Electric Machines and Power Electronics

download Electric Machines and Power Electronics

of 58

Transcript of Electric Machines and Power Electronics

  • 8/12/2019 Electric Machines and Power Electronics

    1/58

    2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 8, 20121

    Electric Machines

    Considering Power Electronics

    Zed (Zhangjun) Tang, Ph.D.

    Presented at ANSYS Confidence by Design

    June 5, 2012

  • 8/12/2019 Electric Machines and Power Electronics

    2/58

    2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 8, 20122

    Machine Design Methodology Introduction

    RMxprtMaxwell

    Advance Capabilities

    Core Loss

    Demagnetization / Magnetization

    Field-Circuit Co-Simulation

    Maxwell Circuit Editor

    Simplorer Capabilities, Switches, IGBT Characterization

    Simplorer Examples

    Multi-Physics

    Force Coupling

    Thermal Coupling

    Outline

  • 8/12/2019 Electric Machines and Power Electronics

    3/58

    2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 8, 20123

    Introduction: MachineDesign Methodology

  • 8/12/2019 Electric Machines and Power Electronics

    4/58

    2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 8, 20124

    Maxwell 2-D/3-DElectromagnetic Components

    Field Solution

    Model Generation

    HFSS

    ANSYS

    MechanicalThermal/Stress

    ANSYS CFDFluent

    PExprtMagnetics

    RMxprtMotor Design

    Maxwell Design Flow Field Coupling

  • 8/12/2019 Electric Machines and Power Electronics

    5/58

    2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 8, 20125

    SimplorerSystem Design

    P P :=6

    ICA:

    A

    A

    A

    GAIN

    A

    A

    A

    GAIN

    A

    JPMSYNCIA

    IB

    IC

    Torque JPMSYNCIA

    IB

    IC

    Torque

    D2D

    HFSS, Q3D, SIwave

    ANSYS CFDIcepack/Fluent

    Maxwell 2-D/3-DElectromagnetic Components

    ANSYS

    MechanicalThermal/Stress

    PExprtMagnetics

    RMxprtMotor Design

    Simplorer Design Flow System Coupling

    Model order Reduction

    Co-simulation

    Push-Back Excitation

  • 8/12/2019 Electric Machines and Power Electronics

    6/58

    2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 8, 20126

    RMxprt - Initial Motor Design

    Analytical solution

    16 different Motor/Generator types Input data geometry, winding layout saturation, core losses

    comprehensive results machine parameters

    performance curves

  • 8/12/2019 Electric Machines and Power Electronics

    7/58 2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 8, 20127

    Parametric Sweep:

    Stack_Length

    Skew/no Skew

    Stator_ID

    AirGap

    Monitor:

    Torque

    Power

    Efficiency

    Determine the Best Design

    Create FEA Model

    Export Circuit Model

    RMxprt - Motor Design

  • 8/12/2019 Electric Machines and Power Electronics

    8/58

  • 8/12/2019 Electric Machines and Power Electronics

    9/58 2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 8, 20129

    Maxwell/RMxprt V15 Axial Flux Machine

    AC or PM Rotor

    Single or Double Side Stator

    Sample Inputs

    Sample Outputs

  • 8/12/2019 Electric Machines and Power Electronics

    10/58 2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 8, 201210

    Maxwell/RMxprt V15 Axial Flux Machine

    Maxwell 3D auto-setup (Geometry, Motion, Master Slave, Excitations, etc. )

  • 8/12/2019 Electric Machines and Power Electronics

    11/58

    2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 8, 201211

    Design Exploration

    P2 - parallel

    P1 - cond

    Workbench Schematic

    Maxwell Project

  • 8/12/2019 Electric Machines and Power Electronics

    12/58

  • 8/12/2019 Electric Machines and Power Electronics

    13/58

    2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 8, 201213

    Design Exploration Six Sigma

  • 8/12/2019 Electric Machines and Power Electronics

    14/58

    2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 8, 201214

    More Than 30UDP Machine

    Components

    for 2D and 3D

    Integrated Motor Solution

  • 8/12/2019 Electric Machines and Power Electronics

    15/58

    2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 8, 201215

    RMxprt Dynamic Link to Simplorer

  • 8/12/2019 Electric Machines and Power Electronics

    16/58

    2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 8, 201216

    Maxwell

    0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00 16.00 18.00Time [ms]

    0.00

    0.20

    0.40

    0.60

    0.80

    1.00

    1.20

    1.40

    Position[mm]

    0.00

    0.50

    1.00

    1.50

    2.00

    2.50

    3.00

    3.50

    CoilCurrent[meter]

    TRW/ Ansoft Position & Current Hysteresis Control Close/Open1

    CurveInfo

    Position

    CoilCurrent

    DiodeCurrent

  • 8/12/2019 Electric Machines and Power Electronics

    17/58

    2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 8, 201217

    Automatic Adaptive Meshing

  • 8/12/2019 Electric Machines and Power Electronics

    18/58

    2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 8, 201218

    Advanced CapabilitiesCoreloss Computation

  • 8/12/2019 Electric Machines and Power Electronics

    19/58

    2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 8, 201221

    Lamination Core Loss in Time Domain

    Instantaneous hysteresis loss

    Instantaneous classic eddy current loss

    Instantaneous excess loss

    where

    dt

    dBH

    dt

    dBBkt irrmhh

    cos

    1)(

    2

    22

    1)(

    dt

    dBkt cc

    dCe 2/

    0

    5.15.1 cos2

    2

    21

    )( dt

    dB

    kCt cee

  • 8/12/2019 Electric Machines and Power Electronics

    20/58

    2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 8, 201223

    Core Loss Effects on Field Solutions

    Basic concept: the feedback of the core loss istaken into account by introducing an

    additional componentof magnetic field Hin

    core loss regions. This additional component

    is derived based on the instantaneous coreloss in the time domain

  • 8/12/2019 Electric Machines and Power Electronics

    21/58

    2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 8, 201225

    Model Validation by Numerical Experiment

    The effectiveness of the model can be validated by the

    power balance experiment from two test cases:

    considering core loss feedbackand without considering

    core loss feedback. The increase of input electric power

    and/or input mechanical power between the two cases

    should match the computed core loss.

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    160

    0 20 40 60 80 100

    Time (ms)

    Los

    s(W)

    Input power increase

    Core loss 0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

    Time (ms)

    L

    oss(W)

    Core loss

    Input power increase

    Three-phase transformer Three-phase motor

  • 8/12/2019 Electric Machines and Power Electronics

    22/58

    2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 8, 201226

    Advanced CapabilitiesDemagnetization Modeling

  • 8/12/2019 Electric Machines and Power Electronics

    23/58

    2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 8, 201227

    Modeling Mechanism

    The worst demagnetization pointfor each element is dynamically

    determined from a full transient

    process

    The demagnetization point issource, position, speed and

    temperature dependent

    Each element uses its own recoil

    curve derived at the worst

    demagnetization point in

    subsequent transient simulation

    HHc

    B

    0

    Br'

    Br

    K

    p Recoil lines

    Worst demagnetizing point

  • 8/12/2019 Electric Machines and Power Electronics

    24/58

    2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 8, 201228

    HHc

    B

    0

    Br'

    Br

    K

    p Recoil line

    Irreversible Demagnetization

    If a demagnetizing point Pgoes below the knee point K,

    even after the load is reduced or totally removed, thesubsequent working points will no longer along the

    original BH curve, but along the recoil line.

    The animation shows how the demagnetization

    permanently occurs with varying load current

  • 8/12/2019 Electric Machines and Power Electronics

    25/58

    2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 8, 201232

    Benchmark Example

    8-pole, 48-slot, 50 KW, 245 V, 3000 rpm Toyota Prius IPMmotor with imbedded NdFeB magnet

    Two steps in 3D transient FEA:

    1. Determine the worst operating point element by elementduring the entire transient process

    2. Simulate an actual problem based on the element-basedlinearized model derived from the step 1

    To further consider the impact of temperature, element-based average loss density over one electrical cycle is

    used as the thermal load in subsequent thermal analysis

    The computed temperature distribution from thermal solveris further feedback to magnetic transient solver to considertemperature impact on the irreversible demagnetization

  • 8/12/2019 Electric Machines and Power Electronics

    26/58

    2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 8, 201233

    Hc'change in one element during a transient process:

    The 1stcycle (0 to 5ms) doesnt consider temperature impact. The 2nd

    cycle (5 to 10ms) has considered the feedback from thermal solution

    based on the average loss over the 1st cycle

    Observation: Hc' has dropped from 992,755 A/m to 875,459

    A/m, which is derived from the worst operating condition

  • 8/12/2019 Electric Machines and Power Electronics

    27/58

    2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 8, 201234

    Contours of loss density distribution Static temperature distribution (K)

  • 8/12/2019 Electric Machines and Power Electronics

    28/58

    2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 8, 201235

    Torque profiles showing demagnetization and

    temperature dependence:

    Torque profiles derived from without considering demagnetization,

    considering demagnetization but no temperature impact and

    considering demagnetization as well as temperatures dependence

  • 8/12/2019 Electric Machines and Power Electronics

    29/58

    2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 8, 201236

    Magnetization

    Compute magnetization basedon the original non-remanent

    B-H curve

    Find operating pointp from

    nonlinear solutions

    Construct line bat the operating

    pointp, which is parallel to the

    line a at saturation point

    Br is the intersection of line b

    with B-axis Element by element

    B

    H0

    Br Line b

    Slope of line a at saturation point

    p

  • 8/12/2019 Electric Machines and Power Electronics

    30/58

    2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 8, 201237

    Br

    Magnetostatic case: theoperating point used for computing

    magnetization (Br) is from single

    source point;

    What is the Difference between UsingMagnetostatic and Transient solver?

    Transient case: the

    operating point used for

    computing magnetization (Br)

    is the maximum operating

    point with the largest (B,H)during the entire transient

    simulation.

    H0

    Br p

    B

    H0

    p

    B

  • 8/12/2019 Electric Machines and Power Electronics

    31/58

    2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 8, 201238

    Anisotropic magnetization: magnetization direction is determined bythe orientation of the magnet material and the direction is specified by a

    user;

    Anisotropic or Isotropic Magnetization

    P(T) input

    Q(T) input

    Isotropic magnetization:

    magnetization direction isdetermined by the orientation of

    the magnetizing field and is

    determined during the field

    computation.

    For isotropic magnetization, all three

    components have to be set to zero

  • 8/12/2019 Electric Machines and Power Electronics

    32/58

    2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 8, 201239

    Field-Circuit

    Co-simulation

  • 8/12/2019 Electric Machines and Power Electronics

    33/58

    2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 8, 201241

    Maxwell Circuit Editor Example

    Commutator bar: model position

    Commutating model: model parameters

    (a) (b) (c) (d)

    WidB

    WidC

    PeriodLagAngle

    Position

    G

    0WidC+WidB

    |WidC-WidB|

    a

    b c

    d

    Gmax

  • 8/12/2019 Electric Machines and Power Electronics

    34/58

    2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 8, 201242

    Case Example for Commutating Circuit

    Torque

    Winding currents

    PMDC Motor

    Brush

    commutation

    circuit

  • 8/12/2019 Electric Machines and Power Electronics

    35/58

    2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 8, 201243

    Simplorer:

    Power Electronics

  • 8/12/2019 Electric Machines and Power Electronics

    36/58

    2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 8, 201244

    Simplorer Technology Highlights

    f h i

  • 8/12/2019 Electric Machines and Power Electronics

    37/58

    2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 8, 201245

    State-of-the-Art Drive System:A MultidomainChallenge

    Drive systems

    Simplorer conservative structures (electricalcircuits, mechanics, magnetics, hydraulics,

    thermal, ...)

    Simplorer non-conservative systems (blocks,

    states, digital, nth-order differential equations.

    Drive components

    Maxwell with motion and circuits

    RMxprt and PExprt (incl. thermal)

    Maxwell with ANSYS Thermal.

    HFSS, Q3D, SIwave with circuits(Designer/Nexxim), ANSYS Mechanical,

    ICEPACK, etc. ...

    ANSYS provides a comprehensive toolset for multidomain work:

    =M SV RS

  • 8/12/2019 Electric Machines and Power Electronics

    38/58

    2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 8, 201246

    +

    -

    B11A11 C11

    A12 A2

    B 12 B 2

    C12 C2

    ROT2ROT1

    ASMS

    3~M

    J

    STF

    M(t)

    GND

    m

    STF

    F(t)

    GND

    Magnetics

    JA

    MMF

    Mechanics

    L

    HQ

    Hydraulics, Thermal, ...

    Simplorer Simulation Data Bus / Simulator Coupling Technology

    State-space

    Models

    statetransition

    AUS

    SET: TSV1:=0SET: TSV2:=1SET: TSV3:=1SET: TSV4:=0

    (R_LAST.I = I_OGR)

    EIN

    SET: TSV1:=1SET: TSV2:=0SET: TSV3:=0SET: TSV4:=1

    Cxy

    BuAx

    Electrical circuits

    Multi-Domain System Simulator

    Analog Simulator

    Block DiagramSimulator

    State MachineSimulator

    Digital/VHDLSimulator

    PROCESS (CLK,PST,CLR)

    BEGIN

    IF (PST = '0') THEN

    state

  • 8/12/2019 Electric Machines and Power Electronics

    39/58

    2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 8, 201247

    Electromechanical Design Environment

    Simulation Data Bus/Simulator Coupling Technology

    Model Database

    Electrical, Blocks, State Machines, Automotive, Hydraulic,

    Mechanics, Power, Semiconductors

    Maxwell CircuitsBlock

    Diagram

    State

    Machine VHDL-AMS

    MatlabRTW

    UDC MathCAD MatlabSimulink

    Maxwell

    C/C++ Programming Interface (FORTRAN, C, C++ etc.)

    Co-Simulation

  • 8/12/2019 Electric Machines and Power Electronics

    40/58

    2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 8, 201249

    Transient Electromagnetic

    FEM Co-simulationMaxwell2D/3D

    Future: Multidomain model extraction and

    co-simulation

    plunger

    limit

    spring

    F

    F

    em_force

    Battery

    - +

    bjt1 bjt2

    accumulator

    Digital Control

    TRIG

    CTRL2

    CTRL1 BS=>Q

    BS=>Q

    DETECT

    PLUNGERI

    TRIG

    Solenoidmp2

    pp1

    75

    m := 0.0066s0 := 0.0002

    gravity

    value := 0.0066*9.8

    spacer

    sul := 0.0002sll_ := 0.0

    Digital Electrical

    Mechanical Hydraulic

    Solenoid

    A

    orifice

    75

    ctrl1

    ctrl2

    plunger_control

    Multi-Physics Co-Simulation

  • 8/12/2019 Electric Machines and Power Electronics

    41/58

    2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 8, 201250

    Semicondutor Modeling In Simplorer

    IGBT Device model

    Semiconductor device model on Simplorer IGBT Device model : Average / Dynamic Capability of IGBTmodel

    Thermal management for Inverter Thermal model in Simplorers semiconductor model. Extract thermal network from ANSYS Icepak Heat / Power loss coupling with device model

    Inverter surge and conduction noise

    Extract parasitic LCR from Q3D Extractor Inverter surge and conduction noise in Simplorer

  • 8/12/2019 Electric Machines and Power Electronics

    42/58

    2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 8, 201252

    IGBT model1. System model

    Nonlinear resistance verification of operation

    2. Average model

    Static char. & average loss.

    Heating & temp. rise

    3. Basic Dynamic model

    Dynamic char.& Energy Switching loss & heating.

    4. Advanced Dynamic model

    Detailed dynamic char. Inverter surge & noise

    1) 2)

    3)4)

  • 8/12/2019 Electric Machines and Power Electronics

    43/58

    2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 8, 201257

    IGBT Characterization

    G i d i

  • 8/12/2019 Electric Machines and Power Electronics

    44/58

    2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 8, 201258

    IGBT inverter designCircuit design (loss) + thermal model

    Line current

    1T, 1D SW loss + DC loss

    1T, 1D

    junction

    temperature

    Package

    temperature

    Examination of

    temperature cycle

    1T 1D

    Ambient temperature = 20 cel

    Si l I k

  • 8/12/2019 Electric Machines and Power Electronics

    45/58

    2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 8, 201259

    -231.0n 618.0n0 200.0n 400.0n

    -50.0

    700.0

    0

    166.7

    333.3

    500.0

    Simplorer + Icepak= Detailed modeling of thermal system

    Simplorer

    ANSYS Icepak

    Q3D Extractor

    Parasitism LCR

    extraction

    Device property and

    loss consultation

    CAD Import

    Design of the coolingtechnique and

    arrangement

    Design of substrate radiating route

    The simulation in consideration of

    change of detailed temperature

    environment

  • 8/12/2019 Electric Machines and Power Electronics

    46/58

    2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 8, 201260

    Induction Motor FEA Coupled with Simplorer

    FEA

    PhaseA1

    PhaseA2

    PhaseB1

    PhaseB2

    PhaseC1

    PhaseC2

    Rotor1

    Rotor2

    w+

    ICA:

    1400 rpm

    LL:=237.56u

    RA:=696.076m

    B6U

    D1 D3 D5

    D2 D4 D6

    2L3_GTOS

    g_r1

    g_r2

    g_s1

    g_s2

    g_t1

    g_t2

    ~

    3PHAS

    ~

    ~

    A * sin (2 * pi * f * t + PHI + phi_u)

    PHI = 0

    PHI = -120

    PHI = -240

    LDUM:=100m

    CDC:=10m

    LDC:=10m

    RDC:=10

    VZENER:=650

    AMPLITUDE := 800 V

    FREQUENCY := 60 Hz

    -297.50

    300.00

    -200.00

    0

    200.00

    0 100.00m 50.00m

    LA.I [A]

    LB.I [A]

    LC.I [A]

    FREQ := 800 Hz

    AMPL := 800

    PHASE := 0 deg

    AMPL := 500

    PHASE := -315 deg

    FREQ := 50 Hz

    PHASE := -195 deg

    PHASE := -75 deg

    SA

    SB

    SC

    G_R1 := SA.VAL

    G_R2 := -SA.VAL

    G_S1 := SB.VAL

    G_S2 := -SB.VAL

    G_T1 := SC.VAL

    G_T2 := -SC.VAL

    +

    V

    Name Value

    SIMPARAM1.RunTime [s] 111.29k

    SIMPARAM1.TotalIterations 40.51k

    SIMPARAM1.TotalSteps 10.00k

    FEA1.FEA_STEPS

    -500.00

    1.50k

    0

    1.00k

    0 100.00m 50.00m

    100.00 * LD.I [A]

    VDC.V [V]

    -715.00

    425.00

    -500.00

    0

    0 100.00m 50.00m

    Current Torque

    Speed

    Fed by ac-dc-ac inverter

    Frequency controlled speed

  • 8/12/2019 Electric Machines and Power Electronics

    47/58

    2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 8, 201261

    BLDC motor FEA Coupled with Simplorer

    FEA

    sourceA1

    sourceA2

    sourceB1

    sourceB2

    sourceC1

    sourceC2

    Magnet01

    Magnet02

    w+

    ICA:

    +

    FGAIN

    CONST

    CONST

    EQUBL

    EQUBL

    EQUBL

    1500 rpm

    LL:=922u

    RA:=2.991

    ANGRAD

    57.3

    -60+PWM_PER

    -30+PWM_PER

    QS1

    QS2

    QS3

    VAL[0] := mod( INPUT[0] ,INPUT[1] )

    PWM_T:=60

    I_TARG:=9

    I_HYST:=0.2

    Q1

    Q2

    Q3 Q5

    Q4 Q6

    400 V

    THRES := PWM_T

    EQUBL

    CONST

    QS4

    -90+PWM_PER

    EQUBL

    CONST

    QS5

    -120+PWM_PER

    EQUBL

    CONST

    QS6

    -150+PWM_PER

    RA Ohm LL H

    PWM_PER:=180

    INPUT[1] := PWM_PER

    INPUT := -LB.I

    LC.I

    -LA.I

    LB.I

    -LC.I

    LA.I

    THRES1 := I_TARG - I_HYST

    0

    8.50

    5.00

    0 20.00m 30.00m

    -14.50

    7.80

    0

    0 30.00m20.00m

    -10.30

    10.00

    0

    0 30.00m20.00m

    Output torque

    Chopped currents

    Inverter fed three phase BLDC

    motor drive

    Chopped current control

    0

    8.50

    5.00

    0 30.00m20.00m

  • 8/12/2019 Electric Machines and Power Electronics

    48/58

    2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 8, 201262

    FEA

    A1

    A2

    B1

    B2

    C1

    C2

    AirRotor1

    AirRotor2

    w

    +

    26293 rpmICA: LL:=70.6914u

    RA:=203m

    140 V

    100u F

    +

    F ANGRADGAIN

    57.3

    CONST -30+90

    CONST -60+90

    EQUBL

    VAL[0] := mod( INPUT[0] ,90 )QA

    QB

    QC

    EQUBL

    EQUBL

    Name Value

    FEA1.FEA_STEPS 1.00k

    SIMPARAM1.RunTime [s] 6.90k

    SIMPARAM1.TotalIterations 4.05k

    SIMPARAM1.TotalSteps 1.00k

    0

    100.00

    50.00

    0 1.00m500.00u

    10.00 * QA.VAL

    10.00 * QB.VAL + 30.00

    10.00 * QC.VAL + 60.00

    ROTA.VAL[0]ROTB.VAL[0]

    ROTC.VAL[0]

    -54.00m

    264.00m

    0

    100.00m

    200.00m

    0 1.00m500.00u

    10.00u * FEA1.OMEGA

    V_ROTB1.TORQUE [Nm]

    mechanical

    -17.80

    18.00

    -10.00

    0

    10.00

    0 1.00m500.00u

    L1.I [A]

    L2.I [A]

    L3.I [A]

    E1.I [A]

    current control variable

    SRM FEA Coupled with Simplorer

    Electric Machine Design:

  • 8/12/2019 Electric Machines and Power Electronics

    49/58

    2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 8, 201263

    Electric Machine Design:Maxwell Simplorer Co-Simulation

    3-ph Windings

    Permanent Magnets

    Stator & Rotor

    Flux Linkages

    3ph Line Currents

    Co-simulation

  • 8/12/2019 Electric Machines and Power Electronics

    50/58

    2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 8, 201264

    Multi-physics

  • 8/12/2019 Electric Machines and Power Electronics

    51/58

    2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 8, 201265

    Multiphysics Coupling through WB

    Maxwell 3D provide volume/surface forces to ANSYS Structural

    Solver improvements Surface forces are supported

    Deformation of the stator Deformation of coils

    The electromagnetic force density from

    Maxwell is used as load in Structural

    Thermal-Stress with Electromagnetic Force load

  • 8/12/2019 Electric Machines and Power Electronics

    52/58

  • 8/12/2019 Electric Machines and Power Electronics

    53/58

  • 8/12/2019 Electric Machines and Power Electronics

    54/58

    2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 8, 201268

    Maxwell Couplings

    Forced water cooling Forced air cooling Natural air cooling

    Mapped Losses2D/3D Losses Temperature

    T W CFD Th l A l i R14

  • 8/12/2019 Electric Machines and Power Electronics

    55/58

    2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 8, 201269

    Two Way CFD Thermal Analysis, R14

    Geometry

    Losses

    Maxwell Model

    CFD Model

    Mapped Losses

    Temperature

    P L M d i FLUENT

  • 8/12/2019 Electric Machines and Power Electronics

    56/58

    2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 8, 201270

    Power Loss in windings are not displayed.

    Power Loss Mapped into FLUENT

  • 8/12/2019 Electric Machines and Power Electronics

    57/58

    2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 8, 201271

    ResultsTemperature Distribution

    http://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_9/TemperatureRendering.cvf
  • 8/12/2019 Electric Machines and Power Electronics

    58/58

    Thank you