Emory’University’Departments’of’Otolaryngology … · 2014. 1. 6. · • This "sinodural...

1
SITE FOR BONE ANCHORED HEARING SYSTEM FOR CHILDREN YOUNGER THAN FIVE YEARS CeIsha Ukatu; Nilesh K. Desai, MD 1 ; N. Wendell Todd, MD, MPH 2 Emory University Departments of Otolaryngology 2 and Radiology 1 INTRODUCTION RESULTS METHODS ABSTRACT REFERENCES CONTACT Objective: To describe, in children younger than the present FDA-approved five year of age, the thickest part of the temporal bone available for placement of a bone anchored hearing system (BAHS). Technique: With IRB approval, from the radiology records of a large children's hospital, for the years 2002-2012, thirty-eight patients less than age 6 years with congenital aural atresia had temporal CTs useable for this study. Bone thickness perpendicular to the surface of the bone was measured in the topmost axial CT slice that included any adjacent petrous ridge (i.e., at the sinodural angle). Conclusion: Based on this small case series, bone thickness at the sinodural angle is sufficient for many children suffering from aural atresia to have bone anchored hearing systems implanted younger than the present FDA-approved age of five years. Participants were patients, aged birth to 18 years of age, who underwent CT of the temporal bones for bony congenital aural atresia Patients were identified through the database of radiology reports for ten years (2002- 2012) On the top-most axial CT image that included any contiguously adjacent petrous ridge, bone thickness was measured perpendicular to the cortical surface This "sinodural site" was posterior-superior to the external auditory canal, and above the level of the sigmoid plate, with the sinodural angle in full view A second site for measurement of bone thickness was taken 5 mm posterior to the first measurement, the "cortical site" 1) Jensen DR, Grames LM, Lieu JEC. Effects of aural atresia on speech development and learning: Retrospective analysis From a multidisciplinary craniofacial clinic. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. [Epub ahead of print] 2) Lieu JEC, Tye-Murray N, Fu Q. Longitudinal study of children with unilateral hearing loss. Laryngoscope 2012;122:2088–95. 3) Semenov YR, Yeh ST, Seshamani M, Wang NY, Tobey EA, Eisenberg LS, Quittner AL, Frick KD, Niparko JK; the CDaCI Investigative Team. Age-dependent cost- utility of pediatric cochlear implantation. Ear Hear 2013;34:402-12. 4) Novakovic D, Meller CJ, Makeham JM, Brazier DH, Forer M, Patel NP. Computed tomographic analysis of outer calvarial thickness for osseointegrated bone- anchored hearing system insertion. Otol Neurotol 2011;32:448-52. 5) BAHA Surgery Guide. Cochlear Americas. 2010. 6) Ponto System – Surgical Manual. Oticon Medical. M50324/09.09. 7) Sophono Alpha (S) & Alpha (M) - Bone Conduction Hearing Systems - Physician Manual. REV A S0460-00 01/2013. CeIsha Ukatu Emory University Dept of Otolaryngology Email: [email protected] Website: hmp://otolaryngology.emory.edu Patients with unilateral hearing impairment, as with congenital unilateral aural atresia, suffer lifelong consequences attributable to infantile auditory deprivation. 1,2 Surgical options to improve hearing in children with aural atresia are not generally available until age five years, well beyond the age for auditory input to have a purposeful effect on the infant- dominant plasticity of the auditory system. 3 Bone anchored hearing systems are not FDA- approved until age five years in the United States; the concern is adequate cortical bone thickness. 4 The objective of this study is to describe bone thickness at the most lateral extent of the sinodural trough, i.e. the thicker mastoid bone in children 5 for placement of a BAHS Bone thickness at the "sinodural site" was, on average, more than 4 mm Bone thickness at the "cortical site" was nearly as thick No significant difference in bone thickness at the two sites was observed between the atretic and the non-atretic ears The concordance correlation coefficients checking inter- observer agreement were excellent o For the sinodural sites 0.76 (95%CI 0.64-0.85) for the atretic side and 0.81 (95%CI 0.69 to 0.88) for the non-atretic side o For the cortical sites, both were 0.85 (95%CI 0.75-1.00) The mean distances from the "sinodural site" to nearest pinna attachment of the microtic pinna at 10 mm from the skin ranged from 12.8 to 23.5 mm Sufficient distance exists from the center of the implant to the nearest pinna, for the child to wear the present 10 mm radius external device, plus the needed 7 mm distance to avoid acoustic feedback Measured the distance from 5 mm lateral from the skin at the "sinodural site" to the nearest portion of the microtic pinna attached to the overlying scalp This measurement was repeated at 10 mm lateral from the skin at the "sinodural site" Thickness at the "sinodural site" in children younger than age five years is usually sufficiently thick for the safe placement of a screw extending 3 mm into the bone Use of the "sinodural site" would require a magnetic BAHS, which could be repositioned posteriorly at age five years when pinna construction endeavors typically begin We endorse a prospective randomized study of children less than age five years to address both (1) safety and stability of the installing BAHS at the "sinodural site" (2) evidence that quality auditory input truly benefits the children of unilateral hearing loss CONCLUSION

Transcript of Emory’University’Departments’of’Otolaryngology … · 2014. 1. 6. · • This "sinodural...

Page 1: Emory’University’Departments’of’Otolaryngology … · 2014. 1. 6. · • This "sinodural site" was posterior-superior to the external auditory canal, and above the level

Poster  Print  Size:  This  poster  template  is  44”  high  by  44”  wide.  It  can  be  used  to  print  any  poster  with  a  1:1  aspect  ra?o.  

Placeholders:  The  various  elements  included  in  this  poster  are  ones  we  oAen  see  in  medical,  research,  and  scien?fic  posters.  Feel  free  to  edit,  move,    add,  and  delete  items,  or  change  the  layout  to  suit  your  needs.  Always  check  with  your  conference  organizer  for  specific  requirements.  

Image  Quality:  You  can  place  digital  photos  or  logo  art  in  your  poster  file  by  selec?ng  the  Insert,  Picture  command,  or  by  using  standard  copy  &  paste.  For  best  results,  all  graphic  elements  should  be  at  least  150-­‐200  pixels  per  inch  in  their  final  printed  size.  For  instance,  a  1600  x  1200  pixel  photo  will  usually  look  fine  up  to  8“-­‐10”  wide  on  your  printed  poster.  To  preview  the  print  quality  of  images,  select  a  magnifica?on  of  100%  when  previewing  your  poster.  This  will  give  you  a  good  idea  of  what  it  will  look  like  in  print.  If  you  are  laying  out  a  large  poster  and  using  half-­‐scale  dimensions,  be  sure  to  preview  your  graphics  at  200%  to  see  them  at  their  final  printed  size.  Please  note  that  graphics  from  websites  (such  as  the  logo  on  your  hospital's  or  university's  home  page)  will  only  be  72dpi  and  not  suitable  for  prin?ng.  

 [This  sidebar  area  does  not  print.]  

Change  Color  Theme:  This  template  is  designed  to  use  the  built-­‐in  color  themes  in  the  newer  versions  of  PowerPoint.  To  change  the  color  theme,  select  the  Design  tab,  then  select  the  Colors  drop-­‐down  list.                    The  default  color  theme  for  this  template  is  “Office”,  so  you  can  always  return  to  that  aAer  trying  some  of  the  alterna?ves.  

Prin?ng  Your  Poster:  Once  your  poster  file  is  ready,  visit  www.genigraphics.com  to  order  a  high-­‐quality,  affordable  poster  print.  Every  order  receives  a  free  design  review  and  we  can  delivery  as  fast  as  next  business  day  within  the  US  and  Canada.    Genigraphics®  has  been  producing  output  from  PowerPoint®  longer  than  anyone  in  the  industry;  da?ng  back  to  when  we  helped  MicrosoA®  design  the  PowerPoint®  soAware.      US  and  Canada:    1-­‐800-­‐790-­‐4001  Email:  [email protected]  

 [This  sidebar  area  does  not  print.]  

SITE  FOR  BONE  ANCHORED  HEARING  SYSTEM  FOR    CHILDREN  YOUNGER  THAN  FIVE  YEARS      

CeIsha  Ukatu;  Nilesh  K.  Desai,  MD1;  N.  Wendell  Todd,  MD,  MPH2  Emory  University  Departments  of  Otolaryngology2  and  Radiology1  

INTRODUCTION   RESULTS  

METHODS  

ABSTRACT  

REFERENCES  

CONTACT  

Objective: To describe, in children younger than the present FDA-approved five year of age, the thickest part of the temporal bone available for placement of a bone anchored hearing system (BAHS). Technique: With IRB approval, from the radiology records of a large children's hospital, for the years 2002-2012, thirty-eight patients less than age 6 years with congenital aural atresia had temporal CTs useable for this study. Bone thickness perpendicular to the surface of the bone was measured in the topmost axial CT slice that included any adjacent petrous ridge (i.e., at the sinodural angle). Conclusion: Based on this small case series, bone thickness at the sinodural angle is sufficient for many children suffering from aural atresia to have bone anchored hearing systems implanted younger than the present FDA-approved age of five years.

•  Participants were patients, aged birth to 18 years of age, who underwent CT of the temporal bones for bony congenital aural atresia

•  Patients were identified through the database of radiology reports for ten years (2002- 2012)

•  On the top-most axial CT image that included any contiguously adjacent petrous ridge, bone thickness was measured perpendicular to the cortical surface

•  This "sinodural site" was posterior-superior to the external auditory canal, and above the level of the sigmoid plate, with the sinodural angle in full view

•  A second site for measurement of bone thickness was taken 5 mm posterior to the first measurement, the "cortical site"

1) Jensen DR, Grames LM, Lieu JEC. Effects of aural atresia on speech development and learning: Retrospective analysis From a multidisciplinary craniofacial clinic. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. [Epub ahead of print]

2) Lieu JEC, Tye-Murray N, Fu Q. Longitudinal study of

children with unilateral hearing loss. Laryngoscope 2012;122:2088–95.

3) Semenov YR, Yeh ST, Seshamani M, Wang NY, Tobey

EA, Eisenberg LS, Quittner AL, Frick KD, Niparko JK; the CDaCI Investigative Team. Age-dependent cost-utility of pediatric cochlear implantation. Ear Hear 2013;34:402-12.

4) Novakovic D, Meller CJ, Makeham JM, Brazier DH,

Forer M, Patel NP. Computed tomographic analysis of outer calvarial thickness for osseointegrated bone-anchored hearing system insertion. Otol Neurotol 2011;32:448-52.

5) BAHA Surgery Guide. Cochlear Americas. 2010. 6) Ponto System – Surgical Manual. Oticon Medical.

M50324/09.09. 7) Sophono Alpha (S) & Alpha (M) - Bone Conduction

Hearing Systems - Physician Manual. REV A S0460-00 01/2013.

CeIsha  Ukatu  Emory  University  Dept  of  Otolaryngology  Email:  [email protected]  Website:  hmp://otolaryngology.emory.edu  

•  Patients with unilateral hearing impairment, as with congenital unilateral aural atresia, suffer lifelong consequences attributable to infantile auditory deprivation.1,2

•  Surgical options to improve hearing in children with aural atresia are not generally available until age five years, well beyond the age for auditory input to have a purposeful effect on the infant-dominant plasticity of the auditory system.3

•  Bone anchored hearing systems are not FDA-approved until age five years in the United States; the concern is adequate cortical bone thickness.4

•  The objective of this study is to describe bone thickness at the most lateral extent of the sinodural trough, i.e. the thicker mastoid bone in children5 for placement of a BAHS

•  Bone thickness at the "sinodural site" was, on average, more than 4 mm

•  Bone thickness at the "cortical site" was nearly as thick

•  No significant difference in bone thickness at the two sites was observed between the atretic and the non-atretic ears

•  The concordance correlation coefficients checking inter-observer agreement were excellent o  For the sinodural sites 0.76

(95%CI 0.64-0.85) for the atretic side and 0.81 (95%CI 0.69 to 0.88) for the non-atretic side

o  For the cortical sites, both were 0.85 (95%CI 0.75-1.00)

•  The mean distances from the "sinodural site" to nearest pinna attachment of the microtic pinna at 10 mm from the skin ranged from 12.8 to 23.5 mm

•  Sufficient distance exists from the center of the implant to the nearest pinna, for the child to wear the present 10 mm radius external device, plus the needed 7 mm distance to avoid acoustic feedback

•  Measured the distance from 5 mm lateral from the skin at the "sinodural site" to the nearest portion of the microtic pinna attached to the overlying scalp

•  This measurement was repeated at 10 mm lateral from the skin at the "sinodural site"

•  Thickness at the "sinodural site" in children younger than age five years is usually sufficiently thick for the safe placement of a screw extending 3 mm into the bone

•  Use of the "sinodural site" would require a magnetic BAHS, which could be repositioned posteriorly at age five years when pinna construction endeavors typically begin

•  We endorse a prospective randomized study of children less than age five years to address both (1) safety and stability of the installing BAHS at the "sinodural site" (2) evidence that quality auditory input truly benefits the children of unilateral hearing loss

CONCLUSION