Environmental Economics. Cost of Reducing Pollution Pollution Reduction MAC a CaCa PaPa Greater...

22
Environmental Economics
  • date post

    22-Dec-2015
  • Category

    Documents

  • view

    218
  • download

    0

Transcript of Environmental Economics. Cost of Reducing Pollution Pollution Reduction MAC a CaCa PaPa Greater...

Environmental Economics

Cost of Reducing Pollution

Pollution Reduction

MACa

Ca

PaGreater Abatement

A

Total abatementCosts =Area A$

Command and control

• Legislate emission levels– All firms required to reduce pollution to

specific levels

• ef is maximum pollution

• Forced to cut in half (0.5ef)

• What are costs of abatement?

Firm 1

$

Firm 2

Abatement

Total abatement for firm 1 Total abatement for firm 2

$

(Low cost firm)

(High cost firm)

MAC1

MAC2

.5ef

C1

C2

(ef,0)(0,ef)

Firm 1

$

Firm 2

Abatement

.5ef

$

Ce

a b

d

f

g

C2

C1

Total abatementCosts = a+d+f+b+g

Taxes

• Instead of command and control, why not tax emission

• Requires continuous monitoring

• In this case, Ce is per unit tax

• Two characteristics– Equal cost at the margin for both firms– Will show it holds total pollution constant to

command and control levels

Firm 1

$

Firm 2

Abatement

.5ef

$

Ce

a b

d

f

g

C2

C1

Total abatementCosts = a+d+f+b+g

Firm 1

$

Firm 2

Abatement

.5ef

$

Ce

a b g

C2

C1

Total abatementCosts = a+b+g

Ce

e1

Total cost savings=d+f

d

f

Taxes paid, Firm 1

Taxes paid,Firm 2

Firm 1

$

Firm 2

Abatement

.5ef

$

Ce

Ce

a b

d

f

g

C2

C1

Firm 1

$

Firm 2

Abatement

.5ef

$

Ce

Ce

a b

d

f

g

C2

C1

e1

Cap and trade

• Start with command and control levels– Receive permit to pollute 0.5ef

– must abate 0.5ef

• However, you can increase pollution levels only if you purchase the right to pollute from another manufacturer

• Who would sell their right to pollute? Who would purchase?

Firm 1

$

Firm 2

Abatement

.5ef

$

Ce

Ce

a b

d

f

g

C2

C1

e1

Firm 1

$

Firm 2

Abatement

.5ef

$

Ce

Ce

a b

d

f

g

C2

C1

e1

• Firm 2– Willing to pay area d+f+b for the right to

pollute more

• Firm 1– Needs b to increase pollution

• Trade will take place

• Notice that both firms are better off

• Costs of a abatement have fallen by d+f