Environmental Monitoring Report...Environmental Monitoring Report Project No.: 42189-012 Bi-annual...
Transcript of Environmental Monitoring Report...Environmental Monitoring Report Project No.: 42189-012 Bi-annual...
Environmental Monitoring Report
Project No.: 42189-012 Bi-annual report (July – December 2015) January, 2016
TAJ: Nurek 500 kV Switchyard Reconstruction Project Prepared by: State Establishment “Project Management Unit for Electroenergy Sector” This environmental monitoring report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.
1
Table of Contents
I. INTRODUCTION 2
1.1. Project Description 2
1.2. Objective and Methodology of Bi-Annual Report 4
1.3. Changes in Project Organization and Environmental Management Team 4
1.4. Relationships with Contractors, Owner and Lender 6
1.5. Construction Activities and Project Progress during the Previous 6 Months 6
1.5.1. Construction facilities 8
1.5.2. Construction activities 12
II. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 15
2.1. Noise and Vibration 15
Table 3. Noise Level Monitoring Data 15
2.2. Water Quality 16
2.3. Air Quality 16
2.4. Flora and Fauna Monitoring 16
2.5. Monitoring of Occupational Health and Safety, and HIV-AIDS Issues 17
III. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 18
3.1. EMP, SSEMP and Work Plans 18
3.2. Site Inspections and Audits 18
3.3. Non- Compliance Notices 18
3.4. Consultation and Complaints 18
3.5. Non-compliance notices fulfillment 18
3.6. Corrective Action Plan 19
Abbreviations ADB - Asian Development Bank EA - Executive Agency EIA - Environmental Impact Assessment EMP - Environmental Management Plan ES - Environmental Safeguards ESMS - Environmental and Social Management System IA - Implementation Agency IEE - Initial Environmental Examination LLC - Limited Liability Company MES - Monitoring and Evaluation Specialist MEWR - Ministry of Energy and Water Resources of the Republic of Tajikistan OJSC - Open Joint Stock Company PAM - Project Administration Manual PIU - Project Implementation Unit PMC - Project Management Consultant PPTA - Project Preparation Technical Assistance TA - Technical Assistance
2
I. INTRODUCTION
1.1. Project Description
1. Nurek HPP, incorporating 220 kV and 500 kV switchyards, produces over 70% of Tajikistan's
electricity.
2. The existing switchyards were built more than 30 years ago with Soviet technology and
replacement parts are no longer available. Therefore, they are need in complete replacement. The
works comprise mainly: earth excavation (ca. 5,000 m³); construction of a new GIS building covering a total area of about 700 m²; construction of 500 kV cable ducts; demolition of the old
switchyard; mainly busbars, electrical equipment and air-insulated circuit breakers; and demolition
of pylons with conductors.
3. Around the switchyards, severe soil subsidence has been occurring over many years,
requiring major continuous remedial measures. This is due to an extensive salt dome in the
vicinity of the switchyards that destabilizes the ground conditions during snow melt and rain.
There are risks for both switchyards that a catastrophic event may occur at any time, thereby
destroying major parts of the switchgear. Ground stabilization measures are considered
impractical.
4. The Government of Tajikistan (the Government) considers reconstruction of these
switchyards to be an emergency project due to the deteriorating equipment and unstable
geological site conditions with the potential for a major loss of output from the Nurek HPP for
lengthy periods. A 2006 feasibility study recommended that the equipment in both switchyards be
retired, with new switchyards built on stable ground. The study recommended that the least-cost
option was to utilize a portion of the land where the existing 220 kV switchyard is currently located
for both new switchyards. The ground conditions of the proposed new site have been verified as
satisfactory by geological investigation. Gas-insulated switchgear technology, which uses
approximately 10% of the area required by conventional air-insulated switchgear technology, is
required due to the restricted area of the proposed new site.
5. The Government signed a loan agreement with the German Development Cooperation
through KreditanstaltfürWiederaufbau (Credit Institute for Reconstruction) in August 2008 for financing of the new 220 kV gas-insulated switchgear switchyard, with a projected completion
date of April 2011. The Project under Asian Development Bank (ADB) financing will complete the
required rehabilitation of the switchyards. The outcome will be a sustainable and reliable electricity
supply to support economic development. It will mitigate the risk of natural disasters disabling the
switchyard, and will stabilize the flow of electricity coming from the strategically important Nurek
HPP.
6. The project for reconstruction of the 500 kV switchyard at Nurek HPP comprises construction
of a new transformer substation with SF6 insulation and dismantling of the existing 500 kV
switchyard. Figure 1 below shows the project area.
3
3
Figure 1: Project Area
7. However, for many years, soil subsidence has been occurring around the substation site
which could result at any time in a collapse, with destruction of major parts of the substation and
power supply disruption, so relocation of the 500 kV transformer substation at Nurek HPP is of
critical.
8. A contract was signed on 06.10.2009 with the consultancy company FICHTNER (Germany).
A contract for project implementation was signed with ALSTOM (Germany) (Contractor) on
15.10.2011. Subcontracts for performance of Lot 1A and Lot 1B 2 were concluded with Integral,
for implementation of Lot 1B 1 with Tajikgidroenergostroy, for Lot 2 and Lot 3 with “Bozdemir”, and
for Lot 5 with “Zumrat”.
4
4
1.2. Objective and Methodology of Bi-Annual Report
9. In May 2011, an updated Initial Environmental Examination regarding the Nurek
Rehabilitation Project was prepared. This also contains an Environmental Management Plan (in
the following called EMP) stipulating mitigation and monitoring measures for the design,
construction, commissioning and operation phases. One of the requirements within this EMP is
that the construction contractor shall set up a safety plan to the construction activities. 2012
Alstom Grid GmbH, the contractor, has prepared a report called Health, Work and Environmental
Protection Planning ‘applied to the Nurek 500 kV GIS Project for the avoidance of risks to the health of the workforce on the job site as well as for the protection of the environment’ (in the
following called HSE Plan). The purpose of semi-annual environmental monitoring is to monitor
compliance of project activities with the EMP and the HSE Plan. The report covers July-December
2015.
10. Additionally, the purpose of this fourth bi-annual environmental monitoring report is to satisfy
the environmental safeguarding requirements of the Government of Tajikistan and the Asian
Development Bank (ADB) as well as to fulfill the requirements written into the loan document for
the Government (Open Stock Holding Company “BarqiTojik”, Ministry of Energy and Water Resources) of the Republic of Tajikistan.
11. The findings are based on a review of monthly engineering progress reports and quarterly
monitoring progress reports submitted by the Contractor (ALSTOM Grid GmbH, Germany), and
findings obtained during the supervision and monthly inspections by PMU environmental experts
for monitoring environmental impacts prepared fromJulytoDecember 2015. Further, the PMU
environmental specialists regularly supervised environmental monitoring of relevant parameters
administered by the Contractor (ALSTOM Grid GmbH) as well as additionally reviewed project
design, social and associated documents. The Contractor's environmental reports include
chapters for health, environment and labor safety.
1.3. Changes in Project Organization and Environmental Management Team
12. The Executing Agency (EA) is the Open Stock Holding Company “BarqiTojik” (BT). The EA has set up a Project Management Unit (PMU) to manage day-to-day coordination,
implementation, monitoring and administration activities of the project. The schematic below
shows the structure of the environmental management team.
5
5
Figure 2. Institutional Chart of the Environmental Safeguards Arrangement
13. As per TOR the Consultant has one international and one national expert foreseen for the
environmental matters of this project. The international expert of the Consultant has prepared of
the Consulting Services Contract an update of the IEE in May 2011. Within OSHC ‘Barki
Tojik/PMU’ an Environmental Monitoring Department exists that is in full operation. This department is responsible for the implementation of the mitigation and regular monitoring
measures as outlined in the IEE Report. In addition to his duties (as outlined in the TOR), the
international environmental expert of Fichtner is supporting PMU experts with annual inspections
and additional training on all environmental issues related to this project within the frame of the
available person-months.
14. In October 2012, the Social Sector and Environmental Monitoring Department within the
(PMU) consisted of 8 persons. Currently it consists of 5 specialists including Head of Department.
This department is responsible for all foreign financed projects except for one World Bank Energy
Loss Reduction Project that set up its own PMU. The Social Sector and Environmental Monitoring
Department shall: to ensure all statutory environmental submissions under CEP requirements and
other environmentally related legislation are fully implemented; to ensure all environmental
requirements and mitigation measures resulting from the environmental assessment of the project
are included in the contract prequalification and bidding documents for suppliers and contractors;
support the development of any additionally needed IEE and IEE requirements that become
apparent following fine tuning; provide training and project awareness for BarkiTojik PMU and
PIU staff and project stakeholders; communicate with the CEP and people affected by the Project;
initially supervise and monitor Contractor’s first construction measures; investigate complaints.
15. Current PMUES staff for EM and SS is as follows:
6
6
Table 1: PMU organizational arrangements for Environmental Monitoring
No Social Sector and Environmental Monitoring Department1 of PMUES
Name
1 Head of Department Mr. Sirojiddin Karimov
2 Main specialist on social and environmental issues Mr. Hisrav Sharipov
3 Main specialist on social and environmental issues Mr. Aziz Holov
4 Leading specialist on environmental issues Mr. Firuza Dusmatova 5 Leading specialist on environmental issues Ms. Shahlo Khokiroeva
16. One environmental specialist was appointed by the PMU to ensure project activities are in
compliance with the EMP, Mr. Aziz Kholov(tel. 985487378), responsible for EMP implementation.
17. For other positions, no changes to the project organization structure were made during this
reporting period. There were no changes to the CSC project organization team.
1.4. Relationships with Contractors, Owner and e.t.c.
18. During this reporting period, the PMU of Open Stock Holding Company “BarqiTojik” closely collaborated with ADB, Consultant (FICHTNER (Germany)) and the Contractor (Alstom Grid
(Germany)) to review the Environmental Reports for the Project. The Contractor submitted 6
progress reports and the Consultant submitted 2 quarterly reports over 6 months.
Communications with the PMU pass directly to and via Team Leader Mr. Urgenc and by e-mail
exchange.
1.5. Construction Activities and Project Progress during the Previous 6 Months
19. The construction activities in the previous six months are summarized below (Table 2).
Table 2: Construction activities implemented during reporting period No Month Construction activities
1 July 2015
ECA equipment are supplied and installed in the Regar substation. The cable connection of this equipment will be soon.
ECA equipment is supplied at the site and cable connection is under progress.
Outdoor cable terminal coupling for G3 and G4 on behind of HPP’s building are completed and energized via new GIS 500kV.
The cabling between the ECA and protection room in the control building is under the progress
The handing over of ventilation and air conditioning system is completed
Investigation and handing over of construction works are completed, nearly
The cabling of HV G5 and G6 is under the progress.
2 August
2015
ECA equipment already supplied and installed at the Regar substation. The wire and cable connection of this equipment are under the progress.
Testing of new installed ETN L-505 at the 500kV Switchyard of Nurek HPP
Dismantling of old disconnection switch on the L-505 at the 500kV
1 It is also commonly referred to as “Monitoring Department”
7
7
Switchyard.
Installation, cabling and cable laying to new installed arresters and ETH on the L-505 at the 500kV Switchyard.
The inspection and training on the fire-warning system
Training on the low current lighting in the hall/basement of GIS and south tunnels
clearing and painting of gate
The spare parts handing over are under the progress.
3 September
2015
ECA equipment already supplied and installed at the Regar substation. The wire and cable connection of this equipment are under the progress
ECA equipment is supplied at the site and wire and cable connection are under the progress.
The connection of outdoor lighting at the AT-1 territory is completed
The installation of DC and AC equipment in the HPP’s building – works were continued after signing of Amendment No.09, Battery system 2
The cabling of between ECA and protection room and control building
Installation of line trap, ETH for section A, L-505 is completed
Dismantling of existing equipment in the Section A, L-505 at the Regar substation and installation of new equipment with relevant tests is completed
Investigation and handing over of construction works are completed, nearly
4 October
2015
Installation of new equipment and main connection at the Switchyard of Nurek HPP is completed and L-505 is energized.
Cable terminal coupling and testing of partial discharge for HV cables G5 and G6 are completed
Cabling and wiring in the ECA panels at the Nurek HPP and Regar substation are completed
Investigation of soil at the old 500kV substation at the Nurek HPP is completed
Dismantling of old circuit breaker at the old 500kV Switchyard of Nurek HPP
Contractor continues to eliminate a notes on the outstanding items
Commissioning of ECA at the Nurek HPP and Regar substation is completed, almost.
Re-energizing of L-505 via GIS, including G5-G6 and AT-1 is completed.
5 November
2015
Contractor continues to eliminate the notes on the outstanding items.For example:
Fill up holes in fire separation walls.
Cleaning of cable channels
Installation of protection device on disconnectors.
Final cleaning of tunnel from rubbish and lumbers
6 December
2015
Gravel alignment and cleaning of the remaining construction waste.
Painting of ground floor in the building of 500 kVGIS.
Repairing the battery room and repair the system 1.
Final cleaning of tunnel from rubbish and lumbers.
8
8
20. The works for installation of the lighting and air systems are now completed and works for
installation of gas-insulated switchgear equipment in the SF6 GISbuilding are continued. At the
present time, the company "Integral" has completed the civil works under Lot 1 A and Lot 1B2.
21. Under Lot 1B1, «Tajikhydroenergostroi» has executed the civil works at the cable tunnel to a distance of 120 m, which is 100% of the total work.
22. The civil works under Lot 2 for the cable tunnel and basement construction and steel GIS
building under Lot 3 were completedto 100% by «Bozdemir».
23. Construction works on Lot 5 comprising construction of the foundations for the single
installation of outdoor equipment were completed to 100% by "Zumrat."
24. Work on complex recultivation at the Nurek substation – the works for planting trees are
completed-100%. The subcontract company “Suman” was involved for carrying out of this works.
1.5.1. Construction facilities
a. Construction camp
25. The project is being implemented on HPP property. This is well laid out and has own quite
sound infrastructure. Hence, no additional construction camp has been set up under the project,
and engineering personnel as well as construction workers use the existing facilities. The HPP
compound is fenced and only authorized persons are permitted to enter.
26. 150 persons are involved to this construction project of which 120 are local residents who live
in their own houses. Others rent apartments in the Nurek. No separate construction camp has
been set up.
27. Canteen and kitchen facilities are located in the HPP compound, as well as sanitary
installations, showers and a medical unit. The photographs below show the condition of these
facilities in reporting period.
Figure 3. Canteen and kitchen
9
9
Figure 4. Bathroom and medical unit
b. Warehouse facility
28. Under the Project warehouse facilities for materials of the switchyard are needed. For this
purpose, the construction contractor uses the warehouse in the HPP compound, in which mainly
construction supplies are stored, together with rented warehouse space 2 km from the HPP for
storing spare parts. This warehouse facility is located on open as well as enclosed plots (Figure 5)
Figure 5: Temporary warehouse for switchyard facilities
10
10
c. Construction site
29. As noted above, the HPP compound is well fenced, it has security guards and only authorized
persons have access. Construction sites within the HPP compound are separated by temporary
lattice and wooden fencing (Figure 6 below).
Figure 6.Fencing at construction sites
30. Construction and demolition wastes are generated in the course of ongoing works, which are
managed collected, transported and disposed of in compliance with IEE requirements.
31. An agreement has been concluded and still is acting with a local company for the removal of
municipal waste and this company disposes of the wastes in the Nurek municipal waste landfill,
which is located at the distance of 3.5 km from the construction site.
32. The construction works involve disposal of spoil (inert waste). The spoil bank is located just
outside the Nurek HPP compound in an area that was once the borrow area for excavating
materials for construction of the dam body (Figure 7).
33. Figure 7 below shows the Google image of the spoil material location near the HPP, which is
in compliance with EMP requirements.
11
11
Figure 7. Spoil and inert materials location – in compliance with EMP requirements
34. Equipment after dismantling of distributing system can be used as spare parts in other
Switchyard in Tajikistan. As for the ferrous and small amounts of non-ferrous scrap – steel,
copper, and aluminum – these thingswill be sold to local recycling companies.
35. The sewerage system of the hydro power station is linked to the Nurek municipal sewerage
system. Sanitary facilities – toilets, bath, washing sinks – are installed and are in compliance with
EMP/HSE Plan requirements (see Figure 9 below).
36. No any oil leakages/spillagewere observedat the project site.
Figure 8. Sanitary
facilities for project
workers with fire
extinguisher
12
12
37. There are various types and classes of waste arising during construction, and these are
disposed of temporarily on construction sites. The territory should be located on the secondary
protective covering, for allocation of toxic wastes. The area should be roofed. All storage areas
should be fenced according to the requirements.
38. Contractor was advised to undertake the appropriate measures for proper storage of specific
wastes.
1.5.2. Construction activities
a. Civil works for 500 kV cable tunnels
39. The figures below show the status of the works during the reporting period. No accidents
were reported. Necessary arrangements like setting up warning signs and fencing, and issuing
protective clothing and equipment to the workers in accordance with EMP/HSE Plan requirements
were observed.
Figure 9. Civil works status – mainly in compliance with EMP/HSE Plan requirements
Figure 10 .Switchingonofnewequipmentbehind of HPP’s building on the G5/6-in compliance with EMP/HSE Plan requirements
13
13
b. Erection of gas-insulated facility in the 500 kV insulated switchgear/control gear building (SF6 Switchgear)
40. All environmental requirements for the mentioned works were followed, like setting up
warning signs, issuing safety instructions, providing protective closing and equipment, daily
induction training for the workers, and fire prevention measures. The figures below show the
progress and status of project construction works.
Figure 11. Erection of gas-insulated facility in the 500 kV insulated switchgear/control gear building – in
compliance with EMP/HSE Plan requirements
41. The installation works on cable laying for ECA system at “Regar” substation are carrying out (see. Fig. 12 below)
Рису к 12. CablelayingforECAsystemattheRegarsubstation– in compliancewithEMP/HSE Plan
requirements
42. Protection measures can be seen in more detail in the figures below.
14
14
Figure 13. Protective and fire prevention measures are currently in compliance with EMP/HSE Plan
requirements
c. Construction of 500 kV GIS building
43. Construction of the GIS building is proceeding in compliance with the principal EMP/HSE Plan
requirements: fencing of construction plots, setting up warning signs, and safety training for
the workforce.
Figure 14. Protection measures for construction of the 500 kV GIS building
44. The Contractor showed evidence of attendance at training sessions by books containing the
workers’ signatures (see Figure 15 below).
15
15
Figure 15. Attendance book for safety instruction sessions for the workers
II. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING
2.1. Noise and Vibration
45. Construction equipment used for excavation and foundation works was equipped with
silencers or mufflers.
46. According to EMP requirements, noise level measuring shall be carried out at the main
construction work locations.
47. During the reporting period noise level measurements were conducted by relevant
equipment. Data on noise level are shown in Table 3 below:
Table 3. Noise Level Monitoring Data
Month: October Year: 2015
No. Location Noise National Standards in dBA (max)
Monitoring data
07.00-23.00 23.00-7.00 Time measurement diapason
11.00-12.00
1 500kV GIS building 80 80 70-72
2 Near Autotransformer
80 80 75-78
500kV cable tunnels 80 80 65-70
Standards: 55-45 dBA (max) - Residential area 75-75 dBA (max) - Commercial area 80-80 dBA (max) - Industrial area 50-40 dBA (max) - Hospitals 55-55 dBA (max) - Schools, Library
48. It should be noted that all construction works take place on the Nurek HPP property at an
appropriate distance from human settlements. Installation works do not give rise to high levels of
16
16
noise. However, the Consultant did recommend conducting routine noise level measurements at
selected construction site locations by procurement of noise meters or by contracting an analytical
laboratory, so as to record monitoring data for period under report.
49. Regarding vibration, no cracks or other damage to buildings and facilities were observed
during the site visits conducted during the reporting period.
2.2. Water Quality
50. According to EMP/HSE Plan,no water quality monitoring is needed as all construction is
proceeding within the boundaries of the Nurek HPP property, and the project works do not
additionally contaminate the water sources.
2.3. Air Quality
51. In the dry season, the approach roads and sites should be watered in order to avoid dusting.
2.4. Flora and Fauna Monitoring
52. No disturbance to fauna was observed during the reporting period as, within the area of the
project site, there are no protected areas or environmentally sensitive habitats.
53. As it was described in previous bi-annual report duringthe constructing of GIS building and
cable channels, about 25 shrubs of Euonymus gen. were removed. This vegetation type is shown
below. These shrubs have no high environmental value and can be easily replanted. Early,
Contractor was advised to undertake replanting after the completion of cable tunnels works –in
November-December 2014 or in February-March 2015. Howeverduetodelay the measures to
restore landscaping were decided to postpone to the autumn season 2015. The complex
restoration of area was performed in reporting period.
Figure 16.Type of shrubs removed during
civil works for the cable tunnels
17
17
Picture17. Lawn planting
Picture 18. Watering of grass on re-storated sutes
2.5. Monitoring of Occupational Health and Safety, and HIV-AIDS Issues
54. No accidents were registered during the reporting period. Relevant measures were
undertaken by contractors during implementation of project works to comply with all the
requirements and measures for the protection of occupational health and safety:
The Contractor developed and had approved a safety training program, consisting of an initial course on health and safety. All workers attended the safety training courses starting from the first week of occupancy of the construction camps. Technical safety instructions courses wereheldon a monthly basis.
Workers and engineers were issued with protective equipment and clothing, e.g. helmets, special work wear, safety belts, gloves, protective glasses etc. in good time. A first aidcenter has been equipped. Air conditioning and heating is provided within the building, when it is needed.
In the March 2014, Contractor has conduct first training on HIV / AIDS. Trainings are conducted with three months intervals, regularly.
Briefingson technicalsafety, labor and environmental protection (including electro-magnetic fields) are held for the workforce on a daily basis.
Arrangements have been made for proper sanitary facilities.
18
18
III. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
3.1. EMP, SSEMP and Work Plans
55. Assessment of compliance with the Environment Management Plan (EMP) and the
Constructor’s Health, Work and Environmental Protection Planning (HSE Plan) commenced with a review of the environmental management requirementsfor compliance during the construction
stage of the project.
56. The Contractor submitted 6 progress reports with HSE sections for July-December 2015.
3.2. Site Inspections and Audits
57. Six site inspections and audits were conducted to verify the effectiveness of environmental
protection measures in achieving the results specified in the EMP and HSE Plan during the
reporting period and starting from July 2015 (22.07.2015, 19.08.2015, 16.09.2015, 21.10.2015,
25.11.2015, 16.12.2015). During the inspections, visual surveys on site as well as meetings with
workers, the Contractor, engineers and specialists were conducted.
3.3. Non- Compliance Notices
58. Non-compliance notices were issued as follows:
The Contractor’s progress reports should contain more details on health, safety and
environmental issues;
59. More detailed recommendations to correct the notes with indication of authorized persons
are submitted in the Correction Action Plan (para 3.6.).
3.4 Consultation and Complaints
59 Any complaints were received from the workers and beneficiaries during the reporting
period.
3.5 Non-compliance notices fulfillment
60 The action to resolve the non-objection, referred in the last bi-annual report is showed in Schedule 4above.
Table 4: Status of fulfillment of non-compliance notices
No Environmental issues identified
Corrective actions to be taken Deadlines to resolve the
issues
Status of fulfillment
1 Insufficient details of
HSE issues in the
Contractor’s progress
reports
The Contractor’s progress reports should contain more details of health, safety and environmental issues: - waste management - flora monitoring - warning signs, other protective measures
With progress report for July 2015
Fulfilled
2 Some shrubs
wereremoved during
the cable tunnel works
Shrubs should be replanted-preferably in October-November 2015
October-November 2015
Partially performed
19
19
3.6 Corrective Action Plan
61. Detailed corrective action plan, coordinated with the PMU and the Contractor, is set out in
Table 5 below.
Table 5: Corrective Action Plan – December 2015
No Environmental
issues identified Corrective actions to be taken
Deadlines to resolve issues
Responsibilities for implementation/sup
ervision
1 Special number of
scrubs were removed
during cable laying of
cable tunnels
Shrubs should be planted again - preferably before April 2016
March 2016
Contractor
2 Final audit of
completed
construction sites
Final environmental audit will be conducted for completed construction sites and filled check-lists amended to the Final environmental monitoring report for January-June 2016
March-June 2016 PMUES ES, representatives (HSE specialist) of Contractor