Emerging Chemicals: Moving Beyond Compliance
description
Transcript of Emerging Chemicals: Moving Beyond Compliance
Emerging Chemicals: Moving Beyond Compliance
Shannon E. CunniffSpecial Assistant, Emerging ContaminantsJoint Services Environmental Management ConferenceTampa, FLApril 12, 2005
2
DoD MERIT
3
Moving Beyond Compliance
Compliance Approach• $ provided for what you
legally have to do• Harder to find $ for smart to
do actions• Always reactive• Budget process cannot
handle emerging issues• Focuses on what you know• High potential for stopping
mission activities
Sustainability Approach• Equal footing: $ for activities
supporting mission sustainment• Proactive, predictive…able to
rapidly respond to new info• Focuses on what you need to
know & ought to do• Ties environmental activities to
mission accomplishment
4
DOD Directive 4715.1 MERIT
4.1 Manage & apply DoD installation assets to sustain DoD mission 4.2 Use Defense Installations Strategic Plan to guide ESOH decision-making 4.3 Use ESOH management systems in planning & execution across all military ops and activities
4.4 Ensure all organizations plan, program, & budget to manage ESOH risks 4.5 Evaluate all activities for current & emerging ESOH resource requirements & make prudent investments to support mission accomplishment, enhance readiness, reduce future funding needs, prevent pollution, prevent illness & injury, ensure cost-effective compliance, & maximize existing resource capability
4.6 Ensure tenants comply with laws and DoD policies. 4.7 Protect DoD personnel from accidental dealth, injury or occupational illness. 4.8 Protect the public from risk of death, injury, illness or property damage because of DoD activities
4.9 Establish and maintain open and productive ESOH dialogue
5
DoD MERIT
6
SUSTAIN OUR ASSETS• RESTORE• MANAGE• MODERNIZE
7
Emerging Chemicals
1,343,277 commercial chemicals
224,787 regulated chemicals
8
Interest in Emerging Materials DoD: Responsible
for Sustaining Defense and
National Security
EPA/States: Need to Protect
Valuable Assets
Public: Needs to Feel Assured That They Are Protected From
DoD Substances
9
DOD Mission is Affected by Emerging Materials Challenges
• Acquisition • Manufacturing• Training, research, and
development investments• Operations • Readiness and range
management
• Occupational health and safety
• Environmental management (compliance & clean-up)
• Demilitarization
GENERATES UNCERTAINTIES AND STRAINS RESOURCES
10
11
DoD MERIT Vision
- Act as the principal agent of change for transforming the way DoD addresses the legitimate concerns of
the public, regulators and defense community about emerging health and environmental concerns.
- Through proactive and strategic investments pay the cost in time, money and frustration now to avoid
more costly issues in the future- Through better coordination and visibility of Services
efforts, address current issues with a single DoD voice effectively.
12
DoD MERIT Goals
…principal agent of change…• DoD stovepipes….• DoD is culturally “locked-in” to cleaning up the
past.– Cleanup standards have lowered based on:
• Good science (fair enough, we clean-up)• Incomplete or inconclusive science and (legitimate) fear of the
unknown (we should provided more complete and conclusive science).
13
DoD MERIT Goals
…legitimate…
• We are not trying to dodge responsibility, avoid liability or preach that our chemicals are benign.
• Concerns of the public are legitimate and should be addressed up front and honestly.
• We need to be prepared ahead of time to do just that.
14
DoD MERIT Goals
…proactive and strategic investments…
• Pay the upfront cost to avoid future issues. • We cannot afford to be constantly entering the
regulatory and public fray from behind. • We cannot afford to constantly resort to defending
our materials and practices.
15
DoD MERIT Goals
…better coordination and visibility…
• Enterprise risk management that:• Identifies and assess needs of all stakeholders.• Transforms substance management to be
forward looking, flexible and rapid (because concerns will still arise that take us by surprise).
• Coordinates DoD technical resources.• Maintains Service and installation autonomy to
address their unique issues as they see fit.
16
DoD MERIT
17
Materials of Evolving Regulatory Interest Team (MERIT)
Planning & Integration
Risk Assessment Risk Management
Communication
18
Risk Assessment, Risk Management, & Outreach
Outreach
Risk ManagementRisk Assessment
19
Risk Assessment &
Risk Management
Mission
PlaceChemical
20
Predictive Assessments– Evaluating & leveraging work already done
• Environmental screening of replacement materials (QSAR)
• Prioritization of emerging materials using new algorithms (Army EQT Program)
• Prioritization of emerging materials using commercial databases (GMACS)
– Developing protocols for using predictive models to assess environmental and health affects
21
Getting the Gears Moving Together
ECOS
EPA
Other Feds
Installation Managers
Clean-up
Toxicology Researchers
Manufacturing
Training
Technology ResearchersRemediation
Industry
ITRC
22
Lubricating the Gears• Providing a science and studies registry• Being a toxicological info source• Identifying research and
investment priorities
23
Toxicological Data Needs
Human EcologicalMERI Examples Oral (RfD) Uncertaintly FactorsInhalation (RfC) Cancer Mammals Birds Amphibians Reptiles
Depleted Uranium2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene1,3,5-TrinitrobenzeneHMX UF = 1000RDX UF = 100Nitroglycerin1,3-Dinitrobenzene UF = 30002-A-4,6-DNT4-A-2,6-DNTTrinitrophenol2,4-Dinitrotoluene2,6-DinitrotolueneTetryl UF = 10,000MNXTNXDNXTATB
- Benchmark exists- Conservative benchmark exists- No benchmark exists- Benchmark evalution underway b/c new data*- Generally not applicable
24
Information Communication Strategies
• MERIT web site
• Public affairs and press releases
• Science & studies coordination systems
• Identifying science & study priorities & gaps
• Establish training module for acquisition training (DAU)
25
Other Deliverables• Policies to position the department to
better manage resources
• Tools to implement polices
• Metrics with which to measure progress
• Processes for truly joint and systematic program execution and oversight
26
27
What do we give up for MERIT?
• Services will sacrifice some independence for coordination
• The DoD “single voice” may not always be agreeable to all
• Funding channels and priorities will be visible and accountable
28
What do we give up for MERIT?
• Duplication of effort• Ad-hoc approach• Assuming that someone else is working
on a particular issue• Passive acceptance of regulatory decrees• Not knowing what we don’t know
29
30
MERIT Recent Accomplishments• Instituted interagency effort developed
consensus charge to evaluate state of the science for TCE.
• Initiated interagency discussions regarding IRIS update for several chemicals including naphthalene.
• Proposed options to promote transparency and sound peer review and timely interagency involvement in the regulatory process.
31