ERDF in Andalusia Monica Burch, Grupo Alba Monica Burch & Paul Soto, Grupo Alba.
-
Upload
isaac-gordon -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of ERDF in Andalusia Monica Burch, Grupo Alba Monica Burch & Paul Soto, Grupo Alba.
ERDF in Andalusia
Monica Burch, Grupo Alba
Monica Burch & Paul Soto, Grupo Alba
Objective 1, largest Spanish region and one of the most rural
Largest recipient of Stuctural funds in Spain (€12 bn - 30% of Obj 1 budget)
Impressive natural and cultural resources 1995 – 2003 increase from 69.6% to 74.1% of
average EU GDP per capita Population of over 8 M – and growing…
Why Andalusia?
Strategic choices - Global competition Vs territorial cohesion…
– €7.8bn was assigned to Andalusia´s Integrated Operational Programme (IOP)
– 3 core objectives, 1 of which: “increase the efficiency of the territorial model of Andalusia to promote economic development and improve the quality of life”
Rural Andalusia
Reaching rural areas?
Huelva
Seville
CádizMálaga
Granada
Almería
Jaén
Córdoba
Absence of systematic data
No specific “rural objectives” in ERDF (or ESF)
How to measure?
Table 4. Estimates of the proportion of ERDF support during 2007-13
Type of area Total Public Expenditure ERDF contribution
Urban 4.975.772.119 3.456.184.317
Mountainous 1.083.831.551 752.832.228
Areas with a low density 1.675.012.396 1.163.467.988
Other rural areas 2.118.398.031 1.1471.444.808
All rural (non urban) 4.877.241.978 3.387.745.024
TOTAL 9.853.014.097 6.843.929.341
Source: ERDF Operational Programme for Andalusia 2007-13. Page 241.
• WP9: 6 provinces: “strong autonomous intermediate” (€1,012 per head)
• Córdoba: “strong rural” (1,104 per head)
• Jaén: “weak rural” (€895 per head)
And yet… clear importance of ERDF for rural areas
ERDF: €6bn – approx half spent on rural areas– 48% transport infrastructure– 28% environmental measures– 8% business units– 6% social infrastructure
ALL highly relevant for rural areas
EAGGF: €316M 2/3 on agriculture & food 1/3 diversification, start-ups, Leader type projects
ESF: €932M => human capital, employment, micro-businesses, self-
employment
ERDF 82.9% of EU funding (€500M) on business units.
Jaén (weak rural): €246.9 per head. Average: €156.3
Main source of funding for the Global Grant Certain criteria benefit rural areas. Two most rural provinces: 33% of GG, 18% of
population. 22% of companies receiving support were in rural
areas (<10,000 inhabitants)
0
50
100
150
200
250
Strong Intermediate Strong Rural Weak Rural Average
ERDF support for
businesses with growth potential
48% of ERDF expenditure (€3bn): transport infrastructure
High speed rail Madrid-Seville, Madrid-Malaga 90% of the population within 25mins from a motorway
or dual carriageway
6.6% spend on minor and rural roads.
Telecommunications: 1% of budget (€92M) Broadband to all towns of <10,000
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
Strong Intermediate Strong Rural Weak Rural Average
ERDF contribution to accessibility of rural areas
Transport infrastructure
ERDF: support to R&D and innovation in rural areas
Relatively low spending on R&D, but increasing…
At NUTS 3 level, similar spending in the strong intermediate and strong rural provinces. Weak rural province lagging.
Interviews insist on positive role of ERDF on R&D spending in rural areas
– Research centres located in rural areas– Research centres of relevance to rural concerns
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Strong Intermediate Strong Rural Weak Rural Average
ERDF: supporting the environmental and social conditions for development
28% of ERDF investment related to the environment
Environmental compartments and water treatment
Social infrastructure: 6% of ERDF investment, spent particularly in rural areas.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Strong Intermediate Strong Rural Weak Rural AverageSocial & health infrastructure
CONCLUSIONS
The ERDF has played a fundamental role in the development of rural areas in Andalusia
To support and measure rural policy, the following are necessary:
A finer classification of rurality Geographically referenced projects Needs of different types of areas integrated into planning
objectives and project selection criteria Better coordination between different funds to achieve
specified territorial objectives.
With these conditions the ERDF has enormous potential to do even more in rural areas…
Thank you!