Emporia State University LI 810 XC Research and Inquiry in Library and Information Science Teresa...
-
Upload
alannah-mcdaniel -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of Emporia State University LI 810 XC Research and Inquiry in Library and Information Science Teresa...
Emporia State UniversityEmporia State UniversityLI 810 XCLI 810 XC
Research and Inquiry in Library Research and Inquiry in Library and Information Scienceand Information Science
Teresa Harper, Becky Corning &Teresa Harper, Becky Corning &
Ken MilesKen Miles
March 6, 2009March 6, 2009
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/misc/about.shtml
• Peer-reviewed
• Audience - General medical professionals and pediatricians
Social ResearchSocial Research
The Impact of a The Impact of a Clinic-Based Clinic-Based Literacy Literacy Intervention on Intervention on Language Language Development in Development in Inner-City Inner-City Preschool Preschool ChildrenChildren
Copyright 2001Copyright 2001
www.reachoutandread.org
Reach Out and ReadReach Out and Read
ObjectiveObjective
To determine the effect of a To determine the effect of a clinic-based literacy intervention clinic-based literacy intervention on the expressive and receptive on the expressive and receptive language development of language development of preschool children.preschool children.
DescriptionDescription
Unit of AnalysesUnit of Analyses
LatinosLatinos African-AmericansAfrican-Americans
Clinic population not included: Clinic population not included: Whites, Native Americans, East Whites, Native Americans, East Asian and South AsianAsian and South Asian
Purpose of Social ResearchPurpose of Social Research
DescriptionDescription ExplanationExplanation
The results are in …The results are in …
The researchers in this study demonstrated an
enhancement of language in inner-city preschool children participating in Reach Out
and Read.
The results are in …The results are in …
Reach Out and Read has beneficial effects on • Receptive language
and• Expressive language
Subjects for StudySubjects for Study
122 study participants122 study participants Children age 2 to 5.9 years old, not Children age 2 to 5.9 years old, not
attending kindergarten.attending kindergarten. Primary caretaker had to be available for Primary caretaker had to be available for
interview on day of presentationinterview on day of presentation
MeasurementMeasurement
Reading ActivitiesReading Activities READ Subscale of the StimQREAD Subscale of the StimQ
Language DevelopmentLanguage Development Receptive One-Word Picture Receptive One-Word Picture
Vocabulary TestVocabulary Test Expressive One-Word Picture Expressive One-Word Picture
Vocabulary TestVocabulary Test
Literature reviewLiterature review
McCormick, CE. (Ed.). (1986). Intervention procedures for increasing preschool children's interest in and knowledge about reading. In: Teale WH, Sulzby E, eds. In Emergent Literacy: Writing and Reading Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Rural Illinois Distribution of books, information
about reading distributed Associated with decreased placement
in low reading groups
Literature reviewLiterature review
Whitehurst, GJ, Falco, FL, & Lonigan, CJ (1988). Accelerating language development through picture book reading. Dev Psychol. 24, 552-559.
Suffolk County, Long Island Parent-child verbal interactions Improvement in language
Literature reviewLiterature review
Reach Out and Read National Center, Boston Medical Center. (1999). Reach Out and Read Program Manual (2nd ed.) [Brochure]. Boston, MA: P. Klass.
More recent research Pediatric visits viewed as unique
opportunity Improvement in language
Literature reviewLiterature review
High, PC, LaGasse L, Becker S, Ahlgren I, Gardner A. (2000). Literacy promotion in primary care pediatrics: can we make a difference? Pediatrics.
Clinic-based literacy interventions on language outcomes
18-to-25-month-old children
Who conducted Who conducted the research?the research?
2 investigators overseeing 2 investigators overseeing 6 research assistants6 research assistants
Information not provided: Information not provided: Who paid for the study?Who paid for the study?
Sampling: Sampling: Convenience sampleConvenience sample
““Grab” or “opportunity” Grab” or “opportunity” samplingsampling
Nonprobability methodNonprobability method Vulnerable to sampling Vulnerable to sampling
errorerror
Sampling: Sampling: Convenience sampleConvenience sample
Question: Question:
““Is there good reason to believe Is there good reason to believe that a particular convenience that a particular convenience sample would or should respond sample would or should respond or behave differently than a or behave differently than a random sample from the same random sample from the same population?”population?”
ExperimentsExperiments
Intervention group - three years Intervention group - three years of Reach Out and Read of Reach Out and Read
Comparison group - three Comparison group - three months before studymonths before study
ExperimentsExperiments
1. While families waited to see their pediatrician, volunteers and/or staff members sat with children on large playmats and modeled reading activities.
2. While families waited to see their pediatrician, volunteers and/or staff members approached families and discussed the importance of reading.
ExperimentsExperiments
3. Pediatricians counseled families about the importance and fun of reading.
4. Pediatricians distributed developmentally appropriate books to families at each American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)-recommended well-child visit.
Quantitative: Parents were Quantitative: Parents were interviewed about number of interviewed about number of books, frequency of reading, books, frequency of reading, reading activities - parental reading activities - parental reports used to measure reports used to measure interventionintervention
Qualitative: Researchers looked Qualitative: Researchers looked for changes over timefor changes over time
Purpose and DesignPurpose and Design
Additional findingAdditional finding
Not predicted or studied: Not predicted or studied: Children still scored lower than Children still scored lower than US sampleUS sample
Some QuestionsSome Questions
ResearchersResearchers BudgetBudget
How can findings be How can findings be generalized?generalized?
ROR is an important intervention for impoverished preschool children:
• Promotes parental literacy support • Enhances language development in
impoverished preschool children. • Integration into routine pediatric
health care recommended.