Emergency Services Training Center - cccc.edu

Emergency Services Training Center Pre-Design Report

SCO ID # 14-111297-01 NCCCS # 2068

May 2015

Central Carolina Community College Pre-Design Report Emergency Services Training Center Hobbs Architects, PA

Table of Contents

Executive Summary

Section 1

Programming Information

Section 2

Code Analysis

Section 3

Estimated Project Cost

Section 4

Appendix Items

Section 5

Site Plan Building Plan

Meeting Minutes Plumbing Fixture Count Worksheet

1: Executive Summary

Central Carolina Community College Executive Summary Emergency Services Training Center 1 | 1

Executive Summary Hobbs Architects, PA is pleased to submit this pre-design report, the culmination of efforts by stakeholders committed to the success of the Emergency Services Training programs at Central Carolina Community College. The primary objectives of this pre-design phase are to develop a preliminary site plan, preliminary building plan, and a preliminary budget for a proposed new building at CCCC's EST campus. Hobbs Architects, PA worked with departmental staff to develop a space programming list of necessary site and building items for inclusion in the new design. Through numerous meetings, a preliminary site and floor plan have been developed upon which preliminary budget figures have been based. Hobbs Architects, PA commissioned RDK Engineers for mechanical, electrical, and plumbing design input; CLH Design, PA for civil and landscape design input; and Stroud Pence for structural design input. The following is an outline of the key findings included in this report: Site:

The approx. 98 acre site is well-suited to accommodate the proposed new building, as well as significant future growth.

Basic utilities are already present on site in relative proximity to the proposed new building location.

The overall topography of the site is relatively flat, with piped stormwater being discharged at the northeast of the site.

Some surface parking is present on site, with current student overflow parking located on grass surfaces. A gravel parking area for 60 cars may be included in the project, budget permitting.

Security fencing may be added at the property's western border, and near equipment storage buildings, budget permitting.

A future high bay facility is shown as replacing the former terminal building, though not a part of this project's scope.

Building: Proposed square footage: +/- 8,000 SF Proposed building is one story and located adjacent to the existing classroom (former airport

terminal) building Program elements include exercise and mat rooms, locker and shower rooms, 1-2 classrooms,

and a small office suite. The building's HVAC system will likely consist of multiple DX-cooling heat pump split systems.

Enclosed are further materials detailing the programmatic, regulatory, and budgetary context of the proposed project. Hobbs Architects is committed to serving CCCC through the realization of this important milestone in the Emergency Services Training program's growth.

2: Programming Information

Central Carolina Community College Programming Information Emergency Services Training Center 2 | 1

Programming Information Hobbs Architects, PA conducted two meetings with CCCC Emergency Services Training program coordinators to determine specific spatial requirements of the proposed new building. CCCC has a regional reputation for emergency services training, and the EST campus accordingly serves as a regional resource. To maintain and augment this status, the current program has unmet needs related to the physical training aspects of the EST curricula, and seeks to meet those needs with new construction. The EST program has minimal flexibility in scheduling physical training aspects of the curriculum due to the absence of on-site locker and shower rooms. The program also requires an increase in available indoor exercise and physical training spaces. Current accreditation standards dictate sizing of various spaces as indicated (mat room and classrooms). The addition of two classrooms would greatly ease scheduling pressures for Law Enforcement and Fire and Rescue training programs. Initial scope considered the study of two locations on site: one as an addition to the brick ESTC building, and another as a new facility elsewhere on campus. Once CCCC's space needs were identified, however, it became apparent that there is insufficient area adjacent to the ESTC building to accommodate the required program in a one-story configuration. A two-story configuration is cost-prohibitive. Costly utility re-routing would also have contributed negatively to the project's budget were this option to be pursued. Future expansion on the airport campus was discussed. Future building program goals outlined by CCCC included two main facilities: a teaching high-bay space, and a firing range. Zoning and regulatory challenges may hinder the development of any firing range that has an outdoor component. It is recommended that a future firing range facility be considered as an indoor range only, with appropriate acoustic controls and hazardous material (lead) abatement. A 6,000 sq.ft. high bay building footprint is shown as overlaid atop the former terminal building, which is the preferred location for the future high bay facility's construction. Space List A summary space list was compiled as a result of programming efforts. Based on the needs expressed by CCCC, an approximately 8,000 sq.ft. one-story building is proposed.


Emergency Services Training Center Programming List

2015.04.14

Space Rec'd/ Actual Size

Notes

Exercise Room 750 Size to accommodate exercise room equipment - no

accreditation requirements. Mat Room 1500 Size for 30 students at 50 sq. ft. per student

Men's Locker Room

900 A maximum simultaneous load of 60 students may use the lockers at once. 100 lockers are required. Showers should be private with integral undressing area.

Women's Locker Room 660 25-30 lockers required. Showers should be private

with integral undressing area. Office 1 120 Detailed requirements TBD Office 2 120 Detailed requirements TBD

Office/Admin 240 Detailed requirements TBD

Break Room 250 Detailed requirements TBD

Classroom 1 720

24 sq.ft. per student required - 30 students should be accommodated. Classrooms should be grouped in pairs. Infrastructure for overhead projection or SmartBoard technology shall be included.

Classroom 2 720 Same as above Mechanical 100 Detailed requirements TBD

Electrical 60 Detailed requirements TBD

Storage 75 Detailed requirements TBD

Housekeeping 50 Mop sink, shelving recommended Net Subtotal 6265

Net to Gross Increase (25%)

1566

Total 7831

Site Improvements

Security Fence

Should fencing be included in the project, the area facing the high school, and equipment buildings require fencing due to concerns about CCCC property theft.

Track / Pavement Improvements Selected track improvements may be part of the project scope.

Localized parking 40 paved parking spaces are proposed to be added adjacent to the new facility, inclusive of accessible parking spaces.

Gravel overflow parking Gravel surface parking for up to 60 vehicles may be added to the project scope, as budget permits


Building Engineering Systems The following preliminary design selections have been outlined relative to engineering systems: HVAC The mechanical system shall consist of multiple DX-cooling heat pump split systems. Any mechanical rooms will be sized according to equipment selections and recommended clearances, and will include appropriate access to equipment for CCCC and other maintenance personnel. Plumbing Fixtures and Water Heating The plumbing system shall consist of a gas fire water heater with storage tank and recirculation loop. Manual fixtures shall be used throughout. Water closets shall be handle-type floor-mounted. A mop sink with shelving will be provided in the housekeeping closet. Dual flush and pint use fixtures shall be considered for use. Locker room showers and area floor drains shall be provided. Electrical Emergency power is not required above code minimum standards relative to life safety. LED vs. fluorescent lighting will be evaluated. Lighting controls will be a contactor-based system with occupancy sensors and appropriate overrides. TVSS (transient voltage surge suppression) will be provided at incoming power service, and at fire alarm, communication, and security systems as required. Fire Protection, Fire Alarm, and Smoke Detection A sprinkler system is not required due to the building's small size and occupancy type. Fire alarm and smoke detection systems and devices will be provided as required by code. The fire alarm system shall be addressable. Tel/Data and Security The electrical / IT room will be provided with a mini-split HVAC unit as required. Wireless access points will be provided, as will infrastructure for VOIP telephony. A box and conduit system will be provided for telecom and security systems. Structural To minimize cost pressures, the Emergency Services Training Center building will consist of a 1 story, 8,000 square foot, stand alone, pre-engineered metal building. The building’s structural system will be comprised of the manufacturer’s standard moment resisting frames with intermediate cold formed steel roof purlins to support the roof loads. Lateral support will also be provided by the moment frames in one direction while rod bracing or portal frames will provide lateral support in the other direction. If a brick façade is selected for the building, structural design will include non load bearing cold formed metal stud exterior walls to support the brick. If a metal panel façade is selected, the manufacturer’s standard cold formed steel wall girts will be used for the metal panel support. Foundations are expected to be shallow spread footings tied to the slab-on-grade to resist vertical and lateral loads. Site Infrastructure and Improvements An early site analysis was conducted based on a site visit and drawings obtained from CCCC, dated March 2009. At the time of this report's issuance, CCCC's consulting surveyor was completing a localized survey of the project area.


City water appears to arrive on site via Airport Road, routing westwards near the burn building, and tees off towards the existing terminal building and the ESTC building. Numerous fire hydrants exist on site in support of the fire response training program. Surface runoff generally flows from west to east from adjacent Lee County High School. Catch basins are present and stormwater is piped to a discharge area at the northeast corner of the airport site. Sewer appears to arrive on site from the southwest, parallel to the runway. The design team anticipates that the closest tie-in may be southeast of the ESTC building, just past the security gate onto the runway and apron area. The former terminal building, adjacent to the proposed new construction, is currently served by an aging septic system. The proposed location of the new building appears to not conflict with neither the septic tank nor drainfield locations. Electrical power appears to arrive on site via overhead lines along the main entry drive, transitioning to underground across the street from the existing terminal building. Telephone appears to parallel the power across the entry drive. Two areas of bermed topsoil or fill exist on the site across the drive from the proposed building location, the result of earthwork associated with the high school construction. This soil may be suitable as fill if required for this project. Discussions regarding required parking provisions are ongoing with City of Sanford Zoning. The project proposes to add 40 parking spaces adjacent to the building, off of the main entry drive. UDO metrics require the provision of 1 space per 200 square feet of building gross floor area, or 1 space per 4 students, whichever is greater. A gravel overflow lot may be provided, budget permitting.

3: Code Analysis

Central Carolina Community College Code Analysis Emergency Services Training Center 3 | 1

Code Analysis Summary of Code Approach Building Code Edition 2012 IBC with NC amendments*

Occupancy Business

Construction Type Type IIB non-combustible construction

Square Footage Proposed 8,000 SF

Mixed Use No

Square Footage Allowed Table 503 Type IIB construction: 23,000 SF allowed

Sprinklers Not required

Fire ratings Some fire partitions may be required at incidental use spaces; corridor walls

may require a 1 hour fire rating per Table 1018.1. No exterior rated walls are anticipated, due to distance from adjacent building.

ADA Accessibility All primary spaces within the building, including restrooms, locker/shower rooms, classrooms, offices, and exercise/mat rooms will be accessible and on an accessible route.

* The governing codes for this project include the 2012 North Carolina Building, Administrative, Mechanical, Fuel Gas, Plumbing, Energy, and Fire Codes, and the 2011 National Electrical Code (NFPA 70) with 2011 NC Amendments. By reference, ANSI A117.1 and DoJ Accessibility Standards are included. The authorities having jurisdiction (AHJ) over this project include:

Review, Permitting, and Construction Inspections: City of Sanford/Lee County Inspections Division and City of Sanford/Lee County Fire Department

Constructability and State Regulatory secondary review: State Construction Office Zoning Review: City of Sanford Planning and Development Department

Zoning / Environmental Discussions regarding required parking provisions are ongoing with City of Sanford Zoning. The project proposes to add localized parking adjacent to the building, off of the main entry drive. UDO metrics require the provision of 1 space per 200 square feet of building gross floor area, or 1 space per 4 students, whichever is greater. A gravel overflow lot may be provided, budget permitting. Since an addition to an existing building has been ruled out as an option, no hazardous material evaluation has been conducted and is not deemed necessary as part of the project scope.

Central Carolina Community College Code Analysis Emergency Services Training Center 3 | 2

Building The proposed building is one-story and 8,000 sq.ft., with a single primary occupancy as Business. The Exercise and Mat Rooms are of a size below the threshold of being considered A-3 occupancy, due to an occupant count of less than 50 per room. The classrooms also have lower than 50 occupants each. Due to small size and one-story height of the building, any construction type permitted by the 2012 NC Building Code is allowable to be utilized. Fire Protection, Fire Alarm, and Smoke Detection A sprinkler system is not required due to the building's small size and occupancy type. Fire alarm and smoke detection systems and devices will be provided as required by code. The fire alarm system shall be addressable. Plumbing Fixture Count The minimum required plumbing fixture counts are 3 water closets/urinals and 2 lavatories for men, 3 water closets and 2 lavatories for women, and 2 drinking fountains. Locker and shower fixtures counts are all above the minimum required. ESTC has requested that additional fixtures be allocated to the men's locker rooms, to reflect their typical student demographic. The design team will consult with the relevant AHJ to determine the permissibility of this provision. (Refer to the plumbing fixture spreadsheet included in the appendix.) Energy The project is governed by the requirements of the 2012 NC Energy Code. The project is not subject to the sustainability requirements of Senate Bill 668, nor the Net Savings Required requirements of HB 628. State Construction Office Life Cycle Cost Analysis is not required for this project, as it is under 20,000 sq.ft. LEED certification will not be pursued as part of this project's scope. The project is subject to the energy performance standards enumerated in the 2012 North Carolinas Energy Code.

4: Estimated Project Cost

Central Carolina Community College Estimated Project Cost Emergency Services Training Center 4 | 1

Estimated Project Cost The enclosed 3-9 budget form reflects updated preliminary budget cost information. Given current market conditions, the current estimate reflects a construction cost per square foot of $186 for an approximately 8,000 SF building, including site costs. The enclosed budget form also reflects a 3% construction contingency, design fees, estimated Owner costs, and an escalation factor of 6% over the course of 12 months. The total estimated project cost is approximately $1,970,449.

COMMUNITY COLLEGE: DATE: May 2015

PROJECT IDENTIFICATION:

PROJECT LOCATION/COUNTY:

PROJECT DESCRIPTION & JUSTIFICATION:

CURRENT ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST* QTY UNIT COST PER UNIT TOTAL

A. 1 Lump Sum $0

B.

1 Lump Sum $0

1 Lump Sum $210,000

C.

1 Lump Sum $105,000

8,000 SF $ 87.00 $695,960

8,000 SF $ 12.50 $100,000

8,000 SF $ 25.00 $200,000

8,000 SF $ 20.00 $160,000

6. Other: 1 Lump Sum $90,000

D.

1 Lump Sum $12,000

1 Lump Sum $0

$1,572,960$89,189

3 % $ 47,189

10 % $ 166,734

$ 1,876,071

12 months 6 %

$ 94,377.60

$ 1,970,449 * Attach basis and justification for estimate. Include description, quantities, units, special features, similar cost on recent projects, etc.

*****

APPROVED BY: _______________________________________ DATE:________

NORTH CAROLINA COMMUNITY COLLEGE SYSTEM

DIVISION OF FINANCE AND BUSINESS

ADMINISTRATIVE AND FACILITY SERVICES

PROPOSED RENOVATION / REHABILITATION OR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

Fencing, track improvement, A/V infrastr.

DESIGN FEE

1. Fixed (Casework)

The Emergency Services Training Center at Central Carolina Community College provides high quality emergency responder training in Emergency Medical Services, Firefighting, Technical Rescue, and Law Enforcement. The current center needs additional classroom(s), physical training areas, locker room facilities and office spaces.

Emergency Services Training Center

(Attach additional data as necessary to indicate need, size, function of improvements and master plan.)

Central Carolina Community College

Lee County - ESTC Campus

FOR THE BIENNIUM 2011-2013

1. Demolition

2. Site Work***

Construction

1. Utility Services**

Land Requirement

Site Preparation

2. Moveable (Equipment)

ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COSTS

CONTINGENCIES (% of Estimated Construction Costs)

OWNER'S PROJECT COSTS

2. Building Construction

3. Plumbing

4. HVAC

5. Electrical

Equipment

TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS (Estimated Costs + Escalation Cost Increase)

Escalation % = 0.5 per month multiplied by number of months

(From Est. Date to mid-point of construction) =

(% of Estimated Construction Costs + Escalation)

Sum of Estimated Construction Costs + Owner's Costs + Contingencies + Design Fee)ESTIMATED COSTS

ESCALATION COST INCREASE (Estimated Construction Costs x Escalation %)

Attach explanation of any special building, mechanical, or electrical service requirements with appropriate distance to existing water, gas, electrical or other utility service.

Include items such as grading, roads, walks, parking, etc.

TITLE:___________________(President or Chief Business Officer)

NCCCS 3-9April 2008

5: Appendix

A. Site Plan

B. Building Plan

C. Meeting Minutes

D. Plumbing Fixture

Count Worksheet

A: Site Plan

IN = 420.6'

TOP = 426.1'

TOP = 429.1'

OUT = 426.4'

OUT = 420.5'

IN-W = 420.1'

IN-W = 424.4'

UNDERGROUND JB

DROP INLET

IN-S = 419.9'

TOP = 429.1'

INVERT = 425.85'

OUT = 419.6'

IN-W = 423.6'

TOP = 429.0'

DROP INLET

IN-S = 426.7'

IN-E = 423.7'

OUT = 426.0'

TOP = 424.3'

OUT = 426.6'

OUT = 423.5'

DROP INLET

OUT = 421.0'

IN-S = 425.8'

TOP = 427.0'

DROP INLET

OUT = 424.1'

IN = 423.1'

TOP = 421.6'

DROP INLET

DROP INLET

TOP = 429.4'

OUT = 423.0'

IN-S = 416.6'

TOP = 429.0'

DROP INLET

DROP INLET

IN-W = 415.9'

OUT = 427.0'

TOP = 430.3'

TOP = 424.7'

DROP INLET

IN = 427.3'

OUT = 415.8'

DROP INLET

IN = 424.8'

TOP = 430.0'

IN = 420.4'

OUT = 427.2'

TOP = 428.9'

OUT = 424.7'

OUT = 420.3'

1X8 HW

DROP INLET

DROP INLET

IN = 425.4'

JB

TOP = 429.4'

JUNCTION BOX

TOP = 421.6'

OUT = 425.3'

OUT = 427.4'

TOP = 423.7'

IN-W = 417.6'

DROP INLET

IN = 427.2'

IN = 419.3'

IN-W = 427.1'

TOP = 426.4'

IN-NW = 417.3'

OUT = 427.1'

OUT = 419.2'

IN = 422.9'

OUT = 417.1'

DROP INLET

DROP INLET

OUT = 422.8'

TOP = 430.2'

TOP = 426.2'

DROP INLET3

DROP INLET

IN = 426.5'

DI

DI

DI

DI

DI

DI

DI

DI

DI

DI

DI

DI

DI

CA

RV

AN

(37)

NE

W P

AR

KIN

G S

PA

CE

S

(24)

(5)

(8)

(27) EXISTING PARKING SPACES

(23) EXISTING PARKING SPACES

NEW 24" RCP

NEW 18" RCP

NEW 18" RCP

+T

OC

432

.33 +

194

200

4

C02

1

C02

C02

2

2

C02

2

C02

3

C02

4

C02

ELEV = 452.75

NCGS DOLLA

NC GRID (NAD

EOP 200.80+

TOC 200.80+

TC 200.80+

+MATCH

EOP 428.00+

EOP 427.00+

EOP 427.00 +

MATCH +

MATCH +

MATCH +

MATCH +

+-MATCH

+-EOP

+EOP 431.00

+EOP 430.00

ST

RA

W M

AT

EOP 427.50+

TOP =

OUT =

TOP = 426.50

OUT = 423.00

OUT = 420.5

TOP = 426.50

CATCH BASINTOP = 427.00

OUT = 424.50

BENCHMARK AT

TBM

+-430.00

BERM EXCESSBERM EXCESS SOIL HERE.

BERM EXCESS SOIL HERE.



BE

RM

EX

CE

SS

BERM EXCESSSOIL HERE.

MOVE EXCESS SOIL TO FIELD PLACED, STAKED LOCATION AT END OF RUNWAY.

(OWNER WILL RECOMMEND AND APPROVE AREA.)

+MATCH

EO

P 4

32.0

0---

-+

MATCH +

8" & 4" INVERT EL. 427.5 +

8" C

LEA

NO

UT

W/

+TOC 431.50

428'

427'

431

432

430

+EOP432.00

+--EOP 432.00+TOC 432.15

+--EOP 432.00+TOC 432.15

+EOP 432.00

+

+ +TC 431.65

+TC

"PRE-LOAD" DIRT TO BEREMOVED TO ELEVATION 430.00

REMOVED TO ELEVATION 426"PRE-LOAD" DIRT TO BE

OR GEOTECHNICAL RECOMMENDATION.

"PRE-LOAD" DIRT TO BEREMOVED TO ELEVATION 426OR GEOTECHNICAL RECOMMENDATION.

OR GEOTECHNICAL RECOMMENDATION.

MATCH +

+

431.00

HERE, TYP.

LOWPOINT EL 431.50--+

432G

RA

TE

D C

AP

@ E

L 43

1.5

INV

ER

T E

L. 4

30.0

0

NE

W 4

" F

RE

NC

H D

RA

INN

EW

SC

H 4

0 8

" P

VC

BE

SID

E

DROP INLET

TOP = 429.5'

NEW INLET=416.6

SO

IL H

ER

E.

EOP

MATCH. { OVER 3' (TYP)}FEATHER CURB HT. TO

+EOP 430.00

TC 432.25

TC 431.70

431.105"SOIL

5"SOIL

+4

31.8

2E

OP

+

TOC 432.33

427'

425'

430'

435'

440'

435'

440'

445'

45

TEMP INLET PROT. (TYP)

DI

CATCH BASIN (TYP)

430'

428'

427'

426'

RIPRAP APRON

TEMP SILT FENCE (TYP)



GRAVEL CONST.

TEMP INLET PROT. (TYP)

TEMP SILT FENCE (TYP)ENTRANCE

445'

425'

430'

196

195

CONSTRUCTION LIMITS

LIMI TS OF SURVEY

LIMITS OF SURVEY

LIMITS OF SURVEY

C/L DITCH

ELEC. METER

END STATE MAINTENANCE

WOOD LI

NE

WOOD LINE

ELEC. TRANS

36" RCP

12" RCP

18" RCP

24" RCP

30" RCP

8" PVC

18" RCP

15" RCP

DI

15" RCP

24" RCP

DI

36" R

CP

DI

24" RCP

15" RCP

30" RCP

INV. = 428.0'

15" RCP

24" RCP

WV

DI

36" RCP

30" RCP

UP

18" RCP

15" RCP

FH

36" RCP

8" PVC

INV = 425.5'

DI

DI

36" RCP

18" RCP

24" RCPFES

36" RCP

DI

24" RCP

WV

DI

DI

15" RCP

DI30" RCP

DI

AIRPORT RD. NCSR 1213 (60' PUBLIC R/W)

EXISTI NG

METAL BUILDING

EXISTI NG

METAL BUI LDING

FFE = 432.20'

L AW

ENFORCEMENT

TRAINING

BUILDING

4860 SF

FFE = 430.81'

EXIST ING

METAL

BUILDING

FFE = 430.27'FFE = 430.27'

BUILDINGBRICK

EXIST ING

8ø52'59"E

603.23'

N 24ø00'27"E517.21'

S 63ø04'39"E

267.51'

38.79'

N 48ø25'55"E76.89'

S 03ø30'09"E

84.59'

100.00'

S 76ø45'00"W

677.60'

N 62ø51'35"W

604.19'

482.89'

S 62ø51'35"E

803.13'

N 48ø25'55"E100.00'

S 28ø58'22"E

461.34'

N 60ø57'37"E

374.42'

S 28ø59'05"E

100.05'

39'50"E75.23'

38.10'

ASPHALT

IPS @ BASE OF BENT EIP

ALT

MNS

UP

WV

EIP

CONCRETE

IPS

PAD

OLD WINDSOCK AREA

ASPHALT

CONCRETE

IPS

L-4

CONCRETE

IPS

30" RC

P

ASPHALT

ERB

L-8

MNS

ASPHALT

IPS

ASPHALT

ASPHALT

1X8 HW

L-6

L-5

L-1

L-7

EIP

CONCRETE

L-2

EIP

FH

IPS

CW

IPS

EXISTING ASPHALT

UP

EIP

1X8 HW

MADD

WOODED AREA

ASPHALT

ASPHALT

UP

4"-6" PINE

L-3

CW

IPS

1306

2119

2120

22062207

698699

L-3

80.93'

S 28ø58'22"E

298.47'

38.83'

S 28ø58'22"E

L-7

63.71'L-8

L-4

S 03ø30'09"E

47.24'

L-6

L-2

106.66'S 13ø28'13"E

S 27ø06'05"E

L-1

76.80'

32.64'

S 28ø58'22"E

N 61ø01'38"EL-5

COURSE BEARING DISTANCE

S 28ø58'22"E

EXISTING

EX ISTING

EXISTING

EXISTING

EXISTING

EXISTING

EX ISTING

EXISTING

100.00'

WOOD WALKWAY

ENCROAC

HING

ENCROACHING SHEDROBERT KNIGHTDB 300 PG 385

DB 550 PG 378

KENNETH ROBINSONENCROACHING SHED

CONSTRUCTION LIMITS

UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE

FES

UNDE

RGRO

UND

ELEC

TRIC

E

T TTTT

T

E E E E E E E E E E

E

EE

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

T T T

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

EEEEE

FUTURE HIGHBAY BLDG -

6,000sf

FUTURECLASSROOMBLDG

FUTURECLASSROOMBLDG

NEW PARKINGLOT / AREA - 60

CARS

NEW BLDG -8,000sf

NEW PARKINGSPACES

FUTUREPARKINGEXPANSION

RI

LY B

OR

O,N

C

E

3875

TER

ED

R

ARCH

ITECT

O

C

H

M GGIS

N

RTH

AR

OLIN

A

S

OBB

S,JR

T.

ST

TIP

E

TA

OR B

OR

O,N

C

E

9799

TER

ED

R

ARCH

ITECT

O

C

HY

G.GIS

N

RTH

AR

OLIN

A

LO

BB

S, III

ST

TIP

HO

BB

S A

RC

HIT

EC

TS

, PA

Arc

hite

cts

& C

onsu

ltant

s48

0 H

illsb

oro

Str

eet,

Sui

te 4

00P

ittsb

oro,

Nor

th C

arol

ina

2731

2V

oice

: (91

9) 5

45-2

004

Fax

: (91

9) 5

45-9

002

DATE

PROGRESS DRAW

ING

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIO

N

PROGRESS DRAW

ING

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIO

N

NE

W P

RO

JEC

T F

OR

4/27

/201

5 4:

34:4

2 P

M

A101A

SITE PLAN 1"= 50' OPTION

A

CC

CC

ES

TC

4-27-2015

No. Date

1" = 50'-0"1 SITE PLAN - 1" = 50' OPTION A

B: Building Plan

738 SF

CLASSROOM

120

723 SF

CLASSROOM

121

1576 SF

MAT ROOM

123

696 SF

EXERCISE AREA

124

388 SF

CORRIDOR

132

253 SF

BREAK ROOM

133

243 SF

OPEN OFFICE

134

135 SF

OFFICE

135

147 SF

OFFICE

136

187 SF

ENTRY

138

109 SF

CORR

137

66 SF

ELEC

139 100 SF

MECH

140

75 SF

STORAGE

141

51 SF

HSKPG

142

70 SF

TOILET

143

70 SF

TOILET

144

WOMENS LOCKER

145

MENS LOCKER

146

HO

BB

S A

RC

HIT

EC

TS

, PA

Arc

hite

cts

& C

onsu

ltant

s48

0 H

illsb

oro

Str

eet,

Sui

te 4

00P

ittsb

oro,

Nor

th C

arol

ina

2731

2V

oice

: (91

9) 5

45-2

004

Fax

: (91

9) 5

45-9

002

DATE

NE

W P

RO

JEC

T F

OR

5/4/

2015

5:5

5:07

PM

A-101

FIRST FLOORCONCEPT PLAN

CC

CC

ES

TC

5-4-2015

1/8" = 1'-0"1 FIRST FLOOR CONCEPT PLAN

C: Meeting Minutes

Hobbs Architects, P.A. 480 Hillsboro Street, Suite 400 – Chatham Mills P.O. Box 1457 919.545.9002 fax

Pittsboro, North Carolina 27312 919.545.2004 voice

Grimsley T. Hobbs, Jr., AIA G. Taylor Hobbs III, AIA

Central Carolina Community College ESTC Pre-Design Kickoff Meeting Minutes April 9, 2015 CCCC Wicker Civic Center Board Room, 10:00 AM Attendees: Hobbs Architects: Taylor Hobbs, Chevon File, Allison Blanks CCCC: Donnie Lowder, Dr. Phillip Price, Ronnie Measamer, Dwight Dixon, Felicia Crittenden, Dawn Michelle Tucker, Dr. Pamela Senegal General Discussion:

CCCC leadership has a regional vision for the ESTC. Key aspects of this project serve the goal of promoting the center as a regional resource, as well as addressing accreditation requirements for square footage per student and provision of showers. Acquisition of adjacent properties can help with this long term goal.

Site options for the new building were discussed, with the majority of discussion centering on proximity to the existing terminal building.

Future expansion is to be incorporated into site master planning. The overall site has drainage challenges, as all drainage from the adjacent high school parcel flows to the

CCCC site. Any new construction is assumed to be on county sewer. The former terminal building is on an individual

septic system (location of tank and drain field to be verified). The City of Sanford and Lee County are the combined local AHJ. Current overflow parking is in a field nearby; parking may be included as part of this project scope, either as

gravel or paved. Typically 25-50 cars park in the field when necessary. Ronnie Measamer will be the primary contact for this project. The concept of a two-story "gymnatorium" with second story running track was suggested. Specific programmed spaces were discussed as follows, in order of priority for inclusion in the project

(revised per Dwight Dixon email 4.10.2015):

Priority 1: Mat Room :

Sized for 30 students at 50 square feet per student. Workout/Exercise Room:

Sized for 30 students; no square footage per student requirement; sized to accommodate workout equipment.

Showers/Locker Rooms: Currently no showers are provided at the ESTC campus, prohibiting PT to be done in the

mornings. Current practice is to do PT in the afternoons, with students showering at home. A maximum simultaneous load of 60 students may use locker rooms/showers at once. 100 men's lockers are required; 25-30 women's lockers are required. Showers should be private with integral undressing area.

Some small improvements to tactical training area, track, and/or security fencing may be included as priority 1 scope.




Priority 2: Classrooms:

Two to four additional classrooms (sized for 30 students at 24 sq.ft. each) are desired. Classrooms should be grouped in pairs, with A/V provisions for overhead projection and SmartBoard technology.

Priority 3: High Bay Space:

A high bay space for vehicles is desired (four bays), but if not possible to provide, should be accounted for in terms of future expansion.

Priority 4: Live Ammunition Firing Range:

Indoor or indoor/outdoor is preferred. 50 yards pistol range should be the design range length, with revolving/movable targets, lead abatement and HVAC provisions as required.

Noise concerns are a consideration with adjacent residential and high school properties. 15-20 students will be firing simultaneously. Ammunition and gun storage is required, as is a safety booth. In later correspondence, CCCC advised Hobbs that the accreditation body does not specifically

exclude indoor/outdoor ranges as acceptable. Priority 5:

Extensive Track/Exterior Improvements: Skid pan: a 100-yard area of smooth pavement; when wet serves to facilitate training of driving

on wet/slick conditions. Security fencing around key areas.

Misc. Discussion Offices will be required - up to two were discussed. A small break room may also be required. IT, Electrical, Telecom as required Non-lethal ammunition range / provisions are not part of this project scope. FFE (fixtures, furnishings, and equipment) will be by owner (not in project scope/budget). There are no emergency power requirements beyond code-required. No card readers are required.

Next Steps:

3-4 weeks is targeted completion date for pre-design efforts. Weekly progress meetings/updates are to be scheduled.

CCCC to follow up with Hobbs regarding possibility of re-allocating site budget of $500,000 to building budget of $1,500,000.

Upcoming buildings and grounds committee will include updates on this project.




Central Carolina Community College

ESTC Meeting #2 Minutes

April 16, 2015

CCCC Wicker Civic Center Conference Room, 11:00 AM

Attendees:

Hobbs Architects: Taylor Hobbs, Allison Blanks

CCCC: Donnie Lowder, Dr. Phillip Price, Ronnie Measamer, Dwight Dixon, Dawn Michelle Tucker, Dr.

Pamela Senegal

CLH Design, PA: Steve Miller

General Discussion:

Minutes of the last meeting were approved with no modifications.

CCCC shared with the group that a "Pod" modular classroom unit is planned to be moved to the ESTC

campus. A drawing shared later showed the Pod to be 163'-4" by 72' (approx. 11,750 sf). This would provide

(8) 25-seat classrooms for use. These pods are intended for use by some of the ESTC's ancillary training

programs.

This pod will be shown on the masterplan for site placement evaluation, but is currently not planned as part

of the scope of this project. The currently proposed new building project remains as serving the law

enforcement and fire training programs.

Any future meetings that plan to address security planning should include Frank Bedoe, Director of Campus

Security and Safety.

Site Plan Options Review

Hobbs Architects presented two site plan options (A and B) for consideration.

Option A located the new building directly to the plan - east of the former terminal building. The entry- facing

facade/corner is envisioned as a "feature" or otherwise distinctive architectural treatment to create a more

formal sense of entry to the campus (the campus' new symbolic "front door"). New accessible parking was

shown along the existing entry road, and an area to the plan south-east of the new building could serve as

parking. Future expansion grows towards the plan-south (towards the burn building), with new classroom

buildings shown as added closer to the entry gate.

Option B locates overflow parking in the same location as Option A, but locates the new building directly

across from the former terminal building, closer to the main building, in a more "dense" campus

configuration. Existing stormwater lines may require relocation with Option B.

Dwight Dixon noted that on both options, the hypothetical connection between the entry drive and the

southern roadways near the burn building is not preferred; the current procedure of maintaining access

control to the vehicular training areas near the high bay building gate is preferred.

The location of the firing range was problematic in both options; the design team commented that zoning

may now allow a firing range, and assumed that if it was permitted, would need to be a fully enclosed indoor

range.

The nature of the high bay building was clarified - this building will also have classrooms in it, and need to be

located near the new classroom building. It is more ideal to be located where the existing terminal building is

as part of future efforts.




Earthwork fill came from the high school construction project, and was used to build up the grade for the

admin building, training tower, and burn building. Remaining topsoil was bermed on the site in the current

configurations.

Stormwater design will need to be considered; as part of the design process, CLH Design will determine

watershed protection requirements that may be applicable, as well as any onsite treatment devices that may

be required.

Existing sewer is available along the runway, turning towards the admin building.

Option A was agreed upon as the preferred option to proceed with.

Should the two funding groups be unable to be combined, scope of fencing was discussed as needed

towards the border with the school (preventing vehicular traffic between two fence lines), and around the

equipment building.

Programming / Plan Diagram Discussion:

Hobbs shared a spreadsheet of space listings and associated square footages. The new building is

proposed to be approximately 8,000 square feet (1-story), and accommodate one to two classrooms, plus

shower/locker rooms, exercise/mat rooms, offices, and support spaces.

A "block diagram" of space adjacencies was shared to stimulate discussion about relationship of spaces.

CCCC commented that additional access to the mat room without having to go through the locker room is

desired.

A men's shower count of 6 showers and 5 toilets/urinals was used as a planning basis; CCCC expressed

concern that the number of showers may need to be increased. The AHJ may allow flexibility as to the

required ratios of gender-based locker room facilities, given the program's demographics.

A connector to the existing former terminal building is not critical. 30' separation is shown between the two

buildings to avoid any exterior fire-rated walls.

The former terminal building primarily serves motorcycle classes on the weekends.

Attendees suggested flipping the floor plan to have classrooms towards the terminal building, with the idea

that a future high bay classroom building could share an "entry courtyard" type layout.

Dwight Dixon will further examine the floor plan diagram with his colleagues and provide comment.

Next Steps:

Hobbs will work with CLH to update the schematic site plan to be Option A, and show a high bay

space overlaid on the terminal building.

CCCC to follow up with Hobbs regarding possibility of re-allocating site budget of $500,000 to

building budget of $1,500,000; anticipated Monday April 20.

Hobbs will confirm next meeting time and date.

of 3

MEMORANDUM

DATE: April 30, 2015

TO: Chevon File

FROM: Mike Sinack

SUBJECT: CCCC – MEP Meeting On‐Site PROJECT NO.: All CCCC projects

COPIES TO: Stephen Vaughn, Jason Lund, file

Attendees: Hobbs Architects: Chevon File, Allison Blanks RDK Engineers: Jason Lund, Mike Sinack CCCC: Daniel Furr (Maintenance), Ronnie Measamer (Physical Plant), Joel Oldham (Grounds and Housekeeping), Donnie Lowder (Construction Manager), Tommy Holder (IT) The following details the conversations held with CCCC facilities staff and Hobbs Architects. Notes:

1. Sprinkler System – Not desired and not planning to have in any of the buildings. Wicker Center addition requires fire suppression at teaching kitchen hood.

2. Utilities – Power company representative is Vickie Poe with Duke Energy, power switch and transformers

on campus are owned by Duke. There is a partial utilities plan available and a survey being conducted now that Ronnie will send to the team. Pot holing was discussed and will likely be required before construction begins to verify utilities. Gas service is by PSNC.

3. Fire alarm – Preferred brands are simplex, Notifier, and FCI. Honeywell will not be accepted.

4. Plumbing – Sensor hand washing equipment is preferred by Zurn. Water closets shall be handle type.

Equipment shall be Zurn, Kohler, and American standard. Pint flush for urinals is acceptable and will be basis of design. Waterless urinals are not desired. Water closets shall be floor mounted. Water pressure is good for campus 110‐psi average, booster pumps are not anticipated. Dual flush fixtures also acceptable option. Confirm with City on type of backflow prevention required ‐ CCCC prefers Zurn & Wilkins.

5. Sewer – Some buildings have forced main ejection pumps. Vet Tech is served by a pump. The campus has

a main sewer lift station. There is a survey with pumps shown and lift station info, CCCC to send

of 3

T:\Project Correspondence\CCCC - Lee County\5. CCCC - Vet Tech\02 Final Pre Design\Meeting Minutes\20150430_engineering_meeting\2015 05 01 CCCC MEP Meeting Minutes .doc

study/survey information to project team. Capacity of system needs to be reviewed and verified additional capacity may be needed. Pump station output is to city manhole/system.

6. Roof hatches ‐ Some rooftop equipment is anticipated. College would like to see ships ladder vs. rung

over rung. Roof hatches to include guardrails. Fall protection is by code requirements. College does not have additional requirements.

7. Energy Recovery Units ‐ Greenheck is preferred manufacturer. Roof Top unit is acceptable.

8. Elevators – size of elevator is critical, equipment and stretchers to be accommodated. Hobbs is

anticipating Hole‐less Hydraulic type. Machine room will require dedicated cooling unless a true machine room‐less type is specified.

9. IT rooms – Split systems with unit mounted above door frame.

10. Loading docks – Campus buildings; service lane with bumpers, no lift. College plans to use forklift for

bring in pallets. Wicker Center Addition will have one or two docks, lift is anticipated. Bookstore may have additional requirements, from tractor trailer delivery. No dock levelers anticipated.

11. Hand Dryers – High velocity dryers are required. XL is preferred manufacturer.

12. Janitor Closet – Closets need to be sized to accommodate storage and carts, minimum 10'x10'; larger is

preferred. Mop Sink shall be with molded base and wall protection, single unit. Water Heater is preferred to be located in mechanical room. Gas fired water heaters with storage tanks are preferred. Two‐story buildings require mop sinks on both floors. Remote single fixtures may be served by instantaneous hot water heating, depending on design.

13. HVAC rooms – Rooms shall maintain 25% spare space minimum. Do not locate equipment such that

access is hindered. CCCC cannot stress the importance of having enough space to service equipment.

14. Lighting Control – CCCC requests we do not specify Lithonia manufactured lighting control panels. Contactor based system Interfaced with BAS is the preferred method of control. Occupancy sensor based system and occ sensor override. Campus buildings are typically locked at 10pm each night. Wicker Center schedules extend into late nights and weekends; ESTC conducts weekend classes.

15. BAS – CCCC requests that we do not specify Siemens controls or equipment. CCCC has had major issues

with Delta V, Champion Systems products and request we do not specify these manufactures. Preferred manufactures are Alerton and American Auto‐Matrix. Training will be required but can be help at the campus. Systems are remote accessible. Restroom exhaust fans shall be tied into the BMS. One off bathrooms can be tied into system or occupancy sensor. DDC is standard.

16. Existing Wicker Civic Center is pneumatic system, desire to change over to DDC the entire building.

Funded by renovation portion of Wicker Center Addition project.

17. HVAC System – McQuay, Trane, Carrier, Daiken, CCCC requests we do not specify York. VAV systems are preference with Air Cooled Chiller. 4‐pipe system with Hydronic heating. Boilers should be Lochinvar or equal. Preference is for natural gas boiler. Gas indoor AHU’s with OA through louver with mixing box. Gas is on campus and metered at building. RDK to research ice storage. Reheating/heating preferred to be at VAV terminal boxes with minimal heating done at central VAVs.

18. Generator – Wicker center would like to provide a pin and sleeve connection to an ATS for a mobile

genset at the existing civic center building. College is interested in future connectivity for generation.

of 3

T:\Project Correspondence\CCCC - Lee County\5. CCCC - Vet Tech\02 Final Pre Design\Meeting Minutes\20150430_engineering_meeting\2015 05 01 CCCC MEP Meeting Minutes .doc

New buildings will be battery powered fixtures, wall mounted or celling mounted independent fixture. Existing Wicker Civic Center is possible site for public shelter, CCCC in talks with City/County. CCCC will forward memo of understanding between City/County and college.

19. Main switchgear – Monitor power use via BAS to allow for trending and historical data collection. CCCC

does not use a standard power meter or software package to monitor all campus buildings. CCCC desires to monitor building utilities and would be interested in a scheme that could provide this for the new buildings then retrofit older buildings on campus. RDK will work with CCCC and share prior experience with other owners to inform them of options available.

20. Lighting – Consider LED vs. Florescent technology. Daylighting will be a consideration for classroom

buildings/spaces. Wicker center desires to replace a decent amount of the lighting. Zoning of systems preferred over dimming for most spaces, including classrooms.

21. Telecom – Typical RDK design is acceptable for MDF/IDF room requirements. Infrastructure, power,

cabling management, will be specified by RDK for IDF/MDF rooms, owner provides electronics. Health Science may have small data center relocated from Bell Building for Disaster Recovery (DR). Further discussions will be required to verify where on campus fiber can be pulled from/to; a vault is present near the marketing house south of Kelly Drive, but routing within campus is undocumented. Campus uses multimode 50‐micron fiber for campus distribution. IT rooms to be stacked within building. Campus uses VOIP. Further discussion of system configuration will occur as designs develop. Hobbs to include at least 10'x10' for telecom/IT rooms (SCO standard is 10'x10' up to 20,000sf building).

22. Wireless Access – Presently exists throughout campus, extend to all buildings. New buildings will be

equipped with WAP.

23. Clock Tower – CCCC has a masterplan that include a clock tower for the campus. A stub out from health science for electrical feed may be required.

24. Kitchen – Wicker center is planning a full commercial kitchen and a small prep kitchen. Separate gas

monitoring for kitchen with shutoff is desired. Desire remote shutoff via solenoid valve on the teaching kitchen.

25. Insulation – concerns over poor workmanship causing maintenance headaches.

26. Vet Med – DI water system required in Vet Med space.

27. TVSS / Lighting Protection – desired at incoming service, fire alarm system, communication and security

system. Long history on campus with systems being taken down due to no TVSS protection. Possibly BAS controls to receive as well. Lighting protection is not anticipated or budgeted for any of the projects presently.

28. General campus ‐ renovations may include adding a welding shop, large electrical load addition expected.

To be addressed in design.

29. Arc flash / compliant labeling to be incorporated into new building work.

30. CCCC would like to be included in the routing of key equipment submittals during CA.

31. A/V contact at CCCC will be Amanda Carter, Director of Distance Education and Instructional Technology.




Central Carolina Community College Bond Projects Preliminary Code Review Meeting Minutes May 4, 2015 City of Sanford Inspection Division, 900 Woodlawn Avenue, Sanford, NC 27330 Attendees: Hobbs Architects: Taylor Hobbs, Chevon File Sanford Inspections Division: Chris Riggins, Inspections Administrator Sanford Fire Department: Ken Cotton, Division Commander / Fire Marshal All projects to be designed under 2012 IBC with NC amendments. Emergency Services Training Center Classroom Building: Code Summary:

Occupancy: Business (Educational use above 12 grade) Construction Type: Type IIB non combustible construction Square Footage Proposed: 8,000 SF Mixed Use: No Square Footage Allowed: Table 503 Type IIB construction = 23,000 SF allowed Fire ratings: Some fire partitions may be required at incidental use spaces. Corridors are not required to be

rated per Table 1018.1, exception f. (single tenant space). No exterior rated walls are anticipated, given distance to adjacent buildings (Table 602 - fire separation distance > 10').

ADA Accessibility: All primary spaces within the building will be accessible and on an accessible route. Discussion Points:

Occupant load for Mat Room and Exercise Room shall be calculated at 50 GSF per occupant. Occupant load for Classrooms shall be calculated at 20 GSF per occupant. Site of a possible future firing range must be reviewed by the City of Sanford Planning Department.

Veterinary Medical Technology Building: Code Summary:

Occupancy: Business (Educational use above 12 grade) Construction Type: Type VB construction Square Footage Proposed: 13,000 SF new on two stories; renovation of 4,000 SF existing building Mixed Use: No Square Footage Allowed: Table 503 Type VB construction = 9,000 SF allowed per floor Frontage increase per floor = 9,000 SF x 50% increase = 13,500 SF per floor allowable Sprinklers: Not required Fire ratings: Some fire partitions may be required at incidental use spaces. Corridors are not required to be

rated per Table 1018.1, exception f. (single tenant space with rated floors between stories). No exterior rated walls are anticipated, given distance to adjacent buildings (Table 602 - fire separation distance > 10')

ADA Accessibility: All primary spaces within the building will be accessible and on an accessible route.




Discussion Points:

While the new addition will be constructed of Type IIB non -combustible construction, given that the existing kennel is of Type VB construction, the building will be considered Type VB (the more stringent code application).

The building addition will be in an existing parking lot, potentially impacting fire department access to the courtyard-side of the adjacent buildings. While the new addition will be 30' from the adjacent Joyner Hall, the intention is to partially use that space as a dog run for the building's kennel. Code requires that all portions of all buildings be within 150' feet of access by fire trucks. The Sanford Fire Marshal recommends, if the dog run cannot be relocated, that alternate fire department access be provided to the courtyard from the other side of Joyner Hall. Hobbs Architects will investigate this option and provide a diagram of fire department access for review by the Fire Marshal. Another option proposed was to provide a lock box at the dog run gates so that fire trucks can pass through. Ken Cotten was concerned about building collapse on the designated fire truck route.

The building will require gas storage (nitrogen and oxygen) for use in animal medical procedures. These gases could be stored on the exterior of the building and then piped into the building. Hobbs Architects will work with CCCC to determine the total quantities of gas needed. The Sanford Fire Marshal recommended referencing Chapter 2703.1 of the NC Fire Code for Maximum Allowable Quantities of the gases and Chapter 3006 for regulations on medical gas.

Accessibility and navigation of existing grades on site were discussed. Given the grade change between the existing VMT kennel building and the addition, Hobbs Architects may propose using a HC lift in combination with ramping inside the building. Both the existing building and the new addition will be entered at grade.

Dennis A. Wicker Center Addition and Renovation: Code Summary: For purposes of this summary, the 'addition' is conceived as a separate building, located +/- 40' from the existing Wicker Center. A covered pedestrian plaza would connect the two buildings.

Occupancy: Assembly (A-3) Construction Type: Type IIB non-combustible construction Square Footage Proposed: +/-9,500 SF 'addition' in a separate building; renovation of 36,000 SF existing

building Mixed Use: Non-separated mixed use Square Footage Allowed: Table 503 Type IIB construction = 9,500 SF allowed per floor (in addition) Frontage increase per floor = 9,500 SF x 62% increase = 15,466 SF per floor allowable (in addition) Occupant Load: 298 persons (in addition) Fire Area: +/- 11,800 SF (including addition and covered plaza) Sprinklers: Presumed to not be required in addition given the fire separation distance, occupant load and

size of fire area. Fire Separation Distance: >15' to centerline between addition and existing building. Fire Ratings: Some fire partitions may be required at incidental use spaces. Corridors will be required to be

rated per Table 1018.1 (A occupancy, no sprinkler system) No exterior rated walls are anticipated, given distance to adjacent buildings (Table 602 - fire separation distance > 10').


The existing Wicker Center does not have a sprinkler system. The Sanford Fire Marshal believes the applicable building code at the time the facility was built actually required sprinklers for a facility of its type.




Hobbs Architects and the Sanford Fire Marshal agreed to investigate the applicable code from the time the building was built.

Hobbs Architects had a very early, conceptual conversation with the NC Department of Insurance about the code requirements for an addition to an existing non-sprinklered building. DOI's assessment was as follows: as long the addition was not adding to the existing building's fire area, then it was not required to add a sprinkler system to the existing building.

The new 'addition' is proposed to be a separate building, with a fire separation distance of greater than 15' to the centerline between addition and existing. A covered, open-air plaza is proposed between the two buildings. The structure of this covered plaza could be stand-alone (not structurally connected to the existing building.

The occupant load of the proposed addition was reviewed. The current proposed occupant load is based on 7 NSF/ person in the break-out rooms (when operable partitions are open) and 5 NSF/ person in the gallery for all areas outside of circulation space. The Sanford Fire Marshal requested that required clear egress widths be kept at all times in the gallery space. Hobbs Architects will show vendor placement in the gallery for review.

CCCC and Lee County would like to be able to use the Wicker Center as an emergency shelter. It is unclear if there is desire to use the building as a refuge during emergency events, or as an overflow shelter. Hobbs Architects will clarify with CCCC. Depending on the use of the building as shelter, the applicable code sections will change.

Health Sciences Building: Code Summary:

Occupancy: Business Construction Type: Type IIB non-combustible construction Square Footage Proposed: +/-30,000 SF new construction Mixed Use: Non-separated mixed use Square Footage Allowed: Table 503 Type IIB construction = 23,000 SF allowed per floor Frontage increase per floor = 23,000 SF x 75% increase = 40,250 SF per floor total allowable Sprinklers: Not required Fire Separation Distance: >30' Fire ratings: Some fire partitions may be required at incidental use spaces. Corridors are not required to be

rated per Table 1018.1, exception f. (single tenant space with rated floors between stories). No exterior rated walls are anticipated, given distance to adjacent buildings (Table 602 - fire separation distance > 10')


The basic plan was reviewed (two story, double loaded corridor with stairs at either end and an elevator). Chris Riggins confirmed that, given there is only one tenant, the corridors do not have to be rated if the floor is rated.

D: Plumbing Fixture Count Worksheet

4/28

/201

5A

TT

AC

HM

EN

T D

2012

EX

CE

L S

PR

EA

DS

HE

ET

FO

R P

ER

FO

RM

ING

MIN

IMU

M F

IXT

UR

E C

OU

NT

CA

LC

UL

AT

ION

SP

AG

E 1

OF

2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

AB

CD

EF

GH

IJ

KL

MN

OP

2012

NC

PC

TA

BL

E 4

03.1

AR

EA

US

E

CA

TE

GO

RY

NO. OF PERSONS

PERCENT MALES

PERCENT FEMALES

NO. OF MALES

NO. OF FEMALES

MALE WC

MALE UR

MALE LAV

FEMALE WC

FEMALE UR

FEMALE LAV

SHOWERSBATHTUBS

DRINKING FOUNTAINS

Service Sink

Mop Sinkor Hose Bib

Ass

emb

ly A

-10

5050

0.0

0.0

0.0

00.

00.

00

0.0

0.0

0.0

00

Ass

emb

ly A

-1 in

K-1

2 sc

ho

ol

050

500.

00.

00.

00

0.0

0.0

00.

00.

00.

00

0

Ass

emb

ly A

-2 n

igh

tclu

bs

050

500.

00.

00.

00

0.0

0.0

00.

00.

00.

00

0

Ass

emb

ly A

-2 r

esta

ura

nts

050

500.

00.

00.

00

0.0

0.0

00.

00.

00.

00

0

Ass

emb

ly A

-2 c

afet

eria

in K

-12

sch

oo

ls0

5050

0.0

0.0

0.0

00.

00.

00

0.0

0.0

0.0

00

Ass

emb

ly A

-30

5050

0.0

0.0

0.0

00.

00.

00

0.0

0.0

0.0

00

Ass

emb

ly A

-3 in

K-1

2 sc

ho

ols

050

500.

00.

00.

00

0.0

0.0

00.

00.

00.

00

0

Ass

emb

ly A

-3 p

asse

ng

er t

erm

inal

s0

5050

0.0

0.0

0.0

00.

00.

00

0.0

0.0

0.0

00

Ass

emb

ly A

-3 c

hu

rch

es w

/o a

ssem

bly

hal

ls0

5050

0.0

0.0

0.0

00.

00.

00

0.0

0.0

0.0

00

Ass

emb

ly A

-40

5050

0.0

0.0

0.0

00.

00.

00

0.0

0.0

0.0

00

Ass

emb

ly A

-50

5050

0.0

0.0

0.0

00.

00.

00

0.0

0.0

0.0

00

Ass

emb

ly A

-5 in

K-1

2 sc

ho

ols

050

500.

00.

00.

00

0.0

0.0

00.

00.

00.

00

0

Bu

sin

ess

127

5050

63.5

63.5

2.3

01.

62.

30

1.6

0.0

2.0

00

Ed

uca

tio

nal

K-8

050

500.

00.

00.

00

0.0

0.0

00.

00.

00.

00

0

Ed

uca

tio

nal

9-1

20

5050

0.0

0.0

0.0

00.

00.

00

0.0

0.0

0.0

00

Ed

uca

tio

nal

sta

ff0

5050

0.0

0.0

0.0

00.

00.

00

0.0

0.0

0.0

00

Fac

tory

/Ind

ust

rial

050

500.

00.

00.

00

0.0

0.0

00.

00.

00.

00

0

Inst

itu

tio

nal

I-1

050

500.

00.

00.

00

0.0

0.0

00.

00.

00.

00

0

Inst

itu

tio

nal

I-2,

I-3,

I-4

Em

plo

yees

050

500.

00.

00.

00

0.0

0.0

00.

00.

00.

00

0

Inst

itu

tio

nal

I-2,

I-3,

I-4

Vis

ito

rs0

5050

0.0

0.0

0.0

00.

00.

00

0.0

0.0

0.0

00

Inst

itu

tio

nal

I-4

Ch

ildca

re0

5050

0.0

0.0

0.0

00.

00.

00

0.0

0.0

0.0

00

Mer

can

tile

050

500.

00.

00.

00

0.0

0.0

00.

00.

00.

00

0

Res

iden

tial

R-2

Do

rms,

Fra

ts, S

oro

riti

es, b

oar

din

g0

5050

0.0

0.0

0.0

00.

00.

00

0.0

0.0

0.0

00

Res

iden

tial

R-4

050

500.

00.

00.

00

0.0

0.0

00.

00.

00.

00

0

Sto

rag

e S

-1, S

-24

5050

2.0

2.0

0.0

00.

00.

00

0.0

0.0

0.0

00

30

23

02

02

00

TO

TA

L S

HA

RE

D F

IXT

UR

ES

TO

TA

L F

IXT

UR

ES

FO

R M

AL

ES

TO

TA

L F

IXT

UR

ES

FO

R F

EM

AL

ES

2015

0428

_plu

mbi

ng_c

ount

s_E

ST

C.x

lsV

er. 2

0150

120

IF Q

UE

ST

ION

S O

R C

OM

ME

NT

S,

EM

AIL

Bill

Moe

ller

at b

ill.m

oelle

r@nc

doi.g

ovF

IXT

UR

ES

4/28

/201

5A

TT

AC

HM

EN

T D

2012

EX

CE

L S

PR

EA

DS

HE

ET

FO

R P

ER

FO

RM

ING

MIN

IMU

M F

IXT

UR

E C

OU

NT

CA

LC

UL

AT

ION

SP

AG

E 2

OF

2

31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46

AB

CD

EF

GH

IJ

KL

MN

OP

Res

iden

tial

R-1

1 pe

r gu

estr

oom

Wat

er C

lose

t, La

vato

ry, B

atht

ub o

r S

how

erR

esid

enti

al R

-2 A

par

tmen

t H

ou

se1

per

dwel

ling

unit

Wat

er C

lose

t, La

vato

ry, B

atht

ub o

r S

how

er, K

itche

n S

ink

1 pe

r 20

dw

ellin

g un

itsA

utom

atic

Clo

thes

Was

her

conn

ectio

nR

esid

enti

al R

-31

per

dwel

ling

unit

Wat

er C

lose

t, La

vato

ry, B

atht

ub o

r S

how

er, k

itche

n si

nk1

per

20 d

wel

ling

units

Aut

omat

ic C

loth

es W

ashe

r co

nnec

tion

for

atta

ched

one

- an

d tw

o-fa

mily

dw

ellin

gsI-

2 H

osp

ital

s &

oth

er h

ealt

h c

are

faci

litie

s

I-3

Pri

son

s

I-3

Ref

orm

ato

ries

, Det

enti

on

& C

orr

ecti

on

al C

trs

I-4

Ad

ult

Day

Car

e

Fo

otn

ote

sE

) F

or d

ay n

urse

ries,

a m

axim

um o

f one

bat

htub

sha

ll be

req

uire

d.S

ee s

ectio

n 41

1 fo

r em

erge

ncy

eyew

ash

show

ers

in s

tora

ge o

ccup

anci

es

Fix

ture

req

uirm

ents

are

reg

ulat

ed a

nd e

nfor

ced

by s

tate

lice

nsin

g an

d ce

rtifi

catio

n ju

risdi

ctio

ns o

nly.

2015

0428

_plu

mbi

ng_c

ount

s_E

ST

C.x

lsV

er. 2

0150

120

IF Q

UE

ST

ION

S O

R C

OM

ME

NT

S,

EM

AIL

Bill

Moe

ller

at b

ill.m

oelle

r@nc

doi.g

ovF

IXT

UR

ES

Emergency Services Training Center - cccc.edu

Documents

Transcript of Emergency Services Training Center - cccc.edu