EPA sampling data Gold King Mine

6
Summary of EPA Surfa ce Wat e r Sampling of Se l ec t M e tal s R esult s to Dat e Gold King Mine Blowout August 7, 2015 EPA initiated a sampling effort on August 5, 2015, to assess the impacts of the blowout at the Gold King Mine near Silverton, CO. Surface water quality samples were collected from 7 locations (see Attachment 1). Two of these locations were on Cement Creek and 5 of these were on the Animas River in Colorado. These locations were selected based on the fact that an historical dataset already exists at these locations and they will serve thus as good indicators of conditions before, during and after the event. Data depicted are the results of samples collected over two days. These samples were delivered to the lab on August 6 th . Results were available and evaluated on August 7 th . Attachment 2 provides both an analysis of the dissolved concentrations of select metals over time and operational milestones. Metals selected are indicative of trends of all metals analyzed and can be related to historical averages for these water bodies. The graphs in Attachment 2 demonstrate trends in concentrations of select metals that have been detected historically in both Cement Creek and the Animas River. Each graph represents the trends in those concentrations between August 5, and August 6, 2015. Each graph also provides the average historical (pre-blowout) concentration of those metals. Historical concentrations are not available for the 32nd Street Bridge location. The blowout occurred late in the morning on August 5, 2015. The contaminant plume moved down stream at approximately 4 miles per hour. The trends over time and location represent the movement of the contamination and the return of the Animas River to conditions before the event. The first graph provides data on Cement Creek, the downstream from the blowout (CC48). Concentrations throughout the first day following the blowout are above historical averages for the copper, lead and manganese. However, the graphs demonstrate a decrease in those concentrations over the 24 hour period. The second graph provides data on the Animas River above the town of Silverton (A68) and above Cement Creek. This graph demonstrates relatively unchanging metals concentrations that are at or below historical averages. The third graph demonstrates the data from the Animas River just below the town of Silverton (A72). The graph shows an initial spike in metals concentrations with levels returning to historical averages by the morning of August 6, 2015. The fourth graph demonstrates the data from Bakers Bridge on the Animas River just above Durango, CO. Since this location is about 20 miles from Silverton, the metals concentrations are

description

EPA sampling data Gold King Mine

Transcript of EPA sampling data Gold King Mine

Summary ofEPA SurfaceWater Sampling of SelectMetals Results to Date Gold King Mine Blowout August 7, 2015 EPA initiated a sampling effort on August 5, 2015, to assess the impacts of the blowout at the Gold King Mine near Silverton, CO.Surface water quality samples were collected from 7 locations (see Attachment 1).Two of these locations were on Cement Creek and 5 of these were on the Animas River in Colorado.These locations were selected based on the fact that an historical dataset already exists at these locations and they will serve thus as good indicators of conditions before, during and after the event.Data depicted are the results of samples collected over two days.These samples were delivered to the lab on August 6th.Results were available and evaluated on August 7th. Attachment 2 provides both an analysis of the dissolved concentrations of select metals over time and operational milestones.Metals selected are indicative of trends of all metals analyzed and can be related to historical averages for these water bodies. The graphs in Attachment 2 demonstrate trends in concentrations of select metals that have been detected historically in both Cement Creek and the Animas River.Each graph represents the trends in those concentrations between August 5, and August 6, 2015.Each graph also provides the average historical (pre-blowout) concentration of those metals. Historical concentrations are not available for the 32nd Street Bridge location.The blowout occurred late in the morning on August 5, 2015.The contaminant plume moved down stream at approximately 4 miles per hour.The trends over time and location represent the movement of the contamination and the return of the Animas River to conditions before the event. The first graph provides data on Cement Creek, the downstream from the blowout (CC48).Concentrations throughout the first day following the blowout are above historical averages for the copper, lead and manganese. However, the graphs demonstrate a decrease in those concentrations over the 24 hour period. The second graph provides data on the Animas River above the town of Silverton (A68) and above Cement Creek.This graph demonstrates relatively unchanging metals concentrations that are at or below historical averages. The third graph demonstrates the data from the Animas River just below the town of Silverton (A72).The graph shows an initial spike in metals concentrations with levels returning to historical averages by the morning of August 6, 2015. The fourth graph demonstrates the data from Bakers Bridge on the Animas River just above Durango, CO.Since this location is about 20 miles from Silverton, the metals concentrations are increasing above historical averages.But, it is believed that subsequent data collection activities will demonstrate a decrease in concentrations similar to those seen at upstream locations. The fifth graph is of the 32nd Street Bridge sampling location. At the time the samples were collected, it does not appear that the contamination had yet reached this sampling location. It is believed that subsequent data collection activities and results in these locations and in additional downstream locations will demonstrate an increase in metals concentrations followed by a decrease to baseline. I NI TI AL vsFI NAL EPA receives INITIAL results from its laboratory 1-2 days after the samples are collected.These INITIAL results are designated as FINAL once they have been validated.This validation process usually takes 7-10 days.EPA is releasing INITIAL data to the public but it is important to note that results are sometimes changed during the validation process. AT T ACHMENTS Attachment 1: Sampling Locations Attachment 2: Trends and Milestones Attachment 1:EPA SamplingLocations Attachment 2:Trends 8asellne Average CadmlumCopperlronLeadManganeseZlnc 4.3173.93787014.7119321231 8asellne Average CadmlumCopperlronLeadManganeseZlnc 38.32722.61940381 0200040006000800010000120008/3/2013 8/3/2013 8/6/2013LocaLlon: CemenL Creek above SllverLon (CC48)Cadmlum Copper Lead Manganese Zlnc7:23AM01002003004003006007008009008/3/2013 8/3/2013 8/3/2013 8/6/2013LocaLlon: Anlmas 8lver aL SllverLon (A68)Cadmlum Copper Lead Manganese Zlnc11:00AM6:00AM 6:13AM7:13M 4:00M11:30M unl1S: ug/L unl1S: ug/L 8asellne Average CadmlumCopperlronLeadManganeseZlnc 21230704.341839813 8asellne Average CadmlumCopperlronLeadManganeseZlnc 6.37361111.1393894 010002000300040003000600070008/3/2013 8/3/2013 8/3/2013 8/3/2013 8/6/2013LocaLlon: Anlmas 8elow SllverLon (A72)Cadmlum Copper Lead Manganese Zlnc030010001300200023008/3/2013 8/6/2013 8/6/2013LocaLlon: 8akers 8rldgeCadmlum Copper Lead Manganese Zlncunl1S: ug/L unl1S: ug/L 11:30M4:13M1:43M 8:10M 12:00AM8:03M9:00AM 6:30AM 0204060801001208/3/2013 8/6/2013 8/6/2013LocaLlon: 32nd SLreeL 8rldgeCadmlum Copper Lead Manganese Zlncunl1S: ug/L 12:40AM 8:30M9:43AM