EQD2 & BED
-
Upload
mayur-mayank -
Category
Health & Medicine
-
view
465 -
download
65
Transcript of EQD2 & BED
EQD2 & BED:Practical Application for a Radiation Oncologist
MAYUR MAYANK04.03.2016
OVERVIEW◦ INTRODUCTION◦ BIOLOGICALLY EFFECTIVE DOSE (BED)◦ EQUIVALENT DOSE (EQD)◦ USES AND LIMITATIONS◦ SITE SPECIFIC EXAMPLES
◦ Head and Neck Cancers◦ Cervical Cancers
◦ CONCLUSIONS
INTRODUCTION Linear Quadratic Model
Proposed by Fowler – 1989
INTRODUCTION Effective dose response curve for a multi fraction regimen approaches an exponential function of dose for many doses
Effective dose-response relationship is a straight line from the origin through the point on the single-dose survival curve corresponding to the daily dose fraction
INTRODUCTION For n well separated fractions of dose d, the biologic effect is given by
E = α(total dose) (relative effectiveness)
1 + [d/(α/β)] is called relative effectiveness
INTRODUCTION
BIOLOGICALLY EFFECTIVE DOSE BED
◦ Measure of true Biological dose◦ Used for isoeffective dose calculations
◦ Based on ◦ Dose per fraction◦ Total dose to a particular tissue◦ α/β ratio of that tissue
BIOLOGICALLY EFFECTIVE DOSE◦ A simple way to compare different fractionation regimens
◦ Use of the linear-quadratic model, with appropriate values for the parameters α and β, emphasizes the difference between early and late responding tissues
◦ It is never possible to match two different fractionation regimens to be equivalent for both
Differences between Early and Late Responding Tissues
Early responding tissues and Tumors◦ α/β = 10
Late responding tissues◦ α/β = 3
70 Gy in 35 fractions ◦ 1 fraction / day◦ 5 days a week◦ Total time : 7 weeks
BED10 = 70 [1+(2/10)] = 84 Gy10 – For early responding tissues BED3 = 70 [1+(2/3)] = 116.67 Gy3 – For late responding tissues
Comparison of two Fractionation schedules
70 Gy in 35 fractions ◦ 1 fraction / day◦ 5 days a week◦ Total time : 7 weeks
BED10 = 70 [1+(2/10)] = 84 (Acute)
BED3 = 70 [1+(2/3)] = 116.67 (Late)
80.5 Gy in 70 fractions ◦ 2 fractions / day ◦ 5 days a week◦ Total time : 7 weeks
BED10 = 80.5 [1+(1.15/10)] = 89.8 (Acute)
BED3 = 80.5 [1+(1.15/3)] = 111.4 (Late)
BIOLOGICALLY EFFECTIVE DOSE For combined schedules, calculate the total BED
This general BED expression does not take into account the proliferation during treatment could decrease as much as about 1 Gy/day
BED with proliferation during treatment
The effect of proliferation - supplementary term subtracted from BEDtot
Ttreat is the overall treatment time,
Tk is the time for the onset of proliferation
Tp is the effective doubling time during proliferation
α is the linear parameter of LQ model
BIOLOGICALLY EFFECTIVE DOSE
BED is often confused with ‘‘biologically equivalent dose’’
Which it definitely is not
EQUIVALENT DOSE (EQD) EQD2
◦ Equivalent total dose in 2-Gy fraction.◦ The total dose in 2-Gy fractions that would give the same log cell kill as the given
schedule. ◦ It is this that is the biologically equivalent dose, which should not be abbreviated to
BED.
Older literature - EQD has been called NTD (normalised total dose at 2-Gy fractions)
EQD2 EDQ2 can be found for any BED by dividing the BED by the RE for 2 Gy fractions, using the appropriate α/β ratio
For tumour and acute reactions : EQD2 = BED / 1.2 [α/β = 10] For late reactions : EQD2 = BED / 1.67 (for all except CNS) [α/β = 3] EQD2 = BED / 2 (for CNS) [α/β = 2]
BED to EQD2◦ More practical alternative is to convert the BED values to equivalent total
doses delivered in 2 Gy fractions– more practical to clinical practice– more familiar to clinicians– interpreted according to clinical experience
◦ Easier to understand than BED
BED & EQD2
Uses of BED and EQD2◦ Comparison between two fractionation schedules◦ Formulation of new fractionation schedules
Comparison between two fractionation schedules
n1d1 = n2d2 1 + d1 α/β
1 + d2α/β
For equivalent BED
Comparison of two Fractionation schedules
70 Gy in 35 fractions ◦ 1 fraction / day◦ 5 days a week◦ Total time : 7 weeks
BED10 = 70 [1+(2/10)] = 84
BED3 = 70 [1+(2/3)] = 116.67
80.5 Gy in 70 fractions ◦ 2 fractions / day ◦ 5 days a week◦ Total time : 7 weeks
BED10 = 80.5 [1+(1.15/10)] = 89.8
BED3 = 80.5 [1+(1.15/3)] = 111.4
EQD10/2 = 89.8 / [1+(2/10)] = 74.83
EQD3/2 = 111.4 / [1+(2/3)] = 66.71
Formulation of a new fractionation schedule
The three sets of biologically effective dose (BED) calculations to analyse any schedule
1. Ensure late complication constraints are not overdosed (unless volume reduced)◦ No overall time factor normally assumed
2. Tumour BED10=nd(1+d/[α/β]) - 0.693 (T-Tk)/0.35 Tp ◦ Tk=21–32 days and Tp=3 days for lung or head and neck cancer◦ For most tumours a/b=10 Gy, but prostate cancer a/b=1.5 to 2 Gy, breast cancer a/b=4 Gy, malignant
melanoma a/b=0.6 Gy, non-small-cell lung cancer a/b=20 Gy.
3. Acute mucosal BED10=nd(1+d/10)-0.693 (T-7d)/0.35x2.5d ◦ (EQD10/2 = 49–52.5 : derived from oropharyngeal data; possibly applies to rectal mucosa too)
Fowler, Br Jour Radiology 83; 2010
Limitations of BED • Need to know α/β ratio
• LQ model fails at extremes of low dose rate and large fraction sizes
• Hot spots of treatment
• Previous cytotoxic chemotherapy
• Previous surgery
• Extremes of age
• Vascular pathology
• Breaks in treatment, compensation for accelerated proliferation
• Generic values of 10 Gy for tumors and 3 Gy for normal
HEAD AND NECK CANCERS
RTOG 9003 Largest randomized study of fractionation ever conducted
Designed to answer the question whether each of 3 experimental altered fractionation arms would improve loco regional control (LRC) for patients with locally advanced squamous cell cancer of the head and neck
Standard Fractionation 70 Gy/35 fractions/ 7 weeks
Hyperfractionation81.6 Gy/68 fractions/7 weeks
Accelerated Fractionation – Continuous72 Gy/42 fractions/6 weeks
Accelerated Fractionation – Split67.2 Gy/42 fractions/6 weeks with 2-week rest after 38.4 Gy
SFX
HFX
AFX-C
AFX-S
RTOG 9003
Bietler et al, IJROBP 89 ; 2014
Radiobiology of RTOG 9003 arms
Fowler, Br Jour Radiology 83; 2010
Other Fractionation Studies in Head and Neck Cancers
Fowler, Br Jour Radiology 83; 2010
CERVICAL CANCER
BED of Radiation Treatment – Cervical Cancer
In Cervical cancer
BEDtotal = BEDEBRT + BEDbrachy
Low Dose Rate (LDR) Brachytherapy
Significant repair of damage during delivery
D - Radiation dose, T - duration of the BT session μ - a parameter characterizing the repair of sublethal damage in the irradiated tissuesμ = ln(2)/T1/2, where T1/2 is half-life of sublethal damage repair
High Dose Rate (HDR) Brachytherapy
BED is calculated same as that for EBRT
Calculation of BED for Cervical cancer
EBRT : 50 Gy / 25 # over 5 weeks followed by HDR Brachytherapy : 15 Gy / 3 # Assuming α/β = 2
BEDEBRT = 50[1+(2/2)] = 100Gy2
BEDBT = 15[1+(5/2)] = 52.5Gy2
BEDtotal = BEDEBRT + BEDBT = 152.5Gy2
EQD2 = BED / [1+(2/α/β)] = 152.5 / [1+(2/2)] = 76.25 Gy (38 fractions of 2 Gy/fraction)
Recommended EQD2 for Cervical Cancers
The recommended mean combined EBRT plus brachytherapy, EQD2 :◦ 78.9 Gy [SD=10.7] for Stage IB–IIA patients◦ 83.3 Gy [SD=11.2] for Stage IIB–IVA patients
For all stages, EBRT plus brachytherapy◦ 80.9 Gy [SD=10.14]
Viswanathan et al., IJROBP 82; 2012
CONCLUSIONS◦ BED and EQD2 are important tools for Radiation Oncologists to decide the fractionation
patterns
◦ They help in predicting the tumour control and the acute and late reactions to an extent
◦ EQD2 is a better tool than BED as most clinicians are more used to data with doses in conventional fractionation of 2Gy/fraction
◦ Although not perfect, they are integral tools and should be used in all fractionation related studies and for predicting toxicities
THANK YOU….