Electronic Structure and Angular Momentum of Transition...
Transcript of Electronic Structure and Angular Momentum of Transition...
1
© K. S. Suslick, 2013
Electronic Structureand
Angular Momentum of
Transition Metal Complexes
© K. S. Suslick, 2013
Angular Momentum vs. Number of Electron Spins
To understand the energy of paramagnetic systems(i.e., ones with unpaired electrons),we must describe them in terms of their angular momentum.
S = 0 SingletS = 1/2 DoubletS = 1 TripletS = 3/2 QuartetS = 2 Quintet
L = 0 “S term” singly orb. deg.
L = 1 “P term” triply
L = 2 “D term” pentuply
L = 3 “F term”L = 4 “G term”
Total Angular Momentum:
J = Ms + ML
Total Multiplicity: (2S+1)(2L+1)
Each “microstate” has the sameL and S, but different J.
2
© K. S. Suslick, 2013
For the Total Spin of an atom or molecule the rules apply:
1. Doubly occupied orbitals do NOT contribute to the total Spin
2. Singly occupied orbitals can be occupied with either spin-up or spin-down e-
3. Unpaired e- can be coupled parallel or antiparallel, giving a total spin S
4. For a state with total spin S there are 2S+1 “components” with M = S,S-1,...,-S. Hence terms singlet, doublet, triplet, …
5. The MS quantum number is always the sum of all individual ms QNs.
Spin
© K. S. Suslick, 2013
Spin Names
“Russell-Saunders” Term Symbols
Examples for dn configurations:
doublet
sextet
triplet
for atoms; Irr Rep Mulliken for molecules
Atoms Molecules
2H
6A
3l=1 or 3
3
© K. S. Suslick, 2013
Each electronic state has its own term symbol
2S+1
Lspin multiplicity L = 0 “S term” singly orb. deg.
L = 1 “P term” triplyL = 2 “D term” pentuplicatelyL = 3 “F term”L = 4 “G term”
(Within each term, there can be several degenerate microstates with different ML and MS.)
L-S Coupling = Russell-Saunders Coupling
If coupling of the spin angular momentum and orbital angular momentum is relatively weak (and it usually is), then
L and S remain “good” Quantum Numbers and can be treated independently of each other.
L–S Coupling
© K. S. Suslick, 2013
Each electronic state has its own term symbol
2S+1
Lspin multiplicity L = 0 “S term” singly orb. deg.
L = 1 “P term” triplyL = 2 “D term” pentuplicatelyL = 3 “F term”L = 4 “G term”
(Within each term, there can be several degenerate microstates with different ML and MS.)
L = 0, 1, 2…total orbital angular momentum (“term”)
ML = 0, 1, 2, L components of L (ML = ml for each e).For example, for L = 1, there are three ML values: 1, 0, -1.(analogous to l = 1 and its three ml values: 1, 0, -1)# of ML states is 2L+1 = orbital degeneracy
S = total spin angular momentum
Ms = S, S-1, ….-S components of S (MS = ms). For example, for S = 1, there are three Ms values, 1, 0, -1.
L–S Coupling
4
© K. S. Suslick, 2013
Hund’s Rules
1. The ground state (GS ‘term’) has the highest spin multiplicity (S).
2. If two or more terms have the same spin multiplicity,then the GS will have the highest value of L.
3. For subshells less than half-filled (e.g., p2), lowest J is preferred;for subshells more than half-filled, highest J is preferred.
Of all the states possible from degenerate orbitals,the lowest energy one will have the highest spin multiplicity(i.e., most unpaired spins).
For states with the same spin multiplicity, the highest orbital degeneracy will be lowest in energy.
© K. S. Suslick, 2013
The Problem: Electron-Electron Repulsion. d2
eg
t2g
xy xz yz
z2 x2-y2 eg
t2g
xy xz yz
z2 x2-y2
xz + z2 xy + z2
overlapping lobes, large inter-electron repulsion
lobes far apart, small inter-electron repulsion
These two electron configurations differ in energy.
z
x
y
x
z
y
Consider as an example, 2 d electrons, one in z2
5
© K. S. Suslick, 2013
Microstates and Spin Orbit Coupling
For a given L, the allowed values of ML and Ms
are called microstates.
# of microstates =
Where No = degeneracy of orbitals in set of subshelland Ne = number of electrons
e.g., for free atoms/ions, No for d orbitals = 5
(2No)! (2No – Ne)! Ne!
2No from spin up vs. down
© K. S. Suslick, 2013
Microstates and Spin Orbit Coupling
(2No)! (2No – Ne)! Ne!
2No from spin up vs. down
etc.for 20more
Pauli X
etc.for 25
6
© K. S. Suslick, 2013
Microstates and Spin Orbit Coupling
Shorthand way to describe determinantal Wave Functions,
e.g., for 2 electrons:
2 e- in p orbitals: ml = -1, 0, +1, ms = -½ or +½
mL = 1 0 -1 ( 1- 0+ )
mL of electron #1
mS of electron #1
© K. S. Suslick, 2013
Microstates and Spin Orbit Coupling
To find all the terms for a specificconfiguration:
3) Repeat #2 for microstates remainingwith next greater ML etc.
7
© K. S. Suslick, 2013
Microstates and Spin Orbit Coupling: p3
examples:
p3
© K. S. Suslick, 2013
Microstates and Spin Orbit Coupling: d2
MsmL
1G3F3P1D1S
So, the allowedterms states for d2 are 1G, 3F,3P, 1D, and 1S.
What’s the GS?!Hund’s Rules.
ML
8
© K. S. Suslick, 2013
Hund’s Rules
1. The ground state (GS ‘term’) has the highest spin multiplicity (S).
2. If two or more terms have the same spin multiplicity,then the GS will have the highest value of L.
3. For subshells less than half-filled (e.g., p2), lowest J is preferred;for subshells more than half-filled, highest J is preferred.
Of all the states possible from degenerate orbitals,the lowest energy one will have the highest spin multiplicity(i.e., most unpaired spins).
For states with the same spin multiplicity, the highest orbital degeneracy will be lowest in energy.
© K. S. Suslick, 2013
Microstates and Spin Orbit Coupling
G.S. is 3F.
What’s the lowest excited state?
The allowed terms states for d2 are 1G, 3F, 3P, 1D, and 1S.
What’s the GS? Hund’s Rules.
Hund’s Rules DO NOT TELL YOU THAT!!(the XS energies you get from Condon-Shortley or Racah Parameters).
9
© K. S. Suslick, 2013
Energy Separations of Free Ion States
© K. S. Suslick, 2013
Microstates and Spin Orbit Coupling, d2
10
© K. S. Suslick, 2013
Spin Orbit Coupling
© K. S. Suslick, 2013
Size of Spin Orbit Coupling
For a single electron, the strength of Spin-Orbit Coupling (SOC) in a particular microstate is measured by
For the whole Term State, SOC is measured by
11
© K. S. Suslick, 2013
Energy Separations of Free Ion States
But there is a fine structure within these states due to SOC!
© K. S. Suslick, 2013
Energy Separations of Free Ion States
“Lande Interval Rule”
Furthermore, with L-S approximation, Spin-Orbit Coupling must preserve the “center of gravity” of the energy of the term state.(n.b., degeneracies of the J states must be counted.)
12
© K. S. Suslick, 2013
“center of gravity preserved”
Energy Separations of Free Ion States
© K. S. Suslick, 2013
microstates:
Energy Separations of Free Ion States
13
© K. S. Suslick, 2013
L=3, S=1 J = 4, 3, 2Degeneracy = 2J+1
SOCmagnitudefrom centerof gravity
Energy Separations of Free Ion States
© K. S. Suslick, 2013
Spin Orbit Coupling, d2 3F ground state
L=3, S=1, J = 4, 3, 2Degeneracy = 2J+1
SOCmagnitudefrom centerof gravity
14
© K. S. Suslick, 2013
= 9-fold degenerate
7-fold degenerate
5-fold degenerate
Energy Separations of Free Ion States
© K. S. Suslick, 2013
Energy Separations of Free Ion States
The inter-electron repulsion integrals can be broken into 3 radially and angular forms:
15
© K. S. Suslick, 2013
Energy Separations of Free Ion States
The inter-electron repulsion integrals can be broken into 3 radially and angular forms:
(more later on Tanabe-Sugano Diagrams)
© K. S. Suslick, 2013
Energy Separations of Free Ion States: d2
16
© K. S. Suslick, 2013
© K. S. Suslick, 2013
Hole Formalism
Eletrons vs. holes:dn and d10-n will have the same possible term states!
Their energies of interaction with the environment,however, will have opposite signs.
17
© K. S. Suslick, 2013
Spin Orbit Coupling: J-J Coupling
If spin-orbit coupling is very strong, then it can no longer be treated as just a perturbation.
mL and ms are no longer "good" quantum numbers.
Only j = mL + ms is valid.
For multi-electron systems,
applies only (not L and S).
Applies to Lanthanides, Actinides and 3rd row metals.
© K. S. Suslick, 2013
Size of Spin Orbit Coupling120 cm–1 for Ti2+ to 830 cm–1 for Cu2+ (3d)300 cm–1 for Y2+ to 1600 cm–1 for Pd2+(4d), 640 cm–1 for Ce3+ to 2950 cm–1 for Tb3+ (4f).
18
© K. S. Suslick, 2013
Effect of Ligands on State Energies
Simplest approach: “Crystal Field Theory”
1. metal d-electron Term States
2. Perturbation by point charges (i.e., ligands)
3. No consideration of other (non-d) electrons.
4. No covalency (added as an empirical correctionin Ligand Field Theory)
5. Useful for optical spectramagnetismEPRMössbauer
© K. S. Suslick, 2013
Approximations in CFT
kinetic coulombic inter-electron repulsion
spin-orbit coupling ligand field
comparable magnitudes
= net pt. charge on ligand, l.
= distance between ith electronand ligand, l.
= ligand or crystal field
19
© K. S. Suslick, 2013
Approximations in CFT
1. Free ion with SOC:
2. Weak field
3. Strong field
© K. S. Suslick, 2013
Approximations in CFT
So, how do we assign states in each of these conditionsand how do they correlate?
20
© K. S. Suslick, 2013
Effect of Ligands on State Energies
© K. S. Suslick, 2013
Effect of Ligands on State Energies
21
© K. S. Suslick, 2013
Effect of Ligands on State Energies
Spin states through microstate analysis
As an example, consider d2
© K. S. Suslick, 2013
Energy Correlation Diagrams: Orgel Diagram
Ab
solu
te E
ner
gy
of
Sta
tes
freeion
22
© K. S. Suslick, 2013
The Spectrochemical Series: “Tuning the Gap”
eg
t2g
eg
t 2g
weak field ligand(π bases)
high spin complexes“strong field” ligands
(π acids)low spin complexes
Δ Δ
In the middle(σ only donors)
KNOW THIS SERIES, AT LEAST ROUGHLY.
Ligating atom: halogen < oxygen < nitrogen < carbonsmall o large o
less e- donating more e- donatingless covalent more covalent
I- < Br- < Cl-< OH- < RCO2- < F-
< H2O < NCS- < NH3 < en < bipy
<NO2- < phen < PR3 < CN- < CO <NO
© K. S. Suslick, 2013
The Spectrochemical Series: “Tuning the Gap”
eg
t2g
eg
t 2g
weak field ligand(π bases)
high spin complexes“strong field” ligands
(π acids)low spin complexes
Δ Δ
In the middle(σ only donors)
Ligating atom: halogen < oxygen < nitrogen < carbonsmall o large o
less e- donating more e- donatingless covalent more covalent
I- < Br- < Cl-< OH- < RCO2- < F-
< H2O < NCS- < NH3 < en < bipy
< phen < PR3 < CN- < CO <NO
23
© K. S. Suslick, 2013
Ab
solu
te E
ner
gy
of
Sta
tes
freeion
Triplet states only
Energy Correlation Diagrams: d2
© K. S. Suslick, 2013
Energy Correlation Diagrams: Orgel Diagram, d2
Ab
solu
te E
ner
gy
of
Sta
tes
d2, d7 tetrahedrald3, d8 octahedral
d3, d8 tetrahedrald2 and high spin d7octahedral
Orgel diagrams show only the spin allowed transitions (in this case all triplets) and are in absolute energy of states.
24
© K. S. Suslick, 2013
Energy Correlation Diagrams: d2
Ab
solu
te E
ner
gy
of
Sta
tes
free weak strong ion field field
All spin states
© K. S. Suslick, 2013
Energy Correlation Diagrams
d2 Octahedral
25
© K. S. Suslick, 2013
Spin Selection Rule
This is the strictest of electronic selection rules (at least before 2nd row TMs).
Assumes (1) spin can be separated from orbital functions, and(2) dipole operator does notaffect spin.
(l = GS, m = XS)
© K. S. Suslick, 2013
Tanabe-Sugano Diagram for d2 Ions
En
erg
y R
elat
ive
to G
S
free weak strong ion field field
Ground Statetriplet
1st Excited Triplet State
1st ExcitedState
2nd Excited Triplet State
3rd Excited Triplet State
26
© K. S. Suslick, 2013
Remember: in TS Diagrams,Ground state assignedzero energy
Tanabe-Sugano Diagram for d4 Ions
En
erg
y R
elat
ive
to G
S
tripletstates
quintetstates
© K. S. Suslick, 2013
Ground state assigned to E = 0
Energy scale in units of B, the“Racah parameter” (measure of inter-term repulsion).
Critical value of To the left - weak field (or no) ligands:
high spin.
To the right – strong field ligands:higher up in spectro-chemical serieslow spin.
E/B
o
2T2g
4A1g, 4E
4T2g
4T1g
4T2g
4T1g
2A1g
4T2g
2T2g
6A1g
2Eg
4A2g, 2T1g
2T1g
2A1g
4Eg
Weak field (h.s.) Strong field (l.s.)
Tanabe-Sugano Diagram for d5 Ions
27
© K. S. Suslick, 2013
Tanabe-Sugano format:Always make the ground state y=0
2T2g
6A1g
If we had kept4A1g at y=0, thenthe new ground state moves “below” y=0.
2T2g
6A1g
The 2T2g-6A1g gap is the same forthe two formats(of course!)
Tanabe-Sugano Diagram for d5 Ions
4T2g
4T1g
2T2g
4A2g, 2T1g
4T2g
4T1g
4A2g, 2T1g
The 2T2g-6A1g gap is the same forthe two formats(of course!)