English Relative Clauses Subject Relative –The reporter who attacked the senator didn’t check...
-
Upload
sharon-walton -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
0
Transcript of English Relative Clauses Subject Relative –The reporter who attacked the senator didn’t check...
![Page 1: English Relative Clauses Subject Relative –The reporter who attacked the senator didn’t check the facts carefully first. Object Relative –The reporter.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649f275503460f94c3f863/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
English Relative Clauses
• Subject Relative– The reporter who attacked the senator didn’t check
the facts carefully first.
• Object Relative– The reporter who the senator attacked didn’t check
the facts carefully first.
Lots of evidence that English speakers find SRs easier(from reading times, ERPs, fMRI, …)
![Page 2: English Relative Clauses Subject Relative –The reporter who attacked the senator didn’t check the facts carefully first. Object Relative –The reporter.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649f275503460f94c3f863/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Some Possible Reasons• Word order typicality
– SR has default SVO order in RC• reporter attacked senator didn’t …
– OR has 2 NPs in a row & then 2 verbs in a row• reporter senator attacked didn’t …
• SR has shorter distance from Head (= Filler) to typical location (= Gap) in sentence for its role
– Adds to working memory load & integration difficulty– Linear distance vs Structural distance
![Page 3: English Relative Clauses Subject Relative –The reporter who attacked the senator didn’t check the facts carefully first. Object Relative –The reporter.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649f275503460f94c3f863/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Filler-Gap Linear Distance
• Subject Relative– The reporter1 [who 1attacked the senator] didn’t …
FILLER GAP
• Object Relative– The reporter1 [who the senator attacked 1] didn’t …
FILLER GAP
![Page 4: English Relative Clauses Subject Relative –The reporter who attacked the senator didn’t check the facts carefully first. Object Relative –The reporter.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649f275503460f94c3f863/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Some Possible Reasons• Word order typicality
– SR has default SVO order in RC• reporter attacked senator didn’t …
– OR has 2 NPs in a row & then 2 verbs in a row• reporter senator attacked didn’t …
• SR has shorter distance from Head (= Filler) to typical location (= Gap) in sentence for its role
– Adds to working memory load & integration difficulty– Linear distance vs Structural distance
• When SR modifies subject of sentence (as in examples), Head plays more similar role in both clauses
– But, SRs also easier in English when modify main clause Object
• …
• Some of these are confounded in any one language, but can be deconfounded by comparing across languages
![Page 5: English Relative Clauses Subject Relative –The reporter who attacked the senator didn’t check the facts carefully first. Object Relative –The reporter.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649f275503460f94c3f863/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
RCs Across Languages • English
– SVO order, relatively inflexible– Arguments generally can’t be dropped, pronominalized instead– RC postnominal– Relative pronoun (usually) precedes RC, so (usually) no ambiguity about whether is a RC– ORs harder than SRs
• Japanese & Korean– SOV order, but flexible– Easily recoverable arguments can be dropped– RC prenominal– No relativizer, so temporary ambiguity about whether is a RC
• Case particles make noun roles clear, but there’s temporary ambiguity about whether they play those roles in the main clause or some kind of embedded clause
– Most evidence so far shows ORs harder than SRs, like English(Ishizuka et al., 2003; Miyamoto & Nakamura, 2003; Ueno & Garnsey, 2006; Kwon et al., in
press (Korean); but Ishizuka et al., 2006)
• Mandarin– SVO order, more flexible than English– Easily recoverable arguments can be dropped– RC prenominal– Relativizer follows RC, so temporary ambiguity about whether is a RC– Evidence so far mixed, but more find SRs harder than ORs (opposite English)
(Hsiao & Gibson, 2003; Hsu & Chen, 2009; Lin & Garnsey, 2010; Lin, 2010; but Lin & Bever, 2006)
![Page 6: English Relative Clauses Subject Relative –The reporter who attacked the senator didn’t check the facts carefully first. Object Relative –The reporter.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649f275503460f94c3f863/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
SR Modifying Main Clause Object: 新聞 已經 開始 詳細 報導 質詢 議員 的 官員 xinwen yijing kaishi xiangxi baodao zhixun yiyuan de quanyuan news already begin detail report interrogate councilman DE official
The news has already begun to report in detail about the official who interrogated the councilman.
OR Modifying Main Clause Object:新聞 已經 開始 詳細 報導 議員 質詢 的 官員 xinwen yijing kaishi xiangxi baodao yiyuan zhixun de quanyuan news already begin detail report councilman interrogate DE official
The news has already begun to report in detail about the official who the councilman interrogated.
Mandarin RCs
Lin & Garnsey, 2010; Lin, 2010
![Page 7: English Relative Clauses Subject Relative –The reporter who attacked the senator didn’t check the facts carefully first. Object Relative –The reporter.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649f275503460f94c3f863/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Mandarin RC ProcessingORs easier than SRs?(Hsiao & Gibson, 2003; Packard, 2005; Hsu & Chen, 2009; Lin, 2010; but Lin & Bever, 2006)
- ORs have default SVO argument order- ORs have shorter GAP-FILLER distance
… councilman interrogate ___1 DE official1 GAP FILLER
vs … ___1 interrogate councilman DE official1 GAP FILLER
- But effects often weak or absent in simple RCs
![Page 8: English Relative Clauses Subject Relative –The reporter who attacked the senator didn’t check the facts carefully first. Object Relative –The reporter.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649f275503460f94c3f863/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
SR vs OR Modifying Main Clause SubjectR
eadi
ng T
ime
(Mse
c)
SR: [like teacher DE girl ] already go home PERIODOR: [teacher like DE girl ] already go home PERIOD
** *
*
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
0
![Page 9: English Relative Clauses Subject Relative –The reporter who attacked the senator didn’t check the facts carefully first. Object Relative –The reporter.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649f275503460f94c3f863/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
SR vs OR with Classifier Modifying Main Clause Subject
** *
*
Rea
ding
Tim
e (M
sec)
SR: [That+CL like teacher DE girl ] already go home PERIODOR: [That+CL teacher like DE girl ] already go home PERIOD
* *
* *
1000
900
800
700
600
500
400
300
![Page 10: English Relative Clauses Subject Relative –The reporter who attacked the senator didn’t check the facts carefully first. Object Relative –The reporter.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649f275503460f94c3f863/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
SR vs OR Modifying Main Clause Object
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
MatObj_OR
MatOb_SR
SR: Parents invite like teacher DE girl periodOR: Parents invite teacher like DE girl period
SR: Parents invite [ like teacher DE girl] PERIODOR: Parents invite [teacher like DE girl] PERIOD
Rea
ding
Tim
e (M
sec)
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
0
**
**
![Page 11: English Relative Clauses Subject Relative –The reporter who attacked the senator didn’t check the facts carefully first. Object Relative –The reporter.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649f275503460f94c3f863/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
SR vs OR with Classifier Modifying Main Clause Object
*
Rea
ding
Tim
e (M
sec)
*
*
1000
900
800
700
600
500
400
300
SR: Parents invite [ that+CL like teacher DE girl] PERIODOR: Parents invite [that+CL teacher like DE girl] PERIOD
![Page 12: English Relative Clauses Subject Relative –The reporter who attacked the senator didn’t check the facts carefully first. Object Relative –The reporter.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649f275503460f94c3f863/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
OR with Classifier (& Pronoun) Modifying Main Clause Object
Rea
ding
Tim
e (M
sec)
*
*
1000
900
800
700
600
500
400
300
OR: Parents invite [that+CL teacher like DE girl] PERIODOR(Pron):Parents invite [that+CL we like DE girl] PERIODOR(Mis): Parents invite [that+*CL teacher like DE pet] PERIOD
*
![Page 13: English Relative Clauses Subject Relative –The reporter who attacked the senator didn’t check the facts carefully first. Object Relative –The reporter.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649f275503460f94c3f863/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Topicalization of Main Clause Object
Main clause objects can be topicalized by fronting- Regardless of whether the object is modified by a RC
OR Modifying Topicalized Main Clause Object:議員 質詢 的 官員 新聞 已經 開始 詳細 報導yiyuan zhixun de guanyuan xinwen yijing kaishi xiangxi baodaocouncilman interrogate DE official news already begin detail report
About the official who the councilman interrogated, the news has already begun to report in detail.
SR Modifying Topicalized Main Clause Object: 質詢 議員 的 官員 新聞 已經 開始 詳細 報導zhixun yiyuan de guanyuan xinwen yijing kaishi xiangxi baodaointerrogate councilman DE official news already begin detail report
About the official who interrogated the councilman, the news has already begun to report in detail.
![Page 14: English Relative Clauses Subject Relative –The reporter who attacked the senator didn’t check the facts carefully first. Object Relative –The reporter.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649f275503460f94c3f863/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Dropping the Head NounArguments that would be pronominalized in Eng can be dropped in Mandarin
- Including Head N of a RC - Which can be pronominalized as “the one” or “the person” in English- Relativizer DE remains when the HN is dropped
Headless Topicalized OR:議員 質詢 的 官員 新聞 已經 開始 詳細 報導yiyuan zhixun de guanyuan xinwen yijing kaishi xiangxi baodaocouncilman interrogate DE official news already begin detail report
About the person/one who the councilman interrogated, the news has already begun to report in detail.
Headless Topicalized SR: 質詢 議員 的 官員 新聞 已經 開始 詳細 報導zhixun yiyuan de guanyuan xinwen yijing kaishi xiangxi baodaointerrogate councilman DE official news already begin detail report
About the person/one who interrogated the councilman, the news has already begun to report in detail.
![Page 15: English Relative Clauses Subject Relative –The reporter who attacked the senator didn’t check the facts carefully first. Object Relative –The reporter.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649f275503460f94c3f863/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Ambiguity when Head N Dropped
in Topicalized OR In examples so far
- Main clause subject noun (news) is Inanimate - So it’s not a possible HN for either a SR or OR with verb interrogate
In contrast, when main clause subject noun is Animate (reporter)- Possible to mistake it as the HN of the RC
Headless Topicalized SR: 質詢 議員 的 官員 記者 已經 開始 詳細 報導zhixun yiyuan de guanyuan jizhe yijing kaishi xiangxi baodaointerrogate councilman DE official reporter already begin detail report
Do Mandarin speakers use Animacy information immediately to help them interpret ambiguous structural relationships in sentences?
- If yes, unlikely to mistake news as the HN, in spite of its position after DE- But are likely to mistake reporter in that position as HN
![Page 16: English Relative Clauses Subject Relative –The reporter who attacked the senator didn’t check the facts carefully first. Object Relative –The reporter.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649f275503460f94c3f863/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Possible Interpretations of Ambiguity
Headless Topicalized SR: 質詢 議員 的 官員 記者 已經 開始 詳細 報導zhixun yiyuan de guanyuan jizhe yijing kaishi xiangxi baodaointerrogate councilman DE official reporter already begin detail report
Multiple possible interpretations:
1. The reporter who interrogated the councilman has already begun to report about it in detail.
2. About the interrogation of the councilman (by someone unspecified), the reporter has already begun to report in detail.
…
![Page 17: English Relative Clauses Subject Relative –The reporter who attacked the senator didn’t check the facts carefully first. Object Relative –The reporter.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649f275503460f94c3f863/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Some Predictions
1. SRs harder to process than ORs (Hsiao & Gibson, 2003; see, however, Lin & Bever, 2006)
2. Sentences with Headless RCs harder to process than ones with Heads
3. Animate main clause subject nouns are more likely to be interpreted as the missing head in headless RCs and thus to show more processing difficulty when that turns out not to be true
![Page 18: English Relative Clauses Subject Relative –The reporter who attacked the senator didn’t check the facts carefully first. Object Relative –The reporter.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649f275503460f94c3f863/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Stimuli in Two Experiments
• 80 sets of 8 versions, all with topicalized main clause object modified by RC- OR vs SR (Both Expts)- HN Present vs HN Absent (Both Expts)- Main clause Subject Noun Animate (Expt 1) vs Inanimate (Expt 2)
• +60 distractor sentences
![Page 19: English Relative Clauses Subject Relative –The reporter who attacked the senator didn’t check the facts carefully first. Object Relative –The reporter.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649f275503460f94c3f863/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Participants
Native-Mandarin-speaking students at Taiwan
Normal University
- Varying degrees of fluency in other lgs, including English
- Experiment 1 = 40
- Experiment 2 = 48
![Page 20: English Relative Clauses Subject Relative –The reporter who attacked the senator didn’t check the facts carefully first. Object Relative –The reporter.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649f275503460f94c3f863/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Procedure
- Self-paced central word-by-word reading, each word replacing previous one
- Yes/No comprehension questions after 23% (Expt 1)
& 37% (Expt 2) of trials
- Presented in Chinese characters
- Native-Mandarin-speaking experimenter conducted session entirely in Mandarin
![Page 21: English Relative Clauses Subject Relative –The reporter who attacked the senator didn’t check the facts carefully first. Object Relative –The reporter.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649f275503460f94c3f863/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
![Page 22: English Relative Clauses Subject Relative –The reporter who attacked the senator didn’t check the facts carefully first. Object Relative –The reporter.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649f275503460f94c3f863/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
![Page 23: English Relative Clauses Subject Relative –The reporter who attacked the senator didn’t check the facts carefully first. Object Relative –The reporter.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649f275503460f94c3f863/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
![Page 24: English Relative Clauses Subject Relative –The reporter who attacked the senator didn’t check the facts carefully first. Object Relative –The reporter.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649f275503460f94c3f863/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
![Page 25: English Relative Clauses Subject Relative –The reporter who attacked the senator didn’t check the facts carefully first. Object Relative –The reporter.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649f275503460f94c3f863/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Summary of Results & Some Interpretation
• Mandarin SRs are harder than ORs, opposite the pattern for English– Higher memory load &/or integration difficulty due to word order in SR
because of Head-Final order of Mandarin RC– Difference lasts until end of sentence when RC Head Noun & main
clause Subject Noun both Animate– But disappears after main clause Subject Noun when it’s Inanimate
• Probably because that makes it less confusable with RC Head Noun(Warren & Gibson,
2002; Lewis et al., 2006)
• Headless RCs harder than RCs with overt Heads, but an Inanimate main clause Subject Noun makes them MUCH easier– Helps immediately to rule out alternative interpretations that are possible
when both Ns Animate
• Thus, Mandarin speakers do make immediate use of plausibility to resolve structural ambiguity