Electrode Degradation in PEM Fuel Cells in Model Systems ... · Electrode Degradation in PEM Fuel...
Transcript of Electrode Degradation in PEM Fuel Cells in Model Systems ... · Electrode Degradation in PEM Fuel...
Electrode Degradation in PEM Fuel Cells in Model Systems and PEMFC
Testing
F.A. de Bruijn V.A. Dam
G.J.M. Janssen R.C. Makkus
Presented at the 16th ECS Meeting Fall 2009, 4-9 October 2009, Vienna, Austria
ECN-L--09- 174 December 2009
El t d D d ti i PEM F l C ll i M d l S t d PEMFC T tiElectrode Degradation in PEM Fuel Cells in Model Systems and PEMFC TestingFrank de Bruijn1,2, Van Anh Dam2, Gaby Janssen1, Robert Makkus1
1 Energy research Centre of the Netherlands ECN , Petten, NL2 Inorganic Chemistry and Catalysis Group Eindhoven University of Technology Eindhoven NLInorganic Chemistry and Catalysis Group, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, NL
216th ECS Meeting Fall 2009 Vienna, Austria
Fuel Cell Vehicles are on the road!
Toyota FCHV: driving range of 780 km (EPA)due to high fuel efficiency (> 80 mpge)
Honda Clarityhigh fuel efficiency (74 mpge)For lease for governments January 2007 first F-Cell >100,000 km and
2000 h without significant performance loss
216th ECS Meeting Fall 2009 Vienna Austria2
2000 h without significant performance loss
Field Trials
Coast to Coast USA, Simplon Pass, ,4500 km
p ,2000 m altitude, - 9 °C
216th ECS Meeting Fall 2009 Vienna Austria3
Fuel Cell Busses
• 30 busses in 10 citiesV i li t diti• Various climate conditions
• Various options hydrogen production• Availability fuel cell busses higher than
diesel busses1 8 illi k d 116 000 h f• 1.8 million km and >116,000 h ofoperation by all Citaro busses by end February 2007
216th ECS Meeting Fall 2009 Vienna Austria4
Improvements needed on short and long term
Short term: before large scale market introduction can take off
Cost Reduction
Improvement of Life time and Durability
L t f th i t d d f f ll k t t tiLong term: further improvements needed for full market penetration
Increase in Operating Temperature
Operation at Reduced Water Content
216th ECS Meeting Fall 2009 Vienna Austria5
DoE analysis of the technology status versus the TargetsDoE analysis of the technology status versus the Targets
300 5000Durability (under cycling conditions)Fuel cell system costs *
150
200
250 $/kW
3000
4000 hours
$110 $
0
50
100
150
1000
2000$30
$110 $94
02002 2006 2007 2015
target 02003 2006 2015 target
* for 500,000 vehicles produced per yearCost reducing strategies could have a major impact on durability
216th ECS Meeting Fall 2009 Vienna Austria6
J. Milliken et al., Hydrogen Technologies for the Developing World Forum, Moscow 2008
D E l i f F l C ll St k tDoE analysis of Fuel Cell Stack costs
Carlsson Fuel Cell Seminar 2005
Membranes: using thinner membranes leads to reduced materials costs but to increase of gas
membrane
seal
bos
assembly
Carlsson , Fuel Cell Seminar 2005 cross over, as well as to increased risk of damagingduring MEA manufacturing
cooling plate
electrodeGDL
biplar plate
Platinum: lowering its loading is viable,but how stable are these low loading electrodes?
Carlsson , Fuel Cell Seminar 2005
216th ECS Meeting Fall 2009 Vienna Austria7
Durability: capability to work reliably under real life conditions
Freeze – thaw cycles
Load cycles
Cooling problems
216th ECS Meeting Fall 2009 Vienna Austria8
g p
PEMFC degradation: literature reviewPEMFC degradation: literature review
Analyzing published long term PEMFC operation, we concluded that fuel cell degradation varies strongly with conditions:
F.A. de Bruijn et al. Fuel Cells, 8 (2008) 3
fuel cell degradation varies strongly with conditions:
Ideal conditions: RH = 100%; T = 75 °C; no cycling Materials: membranes ~ 125 μm; no ultralow Pt loadings
voltage decay: 1-2 μV.hr-1
lifetime: > 10,000 hrs
Voltage decay generally increases when: thin membranes are usedRH < 100%, but strongly depends on flow field design
lt li i li d i ll h OCV i i l d dvoltage cycling is applied, especially when OCV is includedT > 75 °Cfreeze/thaw cycles are applied
216th ECS Meeting Fall 2009 Vienna Austria9
PEMFC degradationg
SEM cross section of PEMFC MEA
GDL Loss of hydrophobicity
Pt/C catalyst Carbon corrosion; Platinum sintering;
Platinum dissolution; Catalyst fouling
electrolyte Chemical degradation:Membrane thinning; pinhole formation;I h b t l iIon exchange by metal ions
216th ECS Meeting Fall 2009 Vienna Austria10
D bili i f li iDurability issues for transport applications
•Load (voltage cycling) accelerates platinum dissolution/coarsening
• Start-up/shut down can lead to extremely high cathode potentials (up to 1.4 V)Carbon corrosion / platinum dissolution
Hi h ti t t & t t d l d t b d d ti• High operating temperatures & unsaturated gases can lead to membrane degradation
• System must operate in wide window of conditions: –30 and + 40 ºC ambient
• High purity requirements lead to high costs for hydrogen production and infrastructure Contaminants in hydrogen and air can lead to catalyst and membrane poisoning
When developing components for more cost effective fuel cell systems, these must meet the durability requirements to enable 5000 hrs of operation !!
216th ECS Meeting Fall 2009 Vienna Austria11
Stability should be a selection criterion from the beginning!!!
For development of more stable and robust PEMFCs we need:
In situ Ex situ
Accelerated tests which are still representative for conditions in PEMFC applications
Model studies on components and materials at well-defined conditions
Characterization tools that can discriminate between various contributions
Advanced techniques for mechanistic studies
Quantitative data on degradation Understanding of degradationQuantitative data on degradation
Life-time predictionsPost test information
Understanding of degradation
Mitigation strategiesImproved materials
216th ECS Meeting Fall 2009 Vienna Austria12
Content of this Work
In situMEA testing under stressing conditionsMEA testing under stressing conditions
MEA potenial and load cyclingMEA freeze/thaw cycles
Characterization by polarisation curves, EIS, CV, chronoamparometryPost test analysis (TEM,SEM)
Ex situPotentiostatic studies on Platinum, and Carbon Platinum/Carbon electrodes
Characterization by Quartz Crystal Microbalance, CVPost test analysis TEM
216th ECS Meeting Fall 2009 Vienna Austria13
In Situ Accelerated Stress TestsIn Situ Accelerated Stress TestsQualify materials:
• Potential cycling (N2/H2) → catalyst• OCV hold → membrane• OCV hold → membrane• Potential hold ( ≥1.2 V) → carbon support
Qualify MEAs → membrane, catalyst, support, ionomer phase, GDLLoad or potential (H2/air) cycling :
• Variations in potential Pt dissolution, Pt particle growth, carbon corrosion• Exposure to H2/air(O2) membrane/ionomer chemical degradation• Humidity variation shrinkage/swelling of membrane/ionomer• Fuel starvation carbon corrosion
and coupling effects!and coupling effects!Freeze/Thaw cycling includes• Ice formation electrode delamination, GDL damage
216th ECS Meeting Fall 2009 Vienna Austria14
AST i h b k d f ll l lAST with break-down of cell voltage losses1.5
reversible heat
),,(log
)()()()(
2
0
0
jPRfpOmijbRjE
jjjEjV
mpPtm
hf
transportORRcell
−⎟⎠⎞⎜
⎝⎛−⋅−=
−−−= Ω ηηη0.9
1.2
cell
/ V
oxygen reduction reaction
)(1i
j transportORRair Δ+Δ+Δ=Δ Ω ηηηη 0.3
0.6V c
ohmic
transport),,(log 2
1
jPRfiibRj mp
m
mhf ΔΔ++Δ⋅=
1i
0.00 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
current density / A cm-2
),(log)( 2
1
2 jRfiibRjj p
m
mhfO Δ++Δ⋅=Δη Transport losses depend on Rp and Pm,
contributions difficult to separate
Transport loss in pure O2 dominated by Rp
216th ECS Meeting Fall 2009 Vienna Austria15
Rp can be measured by EIS
• H2/O2,
• Under load
Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy
0.10• Under load• High frequency
real axis intercept forOhmic resistanceN i t th d 0.05(Ω
.cm
2 )
Rhf+Rpol
• Nyquist arc: cathode 0.05
-Im Z
45o
Rhf
0.000.00 0.05 0.10 0.15
Re Z (Ω.cm2)
45o
Linear part: (Cdl from cyclic voltammetry) ⎟⎠⎞
⎜⎝⎛−+=
4exp)( πi
CωR
RωZdl
phf
216th ECS Meeting Fall 2009 Vienna Austria16
Fast voltage cycles load profileFast voltage cycles – load profileH2/Air,80oC, 80% RH, ambient pressurePotential cycling between 0.7 and 0.9 V IR-corrected (or OCV ) (30 s hold at each)F ll h t i ti ft 0 1000 5000 10000 30000 l
1.0 100
Full characterization after 0, 1000, 5000, 10000, 30000 cycles
0 4
0.6
0.8
m2 ) a
n V c
ell (
V)
70
80
90
0.0
0.2
0.4
J (A
/cm
50
60
70
0 00 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
time / h
50
MEA1: Hispec 9100, MEA2: Hispec 9100,
216th ECS Meeting Fall 2009 Vienna Austria17
N:C=0.7, NRE211CS N:C=0.55, NRE212CS
Fast voltage cyclingFast voltage cyclingMEA 1 MEA 2
Membrane damage
216th ECS Meeting Fall 2009 Vienna Austria18
Fast voltage cycling
Low ionomer content:
NRE211CS: damage
Low ionomer content:Rp decreases
Green MEA 1Red MEA 2
NRE211CS: damageNRE212CS: stable
216th ECS Meeting Fall 2009 Vienna Austria19
Fast voltage cycling: break down of ΔVair @ 0 4 A cm-2Fast voltage cycling: break down of ΔVair @ 0.4 A cm-2
Loss ECSA & activityAfter 30000 fast cycles
• slight decrease of ohmic losses and increase of kinetic lossesMEA 1 MEA 2 of kinetic losses
•change in in oxygen gain large contribution; depends on ionomer content
•substantial decrease of permeability (P )
MEA 1 MEA 210000 c ECSA 61% 55%activity 54% 57%30000 cECSA 95% 73% substantial decrease of permeability (Pm)
suspected
MEA1 MEA2
ECSA 95% 73%activity 87%
MEA1 MEA2
216th ECS Meeting Fall 2009 Vienna Austria20
Post test analysis TEM cathode catalystPost test analysis – TEM cathode catalyst
Pt particle coarsening
0 x 10000 x 30000 x
20%
30%
rtic
les
01000030000
Pt particle coarsening
d 0 2.4 nm - SA loss 0%
d10000 3.8 nm - 38%10%
frac
tion
of p
a
216th ECS Meeting Fall 2009 Vienna Austria21
d30000 5.8 nm - 55% 0%1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
particle size (nm)
Post test analysis – SEM MEA cross section
After 30000 voltage cycles: membrane thinning observed for NRE211CS (↓ 15 μm)membrane thinning observed for NRE211CS (↓ 15 μm)no significant electrode thinning significant Pt deposition in NRE211CS near cathodesome Pt deposition in NRE212CS near anode
→ ECSA loss is combined effect of Pt particle growth and dissolution
216th ECS Meeting Fall 2009 Vienna Austria22
MEA 1 (NRE211CS) MEA 2 (NRE212CS)
Load on/off cycles: break down of ΔVair @ 0 4 A cm-2Load on/off cycles: break down of ΔVair @ 0.4 A cm-2
Hispec 4000 N:C=0.7G.J.M. Janssen et al., J. Power Sources 191 (2009) 501
After 5 x 10
cycles / 600 hr 674 mV
Hi 9100 N C 0 7
y
at 80oC674 mV
Hispec 9100 N:C=0.55Hispec 9100 N:C=0.7
683 mV 679 mV
216th ECS Meeting Fall 2009 Vienna Austria23
In situ AST
• Freeze/thaw experiments– -20 oC/ 65 oC20 C/ 65 C– no water removal– gas supply shut off
• Start /StopStart /Stop – 5 oC/ 65 oC– gas supply shut off
• 58 cycles, each 4th cycle 0.8
1
1.2
V)y , ycharacterisation
0 2
0.4
0.6
Cel
l vol
tage
(V
0
0.2
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6
Current density (A/cm2)
216th ECS Meeting Fall 2009 Vienna Austria24
Fresh S/S end F/T end
F/T & S/S cyclingF/T & S/S cycling
0.9
1.2
cm2
80%
100%
g-1
0.3
0.6
Rp
/ O
hm c
20%
40%
60%
ECSA
/ m
2 g
0 08
0.00 20 40 60
# cycles
0%0 10 20 30 40 50 60
# cycles
Green S/SRed F/T
6
8
10
mA
cm
-2
0.04
0.06
0.08
Ohm
cm
2
0
2
4
0 20 40 60
i x / m
0.00
0.02
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Rhf
/ O
216th ECS Meeting Fall 2009 Vienna Austria25
0 20 40 60# cycles
0 10 20 30 40 50 60# cycles
0.20
Break down of ΔVair @ 0.4 A cm-2
0.10
0.15
η/ V
0 0
0.00
0.05
Δη
Δη ORR
Δη airΔη O2Δη ΩF/T
Sli ht h i -0.050 10 20 30 40 50 60
# cycles0.20
Slight changes in transport losses only
0 05
0.10
0.15
Δη
/ VΔη airΔη O2
Δη Ω
S/S
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Δη ORR
Δη Ω
216th ECS Meeting Fall 2009 Vienna Austria26
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
# cycles
Conclusions in situ tests • Potential and load cycles at 80oC with breakdown of cell losses show
• Ohmic losses: constant although membrane damage could be observedOhmic losses: constant although membrane damage could be observed (thinning, increased H2 cross-over) for 25 μm membranes
• Kinetic losses increase due to decreased mass activity (Pt growth and dissolution)
• Transport losses dominate cell voltage loss and are strongly affected by catalyst layer composition
• Protonic resistance electrode stable or decreasing, depending on ionomer content
• Oxygen permeability seems strongly reduced (increased hydrophilicity?)• No significant carbon corrosion observed (potentials ≤ OCV)
• F/T cycles and S/S show:• No membrane damage• Slight increase in mass transport losses
216th ECS Meeting Fall 2009 Vienna Austria27
• Stability of Pt, C, and Pt/C at operating conditions of fuel cell (elevated T, E)
Ex Situ Electrochemical study of platinum and carbon stability
• Real time monitoring of catalyst loss (Pt & C) by Quartz Crystal Microbalance (QCM) and Cyclic Voltammetry
Potentiostat
CE RE
PC
CE RE
• Δ(frequency) = - K Δ(electrode mass)
• High accuracy ~ 0 25 ng/cm2
QCM
QCM probe (WE)
• High accuracy ~ 0.25 ng/cm2
• Diversity of electrode materials
1M HClO
216th ECS Meeting Fall 2009 Vienna Austria28
QCM probe (WE) 1M HClO4
Pt thin film mass change at 0.85V & 80°Cg
3
1
2
30.85 V
0.5 mA
(I) (II)
from the slope,
m (μ
g)
0
1E vs. RHE
0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4
Buildingoxide
Dissolvingoxide
the net platinum dissolution rate canbe calculated
-2
-1 layer layer
tox
t (min)0 100 200 300 400 500
-3ox
216th ECS Meeting Fall 2009 Vienna Austria29
• During dissolution, first an oxide layer is f d hi h i f th di l d d di
100
80oC
Pt thin film dissolution
formed, which is further dissolved depending on T & E.
• The oxide layer is still continuously formed e (μ
g/h)
0 1
1
10 80 C
60oCy y
during dissolution.
• At E ≤ 1.15V, 80 ° C , log. of dissolution rate linearly depends on E (0 55 times / 0 1 V)
diss
. rat
e
0 001
0.01
0.1 60oC
linearly depends on E (0.55 times / 0.1 V).
• At E > 1.15 V and 80°C, the dissolution rate decreases due to passivating Pt oxide layer E vs RHE (V)
0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.60.0001
0.001
• Dissolution rate increases 103 times when temperature increases from 60 to 80°C.
E vs. RHE (V)
216th ECS Meeting Fall 2009 Vienna Austria30
Dam and De Bruijn, J. Electrochem. Soc. 154 (2007) B494
Carbon corrosion at 60°C (Vulcan XC72R)Carbon corrosion at 60°C (Vulcan XC72R)
μ g) 30
A)
0.00420oC Sample 1 fresh60oC Sample 1 after 20h, 1.05V
e ar
ea u
nit (μ
10
20 1.15 V
e ar
ea u
nit (
A
0.002
p60oC Sample 2 after 20h, 1.15V20oC Sample 2 fresh
er e
lect
rode
0
10
1.05 V
0.95 V
er e
lect
rode
-0.002
0.000
t (h)0 10 20 30 40 50
m p
e
-10
E (V)0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
I pe
t (h)
• At 0.95 & 1.05V, mass increase corresponds to water uptake
• At E = 1.15V, mass decrease can be observed → CO2 formation (OLEMS)
E (V)
216th ECS Meeting Fall 2009 Vienna Austria31
• Quinone/hydroquinone production increases with the potential.
St bilit f C b f ti f t t (V l XC72R)Stability of Carbon as function of temperature (Vulcan XC72R)
0.61 15 V Increase in temperature accelerates
2 ) 0.2
0.4
60oC
1.15 V carbon corrosion
m (μ
g/cm
2
0.0
m
-0.4
-0.2
80oC
0 10 20 30 40 50-0.6
80 C C
216th ECS Meeting Fall 2009 Vienna Austria32
t (h) V.A.T. Dam et al., Fuel Cells 9 (2009) 453
Platinum/Carbon catalysts
216th ECS Meeting Fall 2009 Vienna Austria33
Pt/C h t 1 05V & 80°CPt/C mass change at 1.05V & 80°C
2
At 80°C, a complex picture is observed which could be caused by:
• platinum oxidation and dissolution
0
platinum oxidation and dissolution
• carbon oxidation and corrosion
• combinations of these processesm (μ
g)
-4
-2
-8
-6
t (h)0 20 40 60
8
How can we discriminate between these processes??
216th ECS Meeting Fall 2009 Vienna Austria34
pAt indicated time intervals, cyclic voltammograms are recorded
Pt/C dissolution at 1.05V & 80°CPt/C dissolution at 1.05V & 80 C0.004
freshafter 2hafter 23.5hafter 48h
A First cyclic voltammograms taken at various intervals during exposure to
0.002after 48hafter 68hafter 92h
during exposure to 1.05 V and 80°C.
D id f d d i
I (A) 0.000
Deep oxides are formed duringexposure to 1.05 V-0.002
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2-0.004
1.05 V & 80oC
216th ECS Meeting Fall 2009 Vienna Austria35
E (V)
Pt/C dissolution at 1.05V & 80°Ct/C d sso ut o at 05 & 80 C
0.004freshafter 2hft 23 5h
B Second cyclic voltammograms t k t i i t l
0.002
after 23.5hafter 48hafter 68hafter 92h
taken at various intervals during exposure to 1.05 V and 80°C.
I (A
)
0.000 23 – 92 h Pt surface area continuously decreases during potential hold
-0.002 Platinum oxide reduction potential shifts first to slightly more positive b h i l
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2-0.004
1.05 V & 80oC but then to more negative values
216th ECS Meeting Fall 2009 Vienna Austria36
E (V)
Pt/C dissolution at 1 05V & 80°CPt/C dissolution at 1.05V & 80°C)
0.78
0.79
m2 )
12
16
8
10Bmaximum average
particle size
Eox
.red.
peak
(V)
0.76
0.77
rface
are
a (c
m
8
12
x.re
d.pe
ak (m
C)
6
8
0 20 40 60 80 1000.74
0.75
0 20 40 60 80 100
Pt s
ur
0
4 QO
x
2
4
Pt surface area Charge of ox.red. peak
From the second CVs:• In the first 23 hours, averaged Pt particle size increases, then decreases.
t (h)t (h)
0 20 40 60 80 100
In the first 23 hours, averaged Pt particle size increases, then decreases.
• Pt surface area decreases with time.
It is very unlikely that Pt redeposition occurs at E = 1.05 V
216th ECS Meeting Fall 2009 Vienna Austria37
Surface area decrease can be attributed to shrinking of particles
Pt/C dissolution at 1.05V & 80°C
16 16 2
area
(cm
2 )
8
12
d P
t (μ g
)
8
12
μ g) -2
0
Pt s
urfa
ce a
4
8
Dis
solv
ed0
4 m (μ
-6
-4 4.8 μg4.9 μg
t (h)0 20 40 60 80 100
0 -4
t (h)0 20 40 60
-8
6
• Pt loss determined from cyclic voltammetry data (assuming spherical particles) is in agreement with QCM mass loss in same time span
t (h)
216th ECS Meeting Fall 2009 Vienna Austria38
• Pt dissolution rate ~ 0.14μg/h or 0.01μg/h.cm2
Electrodeafter 118 hours at 1.05 V
Fresh electrode
216th ECS Meeting Fall 2009 Vienna Austria39
El t dElectrodeafter 118 hours at 1.05 V
Fresh electrode
216th ECS Meeting Fall 2009 Vienna Austria40
Fresh electrode
Particle size distribution in Pt/C ink fresh and after 118 hrs, 1.05 V, 80 ºC
50
60 60After 118 hrs, 1.05 V, 80 ºCFresh
20
30
40
50
mbe
r of p
artic
les
20
30
40
50
mbe
r of p
artic
les
0
10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
particle size (nm)
num
0
10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
particle size (nm)nu
mp ( )
Average particle size: 4.0 ± 1.2 nm
particle size (nm)
Average particle size: 3.0 ± 1.4 nm
216th ECS Meeting Fall 2009 Vienna Austria41
V.A.T. Dam et al., Fuel Cells 9 (2009) 453
Pt surface area lossPt surface area loss60 °C /1.05 V
80°C /1.05 V
80°C /1.05 V
80°C /1.15 V
80°C /1.15 V
80°C /1.15 V
80 °C /1.25 V
Rate of Pt areachange
(cm2 Pt/ cm2
-0.0016 -0.00849 -0.0072 -0.30044 -0.014 -0.015 -0.0779
Ptfresh.hr-1)
Total Loss of Ptsurface areaobserved (as % of
40% in262hours
71% in92 hours
83% in118hours
90% in 6hours
24% in17 hours
30% in20 hours
85% in 6hours
observed (as % oforiginal area)
hours hours
Compensating for decrease of average particle size:
216th ECS Meeting Fall 2009 Vienna Austria42
Compensating for decrease of average particle size:85% loss of platinum
Conclusions ex situ tests
Potentiostatic hold at 1.05 V and higher leads to considerable loss of Platinum surface area. Platinum dissolution is dominant mechanism.
Note: high potentiostatic potential and high electrolyte volume prevents redeposition
Potentiostatic hold at 1.15 V and higher leads to carbon corrosion. Increase in temperature accelerated corrosion. Quinone formation preceeds corrosion, and takes place at lower potentials as well.
Decreasing temperature can prevent loss of platinum by dissolution by orders of magnitude
216th ECS Meeting Fall 2009 Vienna Austria43
Overall conclusions
• Ex situ electrochemical model studies explain in situ MEA observations:• Under conditions applied during potential cycling platinum can dissolve• Under conditions applied during potential cycling platinum can dissolve,
leading to a large loss of electrochemical surface area• Potentials during potential cycling are too low for carbon corrosion, which
takes place at 1.15 V and higherF ti f i i ht l i i d h d hili it f
• Automotive durability targets are not met with present generation components:
• Formation of quinone groups might explain increased hydrophilicity of electrodes
• Electrode properties change considerably • Membranes contribute less to voltage decay, but still a concern
216th ECS Meeting Fall 2009 Vienna Austria44
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank - E F Sitters A J Grootjes and M de la Rie (ECN) for MEA preparation andE.F. Sitters, A.J. Grootjes and M. de la Rie (ECN) for MEA preparation and testing. - K. Jayasayee and S. Celebi (TU/e) for electrochemical tests and TEM characterization
A Pf (JRC IE) f TEM l i- A. Pfrang (JRC-IE) for TEM analysis- M. Roos (ECN) for SEM analysis
This work was part of the Dutch EOS-LT PEMLIFE project, contract no.EOSLT01029, and EOS-LT Consortium PEMFC, contract nos. EOSLT 06005 d EOSLT 07005 t d b th D t h Mi i t f E i Aff i06005 and EOSLT 07005 supported by the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs.
216th ECS Meeting Fall 2009 Vienna Austria45