EMI VERIFICATION REPORT - cubetape.com€¦ · EMI TEST REPORT FOR DECLARATION OF CONFORMITY to FCC...

of 31

EMI TEST REPORT DECLARATION OF CONFORMITY

to FCC PART 15.101

Report Number: M150923F

Test Sample: Cubetape/ Scantape Cradle Model Number: C190CRA

Tested For: ParcelTools Pty Ltd

Date of Issue: 16 October 2015

EMC Technologies Pty Ltd reports apply only to the specific samples tested under stated test conditions. It is the manufacturer’s responsibility to assure that additional production units of this model are manufactured with identical electrical and mechanical components. EMC Technologies Pty Ltd shall have no liability for any deductions, inferences or generalisations drawn by the client or others from EMC Technologies Pty Ltd issued reports. This report shall not be used to claim, constitute or imply product endorsement by EMC Technologies Pty Ltd.

Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025. The results of the tests, calibrations and/or measurements included in this document are traceable to Australian/national standards. NATA is a signatory to the ILAC Mutual Recognition Arrangement for the mutual recognition of the equivalence of testing, calibration and inspection reports.

This document shall only be reproduced in full, with the exception of the certificate on page 2

EMC Technologies Pty Ltd ABN 82 057 105 549 176 Harrick Road Keilor Park Victoria Australia 3042 Ph: + 613 9365 1000 Fax: + 613 9331 7455 Email: [email protected]

Report No. M150923F of 31



EMI TEST REPORT

DECLARATION OF CONFORMITY

to

FCC PART 15.101

EMC Technologies Report No. M150923F

Issue Date: 16 October 2015

CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION

2.0 GENERAL INFORMATION

3.0 TEST CONFIGURATION

4.0 CONDUCTED EMI MEASUREMENTS

5.0 RADIATED EMI MEASUREMENTS

6.0 COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

7.0 MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY

APPENDIX A: MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENT DETAILS

APPENDIX B: PHOTOGRAPHS

APPENDIX C: GRAPHS of EMI MEASUREMENTS

APPENDIX D: FCC DoC REQUIREMENTS




EMI TEST REPORT

DECLARATION OF CONFORMITY

to

FCC PART 15.101

Test Sample: Cubetape/ Scantape Cradle

Model Number: C190CRA

Tested for: ParcelTools Pty Ltd

Address: 24-26 Mary Parade, Rydalmere, NSW 2116 Australia

Phone: +61 2 8081 9099

Contact: Tony Bauer

Email: [email protected]

Responsible Party: John Levisohn

Equipment Type: Unintentional Radiator, Class B Device

Test Standard/s: FCC Part 15 Subpart B

ANSI C63.4-2009 American National Standard for Methods of Measurement of Radio-Noise Emissions from Low-Voltage Electrical and Electronic Equipment in the Range of 9 kHz to 40 GHz

Result of Test: The Test Sample complied with the applicable FCC Part 15 Subpart B requirements. Refer to Report M150923F for full details

Test Dates: 18th & 23

rd September 2015

Attestation: I hereby certify that the device(s) described herein were tested as described in this report and that the data included is that which was obtained during such testing

Test Officer: Sean Nettleton

Authorised Signatory: Chris Zombolas

Technical Director

EMC Technologies Pty Ltd




EMI TEST REPORT FOR DECLARATION OF CONFORMITY

to

FCC PART 15.101 REQUIREMENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION This report details the results of EMI tests and measurements performed on the Cubetape/ Scantape Cradle, Model No. C190CRA, in accordance with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regulations as detailed in Title 47 CFR, Part 15 Subpart B for a for a Class B computer peripheral, unintentional radiator. The results and technical details of the test sample are detailed in this report. The test sample was found to comply with the EMI limits for a Class B device. The test sample was provided by the Client. The results herein apply only to the test sample.

1.1 Summary of Test Results

15.107 Conducted EMI: (0.15-30 MHz) Complied Class B limit, margin of > 10 dB

15.109 Radiated EMI: (30-1000 MHz) *Complied Class B limit, margin of 2.5 dB

15.109 Radiated EMI: (above 1 GHz) Complied Class B limit, margin of > 10 dB

*This result is within the laboratory’s measurement uncertainty. Refer to section 7.0. The measurement procedure used was in accordance with ANSI C63.4-2009. The instrumentation conformed to the requirements of ANSI C63.2: 2009.

1.2 EUT – Voltage Power Conditions

Conducted emissions testing was performed at a voltage of 110V AC, 60 Hz.

2.0 GENERAL INFORMATION (Information supplied by the Client)

The Equipment Under Test (EUT) was identified as follows:

Test Sample: Cubetape/ Scantape Cradle

Model Number: C190CRA

Equipment Type: Unintentional Radiator

Tested with Switching Power Supply:

Model Number: PSM11R-120

Part Number: 46001802

Input Supply: 100-240V AC, 0.3A, 50-60Hz

Output Supply: 12V DC, 0.8A max. 25-34VA

Radio Module: FCC ID: QOQWT12 (WT12 Bluetooth Module) Operating frequency: 2402.0 – 2480.0 MHz

2.1 Description supplied by Client The test sample is a charging cradle for a wireless handheld data collection device.




2.2 Operating Conditions

Testing was performed with the EUT powered by supplied AC/DC plugpack. The cradle was fully charged (green LED illuminated) with a spare battery inserted and the USB cable connected (un-terminated).

2.3 Modifications No modifications were required to achieve compliance.

2.4 Test Procedure

Emissions measurements were performed in accordance with the procedures of ANSI C63.4-2009. Radiated emissions tests were performed at a distance of 10 metres (30-1000MHz) and 3 metres (> 1 GHz) from the EUT.

2.5 Test Facility

2.5.1 General Measurements were performed at EMC Technologies' laboratory in Keilor Park, Victoria Australia. EMC Technologies Pty Ltd is listed by the FCC as a test laboratory able to perform compliance testing for the public. EMC Technologies is listed as an FCC part 47CFR 2.948

test lab and may perform the testing required under Parts 15 and 18 – FCC Registration

Number 90560 EMC Technologies Pty Ltd has also been accredited as a Conformity Assessment Body (CAB) by Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) under the APECTEL MRA and is designated to perform compliance testing on equipment subject to Declaration of Conformity (DoC) and Certification under Parts 15 and 18 of the FCC Commission’s rules –

Registration Number 494713 and Designation number AU0001.

EMC Technologies’ indoor open area test site (iOATS) has been accepted by Industry Canada for the performance of radiated measurements in accordance with RSS-Gen, Issue 8

- Industry Canada iOATS number - IC 3569B

2.5.2 NATA Accreditation NATA is the Australian National laboratory accreditation body and has accredited EMC Technologies to operate to the IEC/ISO17025 requirements. A major requirement for accreditation is the assessment of the company and its personnel as being technically competent in testing to the standards. This requires fully documented test procedures, continued calibration of all equipment to the National Standard at the National Measurements Institute (NMI) and an internal quality system to ISO 17025. NATA is an ILAC member and has mutual recognition agreements with the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) and the American Association for Laboratory Accreditation (A

2LA).

All testing in this report has been conducted in accordance with EMC Technologies’ scope of NATA accreditation. The current full scope of accreditation can be found on the NATA website: www.nata.com.au The scope also includes a large number of emissions, immunity, SAR, EMR and Safety standards.

http://www.nata.com.au/




2.6 Units of Measurements

Conducted Emissions

Measurements are reported in units of dB relative to one microvolt (dBV).

Radiated Emissions

Measurements are reported in units of dB relative to one microvolt per metre (dBV/m).

2.7 Test Equipment Calibration Measurement instrumentation and transducers were calibrated in accordance with the applicable standards by a NATA accredited laboratory such as Keysight Technologies (Australia) Pty Ltd or the National Measurement Institute (NMI). All equipment calibration is traceable to Australia national standards at the National Measurements Institute. The reference antenna calibration was performed by Liberty Labs LLC and the working antennas (biconilog and horn) calibrated by Liberty Labs LLC and EMC Technologies respectively. The complete list of test equipment used for the measurements, including calibration dates and traceability is contained in Appendix A

3.0 TEST CONFIGURATION Refer to Appendix B for photographs of the tested system.




4.0 CONDUCTED EMISSION MEASUREMENTS

4.1 Test Procedure The arrangement specified in ANSI C63.4:2009 was adhered to for the conducted EMI measurements. The EUT was placed in the RF screened enclosure and a CISPR EMI Receiver as defined in ANSI C63.2: 2009 was used to perform the measurements.

The EMI Receiver was operated under program control using the Max-Hold function and automatic frequency scanning, measurement and data logging techniques. The specified 0.15 MHz to 30 MHz frequency range was sub-divided into sub-ranges to ensure that all short duration peaks were captured.

4.2 Peak Maximising Procedure The various operating modes of the system were investigated. For each of the sub-ranges, the EMI receiver was set to continuous scan with the Peak detector set to Max-Hold mode. The Quasi-Peak detector and the Average detector were then invoked to measure the actual Quasi-Peak and Average level of the most significant peaks, which were detected.

4.3 Calculation of Voltage Levels

The voltage levels were automatically measured in software and compared to the test limit. The method of calculation was as follows:

VEMI = VRx + LBPF

Where: VEMI = the Measured EMI voltage in dBµV to be compared to the limit.

VRx = the Voltage in dBµV read directly at the EMI receiver.

LBPF = the insertion loss in dB of the cables and the Limiter and Pass Filter.

4.4 Plotting of Conducted Emission Measurement Data The measurement data pertaining to each frequency sub-range were concatenated to form a single graph of (peak) amplitude versus frequency. This was performed for both Active and Neutral lines and the composite graph was subsequently plotted. A list of the highest relevant peaks and the respective Quasi-Peak and Average values were also plotted on the graph.

4.5 Results of Conducted Emission Measurement

Frequency

MHz

Line Measured

QP Level

dBV

QP Limit

dBV

QP

dB

Measured

AV Level

dBV

AV

Limit

dBV

AV

dB

0.182 Neutral 41.5 64.4 -22.9 34.0 54.4 -20.4

0.189 Neutral 40.1 64.1 -24.0 30.8 54.1 -23.3

0.775 Active 27.5 56.0 -28.5 22.6 46.0 -23.4

0.173 Active 36.0 64.8 -28.8 31.3 54.8 -23.5

0.210 Neutral 38.0 63.2 -25.2 29.5 53.2 -23.7

0.170 Neutral 41.9 65.0 -23.1 31.2 55.0 -23.8

The worst case conducted EMI occurred at 0.182 MHz on the neutral line and complied with the FCC Class B, quasi peak and average limits by margins of 22.9 dB and 20.4 dB respectively. Refer to Appendix C, Graphs 1 and 2.




5.0 RADIATED EMISSION MEASUREMENTS

5.1 Test Procedure The EUT was set up on the table top (placed on turntable) of total height 80 cm above the ground plane, and operated as described in section 2 of this report. The EMI Receiver was operated under software control via the PC Controller through the IEEE.488 Interface Bus Card Adaptor. The test frequency range was sub-divided into smaller bands with sufficient frequency resolution to permit reliable display and identification of possible EMI peaks while also permitting fast frequency scan times. A calibrated Biconilog antenna was used for measurements between 30 MHz and 1000 MHz. A calibrated double-ridged horn antenna was used for measurements over 1000 MHz. Testing was performed at a distance of 10 metres for the frequency range 30 to 1000 MHz and 3 metres for frequency ranges above 1000 MHz. The quasi-peak measurements of emissions between 30 and 1000 MHz were measured with a resolution bandwidth of 120 kHz and a video bandwidth of 300 kHz. The average and peak measurements of emissions above 1000 MHz were measured with a resolution bandwidth of 1000 kHz and a video bandwidth of 10 Hz and 1000 Hz respectively. The receiver bandwidth was set to 6 dB. The EUT was slowly rotated with the Peak Detector set to Max-Hold. This was performed for two antenna heights. Each significant peak was then investigated and maximised with the Quasi-Peak detector. The measurement data for each frequency range was automatically corrected by the software for cable losses, antenna factors and preamplifier gain and all data was then stored on disk in sequential data files. This process was performed for both horizontal and vertical antenna polarisations.

5.2 Plotting of Measurement Data for Radiated Emissions The stored measurement data was combined to form a single graph which comprised of all the frequency sub-ranges. The accumulated EMI (EUT ON) was plotted as the Red trace. The highest recorded EMI signals are shown on the Peaks List below the graph. For radiated EMI each numbered peak is listed as a frequency, peak field strength, quasi-peak or average field strength and the margin relative to the limit in dB. A negative margin is the deviation of the recorded value below the limit.




5.3 Calculation of Field Strength The field strength was calculated automatically by the software using all the pre-stored calibration data. The method of calculation is shown below:

E = V + AF - G + L

Where:

E = Radiated Field Strength in dBµV/m.

V = EMI Receiver Voltage in dBµV. (measured value)

AF = Antenna Factor in dB(m-¹). (stored as a data array of factor versus frequency)

G = Preamplifier Gain in dB. (stored as a data array of gain versus frequency)

L = Cable insertion loss in dB. (stored as a data array of insertion loss versus frequency)

Example Field Strength Calculation

Assuming a receiver reading of 34.0 dBV is obtained at 90 MHz, the Antenna Factor at that frequency is 9.2 dB. The cable loss is 1.9 dB while the preamplifier gain is 20.0 dB. The resulting Field Strength is therefore as follows:

34.0 + 9.2 + 1.9 - 20.0 = 25.1 dBV/m

5.4 Radiated EMI Results

5.4.1 30-1000 MHz

Frequency

MHz

Polarisation

QP Measured

dBV/m

QP Limit

dBV/m

QP

dB

74.76 Vertical 27.0 29.5 -2.5*

74.28 Vertical 25.9 29.5 -3.6*

76.89 Vertical 24.9 29.5 -4.6*

78.54 Vertical 24.2 29.5 -5.3

81.19 Vertical 22.4 29.5 -7.1

327.46 Horizontal 28.0 35.5 -7.5

71.43 Vertical 21.8 29.5 -7.7

*This result is within the laboratory’s measurement uncertainty. Refer to section 7.0.

The worst case radiated EMI occurred at 74.76 MHz and complied with the FCC Class B, quasi peak limit by a margin of 2.5 dB. Refer to Appendix C, Graphs 3 and 4.

5.4.2 Above 1 GHz

Testing was performed to 2.0 GHz at a distance of 3 metres. Both peak and average measurements were recorded. All recorded emissions complied with the Class B peak and average limits by margins of greater than 10 dB. Refer to Appendix B, graphs 5 to 8.




6.0 COMPLIANCE STATEMENT The Cubetape/ Scantape Cradle, Model No. C190CRA, tested on behalf of ParcelTools Pty Ltd, complied with the applicable conducted and radiated EMI requirements of the FCC Part 15 Subpart B Rules for a Class B computer peripheral. The compliance margins were as follows:

15.107 Conducted EMI: (0.15-30 MHz) Complied Class B limit, margin of > 10 dB

15.109 Radiated EMI: (30-1000 MHz) *Complied Class B limit, margin of 2.5 dB

15.109 Radiated EMI: (above 1 GHz) Complied Class B limit, margin of > 10 dB

*This result is within the laboratory’s measurement uncertainty. Refer to section 7.0.

7.0 MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY

EMC Technologies has evaluated the equipment and the methods used to perform emission testing. The estimated measurement uncertainty for emission tests shown within this report are as follows:

Conducted Emissions Mains Port 9 kHz to 30 MHz ±3.2 dB

Radiated Emissions 9 kHz to 30 MHz ±4.1 dB 30 MHz to 300 MHz ±5.1 dB 300 MHz to 1000 MHz ±4.7 dB 1 GHz to 18 GHz ±4.6 dB

The above expanded uncertainties are based on the standard uncertainty multiplied by a coverage factor of k = 2 and providing a level of confidence of approximately 95 %.

Application of measurement uncertainty for this report: The referenced uncertainty standard specifies that determination of compliance shall be based on measurements without taking into account measurement instrumentation uncertainty. However, the measurement uncertainty shall appear in the test report.




APPENDIX A

MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENTATION DETAILS

EQUIPMENT

TYPE

MAKE/MODEL

SERIAL NUMBER

LAST CAL.

DD/MM/YY

DUE DATE

DD/MM/YY

CAL.

INTERVAL

EMI RECEIVERS R&S ESU40 Sn: 100392 (R-140) 09/10/14 09/10/15 1 YEAR *2

HP 8546A Sn: 3549A00290 (R-009) 02/10/14 02/10/15 1 YEAR *2

ANTENNAS

SUNOL JB6 BICONILOG (A-363) 30 - 6000 MHz Sn. A012312

16/05/14 16/05/16 2 YEAR *3

EMCO 3115 Broadband Horn (A-004) 1 – 18 GHz

09/05/13 09/05/16 3 YEAR *1

LISN EMCO 3810/2NM Sn: 9607-1505 (L-019) 23/10/14 23/10/16 2 YEAR *1

Note *1. In-house calibration. Refer to Quality Manual. Note *2. NATA calibration by Rhode & Schwarz (Australia) Pty Ltd Note *3. A2LA Accredited calibration by Liberty Labs, Inc.




APPENDIX B1

TEST SETUP PHOTOGRAPHS

Conducted Emissions




APPENDIX B2


Radiated Emissions Test Setup (below 1 GHz)




APPENDIX B3


Radiated Emissions Test Setup (above 1 GHz)




APPENDIX B4

TEST SAMPLE PHOTOGRAPHS

Test sample




APPENDIX B5


Test sample




APPENDIX B6





APPENDIX B7


Test sample




APPENDIX B8


Test sample




APPENDIX C

Graphs of EMI Measurements

CONDUCTED EMI

Graph 1: Active Line 0.15 MHz - 30 MHz

Graph 2: Neutral Line 0.15 MHz - 30 MHz

RADIATED EMI

Graph 3: Vertical Polarity 30 - 1000 MHz

Graph 4: Horizontal Polarity 30 - 1000 MHz

Graph 5: Vertical Polarity (peak) 1 – 6 GHz

Graph 6: Vertical Polarity (average) 1 – 6 GHz

Graph 7: Horizontal Polarity (peak) 1 – 6 GHz

Graph 8: Horizontal Polarity (average) 1 – 6 GHz




CONDUCTED EMI

Graph 1: Active Line, 0.15 - 30 MHz

Peak Frequency

MHz

Line Measured

QP Level

dBV

QP

Limit

dBV

QP

dB

Measured

AV Level

dBV

AV

Limit

dBV

AV

dB

1 0.775 Active 27.5 56.0 -28.5 22.6 46.0 -23.4

2 0.173 Active 36.0 64.8 -28.8 31.3 54.8 -23.5

3 1.178 Active 23.1 56.0 -32.9 19.1 46.0 -26.9

4 1.070 Active 10.5 56.0 -45.5 10.5 46.0 -35.5

5 4.621 Active 9.6 56.0 -46.4 9.6 46.0 -36.4

6 3.727 Active 9.6 56.0 -46.4 9.6 46.0 -36.4

7 7.627 Active 8.3 60.0 -51.7 8.3 50.0 -41.7

8 29.33 Active 7.8 60.0 -52.2 7.8 50.0 -42.2




CONDUCTED EMI

Graph 2: Neutral Line, 0.15 - 30 MHz

Peak Frequency

MHz

Line Measured

QP Level

dBV

QP

Limit

dBV

QP

dB

Measured

AV Level

dBV

AV

Limit

dBV

AV

dB

1 0.154 Neutral 43.1 65.8 -22.7 24.9 55.8 -30.9

2 0.182 Neutral 41.5 64.4 -22.9 34.0 54.4 -20.4

3 0.157 Neutral 42.6 65.6 -23.0 24.7 55.6 -30.9

4 0.170 Neutral 41.9 65.0 -23.1 31.2 55.0 -23.8

5 0.189 Neutral 40.1 64.1 -24.0 30.8 54.1 -23.3

6 0.210 Neutral 38.0 63.2 -25.2 29.5 53.2 -23.7

7 0.216 Neutral 37.3 63.0 -25.7 21.1 53.0 -31.9

8 0.579 Neutral 27.5 56.0 -28.5 21.4 46.0 -24.6

9 0.371 Neutral 28.6 58.5 -29.9 18.5 48.5 -30.0

10 1.180 Neutral 22.8 56.0 -33.2 18.4 46.0 -27.6

11 4.610 Neutral 13.5 56.0 -42.5 13.5 46.0 -32.5

12 27.21 Neutral 13.5 60.0 -46.5 13.5 50.0 -36.5

13 9.310 Neutral 8.2 60.0 -51.8 8.2 50.0 -41.8




RADIATED EMI

Graph 3: Vertical Polarity, 30 - 1000 MHz

Peak Frequency

MHz

Polarisation

QP Measured

dBV/m

QP Limit

dBV/m

QP

dB

1 74.76 Vertical 27.0 29.5 -2.5

2 74.28 Vertical 25.9 29.5 -3.6

3 76.89 Vertical 24.9 29.5 -4.6

4 78.54 Vertical 24.2 29.5 -5.3

5 81.19 Vertical 22.4 29.5 -7.1

6 71.43 Vertical 21.8 29.5 -7.7

7 34.58 Vertical 21.0 29.5 -8.5

8 34.84 Vertical 20.6 29.5 -8.9

9 70.84 Vertical 20.2 29.5 -9.3

10 329.60 Vertical 25.4 35.5 -10.1

11 36.51 Vertical 19.1 29.5 -10.4

12 332.96 Vertical 23.3 35.5 -12.2

13 415.99 Vertical 22.9 35.5 -12.6

14 407.96 Vertical 22.8 35.5 -12.7

15 924.15 Vertical 21.7 35.5 -13.8

16 411.66 Vertical 20.8 35.5 -14.7




RADIATED EMI

Graph 4: Horizontal Polarity, 30 - 1000 MHz

Peak Frequency

MHz

Polarisation

QP Measured

dBV/m

QP Limit

dBV/m

QP

dB

1 327.46 Horizontal 28.0 35.5 -7.5

2 327.40 Horizontal 27.1 35.5 -8.4

3 329.65 Horizontal 27.0 35.5 -8.5

4 323.86 Horizontal 26.3 35.5 -9.2

5 416.01 Horizontal 23.5 35.5 -12.0

6 30.95 Horizontal 17.0 29.5 -12.5

7 406.83 Horizontal 22.5 35.5 -13.0

8 411.87 Horizontal 22.2 35.5 -13.3

9 296.03 Horizontal 21.9 35.5 -13.6

10 952.48 Horizontal 21.9 35.5 -13.6

11 401.63 Horizontal 20.7 35.5 -14.8

12 274.54 Horizontal 20.6 35.5 -14.9

13 738.60 Horizontal 19.7 35.5 -15.8

14 625.12 Horizontal 17.8 35.5 -17.7

15 991.69 Horizontal 23.0 43.5 -20.5

16 118.23 Horizontal 9.8 33.0 -23.2




RADIATED EMI

Graph 5: Vertical Polarisation (peak), 1 GHz – 6 GHz

No peaks were measured within 10 dB of the limit.




RADIATED EMI

Graph 6: Vertical Polarisation (average), 1 GHz – 6 GHz

Peak Frequency

MHz

Polarisation Measured

AV Level

dBV/m

AV Limit

dBV/m

AV

dB

1 1901.21 Vertical 30.0 54.0 -24.0

2 1615.41 Vertical 27.6 54.0 -26.4

3 1190.03 Vertical 25.3 54.0 -28.7




RADIATED EMI

Graph 7: Horizontal Polarisation (peak), 1 GHz – 6 GHz

No peaks were measured within 10 dB of the limit.




RADIATED EMI

Graph 8: Horizontal Polarisation (average), 1 GHz – 6 GHz

Peak Frequency

MHz

Polarisation Measured

AV Level

dBV/m

AV Limit

dBV/m

AV

dB

1 1911.09 Horizontal 30.0 54.0 -24.0

2 1597.93 Horizontal 27.3 54.0 -26.7




APPENDIX D

FCC DoC REQUIREMENTS

The following information is believed to be true and accurate, however we advise that the current FCC rules/regulations be consulted. EMC Technologies accepts no responsibility for any consequences arising from the use of the following information. It is the manufacturer’s/suppliers responsibility to ensure that all applicable FCC Rules are identified and adhered to. If other parts of the FCC Rules apply, there may be requirements for additional or different forms of labelling and user information.

1. FCC Report & Documentation Requirements

A copy of the measurement report showing compliance with FCC standards must be retained and, if requested, submitted to the commission. The copy of the following documentation pertaining to the equipment tested must be kept with test report:

Test Sample Block Diagram

Test Sample Schematics

Test Sample PCB Layouts

Test Sample User Manual

It is important that testing and product information be readily available, as failure to

produce this information within 14 days of a request by the FCC may result in them

issuing of a substantial fine.

2. Labelling requirements (Reference FCC Rules - Section 15.19) Upon completion of the measurement report a compliance label displaying the FCC logo, product trade name and product model number must be affixed to the device. 15.19(b)(1)(i) Products subject to authorization under a Declaration of Conformity shall be labelled as follows:

15.19(b)(1)(ii) If a personal computer is authorized based on assembly using separately authorized components:




Compliance statement: This device complies with Part 15 of the FCC Rules. Operation is subject to the following two conditions: (1) this device may not cause harmful interference, and (2) this device must accept any interference received, including interference that may cause undesired operation.

When the device is so small or for such use that it is not practicable to place the above applicable compliance information statement on the device it must be displayed in the user manual or product literature supplied to the user or alternatively, shall be placed on the container in which the device is marketed.

Please note that FCC regulations declare -

"The label shall not be a stick-on, paper label. The label on these products shall be permanently affixed to the product and shall be readily visible to the purchaser at the time of purchase…."

"Permanently affixed means that the label is etched, engraved, stamped, silkscreened, indelibly printed, or otherwise permanently marked on a permanently attached part of the equipment or on a nameplate of metal, plastic, or other material fastened to the equipment by welding, riveting or a permanent adhesive. The label must be designed to last the expected lifetime of the equipment in the environment in which the equipment may be operated and must not be readily detachable". Please note: If the device contains pre-approved modular transmitter the following label requirements apply: If using a permanently affixed label, the modular transmitter must be labelled with its own FCC identification number, and, if the FCC identification number is not visible when the module is installed inside another device, then the outside of the device into which the module is installed must also display a label referring to the enclosed module. This exterior label can use wording such as the following: “Contains Transmitter Module FCC ID: XYZMODEL1” or “Contains FCC ID: XYZMODEL1”. Any similar wording that expresses the same meaning may be used. The Grantee may either provide such a label, an example of which must be included in the application for equipment authorization, or, must provide adequate instructions along with the module which explains this requirement. In the latter case, a copy of these instructions must be included in the application for equipment authorization. Refer to FCC Part 15.212 vi (A)




3. Information to the user (Refer to Section 15.105)

Place the following text in the user (instruction) manual or product literature:

Class B Product:

NOTE: This equipment has been tested and found to comply with the limits for a Class B digital device, pursuant to Part 15 of the FCC Rules. These limits are designed to provide reasonable protection against harmful interference in a residential installation. This equipment generates, uses and can radiate radio frequency energy and, if not installed and used in accordance with the instructions, may cause harmful interference to radio communications. However, there is no guarantee that interference will not occur in a particular installation. If this equipment does cause harmful interference to radio or television reception, which can be determined by turning the equipment off and on, the user is encourage to try to correct the interference by one or more of the following measures:

Reorient or relocate the receiving antenna

Increase the separation between the equipment and receiver

Connect the equipment into an outlet on a circuit different from that to which the receiver is connected

Consult the dealer or an experienced radio/TV technician for help

4. Required Warning

In addition the user's manual or instruction manual for an intentional or unintentional radiator shall caution the user that changes or modifications not expressly approved by the party responsible for compliance could void the user's authority to operate the equipment (see below for example). Warning: Any changes or modifications not expressively approved by (company name) could

void the user's authority to operate this equipment

5. Representative/Agents requirements

Your agent/representative in the States must complete DoC paperwork on your behalf.

EMI VERIFICATION REPORT - cubetape.com€¦ · EMI TEST REPORT FOR DECLARATION OF CONFORMITY to FCC...

Documents

Transcript of EMI VERIFICATION REPORT - cubetape.com€¦ · EMI TEST REPORT FOR DECLARATION OF CONFORMITY to FCC...