Energy Security Federal Research Center at White Oak, Silver Spring, MD January 16, 2013.

Energy Security

Federal Research Center at White Oak, Silver Spring, MD

January 16, 2013

2013 ADC INSTALLATION INNOVATION FORUM | PAGE 2

White Oak Aerial View


Dealing with Growth

2009 Master Plan: 9K Employees, 3.9M GSF

1997 Master Plan: 6K Employees, 2.1M GSF

Reliability

Intensity

Location

Timing

SquareFootage

Dynamic

Program!

Intensity

Location

Timing

SquareFootage

Dynamic

Program!Dynamic

Program!


White Oak ESPC I Features

• 25KW photo voltaic array• Renovation of Firehouse/Maintenance Garage• Construction of Generator Hall with Control Room• 5.8MW Dual Fuel Engine Generator• 2MW standby diesel generator (Black start generator)• 1 - 1,130 Ton Absorption Chiller• 2 - 1,130 Ton Electric Centrifugal Chillers• 3 - 10 MMBtu/Hr Hot Water Boilers• Ancillary Plant Equipment and Distribution System

Square Footage Power Load Cooling Load

684,000 6,473 KW 2,200 Tons


White Oak ESPC II Features• ESPC II Base Delivery Order

Photovoltaic Array Expansion Building Expansion for Generators 1 - 4.5 MW Natural Gas Combustion Turbine 1 - 1980-ton Electric Centrifugal Chiller Ancillary Plant Equipment and Distribution System

• ESPC II “All Options” Modification 2 - 4.5 MW Natural Gas Combustion Turbines 2 - 1980-ton Electric Centrifugal Chillers 1 - 1130-ton Absorption Chiller Ancillary Plant Equipment and Distribution System

• ESPC II “Elec Gen” Modification 1 - 4.5 MW Natural Gas Combustion Turbine

Square Footage Power Load Cooling Load

2,694,000 21,778 KW 9,096 Tons


Energy Security (through ESPC II)

• Interconnection with Electric Grid

Two separate feeders into substation

• Underground Electrical Distribution System

• Automatic Load-Shed Scheme

• 5.8 MW Engine-Generator

Dual Fuel/Primary Power Source during early stages of campus development

• 4 - 4.5 MW Turbine-Generators

• 2 MW Standby Diesel Generator


ESPC III – Development Considerations

• Expanded Auto Load Shed Scheme

• Additional Dual-fuel Generation Assets

• Steam from CUP vs. Local Steam Generators– Labs and vivariums

• Challenging Site


• Electrical Generation Two - 7.5 MW turbine-generators (dual fuel) One - 4.5 MW turbine-generator (natural gas only) One - 5 MW steam turbine-generator Two - 2.25 MW diesel black-start generators

• Back-up Fuel Storage (80,000 gal)• Chilled Water (3 @ 2,500 tons + 1 relocated)• Cooling Towers for Chillers and Steam Condensers• Thermal Energy Storage (2 million gal)• Heat Recovery Steam Generators (132,000 lbh)• Dual-fuel Steam Back-up Boiler (one 25 KPPH)• Heating Hot Water Converters (112 MMBTUH)

ESPC III Base – Major Physical Features


CUP: Bird’s Eye Perspective


Micro Grid – Systems Integration Challenges

• Mission requirements• Procurement sequence

Multiple designers Development/communication of criteria “Consulting Party” concurrence

• Points of interface Building automation system (BAS) Plant controls Utility distribution system

• Operational constraints Mission Physical parameters Environmental requirements/ restrictions Fiscal considerations Export limitations

• Optimization elements CUP equipment deployment in response to

campus loads Campus interaction with PJM grid/ market Load management in buildings to enhance

demand response capability

• Practical challenges Grid separation Black Start recovery Building systems status/ restart Critical load management Human interaction Level of automation


ESPC Environmental Benefits

• Annual Energy Savings:Current: 640,000 MMBtuESPC III Base: 275,000 MMBtu

• Pollution Prevention (annual):Current: 50,000 metric tons CO2-equivalent

ESPC III Base: 22,000 metric tons CO2-equivalent

• Co-Generation reduces GSA NCR Demand: Response during “Gold Days” (approximately 22 MW currently; nearly 33 MW post-ESPC III Base)


Other ESPC Project Benefits

• Reduced first-cost to Government• Reduced recurring costs to Government• More energy efficient campus• Fixed accountability for systems performance• Flexibility to meet evolving program requirements• Adaptive re-use of historic structures• Demand response capability ($ to GSA)• Enhanced Energy Security

Ability to continue mission independent of the grid


Questions/Discussion

Mel Fernandez, Ph.D., P.E., CEM Director, Federal Project Development Honeywell Building Solutions

31 Larks Aire PlaceThe Woodlands, TX Office: 936-273-4483 Cell: 713-202-4850 [email protected]

Energy Security Federal Research Center at White Oak, Silver Spring, MD January 16, 2013.

Documents

Transcript of Energy Security Federal Research Center at White Oak, Silver Spring, MD January 16, 2013.