Employment Law Update
-
Upload
springhouse-solicitors -
Category
Law
-
view
77 -
download
0
Transcript of Employment Law Update
![Page 1: Employment Law Update](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062404/554c4276b4c9056b648b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
EMPLOYMENT LAW UPDATE30th April 2014
Presented byBen Power, Andrew Peters, Louise Maynard
Solicitors, Springhouse Solicitors
![Page 2: Employment Law Update](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062404/554c4276b4c9056b648b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Agenda
• Introduction – Ben Power• New TUPE and Mandatory ACAS Conciliation –
Andrew Peters• New Whistleblowing, Flexible Working and
Changes to Parental Rights – Louise Maynard• Cases Update covering calculation of holiday pay,
collective redundancies, maternity rights and fairness of dismissal – Ben Power• End and refreshments
![Page 3: Employment Law Update](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062404/554c4276b4c9056b648b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
New TUPE
Andrew Peters
![Page 4: Employment Law Update](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062404/554c4276b4c9056b648b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
New TUPE
The Old: Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006
The New: The Collective Redundancies and Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) (Amendment) Regulations 2014
![Page 5: Employment Law Update](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062404/554c4276b4c9056b648b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
New TUPE
Dismissals following transfer less likely to be unfair• no longer automatically unfair unless the
‘sole or principal reason for their dismissal is the transfer’
![Page 6: Employment Law Update](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062404/554c4276b4c9056b648b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
New TUPE
Dismissals following transfer less likely to be unfair (continued)• new general defence that the dismissal was
for an ‘economic, technical or organisational reason involving changes in the workforce, including changes in working duties, and numbers of employees’
![Page 7: Employment Law Update](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062404/554c4276b4c9056b648b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
New TUPE
Changing contracts after transfer will be made easier• changes are invalid only if ‘the sole or
principal reason for the dismissal is the transfer’, with an ETO (economic, technical or organisational) defence
• changes allowed where this is in the contract of employment (now would be a good time to review your contracts)
![Page 8: Employment Law Update](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062404/554c4276b4c9056b648b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
New TUPE
Changing contracts after transfer will be made easier (continued)• changes allowed where this is in the contract
of employment (now would be a good time to review your contracts)
![Page 9: Employment Law Update](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062404/554c4276b4c9056b648b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
New TUPE
Employee information must be provided earlier • transferor must provide basic information
about transferring staff and any problems or disputes 28 days before the transfer date
• this used to be 14 days
![Page 10: Employment Law Update](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062404/554c4276b4c9056b648b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
New TUPE
Service provision contracts are less likely to be caught• new TUPE will only apply where contract
carried out by the new contractor is ‘fundamentally the same’ way as before
![Page 11: Employment Law Update](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062404/554c4276b4c9056b648b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
New TUPE
Large scale redundancies: consultation will be easier• transferees planning to make more than 20
people redundant are able to carry out their consultation before the transfer takes place, with consent of existing employer
![Page 12: Employment Law Update](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062404/554c4276b4c9056b648b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
New TUPE
Flexibility for micro businesses• businesses with fewer than 10 employees will
be able to consult with them directly, without the need for the election of representatives
![Page 13: Employment Law Update](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062404/554c4276b4c9056b648b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
New TUPE
Union negotiated terms will be easier to deal with• collective agreement terms can now be
changed after 1 year provided the changes, when considered alongside the whole employment contract, leave the employee no worse off
![Page 14: Employment Law Update](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062404/554c4276b4c9056b648b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
New TUPE
Union negotiated terms will be easier to deal with (Continued)• where there is a union agreement in place,
terms subsequently agreed (such as pay rises) will not affect transferred employees
![Page 15: Employment Law Update](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062404/554c4276b4c9056b648b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
MANDATORY ACAS CONCILIATION
Andrew Peters
![Page 16: Employment Law Update](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062404/554c4276b4c9056b648b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Mandatory ACAS Conciliation
Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013, Schedules 1 and 2
ACAS Guide – Early Conciliation Explained
New rules in force 6 May 2014
![Page 17: Employment Law Update](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062404/554c4276b4c9056b648b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Mandatory ACAS Conciliation
Claimants must notify ACAS about the claim:• before it is commenced• by online/post/telephone• in respect of each respondent
Forms may be rejected if incorrectly filled in
![Page 18: Employment Law Update](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062404/554c4276b4c9056b648b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Mandatory ACAS Conciliation
When notification is not required:• ACAS already contacted• certain types of claim not covered (query
TUPE, counter-claims)
![Page 19: Employment Law Update](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062404/554c4276b4c9056b648b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Mandatory ACAS Conciliation
Starting conciliation – ACAS contact with parties:• ACAS contacts claimant for consent to
contact respondent• may be problems contacting right person at
respondent, but National Contacts List• ‘settlement not possible’ if contact not
possible with either party
![Page 20: Employment Law Update](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062404/554c4276b4c9056b648b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Mandatory ACAS Conciliation
Conciliation:• for up to 1 month• plus 14 day extension if consent and
reasonable prospect of settlement• COT3 where conciliation successful
![Page 21: Employment Law Update](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062404/554c4276b4c9056b648b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Mandatory ACAS Conciliation
Starting a claim:• only possible where EC (Early Conciliation)
Certificate issued (number must be included on ET1)
![Page 22: Employment Law Update](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062404/554c4276b4c9056b648b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Mandatory ACAS Conciliation
• EC Certificate issued if conciliation fails:- settlement not possible- contact not possible- either side refuses- ACAS decides conciliation not possible- time period up
![Page 23: Employment Law Update](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062404/554c4276b4c9056b648b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Mandatory ACAS Conciliation
Extensions of time to bring claims:• clock stops at Day A - date of compliant
contact with ACAS• clock starts at Day B - date of issue of EC
Certificate • but always at least a month to bring claim
after Day B
![Page 24: Employment Law Update](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062404/554c4276b4c9056b648b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
NEW WHISTLEBLOWING
Louise Maynard
![Page 25: Employment Law Update](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062404/554c4276b4c9056b648b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
New Whistleblowing
The Old:• Whistleblowers protected where
- disclosure of information relating to a ‘relevant failure’ (including criminal offences and failures to comply with legal obligations)- ‘reasonable belief’- ‘good faith’ in most circumstances
![Page 26: Employment Law Update](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062404/554c4276b4c9056b648b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
New Whistleblowing
The Old (continued):• Parkins v Sodexho:
- alleged breaches of own contract of employment protected- many employment disputes therefore covered, where no public interest
![Page 27: Employment Law Update](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062404/554c4276b4c9056b648b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
New Whistleblowing
The New:• Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013: • The new ‘public interest’ test for protection• in the ‘reasonable belief’ of the worker
![Page 28: Employment Law Update](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062404/554c4276b4c9056b648b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
New Whistleblowing
The New (continued):• tending to show
- criminal offence- failure to comply with legal obligation etc
• no need to show ‘good faith’
![Page 29: Employment Law Update](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062404/554c4276b4c9056b648b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
New Whistleblowing
How will ‘public interest’ be interpreted?• undefined • potential meanings to be decided by
tribunals and courts
![Page 30: Employment Law Update](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062404/554c4276b4c9056b648b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
New Whistleblowing
How will ‘public interest’ be interpreted? (continued)• potential meanings could be very wide
- from: of some interest to the public (favoured by the press!)
- to: demonstrable benefit to the public generally - but easy to satisfy either? i.e. general interest in
employers complying with their contracts, or that discrimination is a pernicious evil?
![Page 31: Employment Law Update](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062404/554c4276b4c9056b648b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
New Whistleblowing
Removal of ‘good faith’ requirement• now only relevant to award, which can be
reduced by up to 25%• malicious disclosures permitted• courts may allow detriment due to manner of
disclosure, but this remains to be seen
![Page 32: Employment Law Update](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062404/554c4276b4c9056b648b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
NEW FLEXIBLE WORKING Effective from 30 June 2014
Louise Maynard
![Page 33: Employment Law Update](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062404/554c4276b4c9056b648b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
New Flexible Working
What changes?• Right to request flexible working extended:
- to all employees with 26 weeks’ continuous service
- irrespective of caring responsibilities
![Page 34: Employment Law Update](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062404/554c4276b4c9056b648b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
New Flexible Working
What changes? (continued)• Statutory procedures scrapped• Employer must consider request in a
‘reasonable manner’- new draft ACAS Code of Practice- new ACAS Guidance
![Page 35: Employment Law Update](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062404/554c4276b4c9056b648b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
New Flexible Working
What changes? (continued)• Employer must give decision within three
months from date of application• Employee’s failure to attend a meeting and
re-convened meeting can lead to application being treated as withdrawn
![Page 36: Employment Law Update](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062404/554c4276b4c9056b648b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
New Flexible Working
What remains the same?• Flexible working request must be made in
writing and include:- date of application- changes being sought and from when- effect on employer and ways to deal with any
such effect - confirm it is a statutory request and the date of
any previous application
![Page 37: Employment Law Update](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062404/554c4276b4c9056b648b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
New Flexible Working
What remains the same? (continued) • Eight business reasons to refuse a request• One request in any 12 month period• Decisions must be made objectively avoiding
unlawful discrimination
![Page 38: Employment Law Update](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062404/554c4276b4c9056b648b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
CHANGES TO PARENTAL RIGHTS
Louise Maynard
![Page 39: Employment Law Update](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062404/554c4276b4c9056b648b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Changes to Parental Rights
New right to shared parental leave for parents of children expected to be born or placed with them for adoption from 5 April 2015
![Page 40: Employment Law Update](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062404/554c4276b4c9056b648b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Changes to Parental Rights
• Key Rights:- Share maternity leave and 37 weeks SPP- Employee can make three notifications- Parents can take SPL together or separately- Employer not obliged to agree to work pattern- Where employer cannot agree to work pattern
employee entitled to take one continuous block of SPL to start on their chosen date
![Page 41: Employment Law Update](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062404/554c4276b4c9056b648b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Changes to Parental Rights
• Key Rights (continued):- SPL to start on their chosen date - 20 keeping in touch days
• Protection from unfair dismissal or detriment available from 1 October 2014
![Page 42: Employment Law Update](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062404/554c4276b4c9056b648b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Changes to Parental Rights
New right for father and partners (employee and qualifying agency workers) to take time off to attend antenatal appointments• Up to 2 x max 6.5 hour appointments -
unpaid
![Page 43: Employment Law Update](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062404/554c4276b4c9056b648b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Changes to Parental Rights
New right for adoptive parents to take time off to attend adoption appointments• Up to 2 x max 6.5 hour appointments – paid or
unpaid • Employer can require employee to first sign a
declaration• Employer’s unreasonable refusal can lead to
liability for compensation equal to 12 hours’ pay• Effective from 1 October 2014
![Page 44: Employment Law Update](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062404/554c4276b4c9056b648b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Are you ready?
![Page 45: Employment Law Update](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062404/554c4276b4c9056b648b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
CASES UPDATE
Ben Power
![Page 46: Employment Law Update](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062404/554c4276b4c9056b648b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Holiday Pay
Lock v British Gas Trading Ltd and others• Comission payments to be taken into account
when calculating statutory holiday pay
![Page 47: Employment Law Update](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062404/554c4276b4c9056b648b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Collective Redundancy Consultation
USDAW v Ethel Austin Ltd (in administration) and another case (the ‘Woolworths case’)• Employees of the retail chains Woolworths
and Ethel Austin, who worked in stores where fewer than 20 employees were employed, were entitled to be consulted collectively
![Page 48: Employment Law Update](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062404/554c4276b4c9056b648b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Meetings with Employees
Crime Reduction Initiatives (CRI) v Lawrence• Employer's letter to a disabled employee,
which mistakenly invited her to a disciplinary hearing rather than a capability meeting
![Page 49: Employment Law Update](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062404/554c4276b4c9056b648b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Philosophical Belief
Olivier v Department of Work and Pensions• Was Labour Party member's belief in
‘democratic socialism’ a philosophical belief under Equality Act 2010?