Electrowetting Drop profile Wetting defects Wetting transitions Marguerite Bienia, Catherine...
-
Upload
leslie-freeman -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of Electrowetting Drop profile Wetting defects Wetting transitions Marguerite Bienia, Catherine...
ElectrowettingElectrowetting
Drop profileWetting defects
Wetting transitions
Marguerite Bienia, Catherine Quilliet, Marcel ValladeLaboratoire de Spectrométrie Physique
Grenoble, France
2substrate
liquid
solid/liquid
solid/air
air
From wetting...From wetting...
3
reduction of the contact angle of water on the insulator
……to electrowettingto electrowetting
2// 2
1CVsolidwater
effectivesolidwater
Insulating solid
Counter electrode
V
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
+ + + + + + + + + + + +
V
2
0 2
1coscos
CV
Ew equation
4
iso
r
e
V
2coscos
20
0
An alternative geometryAn alternative geometry
2-fluid EW (brine/oil) : by matching densities, capillary length capillary forces dominate
5
Berge et al, 1999Berge et al, 1999Variable focus lens
Cho et al, 2002Cho et al, 2002splitting and merging of droplets
Examples of applicationsExamples of applications
Blake et al, 2000Blake et al, 2000Coating assist
Hayes et al, Nature Hayes et al, Nature Sept 18 2003Sept 18 2003Passive display device
6
OutlineOutline
Introduction
1)Fundamental issue :
study of drop shape under electrical fieldstudy of drop shape under electrical field
2)Electrowetting as an experimental solution for fundamental study of classical wetting :
wetting defectswetting defectswetting transitionswetting transitions
7
1. Drop Profiles1. Drop ProfilesAbt.Angewandte Physik, Ulm, Pr Herminghaus, F. Mugele, EURODOCAbt.Angewandte Physik, Ulm, Pr Herminghaus, F. Mugele, EURODOC
Problem : instability and drop expulsion what is the shape of the drop when an electrical field is applied?
Total width : 1,3mm
water on silanized 0.7mm glassV=1088V
8
Idea : electrostatic pressure compensated by an excess of capillary pressure
electrode
V
Pel
Pcap
insulatorV~
9
Numerical resultsNumerical results
Buehrle et al, 2003Buehrle et al, 2003interface profiles for increasing electrical field
The range of the variation is proportional to e/R
1
12.02
1 2
R
CV
10
Direct measurementsDirect measurements
•EW on 150, 300,450µms glass coated with ~100A Teflon AF1600V range 1000-1500V range 9550°•liquid : BMIM
•EW on 160, 500µm teflonV range 1000-1500V range 100-50°•liquid : brine
=7, e>200µm
Video cameraV
and
=7, e>200µm
V
Video camera
11
ExperimentsExperiments
Typical picture, 0V, vol=3.2µL symmetry plane
1.3mm
12
Profile extraction (3)Profile extraction (3)
13
Curvature calculationCurvature calculation
2/122/32 1
11
1 rrr
r
Cylindrical symmetry r(z)
Successive derivatives very noisy results!
14
Master curveMaster curve
•Dots : experiment, =2
•solid line : theory
Relative heightRe
H
C-C
0 (
µm
-1)
15
PerspectivesPerspectives
•Profile extraction is impossible close to the triple line
very thick insulators needed
very high voltage required
•Theoretical work still running
16
2. Hysteresis2. Hysteresis
ideal case :
real case : a>r
17
Wetting defectsWetting defects
•Joanny et al, 1984 : a model for contact angle hysteresis
•Robbins et al, 1987 : hysteresis on random surfaces
•Raphael et al, 1989 : single defect study
•De Jonghe et al, 1995 : experimental physical and chemical defects on SiO matrix
•Tanguy et al, 1998 : from individual to collective pinning: effect of long-range elastic interactions
18
Electrowetting defectsElectrowetting defects
Characteristic (and drawbacks!) of classical Characteristic (and drawbacks!) of classical wetting defects :wetting defects : 1)wetting contrast is fixed!2)defects are sometimes both chemical and physical
Electrowetting may bring experimental solutions: Electrowetting may bring experimental solutions: 1)allow tunable wetting contrast for a given geometry of defects2)no surface alteration, the defects are virtualvirtual
study of a rectangular defectstudy of a rectangular defect
19
Principle of a bi-layered defectPrinciple of a bi-layered defect
2
1
22
21
0
2
1
C
C
V
V
VCVC
defect
back
defectback
for
+ + +
+ + + +
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _
+ + +
1H
2H
backV defectV
insulator
Wettability contrast
20
Experimental setupExperimental setup
ITO (500Å =>transparent)
ITO, with an etched defect
hydrophilic ring etched using Tetra-Etch (Gore)
glass 1mm
Vd
ground
PTFE 25 microns
water
oil
Vb
glass 0.17mm
21
ResultsResults
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
V(volts)
thet
a (d
egre
es)
Reference electrowetting curve (increasing/decreasing voltage) obtained with a cancelled defect
25x30mm
22
Wetting contrastsWetting contrasts
2mm
23
Wetting contrastsWetting contrasts
Wetting and non-wetting defects •left : experiment with an oil drop in water•right : simulations with Surface Evolver, for theoretical contact angles
A : Vb=305V,Vd=400Vb=107°, d=64°C : Vb=93V, Vd=696Vb=45°, d=106°
scale : 5mm
24
Sharp edge effectSharp edge effect
oil
water
Attraction between water and electrode
wetting is favoured along the edge of the defect
insulator
insulator
-3,5
-3
-2,5
-2
-1,5
-1
-0,5
0
-0,1 0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5
X/H
delt
a ga
mm
a /g
amm
asystem
25
ConclusionConclusion
•Feasibility of e-wetting defects is proved Bienia et al, LangmuirBienia et al, Langmuir
•Wetting contrast is tunable, with
(De Jonghe, 1995 : =+71°)•Theoretical model : the precision of the defect is of the order of magnitude of the thickness of the insulating layer•Perspective : other defect geometries
4361
.4043 1
mmN
3. Electrically induced wetting 3. Electrically induced wetting transitionstransitions
Motivation :
Induce wetting transitions through electrowetting
•water in air or oil : partial to complete wetting impossible (EW saturationEW saturation)
what kind of transition is possible?
27
Effective interface potentialEffective interface potential
P(e) energy per unit surface
•e=0e=0 :
•long rangelong range (a few nm): Hamaker constant A
( for e)
•short and intermediate range:short and intermediate range: no universal model
wateroiloilsolidwatersolidSP )0(
effective interface potential P(e) :
water-insulator interactions through oil
212)(
e
AeP
oil
insulator
water
e
28
Wetting regimesWetting regimes
S>0, A<0 : complete wetting
S
S
S
S<0, partial wetting
S>0, A>0 pseudo-partial wetting
P(e)
e
P(e)
e
P(e)e
repulsionattraction
eeq
29
TransitionTransition
•Initial stateInitial state : oil wets the insulator completely
•By applying voltageBy applying voltage : transition towards pseudo-partial wetting
electrodeinsulator d,d
water
oil e,
V
eeq
Effective potential without electrical field
electrostatic energy
resulting potential
P(e)
e
Quilliet et al, 2002Quilliet et al, 2002
30
SystemSystem
Brine and bromododecane on parylene, in the defect setup
Same experiment on parylene+teflon AF1600
Hamaker constant : A=-6.2.10Hamaker constant : A=-6.2.10-21-21 J.m J.m-2-2 <0, repulsive <0, repulsive
31
EllipsometryEllipsometry
multilayer ellipsometer made by Patrice Ballet
Oil thickness after the transition : eeq<10nm for 20V
32
water 5mm
SetupSetup
Teflon cell
gold 1000Å
Silicon wafer
ground
V ~
oil
ccd
detectorlaser
Parylene2µm
33
Multilayer ellipsometryMultilayer ellipsometryon the detector
air
water (5mm)
Multilayer system (oil + parylene) substrate
Multilayer with thick and thin layersthe water layer can be neglected
34
Signal detection and Signal detection and treatmenttreatment
We consider the second spot :
Ellipsometric parameters (,) : s
p
R
Ri )exp(tan
Preliminary results :
80,178
25.36
89,178
59.33
theo
theo
mes
mes
multilayers
p
airwaters
waterairs
airwaterp
waterairp
refls
reflp
R
R
tt
tt
E
Ei
)(
)()exp(tan
//
//
AppendicesAppendices
Cross defect
Profile extraction
36
ArtefactsArtefacts
water on glass
37
Profile extraction (1)Profile extraction (1)
intensity profile on a line
38
)(exp1 DxC
BAy
inte
nsity
Profile extraction (2)Profile extraction (2)
39
An example : cross defectAn example : cross defect
Idea : cross shaped electrode
Increasing V
V~