Elaine R. Miller, RN, MPH Immunization Safety Office Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion...

27
Elaine R. Miller, RN, MPH Immunization Safety Office Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Vaccine Safety Inquiries to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Immunization Safety Office Nov. 6, 2013 National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion – Immunization Safety Office

Transcript of Elaine R. Miller, RN, MPH Immunization Safety Office Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion...

Elaine R. Miller, RN, MPH

Immunization Safety OfficeDivision of Healthcare Quality Promotion

National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)

Vaccine Safety Inquiries to the Centers for Disease

Control and Prevention’s Immunization Safety Office

Nov. 6, 2013

National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases

Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion – Immunization Safety Office

2

Background

Vaccines are one of the greatest public health achievements in history, but as with other medical products are not 100% safe or effective

CDC’s Immunization Safety Office (ISO) works with FDA to conduct post-licensure vaccine safety monitoring and research

ISO also responds to vaccine safety inquiries from healthcare providers, public health officials and the public

3

Outline

Background on CDC’s Immunization Safety Office (ISO)

ISO inquiry response function General information Examples Lessons learned

Immunization Safety Office (ISO) Mission

Comprehensive approach to vaccine safety includes Surveillance to detect possible adverse events

following vaccination in a timely way

Investigation of possible adverse events following vaccination to determine causality and risk factors

Development of strategies for prevention of adverse events following vaccination

Vaccine safety research

Timely communication and education to partners and the public

Work with other Federal agencies and other organizations to further vaccine safety mission

To assess the safety of vaccines administered to children, adolescents and adults

4

CDC’s Immunization Safety Office: Postlicensure Vaccine Safety Monitoring

Infrastructures System Collaboratio

n Description

Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)

CDC and FDA

• US frontline spontaneous reporting system to detect potential vaccine safety problems

Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD)

CDC and Healthcare Plans

• Conducts active surveillance and planned research studies using large linked databases

• Collects medical care and vaccination data on more than 9.3 million members annually (~3% of the US population)

Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) Project

CDC and Academic Centers

• Conducts clinical vaccine safety assessments at individual level and clinical research 5

Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)*

National spontaneous reporting system for adverse events that occur after receipt of US-licensed vaccines

Received nearly 27,000 US reports in 2012 (>100 reports per business day)

Requires a report be filed

Accepts reports from healthcare providers, manufacturers and lay persons

Report clinical significant adverse health events that occur after vaccination

Jointly administered by CDC and FDA since 1990

Strengths include - national data and rapid signal detection

Limitations include - inconsistent data quality and generally cannot determine if the vaccine caused the adverse event 6* http://vaers.hhs.gov/index

CISA Evaluation for Patient Vaccine Safety Questions

CISA provides consultation to US healthcare providers who have vaccine safety questions about a specific patient

No cost to the provider for a CISA evaluation Advice from CISA and CDC is meant to assist in

decision making rather than provide direct patient management (which is the responsibility of the treating healthcare provider)

Procedure for requesting a CISA evaluation Send an email to [email protected] Include the vaccine safety question and pertinent patient

information For more information:

http://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/Activities/CISA.html

7

8

ISO Inquiry Function Previous Work and Purpose

ISO has been tracking inquires in database since 2002

Tracking inquiries is an important way to gauge vaccine safety concerns among the public and stakeholders

Previous review of inquiries from 2002-2009 has been published* Among 975 inquiries

• Main reasons were to obtain VAERS data (49%) clinical advice (21%) and for other safety related information (21%)

• Main topics were neurologic adverse events (17%), deaths after vaccination (8%) and injection site reactions (6%)

Current review describes inquiries received from July 2009 through December 2012

*Miller, Batten, Hampton et al. Tracking vaccine safety inquires to detect signals and monitor public concerns. Pediatrics 2011 127 Suppl 1: S87-91.

9

Sources of Vaccine Safety Inquiries

Inquiries come to ISO mainly by phone and email

Healthcare providers, health officials from state and local health departments, parents, patients and others send inquires to CDC via:

CDC INFO: [email protected] or 1-800-CDC-INFO (1-800-232-4636)

NIP INFO*: [email protected]

CDC Emergency Operations Center (EOC)

Direct to CDC staff

Complex vaccine safety questions that require specific subject matter expertise and inquiries that require searches in the VAERS database are forwarded to CDC’s ISO for a response

All inquiries and responses are tracked in an electronic database

*NIP – National Immunization Program

10

Resources ISO uses to Answer Questions

on Vaccine Safety Topics VAERS database

Information from published studies – ISO publications available at http://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/library/

CISA Project consult service for healthcare providers via email to [email protected]

Vaccine Package Inserts-available at http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Vaccines/ApprovedProducts/ucm093833.htm

Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) Guidelines-available at http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/acip-list.htm

The Institute of Medicines’ 2011 Review of Adverse Effects of Vaccines-available at http://www.iom.edu/Reports/2011/Adverse-Effects-of-Vaccines-Evidence-and-Causality.aspx

CDC Subject Matter Experts

Published studies from peer reviewed journals-available via Pub Med search at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed

11

Resources ISO uses to Answer Questions

on Vaccine Safety Topics (cont.)

Vaccine Package Inserts-available at http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Vaccines/ApprovedProducts/ucm093833.htm

12

Resources ISO uses to Answer Questions

on Vaccine Safety Topics (cont.)

Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) Guidelines-available at http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/acip-list.htm

13

Resources ISO uses to Answer Questions

on Vaccine Safety Topics (cont.)

Institute of Medicine 2011 Review of Adverse Effects of Vaccines-available at http://www.iom.edu/Reports/2011/Adverse-Effects-of-Vaccines-Evidence-and-Causality.aspx

14

Summary of Vaccine Safety Inquiries to ISO from July 1, 2009 to December 31,

2012667 total inquiries received (~ 2 inquiries for every 3 business days)

Type of requestor (top 5)Healthcare provider 205

(31%)

State/local heath official 150 (22%)

General public 112 (17%)

CDC staff 53 (8%)

Media 30 (4%)

Primary reason for inquiry (top 3)VAERS data 285

(43%)

Clinical information 118 (18%)

Other vaccine safety information 91 (14%)

15

Summary of Vaccine Safety Inquiries to ISO from July 1, 2009 to Dec. 31, 2012

(continued)

Main subject of the inquiry (top 3)VAERS1 130 (19%)

Neurologic adverse events2 92 (14%)

Vaccine administration errors 40 (6%)

Vaccines (top 5)3

Seasonal influenza 177 (27%)

All or all childhood vaccines 169 (25%)

Human papillomavirus 63 (9%)

2009 H1N1 influenza 53 (8%)

Tetanus, diphtheria and pertussis (Tdap)

32 (5%)

1. VAERS subject inquiries included questions on VAERS public data access, data sharing, privacy policy, reporting, follow-up on VAERS reports, etc. 2. Neurologic events do not include neurodevelopmental events such as autism spectrum disorders3. Not necessarily mutually exclusive

16

Concern “…20 …personnel were given inactivated influenza

vaccine intranasally. This was not live influenza vaccine. Please provide guidance.”

Response VAERS contained a total of 72 patients who had

received the inactivated influenza vaccine administered in error into the nose and none reported adverse events

The 20 personnel should be considered unvaccinated, advised of this, and should be re-vaccinated with either inactivated vaccine given IM or live vaccine given intranasally in one week

Example 1: Vaccine Administration Error involving Influenza Vaccine

17

Example 2: General Information Related

to Hepatitis B Vaccine

Question “…Can a person test positive for hepatitis from (hepatitis

B) vaccines?”

Response1-2

Transient positive hepatitis B surface antigens (HBsAg) following hepatitis B vaccine has been described

Is a false positive that will revert back to negative within 18 days

Vaccinee is not infectious when they test positive for HBsAg

However, since most persons are not tested prior to vaccination, cannot completely attribute a positive HBsAg to vaccination-confirmatory testing required

1.De Schryver, A., et al. (2004). Hepatitis B surface antigenaemia following vaccination with a combined vaccine against hepatitis A and B. Journal of Viral Hepatitis, 11(1), 88-90.2. Mast E, et al. (2006). A comprehensive immunization strategy to eliminate transmission of hepatitis B virus Infection in the US. CDC. MMWR 55(RR16);1-25.

Example 3: Neurologic Adverse Event after

Influenza Vaccine Question

“Can flu vaccine cause Guillain-Barre Syndrome or GBS?”

Response In 1976 there was a small increased risk of GBS after

receiving swine flu vaccine. The increased risk was approximately 1 additional case of GBS per 100,000 people who got the vaccine. The exact reason for this association remains unknown.

Studies assessing the risk of GBS after seasonal flu vaccine since 1976 have show either no risk or a small increased risk of 1 case per million doses of vaccine.

Studies looking at the 2009 H1N1 vaccine have shown a risk ranging from about 1 to 2 cases per million doses.*

A history of GBS within 6 weeks following receipt of influenza vaccine is a precaution for influenza vaccine.*Salmon DA, et al. Association between Guillain-Barré syndrome and influenza A (H1N1) 2009 monovalent inactivated

vaccines in the USA:a meta-analysis. Lancet 2013; 381: 1461-68.

18

19

Example 4: Neurologic Adverse Event after

Influenza Vaccine

Question “A 54 year old male received the flu vaccine and

developed Bell’s palsy within 12-24 hours. Was this due to the vaccine?”

Response The Institute of Medicine (IOM) concluded that “The

evidence favors rejection of a causal relationship between inactivated influenza vaccine and Bell’s palsy.”  

Three additional studies1-3 on this topic after the IOM review were also reassuring on this issue.

1) Rowhani-Rahbar A,  et al (2012). Immunization and Bell's palsy in children: a case-centered analysis.  Am J Epidemiol 175(9):878-85. 2) Cano M, et al. (2012) Bell’s Palsy Cases Following Administration of Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine Reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). J Vaccines Vaccin 3:134. 3) Lee GM et al. (2011). H1N1 and seasonal influenza vaccine safety in the vaccine safety datalink project.  Am J Prev Med 41(2):121-8.

20

Example 5: Request for VAERS Data

Question I am a nurse practitioner …  I recently received a flu

shot that was improperly given.  It was given 1-2 mm (not cm) below my acromion.  At the time it felt like it went into a tendon or joint and it hurt.  It was extremely painful that day and night and has since improved greatly. Are you familiar with this happening?

Response The 2011 Institute of Medicine (IOM) report concluded

that the available evidence convincingly supports a causal relationship between the injection of a vaccine and deltoid bursitis.

During the 2011-12 season, VAERS received 50 reports of the influenza vaccine being administered at an inappropriate site; 49 of the 50 reported an adverse health event such as: pain, decreased limb mobility and/or bursitis.  

Outreach and education was conducted for immunization partners as a result of this and similar inquiries

Limitations of the Review

Not all vaccine safety questions are referred to ISO Many vaccine safety inquiries are answered by other

parts of CDC or are answered by state/local health departments or healthcare providers

Patients and parents may not be aware of resources at CDC and therefore do not contact CDC with their concerns

Referrals to ISO are more likely to involve serious, complicated or unusual issues so not necessarily representative of typical vaccine safety concerns

Classification of inquiries may not be mutually exclusive or have clearly defined categories

VAERS data is often used to answer inquiries and the limitations need to be provided with the response

21

Summary and Lessons Learned

Vaccine safety inquiry response is often a complex task that requires training, experience, broad expertise

Answer questions using appropriate language (healthcare provider vs. lay person), provide guidance in data interpretation especially limits of VAERS, and express empathy

Requestors are often seeking clinical information/advice

Responding to concerns about vaccine safety is an important public health function

In addition, inquiries help guide research and surveillance priorities for CDC

22

For Immunization Questions

Call: 1- 800-CDC-INFO (1-800-232-4636)

or email

[email protected]

or

[email protected]

23

Acknowledgements

Karen Broder, MD Tom Shimabukuro, MD, MPH, MBA Beth Hibbs, RN, MPH Claudia Vellozzi, MD, MPH Paige Lewis, MPH

24

Thank you

Questions?

25

Additional Slides

26

Example: Request for Information on Intussusception after Influenza

Vaccine Question

“Can rotavirus vaccine cause intussusception?” Response*

Yes-the risk after currently licensed rotavirus vaccines ranges from about 1 in 20,000 to 1 in 100,000 vaccinations.

The benefits of both rotavirus vaccine continue to outweigh the risks associated with vaccination, including the small excess risk for intussusception. Thanks to vaccination, since 2008, between 40,000 and 50,000 hospitalizations for rotavirus disease have been prevented each year in US children under 5 years of age

CDC continues to recommend that all US infants receive rotavirus vaccination.

*Source: CDC website at http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/812044

27