Emergent (self-organizing) and/or deliberately designed.

29
Structure Structure • norms • roles

Transcript of Emergent (self-organizing) and/or deliberately designed.

Page 1: Emergent (self-organizing) and/or deliberately designed.

StructureStructure

• norms• roles

Page 2: Emergent (self-organizing) and/or deliberately designed.

StructureStructure

• norms• roles• intermember relations

Emergent (self-organizing) and/or deliberately designed

Page 3: Emergent (self-organizing) and/or deliberately designed.

What Are Norms?

Norms: Consensual and often implicit standards that describe what behaviors should and should not be performed in a given context.

Page 4: Emergent (self-organizing) and/or deliberately designed.

Feature Description

Descriptive describe how most members act, feel, and think

Consensual shared among group members, rather than personal, idiosyncratic beliefs

Injunctive (or normative)

define which behaviors are "bad" or "wrong" and which are "good" or "acceptable"

Prescriptive set the standards for expected behaviors

Proscriptive identify behaviors that should not be performed

Informal describe the unwritten rules of conduct in the group

Implicit often so taken for granted members follow them automatically

Self-generating emerge as members reach a consensus through reciprocal influence

Stable once they develop, resistant to change and passed from current members to new members

Page 5: Emergent (self-organizing) and/or deliberately designed.

Development of Norms

Sherif’s studies of the development of norms in groups

– Convergence in actions, thoughts, and emotions occurs over time

Page 6: Emergent (self-organizing) and/or deliberately designed.

Sherif's (1936) autokinetic effect studies

Judged distance a dot of light moved in a darkened room

Page 7: Emergent (self-organizing) and/or deliberately designed.

Autokinetic effect: the stationary dot of light will seem to move

It moved about3.5 inches

Page 8: Emergent (self-organizing) and/or deliberately designed.

What if people make their judgments with others, and state estimates aloud?

Looks like 1 inch

I’d say 2 inches

7.5 inches

Page 9: Emergent (self-organizing) and/or deliberately designed.

Conformity! Initially, they differ; but over trials, they converge

Person A

Person B

Person C

Convergence

Alone GroupSession 1

GroupSession 3

GroupSession 2

Ave

rage

di

stan

ce e

stim

ates

Page 10: Emergent (self-organizing) and/or deliberately designed.

Sherif verified that norms form spontaneously and indirectly

Consensual shared among group members, rather than personal, idiosyncratic beliefs

Implicit often so taken for granted members follow them automatically

Self-generating emerge as members reach a consensus through reciprocal influence

Stable once they develop, resistant to change and passed from current members to new members

Do Norms Sometimes Take on a “life of their own”?

Page 11: Emergent (self-organizing) and/or deliberately designed.

Sherif put in a confederate in some groups who made exaggerated distance judgments others conformed

Confederate

Person B

Person C

Alone GroupSession 1

GroupSession 3

GroupSession 2

Ave

rage

di

stan

ce e

stim

ates

Page 12: Emergent (self-organizing) and/or deliberately designed.

Even when the confederate was replaced, the norm remained

Person B

Person D

Person C

Group Session 4

GroupSession 1

GroupSession 3

GroupSession 2

Ave

rage

di

stan

ce e

stim

ates

Newmember

Page 13: Emergent (self-organizing) and/or deliberately designed.

The exaggerated norm lasted for many “generations” of replacements

Person C

Person F

Person D

Group Session 4

GroupSession 1

GroupSession 3

GroupSession 2

Ave

rage

di

stan

ce e

stim

ates

Page 14: Emergent (self-organizing) and/or deliberately designed.

Sherif’s studies of the development of norms in groups - Members often internalize these consensual

standards- Result: norms are self-generating and stable

Examples

• Eating disorders in groups (binging, purging, excessive exercise)

• Alcohol use on college campuses (Perkins and “social norm interventions”)

Page 15: Emergent (self-organizing) and/or deliberately designed.

What Are Roles?

Roles: The types of behaviors expected of individuals who occupy particular positions within the group (e.g., roles in a play)– Independent of individuals– Flexible, to an extent– Structure interaction, create patterns of

action

Page 16: Emergent (self-organizing) and/or deliberately designed.

What Are Roles?

Role differentiation: The emergence and patterning of role-related actions – Task roles pertain to the work of the group – Relationship roles pertain to relations among

members.– Roles tend to become specialized over time– Task and relationship role demands tend to be

incompatible with one another

Page 17: Emergent (self-organizing) and/or deliberately designed.

What Are Roles?

Moreland and Levine's group socialization theory

– Types of members: prospective, new, full, marginal, and former (ex-member)

– Phases: investigation, socialization, maintenance, resocialization, and remembrance

– Processes: recruitment/reconnaissance, accommodation/assimilation, role negotiation, tradition/reminiscence

– Transition points: entry, acceptance, divergence, exit

Page 18: Emergent (self-organizing) and/or deliberately designed.
Page 19: Emergent (self-organizing) and/or deliberately designed.

What Are Roles?

Role stress – Role ambiguity– Role conflict (interrole conflict and intrarole

conflict)– Role fit

Page 20: Emergent (self-organizing) and/or deliberately designed.

What Are Status Networks?

Status network: Stable pattern of variations in authority and power

Page 21: Emergent (self-organizing) and/or deliberately designed.

What Are Status Networks?

Status differentiation – Competition for status

(pecking orders)– Perceptions of status– Expectation-states

theory: diffuse and specific status characteristics

Page 22: Emergent (self-organizing) and/or deliberately designed.

What Are Status Networks?

Status generalization: when irrelevant characteristics influence status allocation

– Minorities, solos denied status

– Online groups and the status equalization effect

Page 23: Emergent (self-organizing) and/or deliberately designed.

What Are Attraction Networks?

Attraction network (sociometric structure): Stable patterns of liking-disliking

Page 24: Emergent (self-organizing) and/or deliberately designed.

What Are Attraction Networks?

Sociometric differentiation– Types of group members: stars, rejected,

neglected– Features: reciprocity, transitivity, homophily

(clusters)– Heider's balance theory: likes and dislikes are

balanced

B

A

C

+

+

+

B

A

C

+

+

-

B

A

C

-

-

+

Page 25: Emergent (self-organizing) and/or deliberately designed.

What Are Attraction Networks?

What factors predict sociometric standing?– Having socially attractive qualities (e.g.,

cooperativeness or physical appeal)– Person-group fit

Page 26: Emergent (self-organizing) and/or deliberately designed.

What Are Communication Networks?

Communication network: formal and informal paths that define who speaks to whom most frequently

Page 27: Emergent (self-organizing) and/or deliberately designed.

What Are Communication Networks?

– Types: wheel, comcon, chain, circle– Centralized vs. uncentralized

Page 28: Emergent (self-organizing) and/or deliberately designed.
Page 29: Emergent (self-organizing) and/or deliberately designed.

What Are Communication Networks?

Network and location in the network influences many processes

– Information saturation: centralized networks are most efficient unless information overload

– Individuals who occupy more central positions are more influential (and more satisfied) than those located at the periphery.

– Hierarchical networks and information flow: More information flows downward and unrealistically positive information flows upward