
Ligh
tnin
gC
on
tam
inat
ion
un
kno
wn
un
kno
wn
un
kno
wn
Icin
gu
nkn
ow
nU
nkn
ow
nU
nkn
ow
nSh
ield
Wir
e
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
138KV Line Fault Resistance Level (All Fault Cases)
Estimated Value (Ω) Median Value (2.33)
Average Value (2.84)
Existing Protection Setting Guidelines for Line Protection …….. Impedance Zone 1: Generally zone 1 is the zone set to underreach the end of the protected line. Zone 1 reach shall be set to 85% of the actual impedance of the protected line with no intentional tripping delay. Mutual coupling with parallel lines causes overreaching for some faults; the zone 1 reach may be reduced to no less than 60% of the line impedance to allow the two opposite zone 1 reaches to overlap with 15% margin, provided a ground fault with 5 ohms resistance still produces high-speed operation. ……..
Protection Setting Guidelines
Section 502.3 Interconnected Electric System Protection Requirements …….. Bulk Transmission Line Ground Fault Resistance Coverage 15 If a bulk transmission line experiences a fault of the following type, then each of the two (2) protection systems for the bulk transmission line must initiate isolation of the fault: (a) single line-to-ground, with a minimum impedance of five (5) ohms; or (b) phase-to-phase-to-ground with a minimum impedance of five (5) ohms.. ……..
ISO Rules – Part 500 Facilities
Conclusion (Project Specifics)
• An off-line method is proposed for estimating the fault resistance in single phase-to-ground faults. The method eliminates the need to synchronize the fault data.
• The developed program makes it possible to estimate the fault resistances in a large number of fault cases, and to obtain a statistical picture of typical fault resistance values.
• More than 50 fault events are studied and the estimation result aligns with AltaLink Protection Setting Practice.
Conclusion (Application Specific)
• With the outliers excluded, 96% of the recorded ground fault resistances were less than 5 Ohms
• The “5 Ohms” requirement for ground fault resistance coverage, as stated in the ISO (AESO) Rules 502.3 is appropriate
• AltaLink provides “5 Ohms” ground fault resistance coverage in full compliance with Rules 502.3
Questions