Embrapa’s International Action focus on MKTPlace 02 to 28 February 2014
description
Transcript of Embrapa’s International Action focus on MKTPlace 02 to 28 February 2014
Embrapa’s International Actionfocus on MKTPlace
02 to 28 February 2014
Missions
•Eastern Africa:– 02 to 15 February, 4 countries:
• Ethiopia – Addis Abeba; Tanzania – Dar es Salaam; Kenya – Nairobi; Uganda – Entebbe e Kampala.
•Western Africa:– 15 to 28 February, 4 countries:
• Ghana – Accra; Nigeria – Abuja; Benin – Cotonou e Mali – Bamako.
Mission objective and scope• Scope: special Project – “Strengthening of Embrapa's
Internationalization”;
• Objective: raise information, opinions and perceptions of R&D, gov. and IDA institutions in scientific exchange and technical cooperation with Embrapa.
!! – It was neither an individual evaluation of the projects, nor a collection of demands for future
cooperation projects.
Activities
•53 meetings, 6 per country approximately
•22 individual interviews from 30 MKTPlace projects
MKTPlace Projects
ILRI, Ethiopia
Introduction of Napier Grass elite lines for stunt resistance
MKTPlace – Species identification of root-knot nematodes NARS - IITA Tanzania
MKTPlace - Application of DNA-markers for development of drought tolerant potato germplasm – KARI - Kenya
Activity: Embrapa Model system for drought tolerance study
Activity: Construction of hydroponic system for drought tolerance study
Activity: DNA Extraction from potato leaves
Utilization of Hydraulic Ram Pumps for promoting small scale
irrigation
MKTPlace Projects
NARO - UgandaNARO - Uganda
Enhancing rice and maize production by small-holders using bacteria-plant extract biopesticide
MKTPlace Projects
Université des sciences, des techniques et des technologies de Bamako - Mali
Some personal views
•“Marketplace develops projects that fill gaps of major problems.”
•“Small projects are really effective”;
•“It is a partnership more than resources only”
Highlights
• In general, achievement of the expected results• Scientific quality and Embrapa's experience;
• Partnership with Embrapa makes it easier to obtain funds from other organisms/institutions/agencies;
• Peer to peer cooperation;
• Networking closing the gap between african research institutions and Embrapa; and
• Brazilian technology is adaptable to local realities.
Points for Improvement• Language barrier;
• Delay to send genetic material;
• Little dissemination the project knowledge is just among the researchers and the team at the institution;
• Difficulty to find Brazilian partners through the MKTPlace website;
• Project duration is too short;
• Complex pre-proposal selection process
Suggestions• A final workshop to articulate and facilitate the
elaboration of new projects;
• Associate field visits with the Fora and increase staff visits;
• Improve communication of the results within institutions in the countries;
• Improve the 'matchmaking' mechanism;
• Provide documents in other languages, including african ones automatic translation software
Thank you!
Maya TakagiResearcher
Secretariat for International Affairs
Adriana BuenoInternational Cooperation Analyst
Secretariat for International Affairs