QUANTITATIVE PALAEOECOLOGY Lecture 4. Quantitative Environmental Reconstructions BIO-351.
ENG 351 Lecture 11 1 - Application Development Website - … · · 2011-05-23ENG 351 Lecture 11 1...
Transcript of ENG 351 Lecture 11 1 - Application Development Website - … · · 2011-05-23ENG 351 Lecture 11 1...
ENG 351 Lecture 11 1 Well, let’s look at Edwin Arlington Robinson. Notice that’s Edwin, not Edward. I
have people write Edward Arlington Robinson. Edwin Arlington Robinson. My mother’s
library — it was kind of picked over when I got to it. The books that she owned in her
high school and college years, which would be the late ‘20s and the early ‘30s, are
interesting to me because they pretty much tell me what a literate person was reading in
America at that time. A non-specialist, a non-professional. And among her books were
collections of poetry by Edwin Arlington Robinson. This was somebody, like Edna St.
Vincent Millay. These were people that were read by the general public.
He’s from Maine but he’s mostly associated with New York City, although he
used his small town Maine background in many of his poems. A sad life, in many ways.
A sad an lonely life. He held little part-time jobs from time to time but he mainly lived off
of small inheritances. He was in his late twenties before he — he was still living — still
dependent upon his mother, but he wanted to be a poet and that’s all he wanted to be
and that’s what he tried to do.
The strange thing that happened to him was Teddy Roosevelt. President
Roosevelt’s son was at a prep school — I don’t know which one back East — and a
self-published copy of Robinson’s poems was admired by Teddy Roosevelt’s son’s
instructor. He showed it to the kid, the kid took it to the White House on vacation,
Roosevelt picked it up and read it and liked it. He wrote a letter to Robinson and said, “I
would like to help you out” and bullied his publisher into publishing Robinson. He also
put blurbs on the book from the President of the United States — he thought it was bully
— and this got his career started. He also gave him a job in the custom house in New
ENG 351 Lecture 11 2 York, much like Melville and Hawthorne in the past. All Robinson had to do was go in
there and open his roll-top desk, read the newspaper, then put the newspaper in the
chair to indicate that he’d been there that day, and he collected his salary, a few
thousand dollars a year, which was no small thing back then. When Cleveland came in,
Cleveland said he’d have to work and so he quit.
He went to Harvard for a couple of years. He managed to do that, but never
graduated from college. He was influenced by writers — by American writers like
Hawthorne and Whitman and Emerson, but it’s interesting to note that one of his
favorite writers was Thomas Hardy. And Hardy always denied he was a pessimist. But
when you read Arlington Robinson’s poetry, you can see that there’s definitely a somber
pessimistic mood in much of it.
He said — just to defend him, he said — my favorite from him — “There’s a good
deal to live for but a man has to go through Hell really to find out.” There may be more
ways in there than we care to think about right now. He loved to listen to opera and he
also — well, his favorite composer was Wagner. So I don’t know how you feel about
that, but he listened to that late at night and drank. Somebody pointed out, you know,
that he was drinking too much and he said, “I only drink one glass of whiskey a night.”
The fact that the glass was a tumbler that held about 14 ounces should be immaterial.
The poetry is what matters and I don’t know. Did you read Robinson in high
school? Did you read ‘Richard Cory,’ I suppose? Well, here ‘Richard Cory’ is. I
remember my mother reading ‘Richard Cory’ to me when I was very small.
Whenever Richard Cory went down town,
ENG 351 Lecture 11 3 We people on the pavement looked at him:
He was a gentleman from sole to crown,
Clean favored, and imperially slim.
* * *
And he was always quietly arrayed,
And he was always human when he talked;
But still he fluttered pulses when he said,
“Good morning,” and he glittered when he walked.
* * *
And he was rich--yes, richer than a king,--
And admirably schooled in every grace:
In fine, we thought that he was everything
To make us wish that we were in his place.
* * *
So on we worked, and waited for the light,
And went without the meat, and cursed the bread;
And Richard Cory, one calm summer night,
Went home and put a bullet through his head.
Paul Simon wrote a song about that ‘way back in the dim mists of time. What’s
the problem with “Richard Cory”? I’m not talking about what’s Richard Cory’s personal
problem, but what’s the problem with the poem? You didn’t read this in high school?
How many of you read this for the first time? All right. Were you shocked by the last
ENG 351 Lecture 11 4 line? “I heard the news today — oh, boy.” That’s another reference. He didn’t notice
that the light had changed. At any rate, how many times can you read this poem? I
enjoyed reading it to you just then. I like the “fluttered when he talks” — there’s
something about that. But I know what’s gonna happen. Poor little rich man and
everybody envies him, and they think he’s got everything, and he goes home and puts a
bullet through his head.
You can really read that poem once. It’s just like O’Henry. How many times can
you read the story of where, “Well, all the thing she values is her hair and he values his
watch, so she cuts her hair to buy a watch fob and he sells his watch to buy her some
combs.” You know, you can read that once. I don’t know how many times it’s on
“Masterpiece Theater,” it’s still just — it’s a one trick pony and that’s what this poem is.
But then you’ll get a poem that’ll break your heart like “Credo.” Of course a credo
is your creed, is what you believe. First person. “I cannot find my way: there is no star.”
No star to guide his ship by. And there’s no voice. “And there is not a whisper in the
air,”
except maybe, maybe, maybe a bar. He calls it lost, imperial music from way back
when.
No, there is not a glimmer, nor a call,
For one that welcomes, welcomes when he fears,
The black and awful chaos of the night;
For through it all,--above, beyond it all,--
I know the far-sent message of the years,
ENG 351 Lecture 11 5 I feel the coming glory of the Light.
Did he earn the end of that poem? This is a sonnet, by the way, of course. In
that octave he says, “I cannot find my way; I see no light.” There’s no star, no voice,
maybe just kind of an echo. “There is not a glimmer of light, nor a call,” he says in the
sestet. And then all of a sudden he says “for through it all” when it seems to me it ought
to be “but through it all — “beyond it all,-- / I know the far-sent message of the years, / I
feel the coming glory of the Light.”
So there’s a flicker of faith. There’s a flicker of hope. Even though he says “I
know,” it doesn’t sound much like knowledge. And he says he feels but cannot perceive
or see or have evidence of. The only statement of faith that I can think of weaker than
this would be the one in Tennyson’s “In Memoriam” in which he says, “I stretched lame
hands of faith and grope through darkness up the altar stairs to what I feel is lord of all.”
He says “and faintly trust the higher hope.” That’s not a very strong affirmation and
neither is this.
“Miniver Cheevy” is autobiographical, I think you can tell. Robinson said in more
than one place that he felt he was born in the wrong century, the wrong time, and so
“Miniver Cheevy” certainly was.
Miniver Cheevy, child of scorn,
Grew lean while he assailed the seasons;
He wept that he was ever born,
And he had reasons.
* * *
ENG 351 Lecture 11 6 Miniver loved the days of old
When swords were bright and steeds were prancing;
The vision of a warrior bold
Would set him dancing.
Notice this was written in 1910. This is four years before World War I would
begin, which would put — by the time it was over, would put an end to a lot of the
nonsense about chivalry. As in the third stanza, line 21:
Miniver cursed the commonplace
And eyed a khaki suit with loathing;
He missed the mediaeval grace
Of iron clothing.
You know, he doesn’t want to be an ordinary soldier but he could be a knight. The
stanza before that is brilliant.
Miniver loved the Medici,
Albeit he had never seen one;
He would have sinned incessantly
Could he have been one.
You really have to like that kind of humor if you’re gonna read that sort of thing. I mean,
Lord Byron: Tell me lords and ladies intellectual, tell me truly have they not [inaudible].
That kind of comic rhyme. Been on, seen one. If it doesn’t make you smile, then
there’s no point in reading any more of it.
Miniver scorned the gold he sought,
ENG 351 Lecture 11 7 But sore annoyed was he without it;
Miniver thought, and thought, and thought,
And thought about it.
* * *
Miniver Cheevy, born too late,
Scratched his head and kept on thinking;
Miniver coughed, and called it fate,
And kept on drinking.
Quite a bit of alcohol in his poems.
“Mr. Flood’s Party,” I think, is one of his greatest poems. Frost wrote closet
dramas, Frost wrote verse dramas, and “Mr. Flood’s Party” is very nearly one of those.
It’s almost like a dramatic monologue. When the old man starts talking himself, it’s kind
of a one-man show, don’t you think? He sets up the dramatic situation in the first
stanza, that old Eben Flood is on the hill above the town, above Tilbury Town, where he
used to live and where he used to have many friends. And he’s talking to himself.
Second stanza:
“Well, Mr. Flood, we have the harvest moon
Again, and we may not have many more;
The bird is on the wing, the poet says,
And you and I have said it here before.
Drink to the bird.” He raised up to the light
The jug that he had gone so far to fill,
ENG 351 Lecture 11 8 And answered huskily: “Well, Mr. Flood,
Since you propose it, I believe I will.”
I’m seeing change in places in the road. Drink to the bird. All right. Drink to the moon.
Drink to the night.
Alone — first word of the next stanza. And
Below him [line 4] in the town among the trees,
Where friends of other days had honored him,
A phantom salutation of the dead
Rang thinly till old Eben’s eyes were dim.
Dim with tears, I suppose. And then one of the most unusual similes I’ve ever come
across in poetry:
Then, as a mother lays her sleeping child
Down tenderly, fearing it may awake,
He set the jug down slowly at his feet
With trembling care, knowing that most things break;
Sets the jug down as if it were a sleeping infant. Well, at any rate, he winds up singing
Auld Lang Syne — line 45:
For soon amid the silver loneliness
Of night he lifted up his voice and sang,
Secure, with only two moons listening,
Until the whole harmonious landscape rang--
I think that’s funny, “with only two moons listening.” Well, the ending at least is not
ENG 351 Lecture 11 9 funny.
There was not much that was ahead of him,
And there was nothing in the town below--
Where strangers would have shut the many doors
That many friends had opened long ago.
Is that sentimental? Could be a real situation, couldn’t it? I think sentimentality
depends on contrived situations or contrived feeling. But this old man who has outlived
all his friends and whose only friend now is himself that he talks to and his jug makes a
rather at least pathetic figure if not a sympathetic figure that can move us with a little bit
of compassion. But I don’t know. Robinson was extraordinarily popular in his day, so
make your own conclusions.
Robinson Jeffers was a successful poet. He made money from his poetry. Once
he became established a little bit. Took him awhile. And like Robinson, he was
dedicated to it. He did not hold a university position, he did not teach, he did not
lecture; he wrote. When he was a child, the family — well, I guess he was 16, a
teenager — moved to California and that is where he made his home the rest of his life.
He didn’t die until 1962 at the age of 75. If you’re ever in Carmel, California, you can go
by his estate and the tower that he built there is still there — this tower, as he called it.
Built it himself with local rock. That’s a beautiful part of the country. You can only
imagine what it must’ve been like back at the beginning of the 20th century when he was
there as a child and as a young man before it got so totally built up. But there’s still
some rough and wild nature around Carmel.
ENG 351 Lecture 11 10 In the 1920s, with the publication of Tamar in 1924 and Roan Stallion, he
attracted critical attention as well as a popular audience. These were long, long, long
poems. I recommend “Tamar” to you. It’s a good story. It’s based loosely on the story
of Judah and his daughter-in-law, Tamar. You may recall that. I’ve forgotten. It’s in the
Old Testament. But it’s set — it’s a contemporary setting. I think it’s set in the 19th
century. But it’s the American West and it’s good. It’s blank verse although most of
Jeffers’ lyrics were written in blank verse — I mean written in free verse.
One theme practically through nearly all of his poetry from early on is nature, of
course, and admiration for nature. And the older he got and the more he wrote, it
seems that more and more and more, while he admired nature and loved nature, he did
not like man. He did not like what man was doing to the planet and what man was
doing — you know, in general and in California in particular, into his part of the country
specifically.
He’s been accused of misanthropy, the hatred of mankind. I don’t know. Did you
get that feeling when you were reading this? You think you did? I’m trying to mollify it a
little bit and maybe say, you know, perhaps that portion of mankind that leaves all the
trash on the beach for the surf to come and clean up. But, no, I think truly he didn’t like
the idea of man spreading his ruin across the earth.
“To the Stone-Cutters” — well, the theme that, you know, you can cut all the
stone you want and build all the monuments that you want, but nothing’s going to last.
Everything will finally succumb to nature. And yet he winds up saying still some stones
have stood a thousand years, and people still write poetry even though poetry is not
ENG 351 Lecture 11 11 permanent. Poetry doesn’t last. We still have the impulse to build, we still have the
impulse to write down our thoughts, our pained thoughts, as he says.
But a poem like “Shine, Perishing Republic” — and this was published in 1925,
but it seems it could still be relevant. He saw the materialism of the 1920s, and the
disillusionment that came after the war, and the growing population of California as bad
things. But then it occurs to him that fruit has to rot in order to make fertilizer, and then
maybe something great will grow out of it. Shine, perishing republic. That maybe
something will be reborn. And he says to his children, in the next to the last stanza,
But for my children [he had twin sons], I would have them keep their distance
from the thickening center; corruption
Never has been compulsory, when the cities lie at the monster’s feet there
are left the mountains.
* * *
And boys, be in nothing so moderate as in love of man, a clever servant,
insufferable master.
There is the trap that catches noblest spirits, that caught--they say--God,
when he walked on earth.
Don’t succumb to man. Don’t — be moderate in the love of man, but not moderate in
the love of nature.
“Hurt Hawks.” I don’t know. Of the poems you read, I think it’s probably my
favorite. I like “Vulture” a lot, too. But don’t you like “Hurt Hawks”? By the way,
Robinson Jeffers kind of looked like a hawk. He had this craggy face with this big
ENG 351 Lecture 11 12 hooked nose. I don’t know that there’s any relevancy.
[Inaudible student response]
In “Hawks”? What’d you want him to do, splint that wing or --
Student: Well, you know, it’s like the hawk shows up and he says,
“Okay, there’s nothing I can do. I can’t save him, you know,
but I can keep the dogs and all that from tormenting him.” So
his choice is like I can let him starve to death or I can feed him
and kind of make a pet out of him, you know, or I can kill him.
What he decides to do is to keep him for six weeks, feed him,
you know, treat him — it sounds like he didn’t even amputate
the wing. And so here’s the hawk for six weeks with this wing.
Then he goes, “Oh, I’m gonna turn him loose.” He turns him
loose and he comes back ‘cause it’s like, you know — this
guy’s gonna take care of me. “Oh, well you came back? I’m
gonna kill you.”
He’s tamed it, hasn’t he? He tamed that hawk.
Student: Well, he should have either killed it up front or --
Thanks for ruining my favorite poem. It never occurred to me. Yeah, he’s made
that hawk totally dependent on him. Well, let’s look at another one. That’s a good
point, though. That’s a wonderful point. He has such empathy with this hawk he thinks
he can read its mind.
. . . at night he remembers freedom
ENG 351 Lecture 11 13 And flies in a dream, the dawns ruin it.
He is strong and pain is worse to the strong [line 9], incapacity is worse.
The curs of the day come and torment him
At distance, no one but death the redeemer will humble that head.
The dogs were afraid of him. I don’t think he’s keeping the dogs back, but they don’t
want to get to that hawk.
The intrepid readiness, the terrible eyes.
There’s a pen at the Springfield Zoo with a bunch of wounded eagles in it. Have you
seen those things? They’ve been shot. A lot of ‘em have missing wings and this and
that. They always remind me of the Veterans of Foreign Wars at parades, you know.
They’ve got that craggy white hair and blue caps and badges of honor, but they’ve got
that fierce look. I wouldn’t mess with a hurt hawk.
The wild God of the world is sometimes merciful to those
That ask mercy, not often to the arrogant.
And then, if this were just about hawks, okay. But, no, he’s got to go after us.
You do not know him, you communal people, or you have forgotten him;
Intemperate and savage, the hawk remembers him;
The wild God. We don’t know the wild God. We’re all living in our communes of cities
and trade.
Beautiful and wild, the hawks, and men that are dying, remember him.
Then he switches the tone.
I’d sooner, except the penalties, kill a man than a hawk;
ENG 351 Lecture 11 14 That’s not really very shocking to hear him say that, is it?
. . . but the great red-tail
Had nothing left but unable misery
From the bone too shattered for mending, the wing that trailed under his
talons when he moved
We had fed him six weeks
And I will never forget your insight on that.
. . . I gave him freedom,
He wandered over the foreland hill and returned in the evening, asking for
death.
Well, I don’t — too, I don’t know what he thought that hawk would do. The hawk can’t
hunt and he’s feeding him hamburger or mice or something. Oh, well. Yeah. Well,
anyway. Yeah, you’re — no mercy. No mercy for you. Even in this state, in this
dependent state, it has the old implacable arrogance — its eyes do.
. . . I gave him the lead gift in the twilight. What fell was relaxed,
Owl-downy, soft feminine feathers; but what
Soared: the fierce rush: the night-herons by the flooded river cried fear at its
rising
Before it was quite unsheathed from reality.
That’s a neat way to talk about the echo from that shotgun or whatever he fired.
Because unless Jeffers wants us to believe that that hawk’s soul was so great you could
hear the rush of it as it went out of his body and into the heavens, that it would frighten
ENG 351 Lecture 11 15 the herons, but I think the herons probably cried out because of the sound of the muzzle
blast. But what a nice combination.
“November Surf.” Did you like “November Surf” or is there something wrong with
it? Once again, nature is good and man is bad.
Some lucky day each November great waves awake and are drawn
Like smoking mountains bright from the west
And come and cover the cliff with white violent cleanness
When the November surf comes up and the storm comes up, that’s cold water and it
hits the granite there. His house and his tower were built out of native granite. And
washes away all the stuff that people have left behind all summer long.
. . . forgets half a year’s filth:
The orange-peel, eggshells, papers, pieces of clothing, the clots
Of dung in corners of the rock, and used
Sheaths that make light love safe in the evenings: all the droppings of the
summer
Idlers washed off in a winter ecstasy:
Droppings like bird droppings which he would be very familiar with. Sheaths, by the
way, are condoms. I don’t know if you knew that word. And then he thinks about how
the continent wishes it could get the cleansing that the cliffs get. And he has a vision of
the future.
. . . the long cost
Of the future to scour more than her sea-lines:
ENG 351 Lecture 11 16 The cities gone down, the people fewer and the hawks more numerous,
The rivers mouth to source pure; when the two-footed
Mammal, being someways one of the nobler animals, regains
The dignity of room, the value of rareness.
Man would be more valuable were there fewer of them. Miserable bi-pit as
Carlisle calls them. Two-footed mammal. Well, I don’t know how accurate his vision of
the future would be.
“Carmel Point.” Once again, it’s a similar theme. It’s so odd to realize that these
poems were written in the twenties, thirties, forties. This one was published in 1951.
But when the suburban — well, you look at the hillsides in California, little houses on the
hillside, and they’re all made out of ticky-tacky and they all look just the same. Come
from the airport, go driving in San Francisco and look. They’re all extraordinarily
expensive, but they all look just the same. It’s not what was there before.
This beautiful place defaced with a crop of suburban houses--
How beautiful when we first beheld it.
So what’s the solution? Last three lines of “Carmel Point”:
We must uncenter our minds from ourselves;
As for us, we must uncenter our minds from ourselves.
We must unhumanize our views a little, and become confident
As the rock and ocean that we were made from.
I think when he gets to lines like that he’s less of a curmudgeon and more of a
romantic, more of a mystic. Uncenter our minds from ourselves, get out of our petty
ENG 351 Lecture 11 17 human concerns, unhumanize our views a little. Look at the broader picture. Look at
nature. Become confident. The cliffs will remain when the people are gone, but we can
try to achieve something of that naturalness.
“Vulture” is a second cousin to the “Hawk” poem. I think it’s my second favorite.
I hope you’re not going to say that he tortured the vulture because I suppose in some
ways he did. He does apologize. But his first person — where he lies down to rest and
he notices this vulture wheeling high up in the heavens. The vulture sees the two-
legged mammal stretched out on the ground. I don’t know my — my natural history is
pretty sorry. I always thought they smelled the things rather than saw the things. But,
at any rate, this is what he thinks the vulture is doing.
I once looked down — a sunrise on the Buffalo River. I was way up on a ledge
and I was looking down at the mist coming up. It was so far below me. I saw Golden
Eagles in the rising sun and I was admiring that so much. And one of the people with
me said, “Those are vultures.” Somehow it just — you know, in the distance, it just lost
all the romance. But if I ever have a chance with a vulture, I’m gonna try to pull this on
him.
So the bird starts circling. He can see the naked red head between the great
wings. They are really hideous looking creatures. They are really, really ugly. I once
saw a California condor, one of the few left on earth, and I don’t know why they want to
preserve them. Those are really homely birds. But these things — these wings on
these vultures are so huge. The great wings.
. . . I said, “My dear bird, we are wasting time here.
ENG 351 Lecture 11 18 These old bones will still work; they are not for you.”
But how beautiful he looked, gliding down
On those great sails;
Now, that’s a nice metaphor, the wings as sails.
. . . how beautiful he looked, veering away in the sea-light over the
precipice. I tell you solemnly
That I was worry to have disappointed him. To be eaten by that beak and
become part of him, to share those wings and those eyes--
What a sublime end of one’s body, what an enskyment; what a life after
death.
That’s a pretty nice huge leap that he made. And plus, I like poets who — if there’s not
a word for it, then create one. “What an enskyment.” He is asking us to believe that we
are what eats us, but I don’t think that that’s bad to think about.
“Birds and Fishes” is a posthumous poem but it’s certainly — if you didn’t know
— if this didn’t have Robinson Jeffers’ name on it and you just came across this poem
and it was anonymous, wouldn’t you be able to guess pretty well that this was Robinson
Jeffers? This natural observation, of course, is an old tradition in American writing.
Observe nature and make conclusions from it. And in this case, he’s watching all these
fish that come along the shore and they attract all the sea birds, the sea fowl.
. . . The heavy pelicans shout “Haw!” like Job’s friend’s warhorse
I’ve always wondered how that should be pronounced when you say it among the
trumpets “Ha-ha.” I think it maybe ought to be more like a whinny or something like
ENG 351 Lecture 11 19 that.
Heavy pelicans. If you’ve ever watched pelicans fish, they’re so — you think how
can those things fly, you know. They’re big, ungainly birds. Heavy pelicans.
And dive from the high air.
They kind of peel off.
. . . the cormorants
Slip their long black bodies under the water
They’re some of the most efficient fishing machines that ever were. They drive
fishermen crazy in some parts of the world because they are so efficient. They can
really do some damage to fishing grounds and yet he doesn’t mind. And then, of course,
the gulls.
. . . the gulls watch,
Wild with envy and malice, cursing and snatching.
Isn’t that just like a gull? They can’t do that fishing, but, boy, they want it once you’ve
got it.
. . . What hysterical greed!
What a filling of pouches! The mob
Hysteria is nearly human.
These birds are so bad, so greedy, they’re almost like people.
. . . these decent birds!
But don’t mistake him. He’s not saying that they are.
. . . as if they were finding
ENG 351 Lecture 11 20 Gold in the street.
Which would be the way a human mob would be.
. . . It is better than gold.
It can be eaten: and which one in all this fury of wildfowl pities the fish?
No one certainly. Justice and mercy
Are human dreams, they do not concern the birds nor the fish nor eternal God.
Where’d that come from? Usually don’t think about something like that, but are any of
those birds feeling sorry for the fishies? No. But those are human concepts.
. . . Justice and mercy.
But, he says, take one more look before you go. These skerries and minnows
Living in terror to die in torment--
Man’s fate and theirs [living in terror to die in torment].
But the final lines just show this scene. The promontory named Lobos there, out in the
bay near Carmel:
. . . the island rocks and immense ocean beyond, and Lobos
Darkening above the bay: they are beautiful?
That is their quality: not mercy, not mind, not goodness, but the beauty of God.
Are they beautiful, he asks? They are beautiful? That’s their quality, not these
distractions that we put on ‘em. A far cry — I mentioned Tennyson awhile ago.
Tennyson worried about that sort of thing, the whole 19th century did. Nature read in
tooth and claw, you know. This is awful. This is just terrible. I mean, this is something
that we keep from our children.
ENG 351 Lecture 11 21 The nature shows now are not like when I was growing up, you know. Now, on
“Animal Planet” and Discovery Channel the lion gets the gazelle. When I was growing
up, Marlon Perkins would say, “Well, it looks like the lioness will have to hunt again
another day.” Oh, no. Now they get four or five angles, you know. “Let’s watch that
neck snap” and “Ooooh, look at the little lions covered with gore. Whooo.” Jeffers
would like that. He would say, you know, this is right. This is nature’s way. This is
God, actually. And you communal people, you don’t understand that. You don’t know
about that. I wonder how he’d feel if the seals were — oh, well. This is another — on
his dock.
Let’s see. We’ve got Sherwood Anderson and Carl Sandburg next time.
. . .