Equestes Digital Brochure

Equine Business with Confidence

[email protected]

table of contents

Why Equestes©?

Equestes© Mediation.

Equestes© Expert Panel.

Equestes© Documents.

Equestes© Procedural Rules.

Equestes© Code of Conduct.

Equestes© Radiographs.

Equestes© Information.

Page 1

Page 5

Page 7

Page 9

Page 21

Page 23

Page 33

table of contents

table of contents

1. why equestes©?

When unexpected problems arise

after the purchase or sale of a

horse, and the parties involved, i.e.

the seller, buyer and veterinarians,

don’t have a written agreement to

fall back on, not only will they be

unable to effectively communicate,

they are not aware of their

veterinary and legal position.

A veterinary diagnosis can be

interpreted in several different

ways. Conclusions are therefore not

always clear and unambiguous. The

rights and duties of the buyer and

seller are also not always obvious in

international deals. If the contracting

parties have failed to draw up any

kind of agreement in writing, - laying

down aspects such as applicable

law, which court has jurisdiction and

a binding veterinary expert opinion

– then they will become involved in

legal procedures which, apart from

the fact that they will take years and

a great deal of expense to resolve,

will have no definite outcome. In

the meantime, the horse involved

will most likely be neglected when

it comes to proper training, care and

sufficient treatment.

Equestes© may also be appointed as

an expert at the request of courts,

mediators and arbitration institutes.

Equestes wants to emphasize that it

will not act as an advisory party or

expert at the request of individual

parties. Equestes© reviews, collects

and expands its veterinary and legal

knowledge on a continuous basis.

Why Equestes©?Equestrian sports are undergoing

tremendous growth and

development and are now taking

their participants across the

borders on an increasing basis.

It is a fact that protocols and

examination standards are mostly

specific to countries, especially

those relating to veterinary exams

for the sale and purchase of sport

horses. There are no written

agreements for the majority

of transactions, nor are there

internationally coordinated

exam protocols.

Equestes© is an institute that combines knowledge and experience in the international

interfaces of the veterinary and legal equestrian sports world.

2. why equestes©?

3. equestes© mediation

4. equestes© mediation

The mediators who may be contracted via Equestes© are veterinarians and yet also

experienced litigation lawyers who operate fully independently of Equestes©. These

mediators are also obliged to comply with the Equestes© Code of Conduct.

All of these mediators have extensive experience in the equestrian field. In the event of

a dispute involving veterinary matters, it is of course advisable to also request an expert

opinion from the Equestes© Expert Panel during mediation.

For further information and mediation contracts, please visit

www.equestes.com.

Equestes© Mediation.Equestes© now offers

mediation services,

on a national and

international level.

Nearly everyone who has ever been involved in unforeseen civil legal proceedings in which the

litigating parties had a difference of opinion involving a certain horse are unanimous that these types of proceedings cost so much time and money (stables fees to board the horse, attorney’s fees, court costs, etc.) that the old adage ‘Go to law for a sheep and lose a cow’ still applies.

5. equestes© expert Panel

The members of the Equestes©

Expert Panel have entered into

a contractual relationship with

Equestes© either as a third party

providing binding opinions, or

in the capacity of a legal expert

in the event their independent

and professional expert opinion

is requested by the parties to an

agreement, judicial institutions and

by mediation parties, for example.

The members of the Equestes©

Expert Panel have committed

to abide by a Equestes© Code of

Conduct in order to guarantee their

independence, among other reasons.

Specifically because the members

of the Equestes© Expert Panel

do not practice their professions

exclusively in the Netherlands, but

also in Germany, England, Belgium,

the U.S. and so forth, they are able to

provide an added guarantee of their

independent status in international

disputes between parties.

Take the following case as an

illustration: the buyer of an exclusive

and expensive sport horse lives in

America yet the contract of sale is

to be concluded in Germany, since

this is where the seller lives. In the

unexpected event of a dispute, the

American buyer will have more trust

in an international expert opinion,

binding opinion or mediation

handled by internationally appointed

experts, advisers and/or mediators

than he would if those presiding

over the dispute and the veterinarian

providing the expert opinion all

resided in Germany.

For further information about the

Equestes© Expert Panel read the


Equestes© Expert Panel.Visit www.equestes.com for

the current composition of the

Expert Panel, the CVs of the panel

members and the terms and

conditions under which Equestes©

expert opinions and binding

opinions are provided.

You will also find the Equestes©

Code of Conduct on this site.

The Expert Panel consists of attorneys and veterinarians who possess extensive

experience in their professional fields with respect to international equestrian sports.

6. equestes© expert Panel

7. equestes© Documents

Equestes© Statement by Seller:

Contains the most important

info from seller on he horse that

needs to be disclosed to the

potential buyer and the veterinary

advisor. Also refers to agency and

commission positons that need to

be disclosed.

Equestes© Veterinary

Examination Form:

A standard form for executing a

(pre-)purchase exam including

the most important possible

examinations but also a disclosure

on the veterinarians objectivity.

Equestes© Contract:

At the request of parties involved

at the sale of purchase of a horse

Equestes© can be helpful in drafting

a contract and bil of sale, using its

experiences and standard programs.

Equestes© Documents.All these documents will include

articles on the exclusive dispute

resolution by the Equestes© Expert

Panel to avoid ongoing and costful

international litigation as much

as possible.

The legal and veterinary experts of Equestes© have developed the following international

documents;

8. equestes© Documents

9. equestes© Procedural Rules



GEnEral ConditionS1.

These procedural rules apply to the requests made by the parties to the Equestes Expert Panel (“Panel”) 1.1

of Equestes B.V., a limited liability company incorporated and existing under the laws of The Netherlands,

regarding disputes arising from or in connection with the EQUESTES Purchase & Sale Agreement, the Equestes

Statement by Seller and the Equestes Veterinary Examination form and / or their advisors or any other parties

wishing to submit their dispute to and have the dispute resolved by the Panel.

The parties file a written request to the Panel by sending it to their counterparts and to the address of the

Panel:

Attn. Equestes Expert Panel

Dr. Hub van Doorneweg 181

PO Box 1270, 5004 Tilburg

[email protected]

The Netherlands

objECt2.

The object of the Panel shall be realized by providing binding opinions at the collective request of the parties 2.1

in cases such as those below:

The buyer and seller of a horse disagree on the outcome of a veterinary or sales examination;A.

The horse’s owner believes that the veterinarian is liable for the negative consequences of a surgical B.

procedure, for example, or a purchase examination performed by the veterinarian;

The buyer and seller disagree with the buyer’s determination that the horse the buyer has purchased C.

from the seller is not fit or unsound, and therefore wishes to cancel the contract of sale, and receive a

refund of the purchase price.

The object of the Panel is to resolve disputes in the equine business such as mentioned under article 2.1., 2.2

as well as any other disputes arising from or in connection with the Equestes Purchase & Sale Agreement,

the Equestes Statement by Seller and / or the Equestes Veterinary Examination form, that can be used as

independent documents in the equine business.


the object of the Panel also includes:

Providing preliminary relief;A.

Examining and determining the quality and/or of the condition of the horse or any part thereof as B.

referred to in Section 1020 (4)(a) of the Dutch Code of Civil Procedure;

Determining the amount of compensation or monetary amount owed, as referred to in Section 1020 C.

(4)(b) of the Dutch Code of Civil Procedure;

Supplementing or amending the legal relationship as referred to in Section 1020(1) in conjunction D.

with (4)(c) of the Dutch Code of Civil Procedure.

thE EquEStES CounCil3.

The Equestes Council shall be comprised from the members of the Panel and appointed by the parties based 3.1

on the list of the Equestes Experts available on www.equestes.com.

The Equestes Council shall be appointed by the Chairman of the Panel, who shall be nominated by Equestes 3.2

B.V..

The parties shall provide the Chairman, in writing, with the name/names of the expert(s) for whom they have 3.3

established a common preference for appointment in mutual consultation. When appointing the expert(s), the

Chairman shall as much as possible take into account the common preference expressed by the parties. In case

there is no common preference for appointment the Chairman shall appoint the expert(s).

To the extent possible, the Equestes Council shall be appointed by the Chairman no later than two weeks after 3.4

the statement of defence has been filed or the final date specified for doing so has expired without being used.

The appointed Equestes Council shall elect its seat according to Section 1037 of the Dutch Code of Civil 3.5

Procedure.

If the claim or merit of the case does not exceed an amount of EUR 50,000.00 or less, the Equestes Council 3.6

shall be comprised of one expert, unless:

the Chairman decides that due to the nature of the dispute it is desirable to have three experts A.

adjudicate;

both parties desire/have agreed adjudication by three experts.B.


After one expert has been appointed, the Chairman may yet proceed to appoint three experts if he considers 3.7

this desirable in connection with the course of the dispute or if both parties so request.

If the claim or merit of the case does exceed an amount of EUR 50,000.00 the Equestes Council shall be 3.8

comprised of three experts, unless:

the Chairman decides that due to the simple nature of the dispute, adjudication by one expert is A

desirable;

both parties desire/have agreed adjudication by one expert. B

The amount referred to in paragraphs 6 and 8 of this article may be adjusted by the Panel. 3.9

If the assignment to one or more of the appointed experts ends before the Equestes Council has completed its 3.10

task, the Chairman may make a new appointment, without prior notice to the parties.

aPPointmEnt 4.

The members of the Panel who are appointed as experts shall report to the Chairman within a term of two 4.1

weeks after receiving their appointment whether they accept their appointment or whether they are unable

to accept their appointment, stating the reason(s).

The Chairman shall determine the validity of the reason(s) for an expert being unable to accept the 4.2

appointment.

By operation of law and the Equestes Code of Conduct, any expert who might be directly or indirectly related 4.3

to one of the parties shall be deemed unable to accept the appointment.

The expert who accepts his appointment shall so notify the Chairman in writing within a term of two weeks. 4.4

As soon as all members of the Equestes Council have accepted their appointment, the Chairman shall so notify

the parties in writing.

Experts assigned to a case in which binding opinion is to be issued shall be relieved of their assignment 4.5

by termination of their membership, unless the termination of membership ensues from the expiry of the

calendar year in which the relevant member has reached the age of seventy, or from resignation by the

member of his membership.


Experts assigned to a case in which binding opinion is to be issued shall be relieved of their assignment by 4.6

suspension of their membership by the Chairman on account of serious non-performance.

diSmiSSal5.

An expert can be relieved of his duties upon the joint request of the parties. If an expert is no longer able to 5.1

perform his assignment de jure or de facto, he may be relieved of his assignment at the request of any of the

parties. At the request of the most diligent party, the assignment to the Equestes Council may be terminated if

there is a good cause to do so, including the reasons referred to in Section 1031 (2) of the Dutch Code of Civil

Procedure. The Chairman shall decide on such requests. Should the request be granted, the relevant expert or,

as the case may be, Equestes Council shall be replaced in accordance with the provisions in article 3 of these

Rules.

If a member of the Panel is exempted from accepting his appointment as expert due to valid reasons, as well 5.2

in the event of death or any impediment barring an expert from continuing to carry out his assignment as

expert, including the situations referred to in article 5.1, the new appointment shall be made in the manner

determined in article 3 of these Rules.

SECrEtarY6.

A secretary shall be officially added to the Equestes Council by Equestes B.V..6.1

thE ConduCt oF ProCEEdinGS7.

Every dispute must be properly described and explained in writing by either one of the parties or by both 7.1

parties and filed with the Panel to initiate binding opinion.

The date on which binding opinion is initiated shall be the date as referred to in article 1.1 of these Rules, on 7.2

which the notice of initiation of proceedings has been received by the Chairman.

There is no obligation for legal representation. However, in case a party is represented a written power of 7.3


attorney must be submitted.

Pending the proceedings, each claimant is authorised to change, increase or reduce the claim. A change or 7.4

increase of claim can only be permitted by the Equestes Council if the defendant has had the opportunity to

comment on it, in writing or verbally, and if the Equestes Council does not consider the change or increase of

claim unreasonable vis-à-vis this party.

The proceedings shall be conducted in the Dutch or English language, unless the parties have explicitly agreed 7.5

otherwise and the Equestes Council has consented.

CoStS8.

When the intermediation of the Equestes Council is requested a procedural fee is due. The Chairman shall 8.1

determine this fee on the basis of the amount of the claim or the merit of the case. The procedural fee is 5

percent of the amount of the claim or the merit of the case, with a minimum of EUR 750.00 and a maximum of

EUR 50,000.00.

The costs of the expert(s) and the secretary are calculated on an hourly basis. The hourly rate of each of the 8.2

experts is EUR 250.00 The hourly rate of the secretary is EUR 150.00 All rates are excluding VAT and additional

expenses, e.g. travel costs and costs regarding a veterinary examination.

When the intermediation of the Equestes Council is requested, the Chairman shall invite the requesting party 8.3

or parties to pay a deposit to secure payment of the costs of the expert(s) and the secretary. The amount of this

deposit shall be determined by the chairman for each case separately in accordance with the following pace

list:

PRINCIPlE AMOUNT: DEPOSIT:

EUR 0.00 till EUR 5,000.00 EUR 1,000.00

EUR 5,000.00 till EUR 10,000.00 EUR 1,500.00

EUR 10,000.00 till EUR 50,000.00 EUR 5,000.00

EUR 50,000.00 till EUR 100,000.00 EUR 10,000.00


EUR 100,000.00 till EUR 250,000.00 EUR 15,000.00

EUR 250,000.00 till EUR 500,000.00 EUR 20,000.00

EUR 500,000.00 + EUR 25,000.00

In the event that the procedural fee or the deposit requested by the Chairman, has not been paid by the 8.4

date specified for payment, the Equestes Council may dismiss the case or suspend the proceedings, without

prejudice to the provisions in article 11 of these Rules. In the event that the Equestes Council is not, or no

longer, constituted, the Chairman has such authority.

The Equestes Council may deduct the amount of the fees owed to the expert(s) and the secretary and 8.5

further costs incurred by the Equestes Council from the deposit. If the deposit does not suffice, the Chairman

may request additional payment. The Equestes Council shall not be held to render its decision before such

additional payment has been made.

The costs related to a request for the examination and determination of the quality and/or condition of the 8.6

horse, or any part thereof shall be paid by the party or parties requesting such examination and determination.

Compensation of these costs can be claimed in a dispute involving examination and determination.

Form oF ProCEEdinGS9.

The dispute shall be set out in writing. Each of the parties is authorised to submit a statement to the Equestes 9.1

Council.

The Equestes Council may allow the submission of a second statement, both in the original action and in any 9.2

counterclaim action.

If the defendant wishes to lodge a counterclaim, that proceeding may be initiated by including a counterclaim 9.3

no later than in the statement of defence, and the Equestes Council appointed to the original case can also

deal with the counterclaim. In that event, the defendant shall also be considered a ‘requesting party’ and the

Chairman is authorised to demand that a procedural fee and a deposit as referred to in article 8.1 and 8.3 of

these Rules be paid.


The manner and periods within which the statements must be submitted shall be determined by the 9.4

Equestes Council. In the event that the Equestes Council is not yet, or no longer, constituted, the Chairman

shall determine with regard to the submission of statements.

The Equestes Council is authorised to schedule an oral hearing if deemed necessary to obtain additional 9.5

information from the parties and / or to examine possibilities to reach an amicable settlement.

The Equestes Council shall decide whether a witness presented by a party or the parties shall be heard and 9.6

whether (further) taking of evidence shall take place.

If, in the opinion of the Equestes Council, either party or both parties fail to submit their statements and/9.7

or other documents in good time or, in general, in the opinion of the Equestes Council delay the process

unnecessarily, the Equestes Council may declare that litigation will be continued without waiting for the

absent statements and/or documents or acts to be performed, and then render its decision.

The provisions in this article do not affect the Equestes Council’s authority to render its decision or, with 9.8

the Chairman’s approval, to declare the instance to have lapsed if the claimant, despite repeated warnings, is

guilty of delay or remains in default of paying or supplementing the deposit.

If no Equestes Council is yet fulfilling its functions or if, for any reason, a previously appointed Equestes 9.9

Council is no longer fulfilling its functions, that authority shall accrue to the Chairman.

thE rulinG10.

The Equestes Council shall decide unanimously, unless the parties have agreed otherwise, and by a majority 10.1

of votes.

The decision shall be rendered in the form of binding opinion 10.2

The Panel is authorised to make the decision public. 10.3

When rendering a decision on the dispute, the Equestes Council shall also determine the amount of the 10.4


costs of the dispute and which of the parties shall bear these costs in full or in part. The Equestes Council may

include in the costs of the dispute such a contribution to the costs of assistance in the proceedings of one

party by the other as the Equestes Council deems fair.

joindEr oF PartiES and intErVEntion11.

At the request of a third party that has any interest in proceedings as referred to in these Rules, the Equestes 11.1

Council may allow such party to join, or intervene in, such proceedings.

This request – properly described and explained in writing – must be submitted to the Equestes Council in a 11.2

timely manner whereby a copy of such a request must be simultaneously sent by the requesting party to the

parties.

The request can only be considered by the Equestes Council if the requesting third party sufficiently proves 11.3

that an agreement for binding opinion being either the Equestes Purchase & Sale Agreement, the Equestes

Statement by Seller and / or the Equestes Veterinary Examination form, referring to the Equestes Council, has

been concluded between him and one of the parties in the relevant proceedings. The agreement for binding

opinion shall then, in conjunction with these Rules, be considered as a written agreement as referred to in

Section 1045 (3) of the Dutch Code of Civil Procedure.

The Chairman is authorised to invite the requesting party to pay a procedural fee and a deposit as mentioned 11.4

in article 8.1, and 8.3 and to set the amount and the payment deadline to the Equestes Council

The Equestes Council shall hear the parties in proceedings and then render a decision on the request for the 11.5

joinder or intervention of the third party.

If the Equestes Council allows the requested joinder or intervention, the joinder or intervention shall be 11.6

handled by the same Equestes Council as appointed in the proceedings referred to in paragraph 1 of this

Article.

The oral hearing of the allowed joinder or intervention of the aforementioned third party shall take place on 11.7


the same day as the one set for the oral hearing of the proceedings mentioned in paragraph 1 of this Article.

Articles 3 to 9, inclusive, of these Rules shall apply correspondingly to the handling of the joinder or 11.8

intervention, unless the relevant provisions entail otherwise.

joindEr oF ProCEEdinGS12.

A party in proceedings initiated with the Equestes Council whose subject matter is linked to proceedings 12.1

before another (arbitration) institute in the Netherlands may request these proceedings to be completely

joined, provided that the other proceedings (hereinafter also: the proceedings to be joined) are conducted

subject to the applicability of rules providing for the possibility of a complete joinder of proceedings in

substantively corresponding manner. The request for joinder can already be made in the statement initiating

the actual dispute before the Equestes Council.

The parties in a dispute before the Equestes Council expressly waive the possibility of making a request for 12.2

the joinder of proceedings in accordance with the provisions in Section 1046 of the Dutch Code of Civil

Procedure, if the rules applicable to the proceedings to be joined also provide for the possibility of a complete

joinder of proceedings.

Requests seeking a partial joinder of proceedings before the Equestes Council with proceedings before 12.3

another (arbitration) institute in the Netherlands cannot be honoured.

Requests seeking the joinder of proceedings before the Equestes Council with proceedings before another 12.4

(arbitration) institute in the Netherlands shall be deemed not to have been filed pending a motion of lack of

jurisdiction of the Equestes Council in any of those proceedings.

The request must be made in writing to the Chairman of the Panel and must be accompanied by:12.5

a statement of the address of the secretariat of the (arbitration) institute where the proceedings to be A

joined are pending;

if possible, a copy of the document with which the proceedings to be joined was initiated;B

a copy of the arbitration rules that are applicable to the proceedings to be joined. C

The Equestes Council for the joined proceedings shall always handle those proceedings as a whole. However, 12.6

it shall at all times be entitled to refer a dispute, or any part thereof, either ex officio or at the request of any

party, to the original acting arbitration institute, after which referral the arbitration rules applicable to that

dispute prior to the joinder shall once again be applicable.

aPPEal13.

There is no possibility of appeal against binding opinion. Sections 1064-1065 of the Dutch Code of Civil 13.1

Procedure are not applicable.

othEr ProViSionS14.

All correspondence with the Panel, the Chairman and the Equestes Council shall take place by registered mail. 14.1

With regard to points relating to the adjudication of disputes that are not regulated in these Rules, the Equestes 14.2

Council shall decide in accordance with Dutch law.

These Rules may be amended by the Panel. The latest version of these Rules, available on the website of 14.3

Equestes B.V. (www.equestes.com), is applicable to a dispute that is presented to the Equestes Council and will

be rendered by binding opinion.

aPPliCablE laW and Forum15.

Dutch law is applicable to these Rules and the proceedings before the Equestes Council. 15.1

In the event of disputes regarding these Rules and the proceedings before the Equestes Council the court of 15.2

first instance at Breda will be exclusively competent to acknowledge the dispute.

liabilitY16.

The liability of Equestes B.V., the Chairman, the members of the Equestes Expert Panel and the members the 16.1

Equestes Council is limited to the amount paid by its insurer as liability insurance, plus the excess under such

insurance.


21. equestes© code of conduct

applicability 1. Subject to this Code of Conduct

are all of the individual members of

the Equestes© Expert Panel, and the

Assessors and Mediators affiliated with

Equestes©, hereinafter to be referred to

as “The Equestes© Representatives”.

independence and impartiality 2. In performing their Equestes© duties,

the Equestes© Representatives must

remain impartial and independent

under any and all circumstances.

3. The Equestes© Representatives may

not have any direct personal and/

or commercial interest in the advice

they provide and the outcome of any

disputes.

4. The Equestes© Representatives

are prohibited from having direct or

indirect contact with the interested

parties during a dispute, with the

exception of cases in which they have

received prior written permission to do

so from the other interested party(ies)

involved in the proceedings.

5. The Equestes© Representatives

shall not accept their appointment

as an Expert, Assessor or Mediator

in the event a conflict of interest

could arise in the manner provided

for under Article 6 below. Even

in the event of a suspicion exists

regarding a conflict of interest, the

Equestes© Representative will decline

to accept his or her appointment.

The Equestes© Representative who

determines immediately after his or

her appointment that there is the

possibility of a conflict of interest must

contact the person designated for this

purpose at Equestes©. This Contact

Person will then evaluate whether or

not the Equestes© Representative must

withdraw from his or her assignment

with regard to the specific matter

at hand, and refrain from further

participation in the discussion to be

conducted by the Expert Panel on the

Equestes© forum.

Conflicts of interest 6. A conflict of interest is defined as

any personal or financial relationship,

including relationships with family

members, that could influence or be

perceived to influence objectivity when

representing or conducting business

or other dealings for or on behalf of

Equestes©, which in any case include,

yet are not limited to:

The Equestes• © Representative

acting as attending veterinarian for

one of the parties;


acting as a team veterinarian for

one of the parties;


maintains a business relationship

with one of the parties, involving,

among other things, co-ownership

in horses in conjunction with one

of the parties;


maintains a personal relationship

with one of the parties;

The Equestes• © Representative has

a familial relationship to one of the

parties.

Expertise 7. The Equestes© Representative must

demonstrably possess the required

knowledge and expertise and always

act in accordance with the professional

standards applicable to his or her

professional group.

Confidentiality and the media 8. The Equestes© Representative is

obligated to observe strict secrecy

with regard to all of the assignments

granted by Equestes©. The Equestes©

Representative must treat all of the

information made available to him

or her by Equestes© and the parties

concerned with confidentiality, yet at

the same time, will maintain prompt

and open communication with

Equestes© and the parties concerned.

9. The Equestes© Representative must

refrain from disclosing any of the

information and/or decisions made

available to him or her by Equestes©

and the parties concerned to the

media, unless all of the parties involved,

including Equestes©, have agreed as

such in advance.

10. Consultation between the

aforementioned Equestes©

Representatives via the closed Forum,

among other means, will not represent

a violation of this Code of Conduct.

Compliance with the Code of Conduct 11. In the event of a failure to comply

with this Code of Conduct, Equestes©

will be entitled to submit this violation

to its Ethics Panel.

12. Disciplinary sanctions may include:

Warnings, temporary suspension or a

removal from the Expert Panel.

applicable law 13. The laws of the Netherlands apply

exclusively to this Code of Conduct.

The District Court of Amsterdam has

the exclusive jurisdiction in the first

instance to hear civil legal proceedings,

and applicability and interpretation

issues concerning this Code of

Conduct.

equestes© code of conduct.

22. equestes© code of conduct

23. equestes© Radiographs

1. latero-medial projection (lM) of the distal limb, front left

foot elevated.

2. latero-medial projection (lM) of the distal limb, front right

foot elevated.

3. Dorsoproximal-palmarodistal projection (DPr-PaDi), front left

4. Dorsoproximal-palmarodistal projection (DPr-PaDi), front right

5. Skyline-projection of the navicular bone (PaPr-PaDi), front left

6. Skyline-projection of the navicular bone (PaPr-PaDi), front right

7. lateromedial projection (lM) of the fetlock joint, front left

8. lateromedial projection (lM) of the fetlock joint, front right

Equestes© full exam 1 to 36


9. lateromedial projection (lM) of the fetlock joint, hind left

10. lateromedial projection (lM) of the fetlock joint, hind right

11. Dorsolateral to palmaromedial oblique projection (Dl-PaM) of the fetlock joint, front left

12. Dorsomedial to palmarolateral oblique projection (DM-Pal) of the fetlock joint, front left

13. Dorsolateral to palmaromedial oblique projection (Dl-PaM) of the fetlock joint, front right

14. Dorsomedial to palmarolateral oblique projection (DM-Pal) of the fetlock joint, front right

15. Dorsolateral to palmaromedial oblique projection (Dl-PaM) of the fetlock joint, hind left

16. Dorsolateral to palmaromedial oblique projection (Dl-PaM) of the fetlock joint, hind right

Equestes© full exam 1 to 36


17. Dorsomedial to palmarolateral oblique projection (DM-Pal) of the fetlock joint, hind left

18. Dorsomedial to palmarolateral oblique projection (DM-Pal) of the fetlock joint, hind right

19. Dorsoproximal-palmaro/plantarodistal projection (DPr-PaDi)of the fetlock joint, front left

20. Dorsoproximal-palmaro/plantarodistal projection (DPr-PaDi)of the fetlock joint, front right

21. Dorsoproximal-palmaro/plantarodistal projection (DPr-PaDi)of the fetlock joint, hind left

22. Dorsoproximal-palmaro/plantarodistal projection (DPr-PaDi)of the fetlock joint, hind right

23. Dorsopalmar projection (DP) of the carpus, front left

24. Dorsopalmar projection (DP) of the carpus, front right


25. lateromedial projection (lM) of the tarsus, hind left

27. Dorsolateral-plantaromedial projection (D45°l-PIMO) of the tarsus, hind left

29. Plantarolateral-dorsomedial projection (Pl35°l-DMO) of the tarsus, hind left

31. Dorsoplantar projection (DPI) of the tarsus, left

26. lateromedial projection (lM) of the tarsus, hind right

28. Dorsolateral-plantaromedial projection (D45°l-PIMO) of the tarsus hind right

30. Plantarolateral-dorsomedial projection (Pl35°l-DMO) of the tarsus hind right

32. Dorsoplantar projection (DPI) of the tarsus, right AP


33. Dorsomedial to palmarolateral oblique projection (DM-Pal) of the fetlock joint, hind left

35. Dorsomedial to palmarolateral oblique projection (DM-Pal) of the fetlock joint, hind right

34. Dorsoproximal-palmaro/plantarodistal projection (DPr-PaDi)of the fetlock joint, front left

36. Dorsoproximal-palmaro/plantarodistal projection (DPr-PaDi)of the fetlock joint, front right


neck and Back

37. Cranial cervical

lateromedial view of the cervical vertebrae (Occipital to C3)

38. Mid cervical

lateromedial view of the cervical vertebrae (C3 to C5)

39. Caudal cervical spine #3lateromedial view of the cervical vertebrae (C5 to T1)

40. withers region Representation of the spinal processus of the thoracic vertebrae

41. Mid-thoracic region Transition from the thoracic region to the lumbar region

42. lumbar region Representation of the spinal ridges


43. lateromedial projection (lM) of the distal limb, front left foot elevated front foot lM in “podoblock’can replace 1

44. lateromedial projection (lM) of the distal limb, front right foot elevated front foot lM in “podoblock’can replace 2

45. latero-medial projection (lM) of the distal limb, hind left

46. latero-medial projection (lM) of the distal limb, hind right

Additional Views, on request


Equestes additional radiographs

47. lateromedial projection (lM) of the hoof, front left

foot elevated

48. lateromedial projection (lM) of the hoof, front right

foot elevated

49. lateromedial projection (lM) of the hoof, hind left

foot not elevated

50. lateromedial projection (lM) of the hoof, hind right

foot not elevated

51. Dorsoproximal projection (DP) of the pedal bone, front left Dorsoproximal view of the pedal bone, coffin joint, pastern, pastern joint foot elevated

52. Dorsoproximal projection (DP) of the pedal bone, front right Dorsoproximal view of the pedal bone, coffin joint, pastern, pastern joint foot elevated

53. Dorsoproximal projection (DP) of the pedal bone, hind left

54. Dorsoproximal projection (DP) of the pedal bone, hind right


55. lateromedial projection (lM) of the carpus, front left

56. lateromedial projection (lM) of the carpus, front right

57. lateromedial projection (lM) of the carpus, flexed, front left

58. lateromedial projection (lM) of the carpus, flexed, front right

59. Dorsolateral to palmaromedial oblique projection (Dl-PaM) of the carpal joint, front left

61. Dorsomedial to palmarolateral oblique projection (DM-Pal) of the carpal joint, front left

60. Dorsolateral to palmaromedial oblique projection (Dl-PaM) of the carpal joint, front right

62. Dorsomedial to palmarolateral oblique projection (DM-Pal) of the carpal joint, front right


63. lateromedial projection (lM) of the tarsus, flexed hind left

64. Tarsal joint lateromedial projection flexed hind right

65. lateromedial projection (lM) of the stifle joint, flexed hind left

66. lateromedial projection of the stifle joint, flexed hind right

67. Skyline projection of the patella (CrPrCrDi), hind left

68. Skyline projection of the patella (CrPrCrDi), hind right

DR. HuB van DooRneweg 181

5026 RD tilBuRg

tHe netHeRlanDs

P +31 (0) 13 59 42 091

f +31 (0) 13 59 42 096

@ [email protected]

w www.equestes.com

Equestes Digital Brochure

Documents

Transcript of Equestes Digital Brochure