CARL HOLM

COUNTY OF MONTEREYZONING ADMINISTRATOR

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

RESOLUTION NO . 090029

A. P. # 008-445-007-00 0

FINDINGS AND DECISION

to allow a Combined Development Permit in accordance with Title 20 (Zoning) Chapter 20 .82(Combined Development Permits) of the Monterey County Code, for a Combined Developmen tPermit consisting of: 1) a Coastal Administrative Permit to construct a well to augment a nexisting spring and surface diversion system damaged by the 2008 Basin Wildfire ; and 2) aCoastal Development Permit to allow development within 750 feet of a known archaeologica lresource. The property is located at 55000 Highway One, Esalen Institute (Assessor's Parce lNumber 421-011-006-000), Big Sur, Coastal Zone, and came on regularly for hearing before theZoning Administrator on March 26, 2009 .

Said Zoning Administrator, having considered the application and the evidence presented relatin gthereto,

FINDINGSOF FACT

1 . FINDING: CONSISTENCY - The project, as described in Condition No . 1 and asconditioned, conforms to the policies, requirements, and standards of th eBig Sur Coast Land Use Plan, Big Sur Coastal Implementation Plan (Part3), and the Monterey County Zoning Ordinance Part 1 (Title 20), whic hdesignates this area as appropriate for a water system accessory t odevelopment .

EVIDENCE: (a)

The text, policies, and regulations in the above referenceddocuments have been evaluated during the course of review ofapplications . No conflicts were found to exist . Nocommunications were received during the course of review of th eproject indicating any inconsistencies with the text, policies, an dregulations in these documents .

(b) The property is located at 55000 Highway 1 (Assessor's Parce lNumber 421-011-006-000), Big Sur Coast Land Use Plan . Theparcel is zoned Rural Density Residential, in the Coastal Zon e[RDR/40-D-HR (CZ)], which allows the construction of wate rsystem facilities serving 14 or fewer service connections as aprincipal use. Therefore, the property is suitable for the propose ddevelopment.

(c) The project planner conducted a site inspection on January 26 ,2009, to verify that the project on the subject parcel conforms t othe plans listed above .

(d) The existing visitor serving facilities (Esalen Institute) ar ecurrently serviced by a spring and surface water diversion syste mfrom the Hot Springs Canyon . This system was damaged by the2008 Basin Complex Wildfire, and further damage may occu r

In the matter of the applicatio nESALEN INSTITUTE (PLN090029)

from erosion. Due to the damage, the existing system is no tcapable of providing an adequate potable water supply for dailyuse, nor for emergency fire flow purposes . There is no alternativewater supply at the site, and a new well is needed to provide anadequate supply to the existing connection . The proposed wel lwill augment the existing primary water source for the facilitie sand ensure an adequate supply of water for potable use and fireprotection, especially in case of further damage to the existin gsystem. The proposed well will serve existing uses, and will no tresult in intensification (Big Sur Coast LUP Section 3 .4.3). Priorto the wildfire, the existing facilities used approximately 17,00 0gallons per day (GPD), not including irrigation for on-sit eagricultural gardens . Since the wildfire, the existing water systemhas only provided approximately 10,000 GPD. The proposed wellis planned to reduce the deficit in daily use requirements . Theapplicant intends to retain the spring portion of the existing wate rsystem, and stop use of the existing surface diversion source . Thepracticality of this approach will depend upon the quantity an dquality of water provided by the new well, and its long-ter mviability .

(e) The proposed well site is located in an area of the parcel that ha savailable road access both above and below the site. The newwell site will have no effect on special-status species, sensitiv ehabitat, or other significant biological resources (Big Sur CoastLUP Policy 3 .3 .2 .1) . Monarch butterflies are known to over-winter in Eucalyptus trees in the Pfeiffer Big Sur area . Theresource map in the Big Sur Coastal Implementation Planidentifies the riparian corridor as a sensitive environmenta lresource; however, it does not identify any other mappe dresources on the immediate parcel outside of the riparian corridor .No biological report was required for the project, and this aspectwas not further evaluated consistent with Big Sur CIP Policy20 .145.040.A.1 . The parcel is approximately 14 acres, and th eproposed well site is over 400 hundred feet from the ripariancorridor. Therefore, this is consistent with developmen tguidelines that restrict development within 150 feet of a ripariancorridor (Big Sur CIP Policy 20 .145.040 .C .1 .d) .

(f) Tree Removal : Ten (10) Eucalyptus and one (1) Monterey Pineare proposed for removal . All trees proposed for removal ar eeither non-native (Eucalyptus) or have a diameter of less than te ninches, and the removal of these trees is consistent with th ethinning of small trees from densely forested areas (Big Sur Coas tCIP Policy 20 .145 .060.A.1 .c) or the removal of non-native tree s(Big Sur Coast CIP Policy 20.145.060.A.1 .a) . The removal of thenon-native trees will not result in the exposure of structures in th ecritical viewshed . None of the trees proposed for removal excee d24 inches in diameter, and are not considered landmark trees pe rthe definition in the Big Sur Coast CIP (Policy 20 .145.060.D) .

Esalen Institute (PLN090029)Page 2

Therefore, the proposed tree removal is exempt, and no separat eentitlement is required .

(g) The project includes a Coastal Development Permit to allowdevelopment within 750 feet of a known archaeological resource .County records identify the project site is within an area of highsensitivity for prehistoric cultural resources ; however, anarchaeological survey completed for this project did not identif ythe potential for impacts to prehistoric resources, and there is n oevidence that any cultural resources would be disturbed (Big Su rCoast LUP Policy 3 .11 .1) . Also, see Finding 2, Evidence b .Therefore, the potential for inadvertent impacts is limited and ca nbe controlled by the use of the County's standard project conditio n(Condition No . 3) .

(h) Environmental Health has not indicated that the use as propose dwill adversely impact the natural supply of water necessary t omaintain the environment and the supply available to meet theminimum needs of existing users during the driest years .

(i)

The project does not create any new structures within the critica lviewshed (Big Sur Coast LUP Policy 3 .2.2) .

(j)

Implementation of the project will not require water to b eexported out of the principal watershed .

(k) The project was not referred to the Big Sur Coast Land Us eAdvisory Committee for review. Based on the LUAC Procedureguidelines adopted by the Monterey County Board of Supervisor sper Resolution No . 08-338, this application did not warrantreferral to the LUAC because it does not include developmentrequiring CEQA review, does not involve a lot line adjustment ,does not require the issuance of a Variance, and does not include aDesign Approval subject to review by the Zoning Administrato ror Planning Commission .

(1) The application, project plans, and related support material ssubmitted by the project applicant to the Monterey County RMA -Planning Department for the proposed development found inProject File PLN090029 .

2 .

FINDING: SITE SUITABILITY - The site is physically suitable for the useproposed .

EVIDENCE: (a) The project has been reviewed for site suitability by the followin gdepartments and agencies : RMA - Planning Department ,Environmental Health Division, and Water Resources Agency .There has been no indication from these departments/agencies tha tthe site is not suitable for the proposed development. Conditionsrecommended by the Planning Department and the EnvironmentalHealth Division have been incorporated .

(b) Technical report by an outside archaeological consultant indicate dthat there are no physical or environmental constraints that wouldindicate that the site is not suitable for the use proposed . Countystaff concurs . The following report has been prepared :

Esalen Institute (PLN090029)Page 3

"Cultural Resources Letter" (LIB090106) prepared byArchaeological Consulting, Salinas, California, February4, 2009.

(c) Staff conducted a site inspection on January 26, 2009, to verifythat the site is suitable for this use .

(d) The application, . project plans, and related support materialssubmitted by the applicant to the Monterey County RMA - Plannin gDepartment for the proposed development, found in Project Fil ePLN090029.

3 . FINDING: CEQA (Exempt) : - The project is categorically exempt fromenvironmental review and no unusual circumstances were identified t oexist for the proposed project .

EVIDENCE: (a) California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sectio n15303, Class 3, categorically exempts the construction of new ,small facilities or structures .

(b) No adverse environmental effects were identified during staffreview of the development application during a site visit onJanuary 26, 2009 .

(c) The application, project plans, and related support materialssubmitted by the applicant to the Monterey County RMA -Planning Department for the proposed development, found inProject File PLN090029 .

(d) Findings 1 and 2, and supporting evidence .

4. FINDING: NO VIOLATIONS - The subject property is in compliance with all rule sand regulations pertaining to zoning uses ; subdivision, and any otherapplicable provisions of the County's zoning ordinance . No violationsexist on the property . Zoning violation abatement costs, if any, have bee npaid.

EVIDENCE: Staff reviewed Monterey County RMA - Planning Department andBuilding Services Department Monterey County records and is not awar eof any violations existing on subject property .

5. FINDING: HEALTH AND SAFETY - The establishment, maintenance, oroperation of the project applied for will not under the circumstances o fthis particular case be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals ,comfort, and general welfare of persons residing or working in theneighborhood of such proposed use, or be detrimental or injurious toproperty and improvements in the neighborhood or to the general welfareof the County .

EVIDENCE: Findings 1, 2, 3, and 4, and supporting evidenc e

6. FINDING: PUBLIC ACCESS - The project is in conformance with the publicaccess and public recreation policies of the Coastal Act and Local Coasta lProgram, and does not interfere with any form of historic public use o rtrust rights . No access is required as part of the project as no substantia ladverse impact on access, either individually or cumulatively, a s

Esalen Institute (PLN090029)Page 4

described in Section 20 .70.050.B.4.c of the Monterey County CoastalImplementation Plan, can be demonstrated .

EVIDENCE (a)

The subject property is not described as an area where the Loca lCoastal Program requires access .

(b) The subject property is not indicated as part of any designate dtrails or shoreline access as shown in Figure 2 (Shoreline Acces sPlan) and Figure 3 (Trails Plan) of the Big Sur Coast Land Us ePlan.

(c) No evidence or documentation has been submitted or foundshowing the existence of historic public use or trust rights ove rthis property.

(d)

Staff conducted a site visit on January 26, 2009 .

7 .

FINDING: APPEALABILITY - The decision on this project is appealable to th eBoard of Supervisors and the California Coastal Commission .

EVIDENCE: (a)

Board of Supervisors : Section 20 .86.030 of the Monterey CountyZoning Ordinance (Title 20) .

(b) Coastal Commission : Section 20.86.080.A.1 and A.3 of theMonterey County Zoning Ordinance (Title 20). Approvedprojects between the sea and the first public road paralleling thesea, or approved projects involving development in the underlyingzone as a conditional use, are appealable to the CoastalCommission

DECISION

It is the decision of the Zoning Administrator of the County of Monterey that the Mitigate dNegative Declaration and Mitigated Monitoring Plan be adopted and said application for aCombined Development Permit be granted as shown on the attached sketch and subject to th eattached conditions .

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 26th day ofMarch, 2009 .

CARL HOLM, ZONING ADMINISTRATOR

COPY OF THIS DECISION MAILED TO APPLICANT ON . APR 2 2 2009

THIS APPLICATION IS APPEALABLE TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS . IF ANYONEWISHES TO APPEAL THIS DECISION, AN APPEAL FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AN DSUBMITTED TO THE CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ALONG WITH TH EAPPROPRIATE FILING FEE ON OR BEFORE MAY o 2 200 9

THIS APPLICATION IS ALSO APPEALABLE TO THE COASTAL COMMISSION . UPONRECEIPT OF NOTIFICATION OF THE DECISION BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ,THE COMMISSION ESTABLISHES A 10 WORKING DAY APPEAL PERIOD . ANAPPEAL FORM MUST BE FILED WITH THE COASTAL COMMISSION . FOR FURTHER

Esalen Institute (PLN090029)Page 5

INFORMATION, CONTACT THE COASTAL COMMISSION AT (831) 427-4863 OR A T725 FRONT STREET, SUITE 300, SANTA CRUZ, CA

This decision, if this is the final administrative decision, is subject to judicial review pursuant t oCalifornia Code of Civil Procedure Sections 1094 .5 and 1094.6. Any Petition for Writ ofMandate must be filed with the Court no later than the 90 th day following the date on which thisdecision becomes final .

NOTES

1 .

You will need a building permit and must comply with the Monterey CountyBuilding Ordinance in every respect .

Additionally, the Zoning Ordinance provides that no building permit shall be issued ,nor any use conducted, otherwise than in accordance with the conditions and term sof the permit granted or until ten days after the mailing of notice of the granting o fthe permit by the appropriate authority, or after granting of the permit by the Boar dof Supervisors in the event of appeal .

Do not start any construction or occupy any building until you have obtained th enecessary permits and use clearances from the Monterey County RMA - Plannin gDepartment and RMA - Building Services office in Salinas .

2 .

This permit expires two years after the above date of granting thereof unles sconstruction or use is started within this period .

Esalen Institute (PLN090029)Page 6

EXHIBIT C Project Name : Esalen Institut eMonterey County Resource Management Agency

File No : PLN090029 APNs : 421-011-006-00 0Planning Departmen t

Condition Compliance and/or Mitigation Monitoring Approved by: Zoning Administrator Date : March 26, 2009

Reporting Plan

*Monitoring or Reporting refers to projects with an EIR or adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration per Section 21081 .6 of the PublicResources Code.

PermitCOIZCI

NmnbeiNumber

ondltio111 of

l/7/)rol'al anti or llltl

atlol lllellCZ/PNJ (lil(lll(1/JOHJI/)le Lana CSe

DC/lui'tiilnilt

~0111pllaHCeo1'y11o11 1to/'i/l

Ctioil S

to be /(ijo 'l)le(l. I f here applicable .applicable .a certified professional !1 required

or acnoll to he accc~ptcil.

Responsi bl arty f01 '

~oHlpliaHCel

err 'cationof

C OJll/7ZIanC e

(Halite/date)

1 . PD001- SPECIFIC USES ONLYThis Combined Development Permit (PLN090029 )allows the construction of a well to augment anexisting spring and surface diversion systemdamaged by the 2008 Basin Wildfire, anddevelopment within 750 feet of a knownarchaeological resource . The property is located at55000 Highway 1, Big Sur (Assessor's Parce lNumber 421-011-006-000), Big Sur Land Us ePlan, Coastal Zone. This permit was approved inaccordance with County ordinances and land useregulations subject to the following terms andconditions . Neither the uses nor the constructionallowed by this permit shall commence unless an duntil all of the conditions of this permit are met t othe satisfaction of the Director of the RMA -Planning Department . Any use or construction notin substantial conformance with the terms an dconditions of this permit is a violation of Count yregulations and may result in modification or

Adhere to conditions and uses specifie din the permit .

Owner/Applicant

Ongoingunles sother-wisestated .

Permi tContiNutnbet

Number

Conditions of -1I)Z)roval (!11(/ or ,1l tigatiol l

Ie(L111re,c (111(1 Responsible Lam/

s ellep(lrtment

~ 'ollpliance or .1lonitorim; -I ctlollsto he performc7l. II here applicable ,

(! certified prOfes .S7O11([I L4 required

f Or (action to be accepted.

Responsiblef artl . , foY

t mum/miceT1111711 ;

1 L77 1catlonof

C ol)lphanc ename/date)

revocation of this permit and subsequent lega laction. No use or construction other than thatspecified by this permit is allowed unles sadditional permits are approved by the appropriat eauthorities . To the extent that the County hasdelegated any condition compliance or mitigationmonitoring to the Monterey County WaterResources Agency, the Water Resources Agencyshall provide all information requested by th eCounty and the County shall bear ultimateresponsibility to ensure that conditions an dmitigation measures are properly fulfilled . (RMA -Planning Department)

2 . PD002 - NOTICE-PERMIT APPROVALThe applicant shall record a notice which states :"A permit (Resolution 090029) was approved bythe Zoning Administrator for Assessor's Parce lNumber 421-011-006-000 on March 26, 2009 . Thepermit was granted subject to twelve (12 )conditions of approval which run with the land . Acopy of the permit is on file with the Montere yCounty RMA - Planning Department ." Proof ofrecordation of this notice shall be furnished to th eDirector of the RMA - Planning Department prio rto issuance of building permits or commencemen tof the use . (RMA - Planning Department)

Proof of recordation of this notice shal lbe furnished to the RMA - Plannin gDepartment.

Owner/Applicant

Prior totheissuanceofgradingandbuildingpermitsor corn-mence -ment ofuse .

3 . PD003(A) - CULTURAL RESOURCES -NEGATIVE ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPOR TIf, during the course of construction, cultural ,archaeological, historical or paleontologicalresources are uncovered at the site (surface or

Stop work within 50 meters (165 feet) o funcovered resource and contact theMonterey County RMA - Plannin gDepartment and a qualified archaeologistimmediately if cultural, archaeological,

Owner/Applicant/Archaeologist

Ongoing

Esalen Institute (PLN090029)Page 8

PermitCond.Ntclrzbel

Miti,Number

(ond tlons (If . ~ppl'Ul'[!l and or ;ll/ti atton

.lle(IS11reS' all(1 l?

Spo1Lslhlc' L(1/1(1 1 s eDc~partlnc~llt

Compliance or 11o111torin ,

, I ctlon sto he he,f(ll luc d.

here applicable ,a certified profi~ssiollal is' require d

for action toGe accepted .

heSpo1 sible,j (lrtl' . f or

C<,lllplirulce

I11111n

e77flCallUl l

of

('omp/lance(name/date

subsurface resources) work shall be haltedimmediately within 50 meters (165 feet) of the finduntil a qualified professional archaeologist canevaluate it . The Monterey County RMA - Plannin gDepantment and a qualified archaeologist (i .e ., anarchaeologist registered with the Society o fProfessional Archaeologists) shall be immediatel ycontacted by the responsible individual present on -site . When contacted, the project planner and thearchaeologist shall immediately visit the site t odetermine the extent of the resources and t odevelop proper mitigation measures required forthe discovery . (RMA - Planning Department)

historical or paleontological resourcesare uncovered. When contacted, th eproject planner and the archaeologis tshall immediately visit the site todetermine the extent of the resources andto develop proper mitigation measuresrequired for the discovery.

4 . PD004 - INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMEN TThe property owner agrees as a condition and i nconsideration of the approval of this discretionarydevelopment permit that it will, pursuant t oagreement and/or statutory provisions a sapplicable, including but not limited toGovernment Code Section 66474 .9, defend,indemnify and hold harmless the County ofMonterey or its agents, officers and employee sfrom any claim, action or proceeding against th eCounty or its agents, officers or employees t oattack, set aside, void or annul this approval, whichaction is brought within the time period providedfor under law, including but not limited to,Government Code Section 66499 .37, as applicable .The property owner will reimburse the county forany court costs and attorney's fees which the

Submit signed and notarizedIndemnification Agreement to th eDirector of RMA - Planning Departmentfor review and signature by the County.

Proof of recordation of theIndemnification Agreement, as outlined ,shall be submitted to the RMA -planning Department .

Owner/Applicant

UpondemandofCountyCounse lorconcur-concur-rent withtheissuanceofbuildingpermits,use oftheproper-ty, filing

Esalen Institute (PLN090029)Page 9

PerYnlt

Con 7.

Number

AI/6".Number

(omlltions of -1pprol'(l/ and or lltlgatlonlleasnres am/ Responsible Land l Ce

Department

Compliance or llonitorin ;; lc tion sto he performed. 11 here applicable ,a certified professional is require d

for action to be (accepted.

Responsible,

l11111 fo r

(ompllance111111n ,r

I erificationof

('olnpliance

(llllnle/date)

County may be required by a court to pay as aresult of such action . County may, at its solediscretion, participate in the defense of such action ;but such participation shall not relieve applicant o fhis obligations under this condition. An agreementto this effect shall be recorded upon demand o fCounty Counsel or concurrent with the issuance ofbuilding permits, use of the property, filing of th efinal map, whichever occurs first and as applicable .The County shall promptly notify the propert yowner of any such claim, action or proceeding an dthe County shall cooperate fully in the defens ethereof. If the County fails to promptly notify theproperty owner of any such claim, action orproceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defens ethereof, the property owner shall not thereafter b eresponsible to defend, indemnify or hold the countyharmless. (RMA - Planning Department)

of thefinalmap ,which -everoccursfirst andasapplic -able .

5 . PD032 - PERMIT TIME/YEAR & DATEThe permit shall be granted for a time period of 4years, to expire on March 26, 2013 . (RMA -Planning Department)

None Owner/Applicant

Asstated inthecondi-tions ofapproval

6 . PDSP002 - DRILLING SPOILCONTAINMENT (NON-STANDARD)Drilling mud and cement used for capping of th ewell shall not be allowed to escape the well site .

Submit evidence of installation ofcontainment basins to the RMA -Planning Department prior to drilling o fwell .

Owner/Applicant /Well Con-tractor

Prior todrillingof newwell .

Esalen Institute (PLN090029)Page 10

Permit

Cond.

Nutnbc'r

lrn ~J .

°

[II11bP1'

olldili(111 of l pprol'al (111x/or Wit/gat/on

leasurcs and Responsible Land (se

Department

( o11lp/1allce or ;1loni10/'lnti

1( 'ion s

to be performed. 11 here applicable ,

a certified pr(IfeSJlOlla/ is require d

for action to he ilcc(pied.

Responsible

l lrrt~' fo r

Con/pliance

Tim n , ,'

j CP/f1cationof

GI1llplianee(name/date)

Containment basins shall be installed. Drillingmud shall be temporarily stored in these basins s othat none escapes into the surrounding habitat .The driller shall monitor the amount of mu dcontained in the basin to prevent overflow, andshall pump out and properly dispose of any an dall mud generated by this project . All foreignmaterial used in this project, including sand bag sand their contents, shall be removed from the siteafter the project is completed . The applicant shal lsubmit evidence of installation of containmen tbasins prior to drilling of well . (RMA - PlanningDepartment)

7 . PDSP003 - DRAINAGE PLAN (NON-STANDARD )The applicant shall ensure on-site and off-sit eimpacts of water run-off from the pump test ar eminimized, and measures are used t ominimize/contain erosion .(RMA - Planning Department)

Applicant and/or drilling contractorshall contact the assigned planner in th ePlanning Department to discussstrategies to reduce impacts, which mayinclude the preparation of a formaldrainage and/or erosion control plan .

Owner/Applicant /Well Con -tractor

Prior tocon-struct -ion ofthe newwell .

8 . EH1 - WATER SYSTEM PERMITObtain a new or amended water system permitfrom the Division of Environmental Health .(Environmental Health)

Submit necessary application, report sand testing results to EH for review an dapproval .

CA LicensedEnginee r/Owner/Applicant

Within30 day sofissuanceofpermit .

Esalen Institute (PLN090029)Page 11

Permit

Cord

Nuinbel

9 .

Number

Mt oConditions of lpp/'ol'al and or llititi(ltio/ l

Ilcasnrcc and Resp onsible Iand I se

Dcpcn to/e/r t

EH3 - WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT S(STATE PERMITTED SYSTEM )Design the water system improvements to meetthe standards as found in Titles 17 and 22 of th eCalifornia Code of Regulations and as found inthe Residential Subdivision Water Suppl yStandards . (Environmental Health)

Coinpiia/lc'e or 11o/tilor//iti Actions '

be pcrfornlc'd. II here applicable ,

a certified profc's5/0na/ is required

for action to be accepted.

Submit engineered plans for the watersystem improvements to Environmenta lHealth for review and approval prior toinstalling or bonding the improvements .

Responsible

Pam for

C omp liance

CA LicensedEngineer/Owner/Applicant

7ilnin «

Submitplanswithin90 daysofcomple -tion ofthe well .

l crificatioii

of(ornpliance(name/date)

10 . EH8 - WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMI TObtain a water well drilling permit from th eDivision of Environmental Health and constructthe well . (Environmental Health)

Submit the Well Completion Report tothe Division of Environmental Health .

CA LicensedEngineer/Owner/Applicant

Prior tocon-struc-tion ofthe newwell .

11 . EH9 - NEW WELL PUMP TESTSAll new or rehabilitated wells to be added to thepotable water distribution system shall firstundergo a minimum of a 72-hour continuouspump test to determine the yield of the well .Unless otherwise approved by the Director o fEnviromnental Health, the yield of the well shal lbe calculated by multiplying the 24-hour specificcapacity by the available drawdown. If theapparent transmissivity decreases between th efirst 24 hours of the test and the end of the test,the 24-hour specific capacity shall be adjusted bymultiplying the ratio of late-time transmissivity toearly-time transmissivity .

For the purposes o fthis condition, available drawdown is defined a stwo-thirds of the vertical distance from the stati cwater level to the lowest perforations of the well .

Submit a report to EH for review andapproval .

CA LicensedEngineer /Owner /Applicant

Coordi-matespecifictimingwithEnvi-ron-mentalHealth .

Esalen Institute (PLN090029)Page 1 2

-Pei'inl t

Cond.N[l/42bei

Mul *

r~~ 11711I)('1'

( 011(Ilti0/is (f

1/)/)1'01'(1/ (111(1 01 llin,«til l

/('(1S71Y('S (111(/ Responsible Lam/ /SC

l)C'/1(ll't111C 11t

CO111/)1/011((' or Iloliltoi'iliti .`1 C trollS'

to ])c'/)LPfOl711c'(I. JI hen! (1/)/)ficaiIc ,(1(ePtlfic(//)TOf('SSioui iI is require d

for uctioui to be accepted.

Resport S(I)/('/ (!I"t)' fU/ '

CO117/)/ianc ('

Liming~

j ('17fleptWil

ofC oinp ] iance(iwi11e/dcite)

The pump tests shall be made no earlier than Jun e1 of each year and no later than the firstsignificant rainfall event of the wet season . Thepump test results shall be presented in a form fo rdirect comparison to the criteria set forth in thi scondition . A representative of the Division o fEnvironmental Health shall witness the pumptests . The applicant shall pay all associated fees tothe Division of Environmental Health .(Environmental Health)

12 . EH44 - WELL LOT EASEMENT (NON- Submit the well lot easement deed and Owner / Prior toSTANDARD)Submit a well lot easement deed andcorresponding map. The easement map shall bedeveloped in consultation with certifiedprofessional and shall indicate the proposed wel llot, water distribution, and access easement fo rthe water system. An easement deed shall b esubmitted to, reviewed and approved by, th eDivision of Environmental Health prior to issuanc eof well permit .(Environmental Health)

corresponding map, showing the exac tlocation of the easement on the propertyalong with the metes and bounddescription developed in consultationwith a certified professional, to th eDivision of Environmental Health forreview and approval .

Applicant /CertifiedPro-fessional

issuanceof wellpermit.

Record the deed and map showing th eapproved well easement . Submit a copyof the recorded deed and map to theRMA - Planning Department and th eDivision of Environmental Health .

Owner/Applicant

Prior tocorn-mence -ment ofuse .

END OF CONDITION S

Esalen Institute (PLN090029)Page 13

PLANNER: SIDO R

APPLICANT : ESALEN INSTITUTE

AP N : 421-011-006-00 0

~__ 1 300' Limit

FILE # PLN09002 9

2500' Limit

City Limits

N

A0

1,000

liiiil1111 lFeet