eNAPUS Legislative and Political Bulletin 9.2
Transcript of eNAPUS Legislative and Political Bulletin 9.2
-
8/3/2019 eNAPUS Legislative and Political Bulletin 9.2
1/2
Instead, an amendment may be
offered to apply the savings to
deficit reduction. That distinc-
tion is wasted on those whose
earned retirement security is
compromised by the legislation.
H.R. 7 is being abused as simply
another vehicle to reach into the
pockets of postal and federal
workers. Moreover, whether, or
not, the pension cuts would be
used to fund highway construc-
tion or reduce the deficit, the
$44 billion would be used to
offset the cost of H.R. 7.
NAPUS expects the House Rules
Committee to meet by mid-next
week to determine whichamendments will be allowed for a
floor vote. In addition, it will be
noteworthy to see whether the
GOP leadership permits a vote
to strike Article 16 entirely from
H.R. 7, or the only amendment
permitted relating to Article 16
would be an amendment to apply
the savings to deficit reduction.
We expect the House to take up
H.R. 7 on Friday, February 17,
immediately preceding the
weeklong Presidents Day Re-cess. Fortunately, the Senate
version of the highway construc-
tion bill does not target the pub-
lic workforce.
NAPUS members should urge
their Representatives to strike
Section 16 from H.R. 7.
The latest salvo fired at the fed-
eral public service was fired by
freshman Rep. Dennis Ross (R-
FL), chairman of the House Sub-
committee on the Federal Work-
force, Postal Service, and Labor
Policy on Tuesday. The House
Oversight and Government Re-
form Committee favorably ap-
proved H.R. 3813, the so-called
SAFE Act, by a party-line 22-16
vote. The bill would dramatically
slice earned retirement security,
and impose a regressive 1.5%
income tax on the postal and
federal workforce. The cuts
total $44 billion over 10 years.
Specifically, H.R. 3813 would:
Increase FERS and CSRS
contributions by 1.5% over
the next 3 years of all em-
ployees
Change the FERS computa-
tion formula from the high-3
to the high-5 for employees
with less than 5 years of
federal/postal service
Reduce the accrual rate
under FERS by 36% for em-
ployees with less than 5
years of federal/postal ser-
vice
Eliminate the Social Security
Supplement for FERS em-
ployees for those who are
retiree prior to being eligi-
ble for Social Security and
who retire after 2012
Public employee pay freezes,
retirement cuts and health bene-
fit attacks are par for the course
in the current Congress. NAPUS
members are among those who
are vulnerable to these mean-
spirited and unjustified attacks.
The irony to this shameful legisla-
tive charade is that immediatelyafter the Oversight and Govern-
ment Reform Committee ap-
proved the bill, the House Rules
Committee pocketed the text of
H.R. 3813 and inserted it in a
highway construction and trans-
portation funding bill (Article 16
of H.R. 7). It seems as though
the fix-was-in. It is interesting
to note that the Chairman of the
Transportation Committee, John
Mica (R-FL), a Sunshine State
colleague of Rep. Ross whochaired the Federal Workforce
Subcommittee in the mid-1990s.
It appears, however, that the too
-cute-for-comfort legislative ploy
was transparent enough that
some GOP members want to
decouple the cost-cutting at-
tributed to pension reductions
from transportation funding.
Open Season on the Federal Public Service?
eNAPUS Legislative and Political
Bulletin F E B R U A R Y 1 0 , 2 0 1 2V O L U M E 9 , I S S U E 2N A T I O N A LA S S O C I A T I O NO F
P O S T M A S T E R S
O F T H E
U N I T E D S T A T E S
8 Herbert Street
Alexandra, VA 22305
703-683-9027
-
8/3/2019 eNAPUS Legislative and Political Bulletin 9.2
2/2
NAPUS strongly believes that the
CBO estimate is disingenuous, since
none of the identified funds are the
taxpayers, and it results from re-
funding the USPS FERS surplus and re
-amortizing the pre-funding of future
retiree FEHBP liabilities. Moreover,
the Office of Personnel Management
has calculated that the USPS has
overfunded FERS and CSRS by $13.1
billion. (The OPM determination is
independent of the projected $55-75
billion USPS overpayment into the
CSRS.)
Finally, the USPS circulated in theSenate a memorandum, raising ques-
tions about its commitment to purs-
ing passable postal relief legislation
this year. USPS-promoted provisions
excluded from the Governmental
Affairs-approved bill or USPS-resisted
items Committee, or amendments
that may prevail on the Senate floor
have tainted the USPS 2012 legisla-
tive strategy.
However, the facts are uncontested.
The USPS will be unable to make
Over the past couple of weeks, con-
sideration of S. 1789, the 21st Centu-
ry Postal Act , has slipped behind
other Senate legislative priorities. On
the immediate horizon, a 10-month
extension of the Social Security pay-
roll tax holiday will supplant S. 1789
in the legislative pecking order.
Complicating prompt consideration
of the Lieberman-Collins-Carper-
Brown bill are concerns being raised
within the Senate Democratic Caucus
over a limited number of controver-
sial provisions in the bill (e.g., changes
to collective-bargaining and the feder-al workers compensation program).
In addition, there is pressure to add
provisions to the bill to strengthen
Postal Regulatory Commission in-
volvement in facility closure and con-
solidation decision-making, and deny
the USPS the opportunity to reduce
delivery service standards.
In addition, the Congressional Budget
Office estimates that the bill would
cost about $6.3 billion, and caused
pause on the GOP side of the aisle.
$11.1 of pre-funding payments in in
the current fiscal yearabout onAugust 1 and remainder on Septem-
ber 30. The USPS needs relief from
these unjustified payments. In addi-
tion, it needs more legislative latitude
and incentives to grow its revenue;
not simply contract its market reach
into irrelevancy, pursuing a kamikaze
mission of retail inaccessibility and
service cuts.
A potential Senate floor vote on
which NAPUS will be focusing will be
a motion to waive a point of order
against the bill for violating a Senate
budget rule. We expect that an anti-
postal Senator will raise such a point
of order against the bill. NAPUS will
push for a waiver, because congres-
sional budget rules are inherently
unfair to the USPS and prejudicial to
implementing postal relief.
In the meantime, NAPUS will contin-
ue to work with Senate allies to fine-
tune S. 1789, so that the measure will
garner the requisite votes for passage.
Senate Postal Bill Stalled for Now
Retiree Costs Fully Funded in 21 yearsThe USPS Inspector General (IG) has
concluded that the Postal Services
future retiree FEHBP liability could be
fully funded within 21 years; that is,
without any further postal pre-funding
contribution.
The IG noted that the Postal Retiree
Health Fund balance presently stands
at $44 billion. Assuming the historical
interest rate on special issue govern-
ment securities of about 4%, the $44
billion would balloon to about $90
billion in 21 years, without additional
USPS prefunding payments.
In a letter to Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-
VT), the IG cautioned that this strat-
egy would only provide short-term
relief, and only from the onerous
annual $5.5 billion FEHBP payment.
The IG went on to state that, unlikeother public or private entities, the
USPS has put together a war chest
of over $326 billion to address future
pension and retiree health obliga-
tions. The USPS has already over-
100% funded its pension obligations.
In fact, when future pension and
health obligations are combined, 91%
of all future obligations are funded. In
contrast, the federal government is
funded at 42% and military is funded
at 27%.
Moreover, the IG echoed the Gospeltruth that there are no public or
private entities that are required to
pre-fund healthcare at the USPS
level. The federal government does
not pre-fund at all; only 38% of For-
tune 1000 companies prefund. The
median prefunding level for those
private firms that do prefund is 37%.