Elaine M. Prins NOAA/NESDIS/ORA Advanced Satellite Products Team Madison, Wisconsin
Elaine M. Prins NOAA/NESDIS/ORA/ARAD Advanced Satellite Products Team Madison, Wisconsin
description
Transcript of Elaine M. Prins NOAA/NESDIS/ORA/ARAD Advanced Satellite Products Team Madison, Wisconsin
Elaine M. Prins
NOAA/NESDIS/ORA/ARAD
Advanced Satellite Products Team
Madison, Wisconsin
Joleen M. Feltz
Chris C. SchmidtCooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies
Madison, Wisconsin
Collection of Slides on Biomass Burning and Applications of Meteorological
Satellite Fire Products
Applications of Meteorological Satellite Fire Products
Hazards Detection and Monitoring
Each year millions of acres of forest and grassland are consumed by wildfire resulting in loss of life and property with significant economic costs and
environmental implications.
- Although the capabilities of current operational meteorological satellites are limited, they can provide valuable regional and global fire products in near real-time, and are critical for fire detection and monitoring in remote locations and developing countries.
Global Change Monitoring
Biomass burning is a distinct biogeochemical process that plays an important role in terrestrial ecosystem processes and global climate change
- Land use and land cover change monitoring:Fire is used in the process of deforestation and agricultural management. Approximately 85% of all
fires occur in the equatorial and subtropical regions and are not adequately documented.
- Estimates of atmospheric emissions: Biomass burning is a major source of trace gases and an abundant source of aerosols
NO, CO2 (40%), CO (32%), O3(38%), NOX, N2O, NH3, SOX, CH4(10%), NMHC (>20%) , POC (39%)
- Within the Framework Convention on Climate Change (FCCC) countries will need to report on greenhouse gas emissions including those from biomass burning.
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
0 5 10 15
Wavelength (um)
Bla
ck
bo
dy
Ra
dia
nc
e (
W m
-2 u
m-1
sr-1
)
700 K
600 K
500 K
400 K300 K
10.8 micron band3.75 micron band
p
1-p
Pixel
How are Meteorological Satellites Used to Monitor Fires?
Examples of Automated Fire Detection Algorithms
Single channel thresholds e.g. AVHRR Instituto Nacional De Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE) fire product,
European Space Agency ERS Along Track Scanning Radiometer (ATSR) fire product
- Saturation in the 4 micron band - Elevated brightness temperature in the 4 micron band (I.e. > 315K)
Multi-channel thresholdse.g. Canada Centre for Remote Sensing (CCRS) Fire M3, CSU CIRA Fog/Reflectivity Product
- 3 steps Use 4 micron band fixed thresholds to identify possible fires Use 11 micron band fixed thresholds to eliminate clouds Use 4 minus 11 micron band differences to distinguish fires from warm background
Contextual algorithmse.g. AVHRR Joint Research Centre of the European Commission (JRC) World Fire Web,
Tropical Rainfall Mapping Mission (TRMM) Visible and Infrared Scanner (VIRS) GSFC fire product, AVHRR NOAA Fire Identification, Mapping and Monitoring Algorithm (FIMMA) fire product TERRA MODIS Fire Product
- Implement multi-channel variable thresholds based on the heterogeneity of the background
Contextual identification and sub-pixel characterizatione.g. UW-Madison GOES Automated Biomass Burning Algorithm(ABBA)
- Implement contextual algorithms and determine estimates of sub-pixel fire size and temperature. Include offsets for emissivity and atmospheric attenuation.
Examples of Regional Fire Monitoring
AVHRR Brazil INPE Fire ProductJune- November 2000
UW-Madison CIMSS GOES ABBA Fire ProductJune - October 1995 and 1997
NGDC DMSP Operational Linescan System (OLS) Fire Product, July - December 1997
Canada Centre for Remote Sensing (CCRS) Fire M3 Product1999 fire season
GSFC TRMM Visible and Infrared Scanner (VIRS) Fire Product, July 2001
Examples of Global Fire Monitoring
ESA ERS Along Track Scanning Radiometer (ATSR) Fire Product, August 1999
Joint Research Centre World Fire WebAugust 23 - September1, 2000
GSFC MODIS Fire Product November 1, 2000
Shenandoah National Park, VA
Examples of Satellite Fire Monitoring in the United States
NOAA AVHRR FIMMA Fire Product, August 23, 2001
UW-Madison CIMSS WFABBA July 11, 2001
Thirty Mile Fire, WA
Valley Complex, Bitteroot National Forest, MTJuly 31 – October 3, 2000 292,070 acres
National Interagency Fire Center, Boise, Idaho
Sula Complex, Sula, MontanaAugust 6, 2000
John McColgan, BLMAlaska Fire Service
NIFC
MODIS, August 23, 2000, NASA GSFC
GOES Composite for August 2000, UW-Madison/CIMSS
2000 Fire Season in the U.S. (NIFC)
# of fires: 122,827 10-year average: 106,343
Acres burned: 8,422,237 10-year average: 3,786,411
Estimated Cost of Fire Suppression: $1.3 billion
Remote Sensing Fire Detection Validation Studyfor the 2000 Fire Season in Quebec
When considering fires that burned more than 10 ha, the GOES and AVHRR were the first to detect many of the fires in the restricted protection zone of Quebec. Approximately 16 of the fires detected by the GOES were in remote locations and were not detected by the SOPFEU, Quebec’s forest fire detection and prevention agency.
Active Fire Detection in the Western HemisphereUsing the GOES Series
D C
B
A
Arc of Deforestation
1995
1997
1996
1998
1999
Longitude °W70 60 50 40 30 20 10
Longitude °W
70 60 50 40 30 20 10Longitude °W
70 60 50 40 30 20 10
0
-10
-20
-30
-40
-50
Lat
itu
de
°S
0
-10
-20
-30
-40
-50
Lat
itu
de
°S
0
-10
-20
-30
-40
-50
Lat
itu
de
°S
Lat
itu
de
°S
0
-10
-20
-30
-40
-50
Lat
itu
de
°S
0
-10
-20
-30
-40
-50
Lat
itu
de
°SL
atit
ud
e °S
0
-10
-20
-30
-40
-50L
atit
ud
e °S
0
-10
-20
-30
-40
-50
0
-10
-20
-30
-40
-50
Overview of Fires, Opaque Clouds, and Smoke/Aerosol Coverage in South AmericaDerived from the GOES-8 ABBA and MACADA: 1995 - 1999
FIRES SMOKE/AEROSOLOPAQUE CLOUDS
D C
B
A
Longitude °W70 60 50 40 30 20 10
Longitude °W Longitude °W
70 60 50 40 30 20 10
0
-10
-20
-30
-40
-50
0
-10
-20
-30
-40
-50
Lat
itu
de
°SL
atit
ud
e °S
E
J
IH
GF
K
L
M
N
0
-10
-20
-30
-40
-50
0
-10
-20
-30
-40
-50
Lat
itu
de
°SL
atit
ud
e °S
0
-10
-20
-30
-40
-50
0
-10
-20
-30
-40
-50
Lat
itu
de
°SL
atit
ud
e °S
70 60 50 40 30 20 10
Fires Opaque Clouds Smoke/Aerosol
Interannual Differences in Fires, Opaque Clouds, and Smoke/Aerosol: Each Fire Season (June - October) is Compared to the 1995 Benchmark Season
GOES-8 ABBA/MACADA South American Trend Analysis
Comparison of GOES-8 and AVHRR Fire Products for South America
Difference Plots of GOES-8 ABBA minus AVHRR INPE Fire Counts for South AmericaFire Seasons: 1995 through 2000
GOES South American ABBA Fire Products Used in Land Use/Land Cover Change and Fire Dynamics Research
Universities, research institutes, and government planning agencies are using the GOES ABBA fire product as an indicator of land-use and land-cover change and carbon dynamics. GOES fire products also are being used to study the impact of road paving in South America on fire regime feedbacks and the future of the Amazon forests.
Foster Brown, et al., 2001
Chico Mendes Extractive Reserve
MOPITT CO composite is courtesy of the MOPITT team:
John Gille (NCAR),James Drummond (University of Toronto), David Edwards (NCAR)
EOS MOPITT identifies elevated carbon monoxide associated with
biomass burning detected with the GOES ABBA
GOES-8 South American ABBA Composite Fire Product
September 7, 2000
Comparison of GOES ABBA Fire Observations and the EOS MOPITT CO Product
GOES-8 Experimental AOT Analysis: 26-August-1995 at 1445 UTC
Panel a shows smoke as observed in GOES-8 visible imagery at 1445 UTC on 26 August 1995. The GOES-8 MACADA is applied to multi-spectral GOES imagery to automatically distinguish between clear-sky, cloud type, and smoke using both textural and spectral techniques (panels b and c). The MACADA textural/spectral analysis is then used to create a 14-day clear-sky background reflectance map shown as solar zenith weighted albedo (panel d). The AOT product (panel f) is determined by calculating the difference between the observed and clear-sky reflectance and relating this to AOT utilizing a look-up table. If no clear-sky reflectance is available for a given location, an ecosystem based reflectance map (panel e) is used.
a. b. c.
d. e. f.
0.83 Single Scattering Albedo
R2 = 0.5412
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
Sun Photometer AOT at 0.67 microns
GO
ES
AO
T a
t 0.
65 m
icro
ns
0.95 Single Scattering Albedo
R2 = 0.7899
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
Sun Photometer AOT at 0.67 microns
GO
ES
AO
T a
t 0.
65 m
icro
ns
GOES-8 Derived AOT During Study Period: 8/15/95 - 9/7/95 at 1445 UTC Using Single Scattering Albedos .83, .90, and .95
0.90 Single Scattering Albedo
R2 = 0.8566
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
Sun Photometer AOT at 0.67 microns
GO
ES
AO
T a
t 0.
65 m
icro
ns
Single Scattering Albedo: 0.83 Single Scattering Albedo: 0.90 Single Scattering Albedo: 0.95
r = 0.74 r = 0.93 r = 0.89
GOES-8 Derived AOT for North Atlantic BasinStudy Period: July 11-31, 1996 at
1345, 1445, 1545, 1645, 1745, 1845 UTC
Examples of the GOES Wildfire ABBA Monitoring System in the Western Hemisphere
http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/burn/wfabba.html
GOES-8 Wildfire ABBA Summary Composite of Half-Hourly Temporally
Filtered Fire Observations for the Western Hemisphere
Time Period: September 1, 2000 to August 31, 2001
The composite shows the much higher incidence of burning in Central and South America, primarily associated with deforestation and agricultural management.
Fire Pixel Distribution
30-70°N: 6% 10-30°N: 10%70°S-10°N: 84%
Wildfires
Agricultural Burning
Crops and Pasture
Recent Road Construction
Desert/Grassland Border
Deforestation/maintenance
Model Data Assimilation Activities
- At the Naval Research Laboratory (NRL-Monterey) GOES ABBA fire product information is being assimilated into the Navy Aerosol Analysis and Prediction System (NAAPS) to analyze and predict aerosol loading and transport as part of the NASA-ESE Fire Locating And Mapping of Burning Emissions (FLAMBE) project.
- Model output is being compared to GOES satellite derived aerosol products and TOMS products. Initial studies show the model output and aerosol products are in close agreement.
GOES-8 Wildfire ABBA fire product for the Pacific Northwest
Date: August 17, 2001Time: 2200 UTC
NAAPS Model Aerosol Analysisfor the continental U.S.Date: August 18, 2001
Time: 1200 UTC
Real-Time Aerosol Transport Model Assimilation of the Wildfire ABBA Fire Product
FIRES
Future Environmental Satellite Fire Monitoring Capabilities
Global Geostationary Fire Monitoring System- GOES-E/W Imager
- METEOSAT Second Generation (MSG) (2002) Spinning Enhanced Visible and InfraRed Imager (SEVIRI)
- Multi-functional Transport Satellite (MTSAT-1R) (2003) Japanese Advanced Meteorological Imager (JAMI)
NOAA Operational Systems- NPOESS Preparatory Project Visible/Infrared Imager Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) (2006)- Advanced Baseline Imager (ABI) (2010)
International Platforms Designed for Fire Detection- German Aerospace Center (DLR) Bi-spectral Infrared Detection (BIRD)- German Aerospace Center (DLR) Intelligent Infrared Sensor System (FOCUS) (ISS)- Consortium of DLR and European space industries are designing
the Forest Fire Earth Watch (FFEW-FUEGO) satellite mission
GOES-EGOES-W MSG MTSAT
0-40-80-120-160 40 80 120 16080
60
40
20
0-20
-40
-60
-80
Satellite View Angle
80° 65°
International Global Geostationary Active Fire Monitoring:Geographical Coverage
Satellite Spectral Bands
Resolution IGFOV (km)
SSR (km)
Full Disk Coverage
4 m Saturation Temperature (K)
Minimum Fire Size at Equator (at 750 K)
GOES-E 1 visible 4 IR
1.0 4.0 (8)
0.57 2.3
3 hours 335 K 0.15
GOES-W 1 visible 4 IR
1.0 4.0 (8)
0.57 2.3
3 hours ???? 0.15
MSG SEVIRI (2002)
3 visible 1 near-IR 8 IR
1.6 (4.8) 4.8 4.8
1.0 (3.0) 3.0 3.0
15 minutes > 335 0.22
MTSAT-1R JAMI (2003)
1 visible 4 IR
0.5 2.0
18 minutes ~320 0.03
322
ha
GOES-R and GOES-I/M Simulations of Viejas Fire Using MODIS Data: January 3, 2001 at 1900 UTC
Simulated GOES-R: 3.9 micron Simulated GOES-I/M: 3.9 micron