Energy/Nutrient Relations (Ch. 7)

51
Energy/Nutrient Relations (Ch. 7)

description

Energy/Nutrient Relations (Ch. 7). Lecture Outline. 1) Major methods of gaining energy 2) Limitations on energy gain Plants Animals. Plants. Light curve ….Photosynthetic rate vs. light (photon flux density). Note P max at I sat P max = max. rate - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Energy/Nutrient Relations (Ch. 7)

Page 1: Energy/Nutrient Relations (Ch. 7)

Energy/NutrientRelations (Ch. 7)

Page 2: Energy/Nutrient Relations (Ch. 7)

Lecture Outline• 1) Major methods of gaining energy• 2) Limitations on energy gain

– Plants– Animals

Page 3: Energy/Nutrient Relations (Ch. 7)

Plants• Light curve….Photosynthetic rate vs. light (photon flux

density). Note Pmax at Isat

• Pmax = max. rate

• Isat = light amt. when system saturated

Fig. 7.20

Page 4: Energy/Nutrient Relations (Ch. 7)

Plants• Adiantum: fern in deep shade

– Sciophyte: shade-adapted plant

• Encelia: desert– Heliophyte: sun-adapted plant

Ps

Lite

Page 5: Energy/Nutrient Relations (Ch. 7)

Plants• Sun/shade plant Pmax and Isat values

• Highest Pmax?

• Highest Isat?Fig. 7.21

Page 6: Energy/Nutrient Relations (Ch. 7)

Lecture Outline• 1) Major methods of gaining energy• 2) Limitations on energy gain

– Plants– Animals

Page 7: Energy/Nutrient Relations (Ch. 7)

What limits animal food intake?• Search time: find prey

• Handling time: subdue & process prey

Prey Density

Food IntakeRate

LoLo Hi

Hi

Page 8: Energy/Nutrient Relations (Ch. 7)

Animal Functional Response Curves• Holling: 3 functional

responses (how food intake varies with prey density)

Fig. 7.22

Page 9: Energy/Nutrient Relations (Ch. 7)

Animal Functional Response Curves• Type 1: Linear

– Little search or handling time (rare)

– Ex, filter feeders

Feather duster worm Fig. 7.22

Page 10: Energy/Nutrient Relations (Ch. 7)

Animal Functional Response Curves• Type 2: Rate increases

faster than density– Partially limited by

search/handling time– Common!

Fig. 7.22

Page 11: Energy/Nutrient Relations (Ch. 7)

Animal Functional Response Curves• Ex, moose feeding

Fig. 7.23

Page 12: Energy/Nutrient Relations (Ch. 7)

Animal Functional Response Curves• Ex, wolf feeding

Fig. 7.24

Page 13: Energy/Nutrient Relations (Ch. 7)

Animal Functional Response Curves• Type 3: S-shaped curve

(rare)– 1) Prey find safe sites at

low density– Or, – 2) Predator needs to learn

to handle prey efficiently

Page 14: Energy/Nutrient Relations (Ch. 7)

Optimal Foraging• Principle: organisms cannot simultaneously

maximize all life functions.– Choose prey to maximize energy gain

Page 15: Energy/Nutrient Relations (Ch. 7)

Optimal Foraging

Page 16: Energy/Nutrient Relations (Ch. 7)

Optimal Foraging Theory• Model:• Ne = number prey encountered per unit time

• Cs = cost to search for prey• H = handling time• E = energy gained by consuming prey• Can calculate energy intake per unit time: E/T• E/T = (Ne1E1-Cs )/(1 + Ne1H1)• 1 refers to prey species 1

E: Energy gain minus CostTime: reflects handling prey

Page 17: Energy/Nutrient Relations (Ch. 7)

• What if 2 prey?• E/T = (Ne1E1-Cs ) + (Ne2E2-Cs )

• 1 + Ne1H1 + Ne2H2

Optimal Foraging Theory

Ne = number prey encountered per unit time

Cs = cost to search for preyH = handling timeE = energy gained by consuming prey

Page 18: Energy/Nutrient Relations (Ch. 7)

• What if 2 prey?• E/T = (Ne1E1-Cs ) + (Ne2E2-Cs )

• 1 + Ne1H1 + Ne2H2

• If optimal foraging: prey choice maximizes E/T– Ex: if 2 prey, prey #2 eaten if E/T for both prey

> E/T for prey #1 only

Optimal Foraging Theory

Page 19: Energy/Nutrient Relations (Ch. 7)

• Does it work?• Ex, bluegill sunfish

Optimal Foraging Theory

Page 20: Energy/Nutrient Relations (Ch. 7)

• Values calculated for prey in lab• Daphnia (water fleas), damselfly larvae, midge

larvae

Optimal Foraging Theory

midge

damselfly

water flea

Page 21: Energy/Nutrient Relations (Ch. 7)

• Prey abundance documented (top)

• Equation predicts optimal prey size (mid)

• Fish stomachs examined (bottom)

• Does it work?• Yup...

Optimal Foraging Theory

Page 22: Energy/Nutrient Relations (Ch. 7)

Optimal Foraging By Plants?

Page 23: Energy/Nutrient Relations (Ch. 7)

Optimal Foraging By Plants?• Allocation to leaves, stems & roots

• Principle of Allocation: Energy allocated to obtain resource in shortest supply

– Do plants allocate to resource in shortest supply?– Where we see this before?

Page 24: Energy/Nutrient Relations (Ch. 7)

Optimal Foraging By Plants?• Allocation to leaves, stems & roots

• Principle of Allocation: Energy allocated to resource in shortest supply

– Do plants allocate to resource in shortest supply?

• Where we see this before?

Page 25: Energy/Nutrient Relations (Ch. 7)

Optimal Foraging By Plants• Ex, N in soil

Fig. 7.26

Page 26: Energy/Nutrient Relations (Ch. 7)

THE END (material for knowledge demo #1)

Page 27: Energy/Nutrient Relations (Ch. 7)

Population Genetics &Natural Selection (Ch. 4)

Who??

Page 28: Energy/Nutrient Relations (Ch. 7)

Darwin• Proposed most important mechanism

evolution: natural selection

• Key points? (BIOL 1020)

Page 29: Energy/Nutrient Relations (Ch. 7)

• Organisms over-reproduce (competition).• Offspring vary.

– Some differences heritable (transmitted between generations).

• Higher chance survival/reproduction: pass favorable traits to offspring

Natural Selection (BIOL 1020)

Define adaptation

Page 30: Energy/Nutrient Relations (Ch. 7)

• Organisms over-reproduce (competition).• Offspring vary.

– Some differences heritable (transmitted between generations).

• Higher chance survival/reproduction: pass favorable traits to offspring

• Adaptation: Genetically determined trait with survival and/or reproductive advantages (improves “fitness”)

• Key: Trait heritable

Natural Selection (BIOL 1020)

Page 31: Energy/Nutrient Relations (Ch. 7)

Gregor Mendel• Discovered genes (heritable units).

– Alternate forms: alleles.– Some (dominant alleles) prevent

expression others (recessive alleles)

Define….

Page 32: Energy/Nutrient Relations (Ch. 7)

Evolution by Natural Selection• Adaptation: Genetically determined trait with

survival/reproductive advantages (improves “fitness”)– Genotype: Alleles for trait

– Phenotype: Expression of trait. May be affected by environment.

• Phenotypic plasticity: ability phenotype to change based on environment

Page 33: Energy/Nutrient Relations (Ch. 7)

Evolution by Natural Selection• Adaptation: Genetically determined trait with survival

and/or reproductive advantages (improves “fitness”)• Depends on heritability (h2) trait (how “well”

transmitted)

h2 = VG / VP

• VG: Variability due to genetic effect

• VP: Total variability phenotype

Page 34: Energy/Nutrient Relations (Ch. 7)

Evolution by Natural Selection• Heritability: h2 = VG / VP

• VG: Variability due to genetic effect

• VP: Total variability phenotype

• Phenotype influenced by both genes and environment

• Or, VP = VG + VE

Page 35: Energy/Nutrient Relations (Ch. 7)

Evolution by Natural Selection

• Modified equation: h2 = VG / (VG + VE)

• h2 ranges 0-1 • If VG small, little heritability

• If VE large (lots phenotypic plasticity), little heritability

How measure?

Page 36: Energy/Nutrient Relations (Ch. 7)

Measuring heritability• Linear Regression: Fits line to points

– Equation line: Y = m X + b

– m = slope (regression coefficient)

– b = Y intercept

– Regression coefficient: measures h2

Page 37: Energy/Nutrient Relations (Ch. 7)

Variation Within Species• Many species’ populations differ

• How much variation due VG vs. VE?– Clausen, Keck, Hiesey (CA plants)

How test VG vs. VE?

Page 38: Energy/Nutrient Relations (Ch. 7)

Variation Within Species• Common garden experiment: Grow same

location.

Page 39: Energy/Nutrient Relations (Ch. 7)

Variation Within Species– Differences remain: genetic variation (VG)

– Differences disappear: phenotypic plasticity (VE)

Result?

Page 40: Energy/Nutrient Relations (Ch. 7)

Variation Within Species• Found differences. • Populations form ecotypes: locally adapted to

environment– Same species (can interbreed)

Page 41: Energy/Nutrient Relations (Ch. 7)

Variation Within Species• Do animal populations vary locally?• Chuckwalla (Sauromalus obesus)

– Herbivorous lizard (desert SW).

Page 42: Energy/Nutrient Relations (Ch. 7)

Variation Within SpeciesFound at different elevationsRainfall amount & variation changes

Lizards biggerwhere more rain

Due to better environment (VE)or genetic (VG)? How test?

Page 43: Energy/Nutrient Relations (Ch. 7)

Variation Within Species• Chuckwalla “Common garden” expt.• Genetic differences!

Page 44: Energy/Nutrient Relations (Ch. 7)

Variation Within Species• Genetic differences suggest adaptations• Experiments: can show natural selection in populations?

Experiments: who am I?

Page 45: Energy/Nutrient Relations (Ch. 7)

Adaptive Change in Lizards• Genus Anolis (anoles)

• Hundreds species New World

• Length hind leg reflects use vegetation

• Perch diameter

Anolis carolinensis

Page 46: Energy/Nutrient Relations (Ch. 7)

Adaptive Change in Lizards• Experiment: lizards from 1 island (Staniel Cay) put on

islands with different vegetation• Do they evolve (limb size changes)?

Staniel Cay

Page 47: Energy/Nutrient Relations (Ch. 7)

Adaptive Change in Lizards• Positive correlation (after 10-14 yr) between

vegetation and change morphology• Is this natural selection in action?

Page 48: Energy/Nutrient Relations (Ch. 7)

Adaptive Change in Lizards• Positive correlation (after 10-14 yr) between

vegetation and change morphology• Is this natural selection in action? Probably. But

genetic change not shown

Page 49: Energy/Nutrient Relations (Ch. 7)

Adaptation by Soapberry Bugs• Soapberry Bug (Jadera haematoloma) feeds on seeds• Beak pierces fruit walls

Page 50: Energy/Nutrient Relations (Ch. 7)

Soapberry Bugs• Feeds on native or introduced plants

(fruit size varies)• Feed on bigger fruits: longer beaks• How test if differences genetic?

Page 51: Energy/Nutrient Relations (Ch. 7)

Soapberry Bugs

• Raise bugs on common foods--beak length differences persisted

• Bugs adapted to different hosts: natural selection