EMA regulatory perspective on continuous manufacturing for ... · An agency of the European Union...
Transcript of EMA regulatory perspective on continuous manufacturing for ... · An agency of the European Union...
An agency of the European Union
EMA regulatory perspective on continuous manufacturing for Biologicals
Dr Veronika Jekerle (European Medicines Agency, The Netherlands)
CASSS – CMC strategy forum – Seville (13 – 15 May 2019)
Content
Challenges and opportunities
Regulatory considerations
Guidance landscape
Update on ICH Q 13
EMA/BWP experience on continuous manufacturing for Biologicals
1 EMA perspective on continuous manufacturing for Biologicals - Jekerle
Opportunities & Challenges
2 EMA perspective on continuous manufacturing for Biologicals - Jekerle
Opportunities
3
• Flexibility to respond to manufacturing needs (shortages, supply chain demands)
• Decreased need for comparability
• Reduced manufacturing footprint (smaller facilities) & possibility for increased proximity to patient
• Single-use technology and reduced media volumes/ simpler cleaning procedures etc.
• Better product understanding (online monitoring & control)
EMA perspective on continuous manufacturing for Biologicals - Jekerle
Challenges
4
• Raw material properties and variability• Impurities and removal (degradation products over time)• Viral safety & bioburden• Material traceability• Cell line stability and life span
• Product knowledge and structural/functional relationship• Analytical technology and control strategy• Design spaces and potential interactions between steps• Evaluation of manufacturing changes & impact on
product quality
EMA perspective on continuous manufacturing for Biologicals - Jekerle
5
New chemical reactions Fast development & screeningScale-up*
Smaller footprint
Shorter production times
Flexibility and agility
Easier to accommodate supply needs
On line monitoring & controlIncreased assurance of product
quality in real time
Enhanced process
understanding & control
Potential benefits to patients, industry & regulators of CM
Slide by Dolores Hernán Pérez de la Ossa, EMA
6
Regulatory considerations
EMA perspective on continuous manufacturing for Biologicals - Jekerle
Key concepts
7
batchraw
material
equipment
processdescription
processcontrol
EMA perspective on continuous manufacturing for Biologicals - Jekerle
Regulatory considerations
8
Batch! Definition of batch size should be stated prior to manufacture ! ICH Q7 (EU GMP Guide Part II) “A specific quantity of material produced in a process or series of processes so that it is expected to be homogeneous within specified limits. In the case of continuous production, a batch may correspond to a defined fraction of the production. The batch size can be defined either by a fixed quantity or by the amount produced in a fixed time interval”.• in process testing,• specifications• Process validation• GMP compliance
Raw materialEudralex Vol 4. GMP Part II:Raw Material (= general term used to denote starting materials, reagents, and solvents intended for use in the production of intermediates or APIs).
• Raw material properties (functionality, safety, impurities).
• Batch to batch/lot to lot variability and sources of variability
• Impact on process and control strategy (IPC measurements)
• Continuous drip feeding/hybrid approach
• Stability & traceability of raw materials within the CM process
Process descriptionVolume 2B (Notice to ApplicantsMedicinal products for human usePresentation and format of the dossierCommon Technical Document (CTD)) Differences to a batch process• Time-related parameters as a result of
dynamic process • Flow rates (e.g. volume over time),
mean residence times • Scalability aspects (e.g. running time,
equipment design)• Procedures for start up/shut down and
interruption• Design spaces –address potential
interactions between steps• Alternative processes (?)
EMA perspective on continuous manufacturing for Biologicals - Jekerle
Regulatory considerations
9
Control strategy= manufacturing process produces product of intended quality in a reproducible way (=batch process)
• Product and process specific• Product knowledge (structural & functional relationship (e.g. mABs),
platform knowledge/prior knowledge• Control systems (automated valves, feed-back & feed-forward controls (?),
feeder controls)• IPCs and sampling potentially different to batch processes• Online measurement (e.g. multi-attribute method: relevant readout /
degradation products)• In perfusion culture: end of production cell characterisation• Procedures for handling deviations, non-conforming material• Real time release testing (for Bio ?) or Hybrid approach realistic
Equipment= discussed during a pre-approval inspection (GMP)
• Design considerations• Larger contact surface area (temperature
control, leaching)• Single use equipment• Location of segregation points• Potential for microbial
growth/contamination• Indicators of equipment failure• Strategy for cleaning validation
EMA perspective on continuous manufacturing for Biologicals - Jekerle
10
Guidance landscape
EMA perspective on continuous manufacturing for Biologicals - Jekerle
11
The EU regulatory framework has no specific CM guidelines but…
Current regulations and guidelines are supportive of innovative pharmaceutical development and manufacturing approaches.
Although continuous manufacture is not specifically addressed in guidelines, it fits well into the “enhanced approach”.
Regulatory & guidance landscape
12
ICH Q5D
• Derivation and characterisation of cell substrates used for the
production of biotechnological/biological products (Q5D)
• Cell banking
• Characterisation & testing of cell banks
• End of production cells characterisation (genetic stability)
• EU GMP Annex 17: Real Time Release Testing and Parametric Release (results on CoI – online monitoring)
• Guideline on process validation for the manufacture of biotechnology-derived active substances and data to be provided in the regulatory submission (i.e. continued process verification)
• Guideline on process validation for finished products -information and data to be provided in regulatory submissions chemical & biological medicinal products
13
Guidance landscape
EMA perspective on continuous manufacturing for Biologicals - Jekerle
EMA Guideline on process validation for finished products - information and data to be provided in regulatory submissions (main principles)
14
process validation after pharmaceutical development / process development, after scale-up and prior to marketing authorisation
• Manufacturing/process performance continuously monitored and evaluated. (ICH Q8)• Science and risk-based real-time approach (in-line, on-line or at-line controls &
monitoring of process performance & product quality on each batch)• Most appropriate method for validating continuous processes
Combination of traditional process validation and continuous process verification approach for different steps within the manufacturing process.
EMA perspective on continuous manufacturing for Biologicals - Jekerle
Guidance on real-time release testing
• Specifications are required for
active substance & finished product
• Specific tests: “Complies if tested”
when RTR testing is applied
• Release Tests can be moved into Process Controls, however specifications must be adequate.
15 EMA perspective on continuous manufacturing for Biologicals - Jekerle
Guidance landscape
16
ICH Q8-12• Product and process understanding and process control (ICH Q8R2)
• Quality risk management (ICH Q9)
• Quality Systems (ICH Q10)
• Development and manufacture of drug substances (ICH Q11)
• Quality-by-Design
• Lifecycle approach to process control/validation (ICH Q12)
principles apply to enhanced development, manufacturing and control
strategy approaches including CM flexibility, agility & product
understanding
EMA perspective on continuous manufacturing for Biologicals - Jekerle
ICH Q 13
17 EMA perspective on continuous manufacturing for Biologicals - Jekerle
18 EMA perspective on continuous manufacturing for Biologicals - Jekerle
Business Plan for ICH Q13:
• Step 1: Initiated November 2018
• Step 2a/Step 2b: June 2020
• Step 3: June 2020 – November 2021
• Step 4: November 2021
• Step 5: Initiate after November 2021
ICH Q13: Continuous Manufacturing of Drug Substances and Drug Products
Initiated: September 2018Concept paper & Business plan endorsed: November 2018, Charlotte, NC, U.S.A.
o Rapporteur: Dr. Sau (Larry) Lee (FDA, US)o Regulatory Chair: Dr. Yoshihiro Matsuda (MHLW/PMDA)o EMA team: Dolores Hernan (EMA) & Nick Lee (HPRA)
Status of ICH Q13 Guideline Development: https://www.ich.org/products/guidelines/quality/article/quality-guidelines.html
19
Objectives
Capture key technical and regulatory considerations that promoteharmonisation, including certain CGMP elements specific to CM,
Allow drug manufacturers to employ flexible approaches to develop,implement, or integrate CM for the manufacture of small molecules andtherapeutic proteins for new and existing products, and
Provide guidance to industry and regulatory agencies regardingregulatory expectations on the development, implementation, andassessment of CM technologies used in the manufacture of drug substancesand drug products.
EMA perspective on continuous manufacturing for Biologicals - Jekerle
20 EMA perspective on continuous manufacturing for Biologicals - Jekerle
ICH Q13: Continuous Manufacturing of Drug Substances and Drug Products
Concept paper
Definitions & regulatory concepts
• definition of CM
• startup/shutdown
• state of control
• process validation
• continuous process verification
Key scientific approaches
• Concepts of system dynamics
• monitoring frequency,
• detection and removal of non-conforming material
• material traceability
• process models
• advanced process controls
Regulatory aspects initial marketing authorisation and post-authorisation phase
21
EMA/BWP experience on continuous manufacturingfor Biologicals
EMA perspective on continuous manufacturing for Biologicals - Jekerle
Additional considerations (BWP)
Definition of ‘continuous’ manufacture
• direct formulation from active substance to finished product (ATMPs) (?)
Continuous manufacturing process where the active substance is directly formulated into the finished product, a drug substance shelf life is not required to be registered.
Alternative processing in case the direct formulation becomes optional(vs. a holding step – shelf life etc.) – acceptability (?)
Single use equipment (i.e. extractables & leachables)
Experience at PAT team is monitored (2 BWP members in the PAT team)
22 EMA perspective on continuous manufacturing for Biologicals - Jekerle
EMA/BWP experience on continuous manufacturing
23
• PAT team
• Scientific advice requests (small molecules): active substance and finished product
• 3 MAAs (1 in EMA-FDA QbD pilot program: e. g. Orkambi) and 1 variation in the centralised procedure: all relate to the finished product
• Very limited experience on CM approaches with Biologicals
• Discussion topic at the BWP interested parties meeting (June 2017)
Few examples:
• Perfusion cell culture
• (partial) continuous downstream purification process without holding steps
• Cell therapy products (continuous process without holding step at level of active substance)
EMA perspective on continuous manufacturing for Biologicals - Jekerle
chem
ical
exp
erie
nce
24
EMA Support for Continuous Manufacturepoints of contact
CHMP Scientific Advice - official advice from the CHMP on appropriate tests and studies
http://www.ema.europa.eu/ema/index.jsp?curl=pages/regulation/general/general_content_000049.jsp&mid=WC0b01ac05800229b9
PAT team - supports PAT and QbD activities in the EU (including CM)http://www.ema.europa.eu/ema/index.jsp?curl=pages/regulation/document_listing/document_listing_000162.jsp&mid=WC0b01ac058076ed73
Contact [email protected] for orientation
Innovation task force – can also support innovative approaches to the development of MPs through informal ITF meetings
https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/human-regulatory/research-development/innovation-medicines
EMA perspective on continuous manufacturing for Biologicals - Jekerle
Regulator’s conclusions Commercial implementation is underway - Regulators & Industry are building
experience.
Current regulatory framework is adequate & existing GLs are supportive. ICH Q13 is welcome and will provide further specific support
EU regulators support novel pharmaceutical technologies and offer an increased exchange/dialogue on this topic (stakeholder interaction, ICH, product specific)
Some technical aspects can be very specific & different (i.e. process description, control strategy etc.) – technical detail & consideration by the Company need to be shared with Regulators (pre-authorisation & in the dossier (e.g. QOS))
Applicants are highly recommended to establishing an early dialogue with EU Regulators
25 EMA perspective on continuous manufacturing for Biologicals - Jekerle
Acknowledgements
• Dolores Hernan
• Peter Richardson
• Steffen Gross
• Nino Mihokovic
26 EMA perspective on continuous manufacturing for Biologicals - Jekerle
Thank you for your attention
Dr Veronika Jekerle, BWP Scientific secretariat, Quality Office, Specialist Scientific Disciplines Department, EMA
European Medicines Agency
Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The NetherlandsTelephone ++31 (0)88 781 6000Send a question via our website www.ema.europa.eu/contact
Further information