Environmental impact assessment of man-made cellulose ... · World fibre production 1920-2005...
Transcript of Environmental impact assessment of man-made cellulose ... · World fibre production 1920-2005...
Environmental impact assessment of man-made cellulose fibres and
recycled polyester fibre
Dr. Li Shen ([email protected]) LEI, Wageningen University and Research Centre
(Formally Department of Science, Technology and Society (STS), Copernicus Institute, Utrecht University)
[avniR] LCA in business Conference 2011
3-4 November 2011 Lille, France
Copernicus Institute Research Institute for Sustainable Development and Innovation
Part I Comparative LCA of man-made
cellulose fibres Published in Resources, Conservation and
Recycling (2010) 55:34-52.
2
World fibre production 1920-2005 (kton)
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
1915 1925 1935 1945 1955 1965 1975 1985 1995 2005
Cotton
Synthetic (petro-based)
Man-made cellulosic
Why man-made cellulose fibres are interesting?
So
urc
es: U
SD
A (
20
06
), J
CF
A (
20
06
), U
llma
nn
(1
99
7),
Te
xtile
on
line
lib
rary
(2
00
6)
3
LCA of man-made cellulose fibres
• Goal:
1) assess the impacts of man-made cellulose fibres;
2) compare with cotton, PET and PP.
• Functional unit:
– 1 metric tonne of staple fibre
• System boundary:
– cradle-to-factory gate
– cradle-to-factory gate plus post-consumer waste incineration with energy recovery
4
Man-made cellulose fibres - Viscose Asia - Viscose Austria - Modal - Tencel - Tencel 2012 Cotton (US and China) PET and PP fibres (Western Europe) (PLA)
Lenzing data
Literature data
Types of fibre and data sources
5
Viscose, Modal and Tencel
Fibre name Pulp source Process Process energy
Viscose Asia Market Pulp
Separate
production
Local electricity, coal, gas,
oil
Viscose Austria Lenzing Pulp
Integrated
production - Biomass
- Energy from MSWI
- Fossil fuels Modal
Lenzing Pulp Integrated
production
Tencel
Mixed
Market pulp &
Lenzing pulp
Separate
production
- Biomass (30%)
- Natural gas (70%)
Tencel, 2012 - Energy from MSWI
(100%)
6
Net NREU (GJ/t fibre), Cradle-to-factory gate plus post-consumer waste incineration with energy recovery
(recovery rate = 60%primary energy)
Cotton (U
S&CN)
PET (W.Europe)
PP (W.Europe)
PLA fibre, w
ithout w
ind
PLA fibre, w
ith w
ind
Lenzing Viscose Asia
Tencel, Austria
Lenzing Modal
Tencel, Austria
, 2012
Lenzing Viscose Austria-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
Net NREU
Net NREU, lower range
Net NREU, higher range93
85
62
43
2536 22 19
-10 -14
-29
-9 -9 -9 -9 -9
Cradle-to-factory gate
Recovered energy from
waste incineration
(energy recovery rate 60%)
Cotton: 26
-11 -11
66
39
7
Environmental impact categories (CML) Cradle-to-factory gate, 1 tonne fibre (cotton = 100)
abiotic depletio
n
ozone layer d
epletion
human toxicity
fresh w
ater aquatic
ecotox.
terrestria
l ecotoxicity
photochemical oxidant fo
rmatio
n
acidificatio
n
eutrophicatio
n0%
50%
100%
150%
200%
250%
300%
Cotton
PET
PP
Lenzing Viscose Asia
Lenzing Viscose Austria
Lenzing Modal
Tencel Austria
Tencel Austria 2012
8
Cotton (U
S&CN)
Lenzing V
iscose A
sia
PET fibre
(W.E
U)
PP fibre
(W.E
U)
Tencel, Austri
a
Lenzing M
odal
Lenzing V
iscose A
ustria
Tencel, Austri
a 2012
NO
GE
PA
Sin
gle
-sc
ore
po
ints
(Fir
st
no
rma
lise
d t
o W
orl
d 1
995
)
0
1050
60
70
80
90
100
Global warming
Abiotic depletion
Ozone layer depletion
Human toxicity
Fresh water ecotoxicity
Terrestrial ecotoxicity
Photochemical oxidation
Acidification
Eutrophication
Single-score result (III) NOGEPA weighting factors (normalised to world) 1 tonne fibre, cradle-to-factory gate, cotton =100
Weighting factors (NOGEPA)
Climate Change 32
Abiotic depletion* 8
Ozone layer depletion 5
Human toxicity 16
Fresh water ecotoxicity 6
Terrestrial ecotoxicity 5
Photochemical oxidation 8
Acidification 6
Eutrophication 13
Total 99
Source: Huppes et al (2003), except for abiotic depletion (marked with *), which is not excluded by Huppes et al. and is determined based on own estimation.
9
Part II LCA of bottle-to-fibre (B2F) recycling
Published in Resources, Conservation and Recycling (2010) 55:34-52.
Product systems (FU = 1 metric tonne of fibre)
Product systems Type of fibre Location Data sources
1.Mechanical
recycling Staple W. Europe Company data
2. Semi-mechanical
recycling Filament (POY) E. Asia Company data
3. Back-to-oligomer
(BHET) recycling Filament (POY) E. Asia Company data
4. Back-to-monomer
(DMT) recycling Filament (POY) W.Europe Literature data
Ref. Virgin PET fibre Staple/Filament W.Europe Literature data
11
Allocation: open-loop recycling
• Cut-off approach: – The first life (bottle) does not have influence on the
second life (fibre)
• Waste valuation approach: – Bottle waste contains part of the burden from first life
(economic allocation)
• System expansion approach: – Do not distinguish first and second life, but do assume
products from 1st and 2nd life are functional equivalent
– Do take into account the “grave” stage
12
Cradle-to-factory gate NREU & GWP100a based on the “cut-off” method
Mech. recyc
ling (s
taple)
Semi-mech. re
cyclin
g (POY)
Chem. recyc
ling (B
HET route, P
OY)
Chem. recyc
ling (D
MT route,POY)
V-PET (W
.EU, staple/POY)
GJ/t
0
20
40
60
80
100
13
23
39
51
95
Mech. recyc
ling (s
taple)
Semi-mech. re
cyclin
g (POY)
Chem. recyc
ling (B
HET route, P
OY)
Chem. recyc
ling (D
MT route,POY)
V-PET (W
.EU, staple/POY)
kg
CO
2 e
q./
t0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
960
1,880
2,590
3,080
4,062
NREU (GJ/t) GWP (kg CO2 eq./t)
13
Cradle-to-factory gate NREU & GWP100a Based on the “waste valuation” method
Mech. recyc
ling (s
taple)
Semi-mech. re
cyclin
g (POY)
Chem. recyc
ling (B
HET route, P
OY)
V-PET (W
.EU, staple/POY)
GJ/t
0
20
40
60
80
100
NREU based on "cut-off"approach
Shifted energy from the first life
26
26
26
13
23
40
95
Mech. recyc
ling (s
taple)
Semi-mech. re
cyclin
g (POY)
Chem. recyc
ling (B
HET route, P
OY)
V-PET (W
.EU, staple/POY)
kg C
O2 e
q./
t0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
GWP based on cut-off approach
Shifted GWP from the first life
960
1,880
2,590
4,060
1,070
1,070
1,070
NREU (GJ/t) GWP (kg CO2 eq./t)
14
NREU and GWP100a (cradle to grave excl. use phase)
Virgin PET
(staple&POY)
Mechanical
recycling
(Staple)
Semi-
mechanical
recycling (POY)
Chemical
recycling, back
to BHET (POY)
VPET fibre
RPET fibre
Incineration with credits
79
23
33
48
Virgin PET
(staple&POY)
Mechanical
recycling (Staple)
Semi-mechanical
recycling (POY)
Chemical recycling,
back to BHET
(POY)
Incineration with credits
VPET fibre
RPET fibre
5,540
1,330
2,210
2,820
NREU (GJ/t) GWP (kg CO2 eq./t)
15
Bio-based and recycled polymers for cleaner production
An assessment of plastics and fibres
http://igitur-archive.library.uu.nl/dissertations/2011-0308-200310/UUindex.html