Engineering Renal

download Engineering Renal

of 7

Transcript of Engineering Renal

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Renal

    1/7

    Contents

    60.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 869

    60.2 Basic Components . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 869

    60.3 Approaches for Renal Tissue Regeneration 870

    60.3.1 Developmental Approaches . . . . . . . . . . . . . 870

    60.3.2 Tissue Engineering Approaches . . . . . . . . . 871

    60.4 Regeneration of Functional Tissue In Vivo 872

    60.5 Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 874

    References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 874

    individuals. Although dialysis can prolong survival

    via ltration, other kidney functions are not replaced,

    leading to long-term consequences such as anemiaand malnutrition [2, 3, 7]. Currently, renal transplan-

    tation is the only denitive treatment that can restore

    full kidney function. However, transplantation has

    several limitations, such as critical donor shortage,

    complications due to chronic immunosuppressive

    therapy and graft failure [2, 3, 7].

    The limitations of current therapies for renal

    failure have led investigators to explore the devel-

    opment of alternative therapeutic modalities that

    could improve, restore, or replace renal function.

    The emergence of cell-based therapies using tissueengineering and regenerative medicine strategies has

    presented alternative possibilities for the manage-

    ment of pathologic renal conditions [1, 713]. The

    concept of kidney cell expansion followed by cell

    transplantation using tissue engineering and regen-

    erative medicine techniques has been proposed as a

    method to augment either isolated or total renal func-

    tion. Despite the fact that the kidney is considered to

    be one of the more challenging organs to regenerate

    and/or reconstruct, investigative advances made to

    date have been promising [8, 1012].

    60.2

    Basic Components

    The unique structural and cellular heterogeneity

    present within the kidney creates many challenges

    for tissue regeneration. The system of nephrons and

    60.1

    Introduction

    The kidney is a vital and complex organ that per-

    forms many critical functions [13]. It is responsible

    for ltering the bodys wastes, such as urea, from the

    blood and excreting them as urine. In addition to the

    excretory function, the kidney maintains the bodys

    homeostasis by regulating acid-base balance, bloodpressure, and plasma volume. Moreover, it synthe-

    sizes 1, 25 vitamin D3, erythropoietin, glutathione,

    and free radical scavenging enzymes. It is also known

    that the kidney participates in the catabolism of low

    molecular weight proteins and in the production and

    regulation of cytokines [46].

    There are many conditions where the kidney

    functions are diminished and these lead to renal

    failure. End stage renal failure is a devastating con-

    dition which involves multiple organs in affected

    Regeneration of Renal Tissues

    T. Aboushwareb, J. J. Yoo, A. Atala

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Renal

    2/7

    collecting ducts within the kidney is composed of

    multiple functionally and morphologically distinct

    segments. For this reason, appropriate conditions

    need to be provided for the long-term survival, dif-

    ferentiation, and growth of many types of cells. Re-

    cent efforts in the area of kidney tissue regeneration

    have focused on the development of a reliable cellsource [1419]. In addition, optimal growth condi-

    tions have been extensively investigated to provide

    an adequate enrichment to achieve stable renal cell

    expansion systems [2024].

    Isolation of particular cell types that produce spe-

    cic factors, such as erythropoietin, may be a good

    approach for selective cell therapies. However, to-

    tal renal function would not be achieved using this

    approach. To create kidney tissue that would deliver

    full renal function, a culture containing all of the cell

    types comprising the functional nephron units shouldbe used. Optimal culture conditions to nurture renal

    cells have been extensively studied and the cells

    grown under these conditions have been reported

    to maintain their cellular characteristics [25]. Fur-

    thermore, renal cells placed in a three-dimensional

    culture environment are able to reconstitute renal

    structures.

    Recent investigative efforts in the search for a re-

    liable cell source have been expanded to stem and

    progenitor cells. The use of these cells for tissue re-

    generation is attractive due to their ability to differen-tiate and mature into specic cell types required for

    regeneration. This is particularly useful in instances

    where primary renal cells are unavailable due to ex-

    tensive tissue damage. Bone marrow-derived human

    mesenchymal stem cells have been shown to be a po-

    tential source because they can differentiate into sev-

    eral cell lineages [14, 15, 18]. These cells have been

    shown to participate in kidney development when

    they are placed in a rat embryonic niche that allows

    for continued exposure to a repertoire of nephrogenic

    signals [19]. These cells, however, were found tocontribute mainly to regeneration of damaged glom-

    erular endothelial cells after injury. In addition, the

    major cell source of kidney regeneration was found

    to originate from intrarenal cells in an ischemic renal

    injury model [14, 17]. Another potential cell source

    for kidney regeneration is circulating stem cells,

    which have been shown to transform into tubular and

    glomerular epithelial cells, podocytes, mesangial

    cells, and interstitial cells after renal injury [15, 16,

    2630]. These observations suggest that controlling

    stem and progenitor cell differentiation may lead to

    successful regeneration of kidney tissues.

    Although isolated renal cells are able to retain

    their phenotypic and functional characteristics in

    culture, transplantation of these cells in vivo may not

    result in structural remodeling that is appropriate forkidney tissue. In addition, cell or tissue components

    cannot be implanted in large volumes as diffusion

    of oxygen and nutrients is limited [31]. Thus, a cell-

    support matrix, preferably one that encourages an-

    giogenesis, is necessary to allow diffusion across the

    entire implant. A variety of synthetic and naturally

    derived materials have been examined in order to de-

    termine the ideal support structures for regeneration

    [9, 3235]. Biodegradable synthetic materials, such

    as poly-lactic and poly-glycolic acid polymers, have

    been used to provide structural support for cells.Synthetic materials can be easily fabricated and con-

    gured in a controlled manner, which make them at-

    tractive options for tissue engineering. However, nat-

    urally derived materials, such as collagen, laminin,

    and bronectin, are much more biocompatible and

    provide a similar extracellular matrix environment to

    normal tissue. For this reason, collagen-based scaf-

    folds have been used in many applications [3639].

    60.3

    Approaches for Renal

    Tissue Regeneration

    60.3.1

    Developmental Approaches

    Transplantation of a kidney precursor, such as the

    metanephros, into a diseased kidney has been pro-posed as a possible method for achieving functional

    restoration. In an animal study, human embryonic

    metanephroi, transplanted into the kidneys of an im-

    mune decient mouse model, developed into mature

    kidneys [40]. The transplanted metanephroi pro-

    duced urine-like uid but failed to develop ureters.

    This study suggests that development of an in vitro

    system in which metanephroi could be grown may

    lead to transplant techniques that could produce a

    870 T. Aboushwareb, J. J. Yoo, A. Atala

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Renal

    3/7

    small replacement kidney within the host. In another

    study, the metanephros was divided into mesenchy-

    mal tissue and ureteral buds, and each of the tissue

    segments was cultured in vitro [41]. After 8 days in

    culture, each portion of the mesenchymal tissues had

    grown to the original size. A similar method was

    used for ureteral buds, which also propagated. Theseresults indicate that if the mesenchyme and ureteral

    buds were placed together and cultured in vitro, a

    metanephros-like structure would develop. This sug-

    gests that the metanephros could be propagated un-

    der optimal conditions.

    In another study, transplantation of metanephroi

    into a nonimmunosuppressed rat omentum showed

    that the implanted metanephroi are able to undergo

    differentiation and growth that is not conned by a

    tight organ capsule [42]. When the metanephroi with

    an intact ureteric bud were implanted, the metanephroiwere able to enlarge and become kidney-shaped tis-

    sue within 3 weeks. The metanephroi transplanted

    into the omentum were able to develop into kidney

    tissue structures with a well-dened cortex and me-

    dulla. Mature nephrons and collecting system struc-

    tures are shown to be indistinguishable from those of

    normal kidneys by light or electron microscopy [43].

    Moreover, these structures become vascularized via

    arteries that originate at the superior mesenteric ar-

    tery of the host [43]. It has been demonstrated that

    the metanephroi transplanted into the omentum sur-vive for up to 32 weeks post implantation [44]. These

    studies show that the developmental approach may

    be a viable option for regenerating renal tissue for

    functional restoration.

    60.3.2

    Tissue Engineering Approaches

    The ability to grow and expand cells is one of the

    essential requirements in engineering tissues. The

    feasibility of achieving renal cell growth, expansion,

    and in vivo reconstitution using tissue engineering

    techniques was investigated [9]. Donor rabbit kid-

    neys were removed and perfused with a nonoxide

    solution which promoted iron particle entrapment in

    the glomeruli. Homogenization of the renal cortex

    and fractionation in 83 and 210 micron sieves with

    subsequent magnetic extraction yielded three sepa-

    rate puried suspensions of distal tubules, glomeruli,

    and proximal tubules. The cells were plated sepa-

    rately in vitro and after expansion, were seeded onto

    biodegradable polyglycolic acid scaffolds and im-

    planted subcutaneously into host athymic mice. This

    included implants of proximal tubular cells, glomer-uli, distal tubular cells, and a mixture of all three cell

    types. Animals were sacriced at 1 week, 2 weeks,

    and 1 month after implantation and the retrieved im-

    plants were analyzed. An acute inammatory phase

    and a chronic foreign body reaction were seen, ac-

    companied by vascular ingrowth by 7 days after im-

    plantation. Histologic examination demonstrated pro-

    gressive formation and organization of the nephron

    segments within the polymer bers with time. Renal

    cell proliferation in the cell-polymer scaffolds was

    detected by in vivo labeling of replicating cells withthe thymidine analog bromodeoxyuridine [17]. BrdU

    incorporation into renal cell DNA was conrmed us-

    ing monoclonal anti-BrdU antibodies. These results

    demonstrated that renal specic cells can be success-

    fully harvested and cultured, and can subsequently

    attach to articial biodegradable polymers. The renal

    cell-polymer scaffolds can be implanted into host

    animals where the cells replicate and organize into

    nephron segments, as the polymer, which serves as a

    cell delivery vehicle, undergoes biodegradation.

    Initial experiments showed that implanted cell-polymer scaffolds gave rise to renal tubular struc-

    tures. However, it was unclear whether the tubular

    structures reconstituted de novo from dispersed

    renal elements, or if they merely represented frag-

    ments of donor tubules which survived the original

    dissociation and culture processes intact. Further in-

    vestigation was conducted in order to examine the

    process [45]. Mouse renal cells were harvested and

    expanded in culture. Subsequently, single isolated

    cells were seeded on biodegradable polymers and

    implanted into immune competent syngeneic hosts.Renal epithelial cells were observed to reconstitute

    into tubular structures in vivo. Sequential analyses

    of the retrieved implants over time demonstrated that

    renal epithelial cells rst organized into a cord-like

    structure with a solid center. Subsequent canalization

    into a hollow tube could be seen by 2 weeks. His-

    tologic examination with nephron-segment-specic

    lactins showed successful reconstitution of proxi-

    mal tubules, distal tubules, loop of Henle, collecting

    Chapter 60 Regeneration of Renal Tissues 871

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Renal

    4/7

    tubules, and collecting ducts. These results showed

    that single suspended cells are capable of reconsti-

    tuting into tubular structures, with homogeneous cell

    types within each tubule.

    60.4

    Regeneration of Functional

    Tissue In Vivo

    The kidneys are critical to body homeostasis because

    of their excretory, regulatory, and endocrine func-

    tions. The excretory function is initiated by ltration

    of blood at the glomerulus, and the regulatory func-

    tion is provided by the tubular segments. Although

    our prior studies demonstrated that renal cells seededon biodegradable polymer scaffolds are able to

    form some renal structures in vivo, complete renal

    function could not be achieved in these studies. In

    a subsequent study we sought to create a functional

    articial renal unit which could produce urine [46].

    Mouse renal cells were harvested, expanded in cul-

    ture, and seeded onto a tubular device constructed

    from polycarbonate [39]. The tubular device was

    connected at one end to a silastic catheter which ter-

    minated into a reservoir. The device was implanted

    subcutaneously in athymic mice. The implanteddevices were retrieved and examined histologically

    and immunocytochemically at 1, 2, 3, 4 and 8 weeks

    after implantation. Fluid was collected from inside

    the implant, and uric acid and creatinine levels were

    determined.

    Histological examination of the implanted de-

    vice demonstrated extensive vascularization as well

    as formation of glomeruli and highly organized

    tubule-like structures. Immunocytochemical stain-

    ing with antiosteopontin antibody, which is secreted

    by proximal and distal tubular cells and the cells of

    the thin ascending loop of Henle, stained the tubularsections. Immunohistochemical staining for alkaline

    phosphatase stained proximal tubule-like structures.

    Uniform staining for bronectin in the extracellular

    matrix of newly formed tubes was observed. The

    uid collected from the reservoir was yellow and

    contained 66 mg/dl uric acid (as compared to 2 mg/dl

    in plasma) suggesting that these tubules are capable

    of unidirectional secretion and concentration of uric

    acid. The creatinine assay performed on the collected

    uid showed an 8.2-fold increase in concentration, as

    compared to serum. These results demonstrated thatsingle cells from multicellular structures can become

    organized into functional renal units that are able to

    excrete high levels of solutes through a urine-like

    uid [46].

    To determine whether renal tissue could be formed

    using an alternative cell source, nuclear transplanta-

    tion (therapeutic cloning) was performed to generate

    histocompatible tissues, and the feasibility of engi-

    neering syngeneic renal tissues in vivo using these

    cloned cells was investigated [25]. Nuclear material

    from bovine dermal broblasts was transferred intounfertilized enucleated donor bovine eggs. Renal

    cells from the cloned embryos were harvested, ex-

    panded in vitro, and seeded onto three-dimensional

    renal devices (Fig. 60.1a). The devices were im-

    planted into the back of the same steer from which

    Fig. 60.1ac Formation of functional renal tissue in vivo. aRenal device. bTissue-engineered renal unit shows the accumu-lation of urine-like uid. cThere was a clear unidirectional continuity between the mature glomeruli, their tubules, and the

    polycarbonate membrane

    872 T. Aboushwareb, J. J. Yoo, A. Atala

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Renal

    5/7

    the cells were cloned, and were retrieved 12 weeks

    later. This process produced functioning renal units.

    Urine production and viability were demonstrated

    after transplantation back into the nuclear donor

    animal (Fig. 60.1b). Chemical analysis suggested

    unidirectional secretion and concentration of urea

    nitrogen and creatinine. Microscopic analysis re-vealed formation of organized glomeruli and tubular

    structures (Fig. 60.1c). Immunohistochemical and

    RT-PCR analysis conrmed the expression of renal

    mRNA and proteins, whereas delayed-type hyper-

    sensitivity testing and in vitro proliferative assays

    showed that there was no rejection response to the

    cloned cells. This study indicates that the cloned re-

    nal cells are able to form and organize into functional

    tissue structures which are genetically the same as

    the host. Generating immune-compatible cells using

    therapeutic cloning techniques is feasible and may beuseful for the engineering of renal tissues for autolo-

    gous applications.

    In our previous study, we showed that renal cells

    seeded on synthetic renal devices attached to a col-

    lecting system are able to form functional renal units

    that produce urine-like uid. However, a naturally

    derived tissue matrix with existing three-dimensional

    kidney architecture would be preferable, because it

    would allow for transplantation of a larger number

    of cells, resulting in greater renal tissue volumes.

    Thus, we developed an acellular collagen-basedkidney matrix, which is identical to the native renal

    architecture. In a subsequent study we investigated

    whether these collagen-based matrices could accom-

    modate large volumes of renal cells and form kidney

    structures in vivo [47].

    Acellular collagen matrices, derived from por-

    cine kidneys, were obtained through a multistep de-

    cellularization process. During this process, serial

    evaluation of the matrix for cellular remnants was

    performed using histochemistry, scanning electron

    microscopy (SEM) and RT-PCR. Mouse renal cellswere harvested, grown, and seeded on 80 of the de-

    cellularized collagen matrices at a concentration of

    30106 cells/ml. Forty cell-matrix constructs grown

    in vitro were analyzed 3 days, 1, 2, 4, and 6 weeks af-

    ter seeding. The remaining 40 cell-containing matri-

    ces were implanted in the subcutaneous space of 20

    athymic mice. The animals were sacriced 3 days, 1,

    2, 4, 8, and 24 weeks after implantation for analyses.

    Gross, SEM, histochemical, immunocytochemical,

    and biochemical analyses were performed.

    Scanning electron microscopy and histologic ex-

    amination conrmed the acellularity of the processed

    matrix. RT-PCR performed on the kidney matrices

    demonstrated the absence of any RNA residues. Re-

    nal cells seeded on the matrix adhered to the innersurface and proliferated to conuency 7 days after

    seeding, as demonstrated by SEM. Histochemical

    and immunocytochemical analyses performed using

    H & E, periodic acid Schiff, alkaline phosphatase,

    antiosteopontin and anti-CD-31 identied stromal,

    endothelial, and tubular epithelial cell phenotypes

    within the matrix. Renal tubular and glomerulus-like

    structures were observed 8 weeks after implantation.

    MTT proliferation and titrated thymidine incorpo-

    ration assays performed 6 weeks after cell seeding

    demonstrated a population increase of 116% and92%, respectively, as compared to the 2-week time

    points. This study demonstrates that renal cells are

    able to adhere to and proliferate on the collagen-

    based kidney matrices. The renal cells reconstitute

    renal tubular and glomeruli-like structures in the

    kidney-shaped matrix. The collagen-based kidney

    matrix system seeded with renal cells may be useful

    in the future for augmenting renal function.

    However, creation of renal structures without the

    use of an articial device system would be prefera-

    ble, as implantation procedures are invasive and mayresult in unnecessary complications. We also inves-

    tigated the feasibility of creating three-dimensional

    renal structures for in situ implantation within the na-

    tive kidney tissue. Primary renal cells from 4-week-

    old mice were grown and expanded in culture. These

    renal cells were labeled with uorescent markers and

    injected into mouse kidneys in a collagen gel for in

    vivo formation of renal tissues. Collagen injection

    without cells and sham-operated animals served as

    controls. In vitro reconstituted renal structures and

    in vivo implanted cells were retrieved and analyzed.The implanted renal cells formed tubular and glom-

    erular structures within the kidney tissue, as con-

    rmed by the uorescent markers. There was no

    evidence of renal tissue formation in the control and

    the sham-operated groups. These results demonstrate

    that single renal cells are able to reconstitute kidney

    structures when placed in a collagen-based scaffold-

    ing system. The implanted renal cells are able to

    Chapter 60 Regeneration of Renal Tissues 873

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Renal

    6/7

    self assemble into tubular and glomerular structures

    within the kidney tissue (Fig. 60.2). These ndingssuggest that this system may be the preferred ap-

    proach to engineer functional kidney tissues for the

    treatment of end stage renal disease.

    60.5

    Summary

    The increasing demand for renal transplantation,combined with the critical shortage of donor organs,

    has ignited intense interest in seeking alternative

    treatment modalities. Cell-based approaches have

    been proposed as a viable method for kidney tissue

    regeneration. Various tissue engineering and regen-

    erative medicine approaches that aim to achieve

    functional intra- and extracorporeal kidney support

    were presented in this chapter. Although the progress

    in this area has been somewhat successful toward

    regeneration of functional kidney tissue, clinical ap-

    plication of this technology is still distant.The concept of renal cell transplantation has been

    demonstrated on multiple occasions. It has been

    shown that renal cells are able to reconstitute into

    functional kidney tissues in vivo, but numerous chal-

    lenges must be addressed and solved in order for

    these techniques to be applied clinically. Some of

    these challenges include the generation of a large tis-

    sue mass that could augment systemic renal function,

    the formation of adequate vascularization in the en-

    gineered renal tissue, and the development of a reli-able renal failure model system for testing cell-based

    technologies.

    References

    1. Amiel, G. E., Yoo, J. J., Atala, A.: Renal therapy using

    tissue-engineered constructs and gene delivery. World J

    Urol, 18: 71, 2000

    2. Chazan, J. A., Libbey, N. P., London, M. R. et al.: The

    clinical spectrum of renal osteodystrophy in 57 chronichemodialysis patients: a correlation between biochemi-

    cal parameters and bone pathology ndings. Clin Neph-

    rol, 35: 78, 1991

    3. Cohen, J., Hopkin, J., Kurtz, J.: Infectious complications

    after renal transplantation Philadelphia, WB Saunders,

    1994

    4. Frank, J., Engler-Blum, G., Rodemann, H. P. et al.: Hu-

    man renal tubular cells as a cytokine source: PDGF-B,

    GM-CSF and IL-6 mRNA expression in vitro. Exp Neph-

    rol, 1: 26, 1993

    5. Maack, T.: Renal handling of low molecular weight pro-

    teins. Am J Med, 58: 57, 1975

    6. Stadnyk, A. W.: Cytokine production by epithelial cells.

    Faseb J, 8: 1041, 1994

    7. Amiel, G. E., Yoo, J. J. and Atala, A.: Renal tissue en-

    gineering using a collagen-based kidney matrix. Tissue

    Engineering suppl, 2000

    8. Amiel, G. E., Atala, A.: Current and future modalities for

    functional renal replacement. Urol Clin North Am, 26:

    235, 1999

    9. Atala, A., Schlussel, R. N., Retik, A. B: Renal cell growth

    in vivo after attachment to biodegradable polymer scaf-

    folds. J Urol, 153, 1995

    Fig. 60.2a,b Reconstitution of kidney structures. The implanted renal cells self assembled into (a) glomerular and (b) tubularstructures within the kidney tissue

    874 T. Aboushwareb, J. J. Yoo, A. Atala

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Renal

    7/7

    10. Atala, A.: Tissue engineering in the genitourinary sys-

    tem. Vol chap 8, 1997

    11. Atala, A.: Future perspectives in reconstructive surgery

    using tissue engineering. Urol Clin North Am, 26: 157,

    1999

    12. Humes, H. D., Bufngton, D. A., MacKay, S. M. et al.:

    Replacement of renal function in uremic animals with a

    tissue-engineered kidney. Nat Biotechnol, 17: 451, 1999

    13. Humes, H. D., Fissell, W. H., Weitzel, W. F. et al.: Meta-bolic replacement of kidney function in uremic animals

    with a bioarticial kidney containing human cells. Am J

    Kidney Dis, 39: 1078, 2002

    14. Ikarashi, K., Li, B., Suwa, M. et al.: Bone marrow cells

    contribute to regeneration of damaged glomerular en-

    dothelial cells. Kidney Int, 67: 1925, 2005

    15. Kale, S., Karihaloo, A., Clark, P. R. et al.: Bone marrow

    stem cells contribute to repair of the ischemically injured

    renal tubule. J Clin Invest, 112: 42, 2003

    16. Lin, F., Cordes, K., Li, L. et al.: Hematopoietic stem cells

    contribute to the regeneration of renal tubules after renal

    ischemia-reperfusion injury in mice. J Am Soc Nephrol,

    14: 1188, 2003

    17. Lin, F., Moran, A., Igarashi, P.: Intrarenal cells, not bone

    marrow-derived cells, are the major source for regen-

    eration in postischemic kidney. J Clin Invest, 115: 1756,

    2005

    18. Prockop, D. J.: Marrow stromal cells as stem cells for

    nonhematopoietic tissues. Science, 276: 71, 1997

    19. Yokoo, T., Ohashi, T., Shen, J. S. et al.: Human mesen-

    chymal stem cells in rodent whole-embryo culture are

    reprogrammed to contribute to kidney tissues. Proc Natl

    Acad Sci U S A, 102: 3296, 2005

    20. Carley, W. W., Milici, A. J., Madri, J. A.: Extracellular

    matrix specicity for the differentiation of capillary en-

    dothelial cells. Exp Cell Res, 178: 426, 1988

    21. Horikoshi, S., Koide, H., Shirai, T.: Monoclonal antibod-ies against laminin A chain and B chain in the human and

    mouse kidneys. Lab Invest, 58: 532, 1988

    22. Humes, H. D., Cieslinski, D. A.: Interaction between

    growth factors and retinoic acid in the induction of kid-

    ney tubulogenesis in tissue culture. Exp Cell Res, 201: 8,

    1992

    23. Milici, A. J., Furie, M. B., Carley, W. W.: The formation

    of fenestrations and channels by capillary endothelium in

    vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 82: 6181, 1985

    24. Schena, F. P.: Role of growth factors in acute renal fail-

    ure. Kidney Int Suppl, 66: S11, 1998

    25. Lanza, R. P., Chung, H. Y., Yoo, J. J. et al.: Generation

    of histocompatible tissues using nuclear transplantation.

    Nat Biotechnol, 20: 689, 200226. Gupta, S., Verfaillie, C., Chmielewski, D. et al.: A role

    for extrarenal cells in the regeneration following acute

    renal failure. Kidney Int, 62: 1285, 2002

    27. Ito, T., Suzuki, A., Imai, E. et al.: Bone marrow is a res-

    ervoir of repopulating mesangial cells during glomerular

    remodeling. J Am Soc Nephrol, 12: 2625, 2001

    28. Iwano, M., Plieth, D., Danoff, T. M. et al.: Evidence that

    broblasts derive from epithelium during tissue brosis.

    J Clin Invest, 110: 341, 2002

    29. Poulsom, R., Forbes, S. J., Hodivala-Dilke, K. et al.:

    Bone marrow contributes to renal parenchymal turnover

    and regeneration. J Pathol, 195: 229, 2001

    30. Rookmaaker, M. B., Smits, A. M., Tolboom, H. et al.:

    Bone-marrow-derived cells contribute to glomerular en-

    dothelial repair in experimental glomerulonephritis. Am

    J Pathol, 163: 553, 2003

    31. Folkman, J., Hochberg, M.: Self-regulation of growth in

    three dimensions. J Exp Med, 138: 745, 197332. Atala, A., Bauer, S. B., Soker, S. et al.: Tissue-engineered

    autologous bladders for patients needing cystoplasty.

    Lancet, 367: 1241, 2006

    33. El-Kassaby, A. W., Retik, A. B., Yoo, J. J. et al.: Urethral

    stricture repair with an off-the-shelf collagen matrix. J

    Urol, 169: 170, 2003

    34. Oberpenning, F., Meng, J., Yoo, J. J. et al.: De novo re-

    constitution of a functional mammalian urinary bladder

    by tissue engineering. Nat Biotechnol, 17: 149, 1999

    35. Tachibana, M., Nagamatsu, G. R., Addonizio, J. C.: Ure-

    teral replacement using collagen sponge tube grafts. J

    Urol, 133: 866, 1985

    36. Freed, L. E., Vunjak-Novakovic, G., Biron, R. J. et al.:

    Biodegradable polymer scaffolds for tissue engineering.

    Biotechnology (N Y), 12: 689, 1994

    37. Hubbell, J. A., Massia, S. P., Desai, N. P. et al.: Endothe-

    lial cell-selective materials for tissue engineering in the

    vascular graft via a new receptor. Biotechnology (N Y),

    9: 568, 1991

    38. Mooney, D. J., Mazzoni, C. L., Breuer, C. et al.: Stabi-

    lized polyglycolic acid bre-based tubes for tissue engi-

    neering. Biomaterials, 17: 115, 1996

    39. Wald, H. L., Sarakinos, G., Lyman, M. D. et al.: Cell

    seeding in porous transplantation devices. Biomaterials,

    14: 270, 1993

    40. Dekel, B., Burakova, T., Arditti, F. D. et al.: Human

    and porcine early kidney precursors as a new source fortransplantation. Nat Med, 9: 53, 2003

    41. Steer, D. L., Bush, K. T., Meyer, T. N. et al.: A strategy

    for in vitro propagation of rat nephrons. Kidney Int, 62:

    1958, 2002

    42. Rogers, S. A., Lowell, J. A., Hammerman, N. A. et al.:

    Transplantation of developing metanephroi into adult

    rats. Kidney Int, 54: 27, 1998

    43. Hammerman, M. R.: Transplantation of embryonic kid-

    neys. Clin Sci (Lond), 103: 599, 2002

    44. Rogers, S. A., Powell-Braxton, L., Hammerman, M. R.:

    Insulin-like growth factor I regulates renal development

    in rodents. Dev Genet, 24: 293, 1999

    45. Fung, L. C. T., Elenius, K., Freeman, M., Donovan, M.

    J., Atala, A.: Reconstitution of poor EGFr-poor renalepithelial cells into tubular structures on biodegradable

    polymer scaffold. Pediatrics, 98 (Suppl): S631, 1996

    46. Yoo, J. J., Ashkar, S., Atala, A.: Creation of functional

    kidney structures with excretion of kidney-like uid in

    vivo. Pediatrics, 98S: 605, 1996

    47. Yoo, J. J., Atala, A.: A novel gene delivery system us-

    ing urothelial tissue engineered neo-organs. J Urol, 158:

    1066, 1997

    Chapter 60 Regeneration of Renal Tissues 875