Eric Linder University of California, Berkeley Lawrence Berkeley National Lab

28
1 1 Eric Linder University of California, Berkeley Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Course on Dark Energy Course on Dark Energy Cosmology at the Beach 2009 Cosmology at the Beach 2009 JDEM constraints

description

Course on Dark Energy Cosmology at the Beach 2009. Eric Linder University of California, Berkeley Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. JDEM constraints. Outline. Lecture 1: Dark Energy in Space The panoply of observations Lecture 2: Dark Energy in Theory The garden of models - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Eric Linder University of California, Berkeley Lawrence Berkeley National Lab

Page 1: Eric Linder  University of California, Berkeley Lawrence Berkeley National Lab

11

Eric Linder University of California, BerkeleyLawrence Berkeley National Lab

Course on Dark EnergyCourse on Dark Energy Cosmology at the Beach 2009Cosmology at the Beach 2009

JDEM constraints

Page 2: Eric Linder  University of California, Berkeley Lawrence Berkeley National Lab

22

OutlineOutline

Lecture 1: Dark Energy in Space

The panoply of observations

Lecture 2: Dark Energy in Theory

The garden of models

Lecture 3: Dark Energy in your Computer

The array of tools – Don’t try this at home!

In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is. - Yogi Berra

Page 3: Eric Linder  University of California, Berkeley Lawrence Berkeley National Lab

33

Solving the Equation of MotionSolving the Equation of Motion

Klein-Gordon equation

Transform to new variables

Autonomous system

where

Transform solution to

Copeland, Liddle, Wands 1998 Phys. Rev. D 57, 4686

Can add equation for EOS dynamics

Caldwell & Linder 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett 95, 141301

Page 4: Eric Linder  University of California, Berkeley Lawrence Berkeley National Lab

44

Equation of State DynamicsEquation of State Dynamics

For robust solutions, pay attention to initial conditions, shoot forward in time, use 4th order Runge-Kutta.

For monotonic , can switch to as time variable, defining present as, e.g. =0.72.

Page 5: Eric Linder  University of California, Berkeley Lawrence Berkeley National Lab

55

Asymptotic BehaviorsAsymptotic Behaviors

Asymptotic behaviors can be physically interesting. Solve for critical points x(xc,yc)=0, y(xc,yc)=0. Check stability by sign of eigenvalues p=Mp.

Copeland, Liddle, Wands 1998 Phys. Rev. D 57, 4686

Crossing w=-1:Relevant to fate of universe.

Phantom fields roll up potential so V>0, so wtot

∞<-1. Cannot cross w=-1 even with coupling. Quintessence can cross with coupling since w<wtot.

p={x,y}

Page 6: Eric Linder  University of California, Berkeley Lawrence Berkeley National Lab

66

From Data to Theory (and back)From Data to Theory (and back)

Fisher matrix gives lower limit for Gaussian likelihoods, quick and easy.

Fij = d2(- ln L) / dpi dpj = O(dO/dpi) COV-1 (dO/dpj)

(pi) 1/(Fii)1/2

Example: O=dlum(z=0.1,0.2,…1), p=(m,w), COV=(d/d)d ij

Fw=k(dOk/d)(dOk/dw)k-2

2() COV(,w)

COV(,w) 2(w)C = F-1 =( )F Fw

Fw Fww

F = ( )Also called information matrix. Add independent data sets, or priors, by adding matrices.

e.g. Gaussian prior on m=0.280.03 via 2 = (m-0.28)2/0.032

See: Tegmark et al. astro-ph/9805117 Dodelson, “Modern Cosmology”

Page 7: Eric Linder  University of California, Berkeley Lawrence Berkeley National Lab

77

Survival of the FittestSurvival of the Fittest

Fisher estimates give a N-dimension ellipsoid. Marginalize (integrate over the probability distribution) over parameters not of immediate interest by crossing out their row/column in F-1. Fix a parameter by crossing out row/column in F.

1 (68.3% probability enclosed) joint contours have 2=2.30 in 2-D (not 2=1). Read off 1 errors by projecting to axis and dividing by 1.52=2.30.

Orientation/ellipticity of ellipse shows degree of covariance (degeneracy).

Different types of observations can have different degeneracies (complementarity) and combine to give tight constraints.

Page 8: Eric Linder  University of California, Berkeley Lawrence Berkeley National Lab

88

Bias from SystematicsBias from Systematics

Fisher estimation calculated around fiducial model, but can also compute bias due to offset (systematic).

Bias p in parameter p is related to offset O in observable, through U=O/p and covariance matrix C=O O. For diagonal covariance, simplifies to:

In statistics, often combine uncertainty and bias into Risk parameter:

R(p) = [2(p)+p2]1/2

Page 9: Eric Linder  University of California, Berkeley Lawrence Berkeley National Lab

99

Design an ExperimentDesign an Experiment

Precision in measurement is not enough - one must beware degeneracies and systematics.

p2

p1

*

.

Degeneracy: e.g. Aw0+Bwa=const

Degeneracy: hypersurface, e.g. covariance with m

Systematic: offset error in data or model, e.g. evolution

or Systematic: floor to precision, e.g. calibration

Page 10: Eric Linder  University of California, Berkeley Lawrence Berkeley National Lab

1010

Orthogonal Basis AnalysisOrthogonal Basis Analysis

Eigenmodes: w(z) = i ei(z) For orthogonal basis, errors (i) are uncorrelated. “Principal components”.

Start with parameters {wi} in z bins. Diagonalize Fisher matrix F=ETDE: D is diagonal, rows of E give eigenvectors. NOTE: basis differs with model, experiment, and probe -- cannot directly compare.

Huterer & Starkman 2003

Page 11: Eric Linder  University of California, Berkeley Lawrence Berkeley National Lab

1111

Decorrelated BinsDecorrelated Bins

Bandpowers or decorrelated redshift bins diagonalize sqrt{F} to try to localize w(zi). Unlike for LSS, for dark energy they do not localize well, and confuse interpretation.

Also depends strongly on assumption of w(z>zmax)

Page 12: Eric Linder  University of California, Berkeley Lawrence Berkeley National Lab

1212

Principal Component AnalysisPrincipal Component Analysis

The uncertainties (i) have no physical meaning -- must interpret the signal-to-noise, not just the noise.

Even next generation experiments have only 2 components with S/N>3. Almost all models have 97-100% of the information in first 2 components. Eigenmode analysis does not improve over w0-wa.

Page 13: Eric Linder  University of California, Berkeley Lawrence Berkeley National Lab

1313

Common MistakesCommon Mistakes

• Neglecting M or S (SN or BAO absolute scale).

• Neglecting systematics.

• Claiming systematics, but still ’ing down errors.

• Thinking “self calibration” covers systematics; “self calibration” = “assuming a known form”.

• Using noise, not S/N, for PCA.

• Fixing w=-1 at high redshift.

Reductio ad absurdum:

1 SN/sec, 10 y survey gives d(z) to 0.003%

Every acoustic mode gives d(z) to 0.1%

Full sky space WL takes 1% shears to 310-6 level

Page 14: Eric Linder  University of California, Berkeley Lawrence Berkeley National Lab

1414

Controlling SystematicsControlling Systematics

Controlling systematics is the name of the game. Finding more objects is not.

Forthcoming experiments may deliver 100,000s of objects. But uncertainties do not reduce by 1/N.

Must choose cleanest probe/data, mature method, with multiple crosschecks.

Page 15: Eric Linder  University of California, Berkeley Lawrence Berkeley National Lab

1515

Battle RoyaleBattle Royale

Astronomer Royal (Airy): “I should not have believed it if I had not seen it!”

Astronomer Royal (Hamilton): “How different we are! My eyes have too often deceived me. I believe it because I have proved it.”

Page 16: Eric Linder  University of California, Berkeley Lawrence Berkeley National Lab

1616

Images

Spectra

Redshift & SN Properties

data analysis physics

Nature ofDark Energy

Each supernova is “sending” us a rich stream of information about itself.

What makes SN measurement special?What makes SN measurement special? Control of systematic uncertaintiesControl of systematic uncertainties

QuickTime™ and aYUV420 codec decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Page 17: Eric Linder  University of California, Berkeley Lawrence Berkeley National Lab

1717

Astrophysical UncertaintiesAstrophysical Uncertainties

Systematic Control

Host-galaxy dust extinction

Wavelength-dependent absorption identified with high S/N multi-band photometry.

Supernova evolution Supernova subclassified with high S/N light curves and peak-brightness spectrum.

Flux calibration error Program to construct a set of 1% error flux standard stars.

Malmquist bias Supernova discovered early with high S/N multi-band photometry.

K-correction Construction of a library of supernova spectra.

Gravitational lensing Measure the average flux for a large number of supernovae in each redshift bin.

Non-Type Ia contamination

Classification of each event with a peak-brightness spectrum.

For accurate and precision cosmology, need to identify and control systematic uncertainties.

Page 18: Eric Linder  University of California, Berkeley Lawrence Berkeley National Lab

1818

Controlling SystematicsControlling Systematics

Same SN, Different z Cosmology Same z, Different SN Systematics Control

Page 19: Eric Linder  University of California, Berkeley Lawrence Berkeley National Lab

1919

Fitting SubsetsFitting Subsets

perfect

Page 20: Eric Linder  University of California, Berkeley Lawrence Berkeley National Lab

2020

Depth + Width + ResolutionDepth + Width + Resolution

Bac

on

, E

llis

, R

efre

gie

r 20

00

Subaru - best ground

HST - space

Weak lensing noiseWeak lensing signal

Kas

liw

al, M

asse

y, E

llis

, Miy

azak

i, R

hod

es 2

007

Page 21: Eric Linder  University of California, Berkeley Lawrence Berkeley National Lab

2121

Cluster Cluster AbundancesAbundances

Optical: light mass Xray: hot gas gravitational potential mass

Sunyaev-Zel’dovich: hot e- scatter CMB mass

Weak Lensing: gravity distorts images of background galaxies

TraditionalDifficult for z>1Detects light, not massMass of what?

Clean detectionsDifficult for z>1Need optical survey for redshiftDetects flux, not massOnly cluster centerAssumes simple: ~ne

2

Clean detectionsIndepedent of redshiftNeed optical survey for redshiftDetects flux, not massAssumes ~simple: ~neTe

Detect mass directlyCan go to z>1Line of sight contaminationEfficiency reduced

Clusters -- largest bound objects. DE + astrophysics. Uncertainty in mass of 0.1 dex gives wconst~0.1 [M. White], w~?

Page 22: Eric Linder  University of California, Berkeley Lawrence Berkeley National Lab

2222

Heterogeneous DataHeterogeneous Data

Offsets due to different instruments, filters, sources can be a serious source of bias. “Stitching together” surveys, even with modest overlap, may give precision cosmology, but inaccurate results.

No need to stitch in z>2 – no leverage.

Page 23: Eric Linder  University of California, Berkeley Lawrence Berkeley National Lab

2323

Design an ExperimentDesign an Experiment

How to design an experiment to explore dark energy?

• Choose clear, robust, mature techniques

• Rotate the contours thru choice of redshift span

• Narrow the contours thru systematics control

• Break degeneracies thru multiple probes

• Use homogeneous data set

With a strong experiment, we can even test the framework of physics. Recall {m,w0,wa,,g*}.

Page 24: Eric Linder  University of California, Berkeley Lawrence Berkeley National Lab

2424

Dark energy may be a decades long mystery.

Space wide-field surveys maximize the discovery space.

Fundamental physics of inflation:

• Weak lensing - ns primordial perturbation spectrum

• Cluster abundances - non-Gaussianity

Dark Matter maps -

40 trillion pixels on sky! 20x ground.

Discovery SpaceDiscovery Space

“the skeleton of the universe”

Imagine COSMOS x 2000!

Page 25: Eric Linder  University of California, Berkeley Lawrence Berkeley National Lab

2525

Dark Energy – The Next GenerationDark Energy – The Next Generation

colorful

w i d e104 the Hubble Deep Field area (and deeper) plus 107 HDF (almost as deep)

deepdeep Mapping 10 billion years / 70% age of universe

Optical + IR to see thru dust, to high redshift

Launch ~2015Euclid (ESA)

Page 26: Eric Linder  University of California, Berkeley Lawrence Berkeley National Lab

2626

The Next PhysicsThe Next Physics

Current data do not tell us is the answer (or anything about dark energy at z>1).

Odds against : Einstein+us failed for 90 years to explain it.

Experiments to reveal dynamics (w-w) are essential to reveal physics. Space is the low risk option for dependable answers.

Expansion plus growth (e.g. SN+WL) is critical combination. We can test GR and can test geometry.

Space imaging mission gives optical-NIR and low-high z measurements, high resolution and low systematics; multiple probes and rich astronomical resources.

What is dark energy? What is the fate of the universe?

How many dimensions are there? How are quantum physics and gravity unified?

Page 27: Eric Linder  University of California, Berkeley Lawrence Berkeley National Lab

2727

Dark Energy PessimismDark Energy Pessimism

1835: “We shall never be able to know the composition of stars” -- Comte

1849: Kirchhoff discovers that the spectrum of electromagnetic radiation encodes the composition

[2008 STScI Symposium: “We shall never be able to know the composition of dark energy”

-- pessimistic physicist]

[2022? Cosmology on the Beach: Fiji has talks revealing the true nature of dark energy

Page 28: Eric Linder  University of California, Berkeley Lawrence Berkeley National Lab

2828

““Acceleration”Acceleration”

to the tune of The Beatles’ “Revolution”