EPSY 8334 Class 1 and 2 (Spring 2015) Heppner et al 3 -4 Pyrczak & Bruce 1&4.

57
EPSY 8334 Class 1 and 2 (Spring 2015) Heppner et al 3 -4 Pyrczak & Bruce 1&4

Transcript of EPSY 8334 Class 1 and 2 (Spring 2015) Heppner et al 3 -4 Pyrczak & Bruce 1&4.

Page 1: EPSY 8334 Class 1 and 2 (Spring 2015) Heppner et al 3 -4 Pyrczak & Bruce 1&4.

EPSY 8334

Class 1 and 2 (Spring 2015)Heppner et al 3 -4

Pyrczak & Bruce 1&4

Page 2: EPSY 8334 Class 1 and 2 (Spring 2015) Heppner et al 3 -4 Pyrczak & Bruce 1&4.

Science in Counseling Psychology

Are our interventions effective? Empirically Validated Treatments

Experimental studies- randomized clinical trials

Relations about psychological phenomena

2

Page 3: EPSY 8334 Class 1 and 2 (Spring 2015) Heppner et al 3 -4 Pyrczak & Bruce 1&4.

Class Goals Identify a research question Develop a research proposal that includes

An introduction/literature review that provides conceptual framework for research question based on theoretical/empirical literature and/or reasoning

Methods to conduct study Participants Instruments to collect the data Procedures Analyses

3

Page 4: EPSY 8334 Class 1 and 2 (Spring 2015) Heppner et al 3 -4 Pyrczak & Bruce 1&4.

Class Goals Demonstrate skills necessary to

understand results sections of journals correlation, T-Test, ANOVAS MANOVAS

Regression, moderation/mediation analyses

Ability to critique articles that report results of randomized clinical trials of psychotherapy efficacy (Goal 2 Competency B.1a)

4

Page 5: EPSY 8334 Class 1 and 2 (Spring 2015) Heppner et al 3 -4 Pyrczak & Bruce 1&4.

Conceptualizing a Research Question

Three steps What do we know about the issue.What we do not know about the issue.How will the study bridge the gap.How what we know leads to the

questions in my study

5

Page 6: EPSY 8334 Class 1 and 2 (Spring 2015) Heppner et al 3 -4 Pyrczak & Bruce 1&4.

6

Identify Research Topics 4/8

1. Read, Read, Read Think…..

2. Identify/discuss ideas

3. Build on previous research

4. Identify research questions (Kiplinger

& Lee, 2001)

Page 7: EPSY 8334 Class 1 and 2 (Spring 2015) Heppner et al 3 -4 Pyrczak & Bruce 1&4.

7

Identify Research Topics 4/8

Identify:

5. Measurable constructs

6. Instruments to assess constructs

7. Participants

8. Statistical analyses

Page 8: EPSY 8334 Class 1 and 2 (Spring 2015) Heppner et al 3 -4 Pyrczak & Bruce 1&4.

Literature: Replication vs. Guide

Use different operational definition of variable Add moderator or control variables Develop different way to test hypotheses Combine questions/strategies from several

studies Examine similar questions with a different

population Identify gaps weaknesses in previous work

that you will address in your study

8

Page 9: EPSY 8334 Class 1 and 2 (Spring 2015) Heppner et al 3 -4 Pyrczak & Bruce 1&4.

How process unfolds: Describe research interests in general, broad

terms. Identify testable research question(s) Identify the variables/constructs embedded in

the question Provide conceptual definitions for variables. Provide operational definitions for variables

How to assess/measure the construct Observations, Self-Report

9

Page 10: EPSY 8334 Class 1 and 2 (Spring 2015) Heppner et al 3 -4 Pyrczak & Bruce 1&4.

10

Assumptions Research Paradigms

Ontology

Epistemology

Methodology

10

Page 11: EPSY 8334 Class 1 and 2 (Spring 2015) Heppner et al 3 -4 Pyrczak & Bruce 1&4.

11

Assumptions Research Paradigms

Ontology

Epistemology

Methodology

Branch of metaphysics that deals with the nature of being & reality

Branch of philosophy that investigates the origin, nature, methods, and limits of human knowledge

Relationship of Knower to Known

Procedures to gain knowledge about the world (reality – others)

11

Page 12: EPSY 8334 Class 1 and 2 (Spring 2015) Heppner et al 3 -4 Pyrczak & Bruce 1&4.

12

Assumptions Paradigms

Ontology

Epistemology

Methodology

Positivism

Post-Positivism

Constructivism

Critical Theory

12

Page 13: EPSY 8334 Class 1 and 2 (Spring 2015) Heppner et al 3 -4 Pyrczak & Bruce 1&4.

13

True or False??

1. The scientific method allows us to observe facts without bias.

2. Observations of psychological states measured with scores on an instrument always will include “true” and “error” measurement.

13

Page 14: EPSY 8334 Class 1 and 2 (Spring 2015) Heppner et al 3 -4 Pyrczak & Bruce 1&4.

14

True or False??

3. In research, the observed cannot be separated from the observer.

4. There is privileged and non-privileged knowledge.

14

Page 15: EPSY 8334 Class 1 and 2 (Spring 2015) Heppner et al 3 -4 Pyrczak & Bruce 1&4.

PositivismOntology

Epistemology

Methodology

15

Page 16: EPSY 8334 Class 1 and 2 (Spring 2015) Heppner et al 3 -4 Pyrczak & Bruce 1&4.

PositivismOntology Truth is universal, absolute; it can be

grasped/discovered

Human nature follows cause-effect laws

Epistemology Discover universal laws that govern nature and human behavior

Theories are reductionist

Methodology Scientific Method

Scientific method allows individuals to observe facts without bias

The observer is a “nuisance”16

Page 17: EPSY 8334 Class 1 and 2 (Spring 2015) Heppner et al 3 -4 Pyrczak & Bruce 1&4.

Post- PositivismOntology Universal truths exist

Human nature follows laws

Nature of universe cannot be known

Probabilistic statements about truth: p value

Epistemology

Observations always = “truth” + “error”

Successive studies to approximate truth

Methodo

logy

Scientific Method

Observations = true + error measurement

Researchers cannot be 100% objective

Scientific community arbitrates knowledge

17

Page 18: EPSY 8334 Class 1 and 2 (Spring 2015) Heppner et al 3 -4 Pyrczak & Bruce 1&4.

ConstructivismOntology Truth - purely objective reality does not exist

“Reality” & knowledge are socially constructed

Meanings given to an experience are more important than the experience itself

Epistemology

Knower and known cannot be separated

Knowledge is based on interpretations of observed interactions within a context

Methodo

logy

Hermeneutics – Interpretations- Qualitative

Dialectics – relation of investigator and participant- to understand constructions

18

Page 19: EPSY 8334 Class 1 and 2 (Spring 2015) Heppner et al 3 -4 Pyrczak & Bruce 1&4.

Constructivism--Critical TheoryOntology A purely objective reality does not exist

Knowledge is socially constructed – shaped by those in power

Epistemology

Knower and known cannot be separated

Observer’s location in social context biases observations

Methodology

Hermeneutics - Interpretations

Dialectics – relation of investigator and participant- to change constructions

Social Change --- Social Justice in CP

19

Page 20: EPSY 8334 Class 1 and 2 (Spring 2015) Heppner et al 3 -4 Pyrczak & Bruce 1&4.

20

True or False??

1. The scientific method allows us to observe facts without bias.

2. Observations of psychological states measured with scores on a test always will include “true” and “error” measurement.

Page 21: EPSY 8334 Class 1 and 2 (Spring 2015) Heppner et al 3 -4 Pyrczak & Bruce 1&4.

21

True or False??

3. The observed cannot be separated from the observer.

4. There is privileged and non-privileged knowledge.

Page 22: EPSY 8334 Class 1 and 2 (Spring 2015) Heppner et al 3 -4 Pyrczak & Bruce 1&4.

2005 Nobel Prize for Physiology or Medicine: Australia Dr. Barry J. Marshall (gastroenterologist) and Dr. J. Robin Warren (pathologist)

2005

1984

bacterium Helicobacter pylori

•Causes stomach inflammation, ulcers and cancers (80-90% of ulcers)•Paradigm: stress gastric acid ulcers•Old Treatment: drugs to block gastric acid•Pharmaceutical Industry: Tagamet and Zantac were biggest profit earners.•MDs: Stm. Ulcers was a chronic disease

22

Page 23: EPSY 8334 Class 1 and 2 (Spring 2015) Heppner et al 3 -4 Pyrczak & Bruce 1&4.

Goals of Science Advance knowledge Make discoveries Increase our understanding of human

behavior, and Acquire facts about counseling (behavior)

Science vs. Practice-- ??

23

Page 24: EPSY 8334 Class 1 and 2 (Spring 2015) Heppner et al 3 -4 Pyrczak & Bruce 1&4.

Science Practice

Knowledge for its own sake

Academic freedom

Seeks to understand populations: probability

Individual differences: nuisance/confound

Knowledge for what it can accomplish

Public service

Seeks to understand individuals – 0 or 100%

Individual differences: focus of attention

24

Page 25: EPSY 8334 Class 1 and 2 (Spring 2015) Heppner et al 3 -4 Pyrczak & Bruce 1&4.

25

Testable Research Question (Kerlinger & Lee, 2000)

(a) Asks a Question

(b) About ……

(c) That …………

25

Page 26: EPSY 8334 Class 1 and 2 (Spring 2015) Heppner et al 3 -4 Pyrczak & Bruce 1&4.

26

Testable Research Question

(a) Asks a Question

(b) About the relation of two or more constructs (correlation/experimental)

(c) That can be measured in some way

26

Page 27: EPSY 8334 Class 1 and 2 (Spring 2015) Heppner et al 3 -4 Pyrczak & Bruce 1&4.

Types of Research Questions Descriptive

Describe what a phenomenon is like: Collect/Categorize Information- Survey Designs

Difference Compare between two or more groups

Experimental: manipulation of IV; random assignment to groups

Non-experimental: no manipulation of IV; non- random assignment to groups

Correlation (relation) Extent to which 2 or more continuous variables

vary together 27

Page 28: EPSY 8334 Class 1 and 2 (Spring 2015) Heppner et al 3 -4 Pyrczak & Bruce 1&4.

28

Research Questions (which analyses?)

Descriptive, Difference, Correlation

1. What are the levels of anxiety and career indecision reported by college men and women?

1. Do college women report higher levels of anxiety than college men?

2. Do college women report higher levels of career indecision than college men?

Page 29: EPSY 8334 Class 1 and 2 (Spring 2015) Heppner et al 3 -4 Pyrczak & Bruce 1&4.

Research Questions (which analyses?)

Descriptive, Difference, Correlation

4. Among college students, are anxiety scores related to career indecision scores?

5. Do college students diagnosed with an anxiety disorder report higher levels of career indecision than college students without an anxiety disorder ?

29

Page 30: EPSY 8334 Class 1 and 2 (Spring 2015) Heppner et al 3 -4 Pyrczak & Bruce 1&4.

30

Research Questions Descriptive, Difference, Correlation

6. Among college students, what is the combined and unique contribution of anxiety, self-esteem and optimism to career indecision?

7. Among college students, are there gender differences in the relation of anxiety to career indecision?

Page 31: EPSY 8334 Class 1 and 2 (Spring 2015) Heppner et al 3 -4 Pyrczak & Bruce 1&4.

Moderation Question

7. Among college students, are there gender differences in the relation of anxiety to career indecision?

Among men, is anxiety related to career indecision? Is the relation + or -?

Among women, is anxiety related to career indecision? Is the relation + or -?

31

Page 32: EPSY 8334 Class 1 and 2 (Spring 2015) Heppner et al 3 -4 Pyrczak & Bruce 1&4.

Research Questions Descriptive, Difference, Correlation

8. Is career indecision –CDS-- a multifactorial or a one-dimensional construct?

32

Report to

Page 33: EPSY 8334 Class 1 and 2 (Spring 2015) Heppner et al 3 -4 Pyrczak & Bruce 1&4.

Types of Variables

Categorical Discrete groups:

gender, diagnosis (depressed vs. not depressed)

Continuous Ratio Scale (equal intervals)

money, # of days, test score (0-100) Continuous Interval

Likert Scales

33

Page 34: EPSY 8334 Class 1 and 2 (Spring 2015) Heppner et al 3 -4 Pyrczak & Bruce 1&4.

Types of Research Questions Descriptive

Describe what a phenomenon is like Collect/Categorize Information - Typically used in SurveysRequires large samples that are

representative of the population of interestDo not involve generation of hypothesisNo use of inferential statistics

34

Page 35: EPSY 8334 Class 1 and 2 (Spring 2015) Heppner et al 3 -4 Pyrczak & Bruce 1&4.

Analyses: Descriptive Collect/Categorize Information - Survey

Means, SD Mean score in standardized test by groups Mean score in opinion survey by groups

Proportions of populations/groups Percentage of high school graduates who attend

college, by ethnic group, Percentage of college students who graduate in 6

years or less, by gender

35

Page 36: EPSY 8334 Class 1 and 2 (Spring 2015) Heppner et al 3 -4 Pyrczak & Bruce 1&4.

Types of Research Questions Difference

Compare Means Between – groups Descriptive vs. Hypothesis testing purpose

Independent variable: categorical Experimental orStatus (cannot be manipulated)

Dependent Variable: continuous

36

Page 37: EPSY 8334 Class 1 and 2 (Spring 2015) Heppner et al 3 -4 Pyrczak & Bruce 1&4.

Stat. Analyses: Difference Compare means in continuous variables

between two or more groups: t-test, ANOVA, MANCOVA-Experimental- IV is categorical and

manipulated Stauts - DV is categorical and not

manipulated

The IV is always continuous

37

Page 38: EPSY 8334 Class 1 and 2 (Spring 2015) Heppner et al 3 -4 Pyrczak & Bruce 1&4.

Difference questions vs.Descriptive Questions?

Difference questions for descriptive purpose do not require rational/hypothesisEg. Proportion of men and women who favor

the republican vs. the democrat nominee

Difference questions for hypothesis testing require rational for expected differences

38

Page 39: EPSY 8334 Class 1 and 2 (Spring 2015) Heppner et al 3 -4 Pyrczak & Bruce 1&4.

Analyses: Difference African American depressed adults who

receive culturally infused CBT will obtain lower post-test scores in the Beck Depression Inventory(BDI) than their counterparts who receive traditional CBT.

Experimental or Non-Experimental ?

IV DV

39

Page 40: EPSY 8334 Class 1 and 2 (Spring 2015) Heppner et al 3 -4 Pyrczak & Bruce 1&4.

Analyses: Difference African American depressed adults who

receive culturally infused CBT will obtain lower post-test depression scores (Beck Depression Inventory-BDI) than their counterparts who receive traditional CBT.

Experimental or Non-Experimental ? Random assignment to treatment groups

IV Treatment Groups: CICBT --- TCBT DV Scores in BDI

40

Page 41: EPSY 8334 Class 1 and 2 (Spring 2015) Heppner et al 3 -4 Pyrczak & Bruce 1&4.

Analyses: Difference - T-Test

Treatment(Random assignment)

BDI Post test Mean SD

Culturally Infused CBT

10.3* 5.3

Traditional CBT 15.1 6.2

*p<.05; Possible range of scores BDI = 1-20

41

Page 42: EPSY 8334 Class 1 and 2 (Spring 2015) Heppner et al 3 -4 Pyrczak & Bruce 1&4.

Analyses: Difference Women will obtain higher BDI scores at

post-test than men (regardless of treatment group)

Experimental or Non-Experimental ? IV DV

42

Page 43: EPSY 8334 Class 1 and 2 (Spring 2015) Heppner et al 3 -4 Pyrczak & Bruce 1&4.

Analyses: Difference Women will obtain higher BDI scores at

post-test than men (regardless of treatment group)

Experimental or Non-Experimental ? Gender – status variable, no random assignment

IV Gender DV BDI scores

43

Page 44: EPSY 8334 Class 1 and 2 (Spring 2015) Heppner et al 3 -4 Pyrczak & Bruce 1&4.

Analyses: Difference - T-Test

Client’s Gender

BDI Post-Test Mean SD

Men 11.5ns 5.2

Women 12.3 6.5

Possible range of scores BDI = 1-20

44

Page 45: EPSY 8334 Class 1 and 2 (Spring 2015) Heppner et al 3 -4 Pyrczak & Bruce 1&4.

2X2 ANOVA: Treatment and Client Gender Differences in Depression

IVsDV

Post Test BDI Scores F statistic

Treatment T I vs. T2 (CI-CBT vs. Trad CBT)

Main Effect*

Client Gender Male vs. Female Main Effect

Treatment x Gender

MeanT1/Male MeanT2/Male T1/Female T2/Female

Interaction Effect*

45

Page 46: EPSY 8334 Class 1 and 2 (Spring 2015) Heppner et al 3 -4 Pyrczak & Bruce 1&4.

Does gender Moderate the treatment effects?

Gender

BDI Post-Test CI CBT

BDI Post-Test Trad-CBT

Male 11.8* 16.5

Female 12.5ns 13.1

*p<.05; Possible range of BDI = 0-20

46

Page 47: EPSY 8334 Class 1 and 2 (Spring 2015) Heppner et al 3 -4 Pyrczak & Bruce 1&4.

2X2 ANOVA: Treatment and Client Gender Differences in Depression

Independent Variable

Parenting Rating Scale

Treatment CI-CBT Trad-CBT

10.3* 15.1

C Gender Male Female

11.5 12.3

Treat. X Gen* Sig

Treatment X Cl Gender Interaction

Cl Gender Treatment

CI-CBT Trad.-CBT

Male 11.8* 16.5

Female 12.5 13.1

* p<.05

47

Page 48: EPSY 8334 Class 1 and 2 (Spring 2015) Heppner et al 3 -4 Pyrczak & Bruce 1&4.

Analyses: Difference Mothers who are diagnosed with clinical

depression (BDI>16) will obtain lower scores in parenting skills (Parenting Skills Rating Scale: PSRS) than mothers who are not clinically depressed (BDI<16).

Experimental or Non-Experimental? IV DV

48

Page 49: EPSY 8334 Class 1 and 2 (Spring 2015) Heppner et al 3 -4 Pyrczak & Bruce 1&4.

Analyses: Difference Mothers who are diagnosed with clinical

depression (BDI>16) will obtain lower scores in parenting skills (Parenting Skills Rating Scale: PSRS) than Mothers who are not clinically depressed (BDI<16). .

Experimental or Non-Experimental?

Status variables- no randomnization IV Depression group: Yes vs. No DV Score in Parenting SRS

49

Page 50: EPSY 8334 Class 1 and 2 (Spring 2015) Heppner et al 3 -4 Pyrczak & Bruce 1&4.

Analyses: Difference - T-Test

Clinically Depressed

Parenting Skills Rating Scale Mean SD

Yes 2.3* 1.4

No 3.8 1 .1

*p<.05; Possible range of PSRS = 1-5

50

Page 51: EPSY 8334 Class 1 and 2 (Spring 2015) Heppner et al 3 -4 Pyrczak & Bruce 1&4.

Analyses Differences: 2 IVs Are there differences in scores in the Parenting

Skills Scale among mothers (a) who are depressed or non depressed (b) and who have a partner or not?

Does partner status moderate (makes a difference in) the association of mothers’ depression diagnosis to scores on parenting skills ratings?

IVs DV

51

Page 52: EPSY 8334 Class 1 and 2 (Spring 2015) Heppner et al 3 -4 Pyrczak & Bruce 1&4.

Analyses Differences: 2 IVs Are there differences in scores in the Parenting

Skills Scale among mothers (a) who are depressed or non depressed (b) and who have a partner or not?

Does partner status moderate the relation of

mothers’ depression status to scores on parenting skills ratings?

IVs partner status (Mod)- depression diagnosis DV parenting skills

52

Page 53: EPSY 8334 Class 1 and 2 (Spring 2015) Heppner et al 3 -4 Pyrczak & Bruce 1&4.

2X2 ANOVA: Depression Diagnosis and Partner Status in Parenting Skills (n=100)

IVsDV

Parenting Skills F statistic

Depression Status (n=100)

Yes vs No (n=50 n=50)

Main Effect*

Partner Status (n=100)

Partner vs No Partner (n=50 n=50)

Main Effect NS

Depression x Partner Status

Partner ---- DY vs DN

No Partner ---- DY vs DN

Interaction EffectNS

53

Page 54: EPSY 8334 Class 1 and 2 (Spring 2015) Heppner et al 3 -4 Pyrczak & Bruce 1&4.

Depression Diagnosis, Marital Status and Parenting Skills m

Independent Vs. Parenting Rating Scale

Depression Yes No

2.3* 3.8

Marital Status Partner No Partner

3.1 2.9

Dep X Partner S NS

Depression X Marital Status Interaction

Partner S Mom Depression

Yes No

Partner 2.5* 3.6

No Partner 2.4* 3.4

* p<.05

Page 55: EPSY 8334 Class 1 and 2 (Spring 2015) Heppner et al 3 -4 Pyrczak & Bruce 1&4.

Types of Research Questions• Correlation

– Extent to which 2 or more continuous psychological constructs vary together

– Pearson correlation coefficient r- bivariate correlation: strength and direction

– Regression - multi IV’s• test combined contribution of several Ivs to one DV• test unique contribution of each IV to the DV while

controlling for the other IVs

55

Page 56: EPSY 8334 Class 1 and 2 (Spring 2015) Heppner et al 3 -4 Pyrczak & Bruce 1&4.

56

External and Internal Validity

E I

Experimental

Field

E i

Correlational/

Descriptive

Field

e I

Experimental

Laboratory

e i Correlational/

Descriptive

Laboratory

Clinical Trials

Page 57: EPSY 8334 Class 1 and 2 (Spring 2015) Heppner et al 3 -4 Pyrczak & Bruce 1&4.

57

Fill in the Blanks

The best research design is:

What type of design is used in the randomized controlled clinical trials used to examine therapy outcome?